[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Claude Sonnet 4 # Claude Sonnet 4 Anthropic · released 2025-05 · proprietary **score 65.0** ±0.6 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 48 benchmark results across 18 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Claude Sonnet 4 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▂▆█▄●▄▄▃▁▁    #159 of 354     22%     11
coding              ▁▁▁▃▄▆█▇●▄▃▁    #147 of 539     22%      6
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▅▄▇█▇●▇▃   #143 of 474*    5.3%      2
math                ▁▁▃▆██●█▃▁▁▁    #199 of 530    8.9%      5
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▃▂▃▅▄●██▄   #103 of 189*    2.5%      1
agent tasks · #159 of 354 · 22% of its score Beats [o3](o3.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md), [DeepSeek V3.2 Exp](deepseek-v3-2-exp.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md), [GPT-4o (2024-05-13)](gpt-4o-2024-05-13.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
τ²-bench Telecom                     46.2%  ██··██●···██ beats 4/6    very hard · avg 8.9%    5.6%  sharp · at its level · several runs
BrowserGym WorkArena-L2 (AgentLab…   40.4%  ▃▅▃·▅▃▃··●·▃ beats 9/11   very hard · avg 3.6%    2.8%  sharp · at its level · noisy
BrowserGym WorkArena-L1 (AgentLab…   63.3%  █···█▄▄·▄█·● beats 10/10  hard · avg 28%          2.3%  at its level
τ-bench Retail (maker)               80.5%  ▁····▃·▂▇█▂● beats 26/28  medium · avg 45%        2.2%  small run
τ²-bench Retail                      80.0%  ▅···█·▃····● beats 6/6    medium · avg 40%        2.1%  at its level
τ-bench Airline (maker)              60.0%  ▁▁▁·▅▄▁█▇▁▁● beats 25/28  hard · avg 26%          1.5%  at its level · small run
τ²-bench Airline                     60.0%  ▄·▄··▄···█▄● beats 6/6    hard · avg 25%          1.4%  at its level
BrowserGym MiniWoB (AgentLab Gene…   70.7%  ▅····▅▅▃▃·▃● beats 9/11   medium · avg 53%        1.3%  blunt · at its level
BFCL V4 (2025-08-26 archive, mode…   70.3%  ▄▄····█▄···● beats 5/5    hard · avg 26%          1.2%  at its level
Terminal-Bench (pre-2.0 release)     40.7%  ▄·▄···▄▄···● beats 5/5    very hard · avg 12%     0.8%  at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (act…   55.0%  ▅▃·▃▃▅▅█▃█●▅ beats 16/19  hard · avg 26%          0.8%  at its level
coding · #147 of 539 · 22% of its score Beats [Qwen3.5 Plus](qwen3-5-plus.md), [Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B)](qwen3-coder-next.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [Seed-OSS 36B Instruct](seed-oss-36b.md), [Solar Pro 4](solar-pro-4.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw…   61.3%  ▂·▂▃▅▂▃█●▄▂▂ beats 36/49  very hard · avg 7.6%    9.5%  sharp · at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   68.3%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃●▃█▇ beats 20/49  hard · avg 17%          3.5%  sharp · at its level
LiveCodeBench (version unspecifie…   45.6%  █·······●▄▄▄ beats 2/5    hard · avg 21%          2.6%  at its level
LiveCodeBench official (Aug 1, 20…   55.9%  ▃▃▅▃··●▅█▅▅▃ beats 5/15   hard · avg 24%          2.4%  sharp · at its level
MBPP+                                80.2%  ▃·····▃█●··▃ beats 5/6    medium · avg 60%        1.9%  typical
HumanEval+                           94.5%  ▄▄▄·····▄▄·● beats 5/6    easy · avg 66%          1.8%  sharp · maxed out
chat & writing · #143 of 474 · 5.3% of its score Beats [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md), [MiniMax-M2.5](minimax-m2-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 2.6B](lfm2-5-2-6b.md), [Nemotron-Cascade-8B](nemotron-cascade-8b.md), [DeepSeek V3 0324](deepseek-v3-0324.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                              result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
LMArena (text)                    1390.9  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆●█▃ beats 234/385  avg 1260          3.8%  blunt
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)   88.3%  █··█·█··●███ beats 3/6      easy · avg 74%    1.5%  typical
math · #199 of 530 · 8.9% of its score Trails [OpenThinker3 7B](openthinker3-7b.md), [Olmo 3 7B Think](olmo-3-7b-think.md), [OpenThinker2 32B](openthinker2-32b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
MATH level 5               84.4%  ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃●▂▃▄ beats 71/92   hard · avg 28%          2.9%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   68.9%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃●▇█▃▂▅ beats 99/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.5%  sharp · at its level · noisy
AIME 2025                  37.0%  ▄●···▄▄··▄·█ beats 1/6     hard · avg 16%          1.8%  sharp · at its level · noisy
AIME 2024                  47.0%  ▁▁▁▂▁▃▁●███▃ beats 20/85   hard · avg 30%          1.0%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH-500                   93.8%  ▄·●··█··▄·▄▄ beats 1/6     very easy · avg 87%     0.7%  maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #103 of 189 · 2.5% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Qwen3.5 4B](qwen3-5-4b.md), [GPT-4.1 mini](gpt-4-1-mini.md), [Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B)](mistral-large-3.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run   difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1188.6  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄●▅█▇ beats 66/152  avg 1061      2.5%  blunt
other tests (21)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         79.2%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 125/211  hard · avg 39%           10%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MMLU                                 91.8%  ▄·····█▄▄▄·● beats 6/6      medium · avg 68%        4.1%  typical
MMLU-Pro                             83.7%  █▄·▄···●··▄▄ beats 4/6      medium · avg 58%        3.1%  typical
KCL-Essay vanilla                    35.5%  ▁···▁▃▂█●▃▃▂ beats 14/23    hard · avg 17%          2.9%  at its level
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1224.3  ▁·▂▁▄▅▅●█▄▁▁ beats 34/62    avg 1034                2.3%  typical
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, …   75.6%  ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄▅▄● beats 59/66    hard · avg 29%          2.0%  at its level
CMMLU                                86.5%  █····▄··●▄▄▄ beats 3/6      medium · avg 67%        1.6%  typical
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   92.3%  ▁▁▃▁█●▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 21/49    easy · avg 77%          1.6%  typical
KCL-MCQA vanilla                     45.7%  ▂···█▂▆▆●█▆▂ beats 15/23    very hard · avg 29%     1.6%  at its level
C-Eval                               86.6%  █····●·▄·▄▄▄ beats 2/6      medium · avg 68%        1.5%  typical
HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception…   69.8%  ▁▁▁▁·▂·█▆●▇▁ beats 18/31    medium · avg 46%        1.5%  typical
COLLIE (constrained text generati…   51.2%  ▄···▄█●····█ beats 4/6      hard · avg 30%          1.4%  at its level
RPC-Bench overall, text input (Z.…   24.2%  ▄··●▄·▄▄█·▄▄ beats 1/8      very hard · avg 12%     1.4%  at its level
VitaBench                            23.0%  █·······▄█·● beats 5/6      very hard · avg 6.5%    1.4%  typical
LongSocialBench (full-context, 4-…   52.0%  ▆▂·▄█·▂▂·▄●▂ beats 14/16    very hard · avg 36%     1.3%  blunt · at its level
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   62.5%  ▁··▃▁▁▁▅●▅▁▅ beats 13/24    hard · avg 51%          0.8%  blunt · at its level
ZebraLogic                           75.8%  █···●··███·█ beats 1/5      medium · avg 51%        0.6%  noisy
BeyondAIME                           20.5%  ●····█·▄▄··▄ beats 0/6      hard · avg 24%          0.5%  at its level
DROP                                 73.1%  ▄···▄·●█·▄·▄ beats 2/6      medium · avg 58%        0.2%  blunt · at its level · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   95.5%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 76/140   very easy · avg 94%     0.1%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   89.7%  ▁▂▁▂▅●▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 43/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Meituan LongCat-Flash-Chat model card          21   36% ▇▇▇▇
Epoch AI                                        3   11% ▇
Aider polyglot benchmark runs                   1    9% ▇
ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard               3    6% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    6% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    5% ▇
Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Towar…        2    4% ▇
Moonshot AI Kimi-K2-Instruct model card         1    4% ▇
τ-bench leaderboard: Anthropic's own su…        2    4% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             2    4% ▇
LiveCodeBench official website results          1    2% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    2% ▇
RPC-Bench leaderboard                           1    1% ▇
LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs U…        1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    1% ▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               2    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 65.0
Licences: Meituan LongCat-Flash-Chat model card ([MIT](https://huggingface.co/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat/blob/f0b8e8d7380330f450ca1fde4ec56823a514584c/LICENSE)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Aider polyglot benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs’ Legal Reasoning Capabilities ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/cards-final-NOTICE.txt)) · Moonshot AI Kimi-K2-Instruct model card ([Modified MIT License (Kimi K2)](https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct/blob/fd1984e2b7a3350dbf7305fe73a4ede25c14de50/LICENSE)) · τ-bench leaderboard: Anthropic's own submissions ([MIT](https://opensource.org/license/mit)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LiveCodeBench official website results ([CC-BY-SA-4.0](../../licenses/lcb-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · RPC-Bench leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs Understand Online Discussion Threads? ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/claude-sonnet-4-20250514) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)