[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Claude Fable 5.1 # Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic · released 2026-09 · closed weights **score 82.2** ±0.5 · #6 of 732 · from 38 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Claude Fable 5.1 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂●     #5 of 313     29%     10
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃●     #6 of 469     15%      5
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●    #5 of 402*    3.0%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂●▁     #5 of 431     26%     10
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●   #14 of 153*    3.0%      2
web search          ▁▁▁▅▄█●▄·▁·▁    #18 of 84*    1.8%      1
agent tasks · #5 of 313 · 29% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Terminal-Bench 4.0                       57.9%  █▅▅▅▅·▅▃▃▅●▅ beats 17/20  very hard · avg 0.5%    7.8%  sharp · at its level · several runs
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  0.1335 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃▂█▁▂●▁▁ beats 56/59  avg -0.379 IPS          7.7%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…       81.2%  ▄█·▄·▄█●···▄ beats 7/9    very hard · avg 7.4%    5.0%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)           89.1%  ▃··▃·▅▃▃●··▃ beats 6/9    hard · avg 31%          2.3%  typical
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…       65.6%  ▁······▁·▄·● beats 9/10   very hard · avg 14%     1.8%  at its level
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)          67.4%  █·····●███·█ beats 1/5    hard · avg 19%          1.4%  at its level
Chartography with tools (maker)          88.4%  ▃········▃█● beats 5/7    very hard · avg 6.5%    1.3%  sharp
OSWorld 2.1 (partial score) (make…       80.7%  █·········●█ beats 1/2    hard · avg 29%          0.7%  small run
Toolathlon-Verified (maker)              77.8%  ▃·····●···▃▃ beats 2/5    medium · avg 37%        0.7%  blunt
OSWorld 2.0, 2026.08.08 release (…       77.9%  █····█·····● beats 2/2    hard · avg 28%          0.7%  small run
coding · #6 of 469 · 15% of its score Beats [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1745.9  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆▅▅●▂ beats 124/129  avg 981                 5.3%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   81.2%  ▄█·▄·▄█●···▄ beats 7/9      very hard · avg 7.4%    5.0%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)       89.1%  ▃··▃·▅▃▃●··▃ beats 6/9      hard · avg 31%          2.3%  typical
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      67.4%  █·····●███·█ beats 1/5      hard · avg 19%          1.4%  at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   83.2%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 41/49    hard · avg 17%          1.2%  sharp
chat & writing · #5 of 402 · 3.0% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Muse Wonder](muse-wonder.md), [Gemini 4 Argon](gemini-4-argon.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1504.4  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 381/385  avg 1260      3.0%  blunt
math · #5 of 431 · 26% of its score
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2               87.8%  ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▃●▁▁▁ beats 61/67    very hard · avg 0.1%    7.6%  sharp
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            90.2%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▆▄● beats 82/86    very hard · avg 1.2%    4.8%  sharp
MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4…   77.5%  ▁·····▅██●·▁ beats 19/20    very hard · avg 7.6%    4.5%  sharp
MathArena ArXivMath June 2026 (48…   91.0%  ▂···▄·██▆▆●▂ beats 18/19    very hard · avg 5.1%    3.6%  sharp
MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 …   80.3%  ▂▂▆█▃▃▂▂●··▂ beats 17/18    very hard · avg 0.8%    2.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MathArena ArXivMath May 2026 (40 …   87.5%  ▁··▁▄█▄▁·●·▁ beats 15/17    very hard · avg 11%     1.5%  typical
MathArena ArXivMath August 2026, …   87.7%  █▄·▄·······● beats 4/5      very hard · avg 5.9%    1.0%  sharp · at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv August 2026…   79.8%  ▄▄·····▄·▄·● beats 4/5      very hard · avg 6.9%    0.5%  at its level · noisy
FrontierMath: Erdős problems          0.0%  ●··········▆ beats 3/6      very hard · avg 0.0%    0.5%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025            100.0%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 197/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.1%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #14 of 153 · 3.0% of its score Trails [Muse Spark 1.2](muse-spark-1-2.md), [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next](qwen3-8-flash-next.md), [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                               result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)    1287.6  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 139/152  avg 1061      2.0%  blunt
Arena document (style controlled)  1492.8  ▁▁▃▃▄▃▇█▅▇▄● beats 34/37    avg 1331      1.0%  blunt
web search · #18 of 84 · 1.8% of its score Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   65.6%  ▁······▁·▄·● beats 9/10   very hard · avg 14%    1.8%  at its level
other tests (12)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
EBR-bench (Epoch)                    57.1%  ▄▂·▆█▂█▆▄●·▆ beats 22/25    very hard · avg 0.3%    7.7%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         58.0%  █··▂▃▇▄█▂●▂▁ beats 71/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    6.2%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           70.0%  █▆▆▆▆▂▆▂●▂▂▅ beats 27/32    very hard · avg 1.2%    5.0%  sharp · at its level
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)         60.9%  ▂·····▂·▄▂█● beats 9/10     very hard · avg 5.9%    3.4%  at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                47.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▁▁ beats 128/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    3.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Global-MMLU (maker)                  94.0%  ▄▄····▄▄··▄● beats 5/6      medium · avg 64%        1.2%  typical
SimpleQA Verified                    70.8%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 77/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.0%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   69.4%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄● beats 36/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.0%  at its level
MirrorCode (Epoch)                   73.3%  ▄·█▄▄▄██·▄▄● beats 12/13    very hard · avg 1.6%    1.0%  sharp · at its level · noisy
HealthBench (maker)                  66.7%  █·▄·····●▄▄▄ beats 3/6      hard · avg 30%          0.7%  blunt · at its level
HealthBench Professional (maker)     62.1%  ▂·▂··▂▂▂█●▂▄ beats 9/13     hard · avg 20%          0.6%  blunt · at its level · small run
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   97.9%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂●▂ beats 46/49    easy · avg 77%          0.4%  maxed out
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                       10   37% ▇▇▇▇
Anthropic system cards and model announ…       15   24% ▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     5   19% ▇▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…        6   13% ▇▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    4% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    2% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 82.2
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Anthropic) · $20.00/M blended · $10 in / $50 out per 1M tokens · [docs.anthropic.com](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/anthropic/models/claude-fable-5-1.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/anthropic/claude-fable-5-1.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/claude-fable-5-1) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)