[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Gemini 1.5 Flash (002) # Gemini 1.5 Flash (002) Google · released 2024-09 · proprietary **score 53.8** ±0.6 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 26 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Gemini 1.5 Flash (002) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▂▆█●▅▄▄▃▁▁ #190 of 354* 0.7% 1 coding ▁▁▁▃▄▆●▇▅▄▃▁ #299 of 539 56% 5 chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▅▄▇●▇▇▇▃ #257 of 474* 4.2% 1 math ▁▁▃▆█●▅█▃▁▁▁ #280 of 530* 11% 2 vision & documents ▁▁▂▃▂▃●▄▆██▄ #125 of 189* 2.8% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too… 89.5% ▃▃▃▃▆▅▆●█▂▅▂ beats 21/31 easy · avg 78% 0.7% typical
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why HumanEval 82.3% ▁·▁▁▃▄▆▅█●▁▁ beats 87/99 easy · avg 76% 18% sharp HumanEval+ 75.6% ▁·▁▁▁▃▄▄▄█●▁ beats 86/99 easy · avg 70% 17% sharp LiveCodeBench official (Jan 1–Nov… 34.4% ▁▁·▁▂▄▆●▅▂·▂ beats 18/31 hard · avg 23% 9.4% sharp · at its level Aider code editing (133 Exercism … 51.1% ▁·▁▂▄▁●▄█▆▂▂ beats 16/62 medium · avg 51% 7.8% sharp · at its level MBPP+ 67.5% ▁···▁▁▂▅▇●▆▂ beats 56/75 easy · avg 66% 4.0% at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LMArena (text) 1309.3 ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▆▇█▃ beats 139/385 avg 1260 4.2% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why MATH level 5 61.9% ▂▂▅▆▄█●▃▅▂▃▄ beats 51/92 hard · avg 28% 9.4% sharp · at its level OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 16.3% ▃▃▄▃●▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 55/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 1.8% sharp · noisy
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Arena vision (style controlled) 1141.7 ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃●▅▅█▇ beats 43/152 avg 1061 2.8% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why MMLU-Pro 64.0% ▃▂▅█▃·●▃▅··▂ beats 16/23 medium · avg 54% 6.8% at its level GPQA Diamond 47.3% ▁▁▁▁▂▄●▄▅▇█▅ beats 58/211 hard · avg 39% 5.8% sharp · at its level AHELM Speech Robust Bench (LibriS… 21.4% ▂·█··●▄·▂▂·▄ beats 5/13 avg 34% 3.0% typical LiveBench 2024-08-31 49.6% ▄█·●·▄▄·▄··▄ beats 3/7 medium · avg 40% 2.3% at its level EvalPerf correctness (118 tasks, … 77.6% ▂·▂▂▂▆▅●▆▆▃█ beats 14/29 easy · avg 74% 2.1% typical AHELM CoRe-Bench conversational a… 77.6% ▂·▄··▂▂·▄▂●▄ beats 11/13 medium · avg 52% 1.5% at its level Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (… 79.9% ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 259/276 medium · avg 72% 0.9% at its level · noisy AHELM LibriSpeech transcription b… 6.2% ▃···▃·█▃▅●▅█ beats 8/13 avg 11% 0.7% typical AHELM VoxCeleb2 same-speaker dete… 54.2% ▂·▂·▂█●▄▄··▄ beats 7/13 very hard · avg 54% 0.6% sharp · noisy AHELM MUStARD audio sarcasm detec… 55.8% ▂·······●█▆▆ beats 2/13 very hard · avg 57% 0.5% blunt AHELM AIR-Bench Foundation music … 50.8% ▃●▃▅▃·▃·▃▅▃▃ beats 1/13 medium · avg 57% 0.3% blunt · at its level Vectara hallucination leaderboard… 96.6% ▁▁▂▃▄▄█●▃▂▂▁ beats 97/140 very easy · avg 94% 0.2% blunt · maxed out · noisy AHELM MELD audio emotion classifi… 42.5% ▃··▃▃▃·▃●▅█▅ beats 5/13 medium · avg 39% 0.2% blunt · at its level AHELM FLEURS 7-language transcrip… 46.1% ▄▂···▂▆▂●▂·▂ beats 9/13 avg 83% 0.1% blunt · noisy AHELM Multilingual LibriSpeech 7-… 7.1% ▂▂▂··▂▂·▂▂●▆ beats 9/13 avg 14% 0.0% blunt · noisy AHELM VocalSound human-sound reco… 41.8% ●█▄▄·█·█·█▄▄ beats 0/13 easy · avg 67% 0.0% blunt · at its level · noisy
source results share of the score EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio… 4 41% ▇▇▇▇▇ Epoch AI 3 17% ▇▇ LiveCodeBench official website results 1 9% ▇ Aider code editing benchmark runs 1 8% ▇ AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-L… 10 7% ▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 2 7% ▇ MMLU-Pro author-released evaluation runs 1 7% ▇ LiveBench model judgments 1 2% ▇ Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard 1 1% ▇ Galileo Agent Leaderboard 1 1% ▇ Vectara hallucination leaderboard 1 0% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 53.8Licences: EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LiveCodeBench official website results ([CC-BY-SA-4.0](../../licenses/lcb-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · Aider code editing benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · AHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Audio-Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MMLU-Pro author-released evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/mmlu-pro-author-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LiveBench model judgments ([Apache-2.0 (stated in the LiveBench datasheet)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gemini-1-5-flash-002) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)