[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Claude Opus 5.5 # Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic · released 2026-09 · closed weights **score 84.7** ±0.6 · #2 of 732 · from 31 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Claude Opus 5.5 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others        rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂●    #1 of 313     38%     10
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃●    #1 of 469     18%      5
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●   #3 of 402*    4.1%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂▁●    #3 of 431     11%      4
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●   #9 of 153*    2.7%      1
web search          ▁▁▁▅▄█▃●·▁·▁   #13 of 84*    2.3%      1
agent tasks · #1 of 313 · 38% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  0.2094 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃▂█▁▂▂▁● beats 59/59  avg -0.379 IPS           10%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 4.0                       64.8%  █▅▅▅▅·▅▃▃▅▅● beats 20/20  very hard · avg 0.5%     10%  sharp · at its level · several runs
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…       89.9%  ▄█·▄·▄██···● beats 9/9    very hard · avg 7.4%    5.5%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)           93.9%  ▃··▃·▅▃▃█··● beats 9/9    hard · avg 31%          2.7%  maxed out
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…       67.7%  ▁······▁·▄·● beats 10/10  very hard · avg 14%     2.3%  at its level
KlinikeBench strict pass@1 (333 i…       28.8%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▁▅▃█▅● beats 26/27  very hard · avg 2.4%    1.8%  at its level
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)          74.2%  █·····████·● beats 5/5    hard · avg 19%          1.8%  at its level
Chartography with tools (maker)          89.0%  ▃········▃█● beats 6/7    very hard · avg 6.5%    1.4%  sharp
OSWorld 2.1 (partial score) (make…       81.8%  █·········█● beats 2/2    hard · avg 29%          1.0%  small run
Toolathlon-Verified (maker)              77.8%  ▃·····●···▃▃ beats 3/5    medium · avg 37%        0.9%  blunt
coding · #1 of 469 · 18% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1809.8  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆▅▅▁● beats 129/129  avg 981                 7.3%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   89.9%  ▄█·▄·▄██···● beats 9/9      very hard · avg 7.4%    5.5%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)       93.9%  ▃··▃·▅▃▃█··● beats 9/9      hard · avg 31%          2.7%  maxed out
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      74.2%  █·····████·● beats 5/5      hard · avg 19%          1.8%  at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   87.0%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 49/49    hard · avg 17%          1.3%  sharp
chat & writing · #3 of 402 · 4.1% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemini 4 Argon](gemini-4-argon.md), [Gemini 4 Carbon](gemini-4-carbon.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1508.7  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 383/385  avg 1260      4.1%  blunt
math · #3 of 431 · 11% of its score Trails [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                          result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2         95.0%  ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▃▂●▁▁ beats 65/67    very hard · avg 0.1%    6.2%  sharp
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2      91.2%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▆▄● beats 84/86    very hard · avg 1.2%    4.1%  sharp · maxed out
FrontierMath: Erdős problems    2.9%  █··········● beats 5/6      very hard · avg 0.0%    0.8%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025      100.0%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 188/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.1%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #9 of 153 · 2.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md), [Gemini 3.7 Flash](gemini-3-7-flash.md), [Gemini 3.8 Flash](gemini-3-8-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1293.0  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 145/152  avg 1061      2.7%  blunt
web search · #13 of 84 · 2.3% of its score Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   67.7%  ▁······▁·▄·● beats 10/10  very hard · avg 14%    2.3%  at its level
other tests (12)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
EBR-bench (Epoch)                    71.4%  ▄▂·▆█▂█▆▄▆·● beats 23/25    very hard · avg 0.3%     10%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         71.0%  █··▂▃▇▄█▂▄●▁ beats 74/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    7.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           83.3%  █▆▆▆▆▂▆▂▂▂▂● beats 32/32    very hard · avg 1.2%    5.9%  sharp · at its level
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)         64.4%  ▂·····▂·▄▂█● beats 10/10    very hard · avg 5.9%    4.4%  at its level
Global-MMLU (maker)                  94.3%  ▄▄····▄▄··▄● beats 6/6      medium · avg 64%        1.4%  maxed out
MirrorCode (Epoch)                   77.4%  ▄·█▄▄▄██·▄▄● beats 13/13    very hard · avg 1.6%    1.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
SimpleQA Verified                    72.2%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 78/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.3%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   70.9%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄● beats 38/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.3%  at its level
HealthBench (maker)                  68.1%  █·▄·····▄▄●▄ beats 5/6      hard · avg 30%          0.9%  blunt · at its level
HealthBench Professional (maker)     65.6%  ▂·▂··▂▂▂█▄▂● beats 13/13    hard · avg 20%          0.8%  blunt · at its level · small run
GPQA Diamond                         90.6%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇●▅ beats 177/211  hard · avg 39%          0.7%  sharp · maxed out
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   98.6%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂▂● beats 49/49    easy · avg 77%          0.5%  maxed out
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                       10   37% ▇▇▇▇
Anthropic system cards and model announ…       12   28% ▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     4   25% ▇▇▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    5% ▇
KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Model…        1    2% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    2% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 84.7
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Models Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Anthropic) · $8.00/M blended · $4 in / $20 out per 1M tokens · [docs.anthropic.com](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/anthropic/models/claude-opus-5-5.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/anthropic/claude-opus-5-5.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/claude-opus-5-5) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)