[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) # DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) DeepSeek · released 2026-04 · 1600B params (49B active) · mit **score 70.9** ±0.5 · #70 of 732 · from 45 benchmark results across 12 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅●▄▂▁    #64 of 313     22%     11
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅●▃▁    #65 of 469     20%      6
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #53 of 402*    3.3%      2
math            ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█●▂▁▁    #62 of 431     41%     12
web search      ▁▁▁▅●█▃▄·▁·▁     #55 of 84    4.9%      4
agent tasks · #64 of 313 · 22% of its score Beats [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md), [Gemini 3.6 Flash](gemini-3-6-flash.md), [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GLM-5.1](glm-5-1.md), [Beam 1.0 501B A23B](beam-1-0-501b-a23b.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   77.6%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄█●▁ beats 25/29  hard · avg 19%          8.3%  sharp · at its level · several runs
SWE-bench Multilingual               76.5%  ▄··▄▄···▄▄·● beats 5/6    hard · avg 30%          2.3%  typical
Terminal-Bench 2.1                   49.2%  ●··▄█·▄····▄ beats 0/6    very hard · avg 13%     2.2%  sharp · at its level
GameLogicBench solve rate (72 God…   25.0%  █▄·●·▄·██▄·▄ beats 3/11   very hard · avg 5.1%    1.7%  at its level
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web…   30.0%  ▃····█··▃●·▃ beats 5/8    very hard · avg 3.6%    1.6%  at its level
MCP-Atlas (public set)               73.6%  █··█·●█·████ beats 2/7    hard · avg 30%          1.5%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools      48.2%  ▄····▄·●·▄·▄ beats 2/5    hard · avg 15%          1.4%  at its level
BrowseComp                           59.4%  ▄·▄▄···▄··●▄ beats 4/6    hard · avg 18%          1.1%  at its level
τ³-bench                             73.2%  ▄····▄·█·▄·● beats 5/6    medium · avg 42%        1.0%  at its level
Legal Research Bench (agentic, al…   23.2%  ▄█··▄●▄██·▄█ beats 4/12   very hard · avg 6.3%    0.8%  at its level
τ³-bench telecom (tau2-bench ≥ v1…   96.3%  ▄·▄···●·▄·█▄ beats 2/6    easy · avg 79%          0.6%  maxed out
coding · #65 of 469 · 20% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B)](mimo-v2-5-pro.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [GLM-5.1](glm-5-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   77.6%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄█●▁ beats 25/29   hard · avg 19%          8.3%  sharp · at its level · several runs
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1463.4  ▁▁▃▂▅█●▆▅▅▁▂ beats 64/129  avg 981                 4.8%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual               76.5%  ▄··▄▄···▄▄·● beats 5/6     hard · avg 30%          2.3%  typical
GameLogicBench solve rate (72 God…   25.0%  █▄·●·▄·██▄·▄ beats 3/11    very hard · avg 5.1%    1.7%  at its level
SciCode subproblems                  50.5%  ▃····▃··█·●▃ beats 5/6     hard · avg 19%          1.4%  at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecif…   92.5%  ██···█··███● beats 6/6     medium · avg 46%        1.3%  typical
chat & writing · #53 of 402 · 3.3% of its score Beats [MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B)](mimo-v2-6-flash.md), [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [GPT-6 Luna](gpt-6-luna.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Sonnet 4.5](claude-sonnet-4-5.md), [Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite](gemini-3-5-flash-lite.md), [MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B)](mimo-v2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                              result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
LMArena (text)                    1455.0  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 325/385  avg 1260          2.7%  blunt
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)   94.0%  ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆██▅●▁ beats 139/145  easy · avg 80%    0.6%  maxed out
math · #62 of 431 · 41% of its score Beats [Qwen3.6 Max Preview](qwen3-6-max-preview.md), [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [A.X K2 (688B-A33B)](ax-k2.md), [Inkling Small (266B-A12B)](inkling-small.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            45.3%  ▂··▁▁▃▄●█▆▄▃ beats 32/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     13%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v2                2.4%  ▁●▁▂█▅▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 3/67     very hard · avg 0.1%    7.3%  sharp
MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4…   51.2%  ▁·····▅●█▄·▁ beats 7/20     very hard · avg 7.6%    5.6%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath February 2026…   51.6%  ▁▁▁▁█▇▄●▁▃·▃ beats 19/24    very hard · avg 9.4%    3.2%  at its level
MathArena ArXivMath March 2026 (3…   55.8%  █▃▅·●▃▃·▅·▃▃ beats 6/14     hard · avg 16%          2.6%  at its level
MathArena ArXivMath January 2026 …   73.9%  ▂··▄▂▄█▆▆▄▄● beats 21/23    hard · avg 23%          2.2%  at its level
AIME 2026                            95.2%  ▁▁▁▂▂▂▆█●▂·▁ beats 40/52    medium · avg 61%        1.6%  sharp · maxed out · small run
MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 …   22.1%  ▂▂▆●▃▃▂▂▂··▂ beats 8/18     very hard · avg 0.8%    1.6%  sharp · noisy
IMO-AnswerBench                      93.0%  ▄····▄·▄▄·█● beats 6/6      medium · avg 41%        1.1%  typical
MathArena BrokenArXiv March 2026 …   15.2%  █·▆●▂·▂▂···▂ beats 8/14     very hard · avg 1.0%    0.9%  sharp · noisy
MathArena BrokenArXiv February 20…   13.3%  ▃▂▂▃●▃▂·▃··▂ beats 10/16    very hard · avg 0.9%    0.9%  sharp · noisy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             96.7%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█●▂▅ beats 168/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.7%  sharp · noisy
web search · #55 of 84 · 4.9% of its score Beats [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md), [Kimi K2.6](kimi-k2-6.md), [GPT-5 Pro](gpt-5-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B)](llama-4-scout.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web…   30.0%  ▃····█··▃●·▃ beats 5/8    very hard · avg 3.6%    1.6%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools      48.2%  ▄····▄·●·▄·▄ beats 2/5    hard · avg 15%          1.4%  at its level
BrowseComp                           59.4%  ▄·▄▄···▄··●▄ beats 4/6    hard · avg 18%          1.1%  at its level
Legal Research Bench (agentic, al…   23.2%  ▄█··▄●▄██·▄█ beats 4/12   very hard · avg 6.3%    0.8%  at its level
other tests (16)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA (subset unspecified)            87.8%  ▄█▄●·▄·····▄ beats 4/6      hard · avg 47%          3.6%  sharp
Humanity's Last Exam                 37.7%  ▄··█▄··▄·▄·● beats 6/6      very hard · avg 5.7%    2.8%  at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         17.0%  █··▂▃●▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 25/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    2.7%  sharp · noisy
GPQA Diamond                         89.6%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇●▅ beats 171/211  hard · avg 39%          2.6%  sharp
MMLU-Pro                             87.5%  ▄·····▄▄▄·●█ beats 4/6      medium · avg 53%        2.2%  typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                20.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂●▃▃▂▁▁ beats 76/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    1.9%  sharp · noisy
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1329.7  ▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃█●▁▁ beats 58/62    avg 1034                1.6%  typical
LongBench v2                         62.1%  ▂·▁·▂▃▁▄▄▃█● beats 30/33    very hard · avg 34%     1.4%  at its level
WildClawBench                        43.7%  ▃·▅▅█·▅●▅▃▃▃ beats 12/17    very hard · avg 11%     1.4%  at its level
MMLU-ProX                            85.6%  ▄·····▄·▄▄●▄ beats 4/6      medium · avg 58%        1.2%  typical
IFBench prompt-level (loose)         79.1%  ▄▄·▄··▄●···█ beats 4/6      medium · avg 47%        1.0%  typical
SimpleQA Verified                    47.0%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆●▄▂▅ beats 47/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.0%  at its level
MultiChallenge                       64.1%  ▁··········● beats 6/6      hard · avg 28%          1.0%  at its level
Legal Research Bench (single-shot…    4.1%  ▃▃█▃·●···█▃▃ beats 7/12     very hard · avg 0.8%    1.0%  too hard for it
CritPt                               14.0%  ▄····▄█···█● beats 6/6      very hard · avg 1.1%    0.6%  too hard for it · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   91.4%  ▁▂▁▂▅█●▃▄▃▁▁ beats 59/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        8   34% ▇▇▇▇
NVIDIA                                         18   29% ▇▇▇▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…        7   17% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    7% ▇
LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B mode…        2    2% ▇
Legal Research Bench                            2    2% ▇
GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agent…        1    2% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    2% ▇
K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benc…        1    2% ▇
zai-org/GLM-5.2 model card                      1    2% ▇
WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-Wor…        1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 70.9
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · NVIDIA ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2606.15007v1.txt)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B/blob/fec0c8dd25fdd20ffd09869d5af5277966d5523d/LICENSE)) · Legal Research Bench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Runtime Game Logic with Tick-Level State Assertions ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benchmark Grounded in Korean Contexts ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · zai-org/GLM-5.2 model card ([mit](../../licenses/zai-org--GLM-5.2.txt)) · WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) (Q4_K_M, needs ~954.6 GB, from [huggingface.co/teamblobfish](https://huggingface.co/teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF/tree/4c14720bf7315ecbb9304f0bf4339cc294d5a00d)) ```sh llama cli -hf teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~1671.8 GB) `llama cli -hf teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF:Q8_0` · Q2_K (~574.1 GB) `llama cli -hf teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF:Q2_K` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) (Q4_K_M, needs ~954.6 GB, from [huggingface.co/teamblobfish](https://huggingface.co/teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF/tree/4c14720bf7315ecbb9304f0bf4339cc294d5a00d)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~1671.8 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · Q2_K (~574.1 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/teamblobfish/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-GGUF@Q2_K -y` ### Other ways to run it 1. Run it as published (fp4 + fp8 mixed, needs ~864.72 GB, NVIDIA only, from [github.com/vllm-project](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/64cb68384241f046d07ba3797e1b14dbc82a0b2d/docs/models/supported_models.md)) ```sh vllm serve deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/deepseek-ai](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/deepseek-v4-pro-preview) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)