[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Claude Fable 5 # Claude Fable 5 Anthropic · released 2026-06 · closed weights **score 79.4** ±0.5 · #14 of 732 · from 48 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Claude Fable 5 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄●▁ #12 of 313 33% 15 coding ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄●▁ #20 of 469 16% 7 chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇● #6 of 402* 2.3% 1 math ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂●▁ #7 of 431 30% 11 vision & documents ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█● #2 of 153 3.6% 4 web search ▁▁▁▅▄█●▄·▁·▁ #22 of 84 3.1% 3
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Terminal-Bench 4.0 44.5% █▅▅▅▅·▅▃●▅▅▅ beats 14/20 very hard · avg 0.7% 5.9% sharp · at its level · several runs Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega… 0.0804 IPS ▁▁▁▃▃▂█▁●▂▁▁ beats 50/59 avg -0.379 IPS 5.8% sharp SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)… 80.0% ▄█·▄·▄●█···▄ beats 6/9 very hard · avg 7.4% 4.6% sharp SWE-bench Multilingual (maker) 86.6% ▃··▃·▅●▃█··▃ beats 4/9 hard · avg 31% 2.2% typical SWE-bench Verified (maker) 95.0% ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁● beats 137/138 hard · avg 28% 1.8% sharp · maxed out τ³-bench banking_knowledge (v1.0.… 39.7% ▃▃▂▃·▆▃▂●▅▅▂ beats 18/25 very hard · avg 4.3% 1.7% at its level Humanity's Last Exam with tools (… 63.8% ▁······▁·▄·● beats 5/10 very hard · avg 14% 1.4% at its level E2E-SWE (build a working codebase… 65.3% ▃··▅··▃█▃▅▃● beats 11/12 very hard · avg 3.7% 1.4% sharp · at its level Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker) 84.3% ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆█▅● beats 50/63 hard · avg 19% 1.3% sharp Chartography with tools (maker) 84.2% ▃········▃●█ beats 3/7 very hard · avg 6.5% 1.3% sharp OSWorld-Verified (maker) 85.0% █▃·▂▅▂▃▂▅▃▆● beats 26/27 hard · avg 28% 1.3% typical Toolathlon (Tool Decathlon) (make… 61.7% █···█··█·██● beats 5/5 hard · avg 16% 1.1% at its level DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker) 69.7% █·····██●█·█ beats 3/5 hard · avg 19% 1.1% at its level BrowseComp with context managemen… 87.4% ▄·▄▂·█▂·▆●·▂ beats 14/15 medium · avg 47% 0.8% typical OSWorld 2.0, 2026.08.08 release (… 72.9% ●····█·····█ beats 0/2 hard · avg 28% 0.5% at its level · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)… 80.0% ▄█·▄·▄●█···▄ beats 6/9 very hard · avg 7.4% 4.6% sharp Arena WebDev (Code Arena) 1624.1 ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆●▅▁▂ beats 106/129 avg 981 4.1% sharp SWE-bench Multilingual (maker) 86.6% ▃··▃·▅●▃█··▃ beats 4/9 hard · avg 31% 2.2% typical SWE-bench Verified (maker) 95.0% ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁● beats 137/138 hard · avg 28% 1.8% sharp · maxed out E2E-SWE (build a working codebase… 65.3% ▃··▅··▃█▃▅▃● beats 11/12 very hard · avg 3.7% 1.4% sharp · at its level Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe… 85.1% ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 46/49 hard · avg 17% 1.1% sharp DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker) 69.7% █·····██●█·█ beats 3/5 hard · avg 19% 1.1% at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LMArena (text) 1503.9 ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 380/385 avg 1260 2.3% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why FrontierMath tier 4 v2 90.2% ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▃●▁▁▁ beats 63/67 very hard · avg 0.1% 8.8% sharp · at its level FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2 87.0% ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▆●▃ beats 77/86 very hard · avg 1.2% 5.7% sharp MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4… 72.5% ▁·····▅██●·▁ beats 18/20 very hard · avg 7.6% 4.0% sharp · at its level MathArena ArXivMath June 2026 (48… 85.4% ▂···▄·██▆●▄▂ beats 16/19 very hard · avg 5.1% 3.6% sharp MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 … 54.1% ▂▂▆█▃●▂▂▂··▂ beats 14/18 very hard · avg 0.8% 1.9% sharp · at its level · noisy MathArena ArXivLean June 2026 (46… 15.2% ▄····▄▄●██·▄ beats 3/9 very hard · avg 0.9% 1.7% sharp · at its level MathArena BrokenArXiv May 2026 (5… 44.5% ██·▄▄▄····●▄ beats 7/8 very hard · avg 1.9% 1.4% sharp · at its level MathArena ArXivMath May 2026 (40 … 87.5% ▁··▁▄█▄▁·●·▁ beats 16/17 very hard · avg 11% 1.3% at its level MathArena BrokenArXiv June 2026 (… 47.8% ▄··█▂▂▂●▄··▂ beats 9/14 very hard · avg 1.3% 1.3% sharp · at its level · noisy FrontierMath: Erdős problems 0.0% ●··········▆ beats 2/6 very hard · avg 0.0% 0.3% sharp · too hard for it · noisy OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 99.7% ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 193/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 0.1% sharp · maxed out · noisy
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Arena vision (style controlled) 1308.7 ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 152/152 avg 1061 1.5% blunt CharXiv (reasoning questions) 86.6% ▂▅▃▅▅▆▆▅▆█▆● beats 99/101 hard · avg 31% 0.9% small run Arena document (style controlled) 1498.9 ▁▁▃▃▄▃▇█▅▇▄● beats 37/37 avg 1331 0.8% blunt CharXiv descriptive questions 94.3% ▂▄▄▅▇▄██▇▂●▂ beats 57/59 medium · avg 64% 0.5% maxed out · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Humanity's Last Exam with tools (… 63.8% ▁······▁·▄·● beats 5/10 very hard · avg 14% 1.4% at its level BrowseComp with context managemen… 87.4% ▄·▄▂·█▂·▆●·▂ beats 14/15 medium · avg 47% 0.8% typical Arena search systems (style contr… 1229.0 ▁·▁▁▂▂▂█▆▃●▂ beats 32/36 avg 1069 0.8% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why EBR-bench (Epoch) 39.5% ▄▂·▆█▂█●▄▆·▆ beats 17/25 very hard · avg 0.3% 5.8% sharp · at its level Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch) 52.0% █··▂▃▇▄█▂●▂▁ beats 67/77 very hard · avg 9.4% 5.0% sharp · at its level · noisy Furniture Assembly (Epoch) 35.8% █▆▆●▆▂▆▂▂▂▂▅ beats 13/32 very hard · avg 1.2% 4.2% sharp · at its level Humanity's Last Exam (maker) 57.8% ▂·····▂·▄▂●▄ beats 8/10 very hard · avg 5.9% 2.7% at its level Chess Puzzles (Epoch) 41.0% █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▁▁ beats 122/137 very hard · avg 5.8% 2.5% sharp · at its level · noisy Global-MMLU (maker) 93.6% ▄▄····▄▄··●█ beats 4/6 medium · avg 64% 1.0% typical SimpleQA Verified 70.7% ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 76/81 very hard · avg 8.0% 0.9% at its level GPQA Diamond 85.9% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 148/211 hard · avg 39% 0.8% sharp · maxed out MirrorCode (Epoch) 63.9% ▄·█▄▄▄██·▄●█ beats 11/13 very hard · avg 1.6% 0.7% sharp · at its level · noisy AutomationBench public set (Zapie… 46.2% ▄······▄●··▄ beats 2/4 very hard · avg 11% 0.7% at its level HealthBench (maker) 61.2% █·●·····▄▄▄▄ beats 2/6 hard · avg 30% 0.6% blunt · at its level RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To… 97.0% ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆●▂▂ beats 41/49 easy · avg 77% 0.4% maxed out NTCIR SciClaimEval Subtask 1 pair… 74.4% ▃▃···▃·▃▃█·● beats 8/8 medium · avg 45% 0.3% blunt · at its level
source results share of the score Epoch AI 11 35% ▇▇▇▇ Anthropic system cards and model announ… 17 25% ▇▇▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 6 15% ▇▇ MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX… 7 15% ▇▇ Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard… 1 3% ▇ τ²/τ³-bench leaderboard: Sierra's own e… 1 2% ▇ Roblox LLM Leaderboard 2 2% ▇ E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building … 1 1% ▇ Meridian Labs inspect_charxiv evaluatio… 2 1% ▇ Zapier AutomationBench README: public-s… 1 1% ▇ SciTrue: Reliable Scientific Claim Vali… 1 0% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 79.4Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · τ²/τ³-bench leaderboard: Sierra's own evaluation runs ([MIT](https://opensource.org/license/mit)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Meridian Labs inspect\_charxiv evaluation report ([MIT](https://github.com/meridianlabs-ai/inspect_charxiv/blob/317e4ff4335d7d4242d8e3c803898b7345973bd2/LICENSE)) · Zapier AutomationBench README: public-set pass rates ([MIT](../../licenses/zapier-automationbench-readme-MIT.txt)) · SciTrue: Reliable Scientific Claim Validation with Frontier and Open Language Models at the NTCIR SciClaimEval Task ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2609.00654v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Anthropic) · $20.00/M blended · $10 in / $50 out per 1M tokens · [docs.anthropic.com](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/anthropic/models/claude-fable-5.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/anthropic/claude-fable-5.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/claude-fable-5) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)