[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / EXAONE 4.5 33B
# EXAONE 4.5 33B
LG AI Research · released 2026-04 · 34.4B params · exaone
**score 63.5** ±1.6 · #163 of 732 · from 7 benchmark results across 2 sources · † no independently run results verified
Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only.
## What it's good at
● marks EXAONE 4.5 33B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests
agent tasks ▁▁▃▆█▄●▅▄▄▂▁ #123 of 313* 15% 1
chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█●▇▇▃ #144 of 402* 4.6% 1
math ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁ #81 of 431* 19% 1
vision & documents not ranked yet — 3
agent tasks · #123 of 313 · 15% of its score
Beats [o3-pro](o3-pro.md), [o3](o3.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md), [Devstral 2 (2512)](devstral-2.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
τ²-bench Telecom (maker) 73.0% ▁·▅█▆▅●▃▃▂▃▁ beats 57/89 hard · avg 17% 15% sharp · at its level · noisy · small run
chat & writing · #144 of 402 · 4.6% of its score
Beats [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [MiniMax-M2](minimax-m2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 8B-A1B](lfm2-5-8b-a1b.md), [LFM2.5 2.6B](lfm2-5-2-6b.md), [Spark-X2.5 1.7B](spark-x2-5-1-7b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) … 89.6% ▄·▄·▄·▄▄···● beats 5/6 easy · avg 78% 4.6% typical
math · #81 of 431 · 19% of its score
Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md), [Qwen3.5 397B-A17B](qwen3-5-397b-a17b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.2 30B](granite-4-2-30b.md), [Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct](qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
AIME 2025 (maker) 92.9% █·▄▄····▄··● beats 6/6 medium · avg 54% 19% sharp
vision & documents · 0.0% of its score
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma… 71.7% ▂▅▃▅▅▆▆●▆█▆▂ beats 62/101 hard · avg 34% — not counted yet: no other model in the …
MMMU-Pro standard (SqueezeBits lm… 17.6% no other model yet — not counted yet: no other model in the …
MMMU-Pro vision (SqueezeBits lmms… 21.5% no other model yet — not counted yet: no other model in the …
other tests (4)
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
GPQA Diamond (maker) 80.5% █···▄▄···▄·● beats 6/6 hard · avg 51% 27% sharp
KOPA-Bench (pass@1) (maker) 25.9% ▄·█··●··█▄·█ beats 3/8 very hard · avg 14% 14% at its level
MMLU-Pro (maker) 83.3% ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅●▁ beats 155/188 medium · avg 62% 13% typical
BFCL multi-turn (version not stat… 53.0% ▄▄···▄·▄●▄▄▄ beats 5/8 hard · avg 26% 6.9% at its level
## How the score was worked out
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source results share of the score
LG AI Research vendor-reported benchmar… 5 78% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Multi-Step Tool-Calling over Korean Ope… 2 21% ▇▇▇
prior: pull toward the middle 1% ▇
weighted average = 63.5
Licences: Multi-Step Tool-Calling over Korean Open Public APIs: A Benchmark and a Data-Synthesis Recipe ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/))
Not counted (4)
source test score why
SqueezeBits MMLU-Pro 72.0% only model in this source's run
SqueezeBits MMMU-Pro standard (SqueezeBit… 17.6% too few models have it yet
SqueezeBits MMMU-Pro vision (SqueezeBits … 21.5% too few models have it yet
LG AI Research vendor… CharXiv (reasoning questions) 71.7% too few models have it yet
## How to run it
### llama.cpp (recommended)
1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md)
```sh
# macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
# Windows
irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex
```
2. Run EXAONE 4.5 33B (gguf-q4_k_m, needs ~21.14 GB, from [huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF/tree/main))
```sh
llama cli -hf LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
```
3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
```sh
llama serve -hf LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
```
Other versions: gguf-q8_0 (~41.78 GB) `llama cli -hf LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF:Q8_0`
### LM Studio
1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download)
2. Run EXAONE 4.5 33B (gguf-q4_k_m, needs ~21.14 GB, from [huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF/tree/main))
```sh
lms get https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
```
3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Other versions: gguf-q8_0 (~41.78 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF@Q8_0 -y`
### Ollama
1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download)
```sh
# Linux
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
```
2. Run EXAONE 4.5 33B (gguf-q4_k_m, needs ~21.14 GB, from [huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF/tree/main))
```sh
ollama run hf.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
```
Other versions: gguf-q8_0 (~41.78 GB) `ollama run hf.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B-GGUF:Q8_0`
Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.5-33B)
[interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/exaone-4-5-33b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)