[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B # DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B DeepSeek · released 2025-01 · 70B params · MIT; underlying Llama 3.3 licence applies to weights **score 58.0** ±0.9 · #225 of 732 · from 18 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task    vs the others         rank  counts  tests
coding  ▁▁▁▃▅▇●▇▅▄▃▁   #252 of 469     15%      5
math    ▁▁▃▅█▆●█▄▂▁▁   #169 of 431     36%      5
coding · #252 of 469 · 15% of its score Beats [Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct](qwen3-vl-32b-instruct.md), [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md), [GLM-4.7-Flash](glm-4-7-flash.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [InternLM2.5 20B Chat](internlm2-5-20b-chat.md), [Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-3b-reasoning.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
LiveCodeBench (version unspecifie…   57.5%  ▄····▄▄··▄●▄ beats 5/6    medium · avg 42%    6.9%  at its level
CodeReviewQA: change localisation…   47.3%  █▂▁▁▂▂▂▃▅▅●▇ beats 35/47  hard · avg 33%      3.4%  sharp · at its level · noisy
CodeReviewQA: automated code refi…   28.7%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃●▅▄ beats 19/47  hard · avg 32%      2.7%  at its level
CodeReviewQA: solution identifica…   68.8%  ▃··▁▂▂▃▂█●▄▂ beats 37/47  medium · avg 51%    2.1%  sharp · noisy
CodeReviewQA: change type recogni…   61.2%  ▁▁▁······▁●█ beats 11/47  easy · avg 67%      0.1%  blunt · at its level · noisy
math · #169 of 431 · 36% of its score Beats [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md), [MiniMax-M2.7](minimax-m2-7.md), [MiniMax-M2.1](minimax-m2-1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Olmo 3 7B Think](olmo-3-7b-think.md), [Nemotron Nano 9B v2](nemotron-nano-9b-v2.md), [Qwen3-VL 4B Thinking](qwen3-vl-4b-thinking.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
MATH level 5               89.9%  ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅●▃▄ beats 78/92   hard · avg 28%           18%  sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   51.4%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃●▇█▃▂▅ beats 78/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    6.7%  sharp · at its level · noisy
AIME 2024 (maker)          70.0%  ▃·▃·▃▃···●·▃ beats 5/7     medium · avg 43%        5.2%  sharp · at its level · noisy · several …
AIME 2025                  51.5%  ●··▄··█··▄·▄ beats 0/6     hard · avg 32%          4.6%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH-500 (maker)           94.5%  ▄·▄▄·▄▄●···▄ beats 6/7     very easy · avg 91%     1.6%  maxed out
other tests (5)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         55.7%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆●▅▇█▅ beats 79/211  hard · avg 39%       38%  sharp · at its level · several runs
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…   39.8%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆●▃ beats 70/97   hard · avg 31%      5.7%  blunt · at its level
Judgemark v2 (LLM-as-judge for cr…   59.7%  ▃▃··▃●▅···█▃ beats 3/10    medium · avg 53%    2.9%  at its level
EuroEval HellaSwag (English), tes…   39.8%  ▃·▁▁▂●▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 21/100  medium · avg 67%    1.3%  sharp · noisy
Omni-MATH                            63.4%  █·●·█·██··██ beats 1/6     medium · avg 64%    0.5%  blunt · at its level · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        3   40% ▇▇▇▇▇
Microsoft                                       4   23% ▇▇▇
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 model card (sub…        4   18% ▇▇
CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehen…        4    8% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    6% ▇
Judgemark v2 results                            1    3% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 58.0
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Microsoft ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2504.21318v1.txt)) · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 model card ([mit](../../licenses/deepseek-ai--DeepSeek-R1.txt)) · CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehension Assessment for Large Language Models ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Judgemark v2 results ([MIT](../../licenses/judgemark-v2-MIT.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Novita AI) · $0.80/M blended · $0.8 in / $0.8 out per 1M tokens · [novita.ai](https://novita.ai/models/llm/deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b) [price source](https://novita.ai/pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Novita AI serverless chat completions, model deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b (status active): input $0.80, output $0.80. Novita serves it with an 8,192-token context (its own serving limit). Currency: USD. Novita AI official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25. · [context source](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B/blob/b1c0b44b4369b597ad119a196caf79a9c40e141e/config.json): DeepSeek official configuration for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B (pinned commit): max\_position\_embeddings 131072 (llama3 rope scaling, factor 8 over original 8192). Configured maximum, not a benchmarked long-context claim: the official card states no context length for the distilled models (its table gives 128K only for DeepSeek-R1/R1-Zero), reports a 32,768-token maximum generation length, and its vLLM example uses --max-model-len 32768. Observed 2026-09-25. ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Q8_0, needs ~74.98 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF/tree/732dd974083ea5877d7b6d788b36fe7c2e5eab36)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF:Q8_0 ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF:Q8_0 ``` Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~26.97 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (4bit, needs ~39.7 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-4bit/tree/6b0c127e00720c480ae36462bb15e71eeb521e80)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-4bit -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~74.98 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · ud-q2_k_xl (~26.97 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y` · 8bit (~75 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Q4_K_M, needs ~42.52 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-r1/tags)) ```sh ollama run deepseek-r1:70b ``` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (4bit, needs ~39.7 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-4bit/tree/6b0c127e00720c480ae36462bb15e71eeb521e80)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~75 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/deepseek-ai](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B) ## Quantization evidence How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent. They don't describe every download of that precision.
precision                       test                                full → quantized    kept
AWQ 4-bit (AutoAWQ; vLLM)       Average of AIME 2024, FOLIO and T…     0.818 → 0.804   98.3%
AWQ 4-bit (AutoAWQ; vLLM)       AIME 2024 accuracy (mean of 3 pas…     0.656 → 0.634   96.6%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  AIME 2024 pass@1                       0.678 → 0.692  102.0%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  Reasoning average of 3 tasks (AIM…     0.762 → 0.765  100.3%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  GSM8K 5-shot strict-match (lm-eva…       0.93 → 0.93  100.0%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  MATH-500 pass@1                        0.953 → 0.951   99.8%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  OpenLLM v1 average of 6 tasks (AR…     0.757 → 0.755   99.7%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  GPQA Diamond pass@1                    0.656 → 0.651   99.4%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  MMLU 5-shot acc (lm-evaluation-ha…      0.78 → 0.774   99.2%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  IFEval 0-shot instruction-level s…     0.424 → 0.421   99.2%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (FP8 weights…  OpenLLM v2 average of 6 tasks (IF…     0.154 → 0.149   96.6%
GPTQ 3-bit (vLLM)               Average of AIME 2024, FOLIO and T…     0.818 → 0.726   88.8%
GPTQ 3-bit (vLLM)               AIME 2024 accuracy (mean of 3 pas…     0.656 → 0.467   71.2%
GPTQ 4-bit (vLLM)               AIME 2024 accuracy (mean of 3 pas…     0.656 → 0.667  101.7%
GPTQ 4-bit (vLLM)               Average of AIME 2024, FOLIO and T…     0.818 → 0.812   99.3%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  OpenLLM v1 average of 6 tasks (AR…     0.757 → 0.759  100.2%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  GSM8K 5-shot strict-match (lm-eva…       0.93 → 0.93  100.0%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  IFEval 0-shot instruction-level s…     0.424 → 0.424   99.9%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  MATH-500 pass@1                        0.953 → 0.952   99.9%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  MMLU 5-shot acc (lm-evaluation-ha…      0.78 → 0.771   98.9%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  Reasoning average of 3 tasks (AIM…      0.762 → 0.75   98.3%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  GPQA Diamond pass@1                     0.656 → 0.64   97.7%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  AIME 2024 pass@1                       0.678 → 0.656   96.7%
INT4 W4A16 (weights only, sym…  OpenLLM v2 average of 6 tasks (IF…     0.154 → 0.136   88.1%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  GSM8K 5-shot strict-match (lm-eva…      0.93 → 0.936  100.6%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  OpenLLM v1 average of 6 tasks (AR…      0.757 → 0.76  100.4%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  IFEval 0-shot instruction-level s…     0.424 → 0.425  100.1%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  MATH-500 pass@1                        0.953 → 0.953  100.0%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  MMLU 5-shot acc (lm-evaluation-ha…       0.78 → 0.78  100.0%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  AIME 2024 pass@1                       0.678 → 0.678   99.9%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  Reasoning average of 3 tasks (AIM…      0.762 → 0.76   99.7%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  GPQA Diamond pass@1                     0.656 → 0.65   99.1%
INT8 W8A8 (weights symmetric …  OpenLLM v2 average of 6 tasks (IF…     0.154 → 0.152   99.0%
Each kept value links to its source. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)