[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Claude 3.5 Haiku # Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic · released 2024-10 · proprietary **score 54.4** ±0.6 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 25 benchmark results across 15 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Claude 3.5 Haiku among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▂●█▄▅▄▄▃▁▁    #290 of 354    4.1%      4
coding              ▁▁▁▃▄▆█●▅▄▃▁    #225 of 539     23%      3
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▅▄▇●▇▇▇▃   #229 of 474*    7.3%      2
math                ▁▁▃▆●█▅█▃▁▁▁    #334 of 530     20%      4
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▃▂▃●▄▆██▄   #137 of 189*    3.3%      2
web search          ▂▁▂▆▅█▅●▁▂▁▁     #12 of 96*    1.3%      1
agent tasks · #290 of 354 · 4.1% of its score Beats [DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B](deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b.md), [Sky-T1 32B Preview](sky-t1-32b-preview.md), [Magistral Small 1.0 (2506)](magistral-small-2506.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.0 1B](granite-4-0-1b.md), [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct](qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…   13.1%  █·▃▃·█●▅▅▅▃▅ beats 8/18    very hard · avg 5.5%    1.3%  sharp
BFCL V4 (2025-08-26 archive, mode…   43.4%  ▄▄····●▄···▄ beats 2/5     hard · avg 26%          1.2%  at its level
BFCL v3                              52.5%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 48/114  medium · avg 51%        0.9%  blunt · at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too…   76.5%  ▃▃▃●▆▅▆▅█▂▅▂ beats 6/31    easy · avg 78%          0.7%  typical
coding · #225 of 539 · 23% of its score Beats [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md), [Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507](qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507.md), [Qwen3.5 4B](qwen3-5-4b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-8b-reasoning.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
CRUXEval (ZeroEval, 800 problems)    68.8%  ▁▂▆▃▆●▆▃▂·▁▁ beats 26/47  medium · avg 57%         10%  sharp · at its level
Aider code editing (133 Exercism …   75.2%  ▁·▁▂▄▁▆▄█▆●▂ beats 57/62  medium · avg 51%        7.4%  sharp · at its level
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw…   28.0%  ▂·▂▃▅●▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 15/49  very hard · avg 7.6%    6.1%  sharp
chat & writing · #229 of 474 · 7.3% of its score Beats [Gemma 2 9B IT SimPO](gemma-2-9b-simpo.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md), [Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B)](mistral-small-4.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct](lfm2-5-1-2b-instruct.md), [LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking](lfm2-5-1-2b-thinking.md), [LFM2.5 8B-A1B](lfm2-5-8b-a1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
LMArena (text)                      1324.8  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▆▇█▃ beats 162/385  avg 1260            4.1%  blunt
Arabic IFEval prompt-level (Incep…   67.1%  ▁·▁▁▂▁▄▄▆▄█● beats 35/38    medium · avg 46%    3.2%  sharp · at its level
math · #334 of 530 · 20% of its score Beats [Molmo 2 8B](molmo-2-8b.md), [Llama 3.3 70B Instruct](llama-3-3-70b.md), [Mistral Large 2 (2407)](mistral-large-2407.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b.md), [Gemma 7B (base)](gemma-7b-base.md), [Tulu 2 DPO 13B](tulu-2-dpo-13b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
MATH level 5                         46.4%  ▂▂▅▆▄●▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 38/92   hard · avg 28%          9.1%  sharp · at its level
MATH Level 5 (ZeroEval, 721 probl…   46.5%  ▁▁▁▆█▂●▇▄··▂ beats 24/38   hard · avg 30%          5.5%  sharp · at its level
GSM8K (ZeroEval, zero-shot)          94.5%  ▁▄·▁▄█▅▅▅█●█ beats 34/43   very easy · avg 87%     3.0%  sharp · maxed out
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025              4.3%  ▃▃●▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 28/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.0%  sharp · noisy
vision & documents · #137 of 189 · 3.3% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [GPT-4 Turbo (2024-04-09)](gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)     1127.4  ▁▁▂▂▂▂●▄▅▅█▇ beats 39/152  avg 1061          2.7%  blunt
MSEarth-Bench Earth-science figur…   47.6%  ●·██····██·█ beats 0/5     hard · avg 48%    0.6%  blunt · at its level
web search · #12 of 96 · 1.3% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…   13.1%  █·▃▃·█●▅▅▅▃▅ beats 8/18   very hard · avg 5.5%    1.3%  sharp
other tests (10)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
MMLU-Redux (ZeroEval, 2,778 quest…   79.6%  ▁·▁▁▄▄▄●█▄▂▁ beats 27/53   easy · avg 75%          15%  typical
ZebraLogic (ZeroEval, 1,000 puzzl…   18.7%  ▁▁▃▆●█▁▁·▁▁▁ beats 25/57   hard · avg 15%         7.5%  sharp · at its level
MMLU-Pro                             62.1%  ▃▂▅█▃·●▃▅··▂ beats 13/23   medium · avg 54%       6.6%  at its level
GPQA Diamond                         38.1%  ▁▁▁▁▂●▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 35/211  hard · avg 39%         5.8%  sharp · at its level
KCL-Essay vanilla                    21.2%  ▁···▁●▂█▂▃▃▂ beats 3/23    hard · avg 17%         2.3%  typical
HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception…   61.3%  ▁▁▁▁·▂·█●█▇▁ beats 15/31   medium · avg 46%       2.2%  at its level
Judgemark v2 (LLM-as-judge for cr…   77.6%  ▃▃··▃▅▅···●▃ beats 8/10    medium · avg 53%       1.4%  at its level
KCL-MCQA vanilla                     28.0%  ▂···●▂▆▆██▆▂ beats 1/23    very hard · avg 29%    1.0%  typical
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   46.9%  ▁··●▁▁▁▅█▅▁▅ beats 2/24    hard · avg 51%         0.8%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   95.1%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 62/140  very easy · avg 94%    0.2%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
WildEval ZeroEval published results             5   40% ▇▇▇▇▇
Epoch AI                                        3   17% ▇▇
Aider code editing benchmark runs               1    7% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    7% ▇
MMLU-Pro author-released evaluation runs        1    7% ▇
Aider polyglot benchmark runs                   1    6% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             2    5% ▇
Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Towar…        2    3% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        2    2% ▇
Judgemark v2 results                            1    1% ▇
Finance Agent Benchmark                         1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    1% ▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       1    1% ▇
MSEarth: A Multimodal Benchmark for Ear…        1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 54.4
Licences: WildEval ZeroEval published results ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/zeroeval-published-results-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Aider code editing benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MMLU-Pro author-released evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/mmlu-pro-author-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Aider polyglot benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs’ Legal Reasoning Capabilities ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/cards-final-NOTICE.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Judgemark v2 results ([MIT](../../licenses/judgemark-v2-MIT.txt)) · Finance Agent Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · MSEarth: A Multimodal Benchmark for Earth Science Phenomenon Discovery with MLLMs ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/claude-3-5-haiku-20241022) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)