[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Gemini 3.7 Flash # Gemini 3.7 Flash Google · released 2026-08 · closed weights **score 74.8** ±0.5 · #36 of 732 · from 32 benchmark results across 9 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Gemini 3.7 Flash among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄●▂▁    #45 of 313     19%      8
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄●▁    #33 of 469     10%      4
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●   #14 of 402*    3.0%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄●▁▁    #27 of 431     45%      8
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●    #5 of 153*    4.9%      2
agent tasks · #45 of 313 · 19% of its score Trails [GLM-5.2](glm-5-2.md), [GLM-5.3-Flash](glm-5-3-flash.md), [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                     result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  -0.0135 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃●█▁▂▂▁▁ beats 23/59  avg -0.379 IPS          7.8%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker)                81.6%  ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆█▅● beats 55/63  hard · avg 25%          3.2%  sharp · small run · several runs
Terminal-Bench 4.0                        11.2%  ●▅▅▅▅·▅▃▃▅▅▅ beats 0/20   very hard · avg 0.5%    3.0%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…        60.4%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 44/58  very hard · avg 6.0%    1.9%  sharp · at its level · small run
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)           65.3%  ▂····▂▁▁▆●██ beats 12/31  hard · avg 25%          0.9%  at its level · small run
KlinikeBench strict pass@1 (333 i…        10.8%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▁▅●█▅█ beats 11/27  very hard · avg 2.4%    0.9%  typical
Terminal-Bench 3.0 (maker)                14.9%  █·█··█●····█ beats 3/4    very hard · avg 1.9%    0.5%  small run
τ³-bench Banking (maker)                  30.9%  ▂▂·▅█▂▃▃▃▆▂● beats 22/24  very hard · avg 7.9%    0.4%  blunt · small run
coding · #33 of 469 · 10% of its score Beats [GPT-5.5](gpt-5-5.md), [GPT-5.6 Terra](gpt-5-6-terra.md), [Claude Opus 4.8](claude-opus-4-8.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GLM-5.2](glm-5-2.md), [GLM-5.3-Flash](glm-5-3-flash.md), [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1589.7  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆●▅▁▂ beats 98/129  avg 981                 5.4%  sharp
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   79.8%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃●▇ beats 32/49   hard · avg 17%          2.0%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   60.4%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 44/58   very hard · avg 6.0%    1.9%  sharp · at its level · small run
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      65.3%  ▂····▂▁▁▆●██ beats 12/31   hard · avg 25%          0.9%  at its level · small run
chat & writing · #14 of 402 · 3.0% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md), [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Muse Spark 1.2](muse-spark-1-2.md), [Muse Spark 1.1](muse-spark-1-1.md), [Claude Opus 4.6](claude-opus-4-6.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1489.6  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 372/385  avg 1260      3.0%  blunt
math · #27 of 431 · 45% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.8 Flash](gemini-3-8-flash.md), [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](deepseek-v4-1-flash.md), [Grok 4.6](grok-4-6.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2               36.6%  ▁▂▁▂█●▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 42/67    very hard · avg 0.1%     13%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            71.6%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█●▄▃ beats 62/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     13%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath June 2026 (48…   62.5%  ▂···▄·█●▆▆▄▂ beats 7/19     very hard · avg 5.1%    6.4%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4…   57.5%  ▁·····▅█●▄·▁ beats 11/20    very hard · avg 7.6%    6.2%  sharp · at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 …   19.3%  ▂▂▆●▃▃▂▂▂··▂ beats 6/18     very hard · avg 0.8%    2.4%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MathArena ArXivMath May 2026 (40 …   47.5%  ▁··▁●█▄▁·▃·▁ beats 4/17     very hard · avg 11%     2.1%  at its level
MathArena ArXivLean June 2026 (46…   21.7%  ▄····▄▄█●█·▄ beats 5/9      very hard · avg 0.9%    1.7%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             97.2%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃●▅ beats 170/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.4%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #5 of 153 · 4.9% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   84.5%  ▃·▃·▃▃▃·▃▃●▅ beats 9/11     medium · avg 38%    2.9%  typical
Arena vision (style controlled)     1295.2  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 148/152  avg 1061            2.0%  blunt
other tests (10)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           26.7%  █●▆▆▆▂▆▂▂▂▂▅ beats 6/32     very hard · avg 1.2%    5.2%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         37.0%  █··▂▃▇▄●▂▄▂▁ beats 59/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    5.0%  sharp · noisy
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                47.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▁▁ beats 126/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    2.9%  sharp · at its level · noisy
GPQA Diamond                         94.8%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█● beats 207/211  hard · avg 39%          1.9%  sharp
SimpleQA Verified                    69.2%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 73/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.2%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   65.0%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄● beats 30/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.1%  at its level
LVBench (maker)                      85.4%  ▇·█▅▅▄▄··●▁▁ beats 26/28    medium · avg 59%        0.9%  typical
MRCR v2 8-needle, 128k (maker)       97.0%  █▄▄█·▄···▄·● beats 8/8      medium · avg 53%        0.9%  small run
MirrorCode (Epoch)                   41.1%  ▄·█▄▄▄█●·▄▄█ beats 9/13     very hard · avg 1.6%    0.8%  sharp · at its level · noisy
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   96.8%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃●▂▂▂ beats 40/49    easy · avg 77%          0.7%  maxed out
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        9   43% ▇▇▇▇▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…        5   19% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     4   18% ▇▇
Google DeepMind Gemini model page and m…        6    8% ▇
Google Cloud developer's guides to Gemi…        4    4% ▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    3% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    3% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Model…        1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 74.8
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Google Cloud developer's guides to Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.7 Flash ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Models Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Google) · $1.50/M blended · $0.75 in / $3.75 out per 1M tokens · [ai.google.dev](https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/google/models/gemini-3.7-flash.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/google/gemini-3.7-flash.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gemini-3-7-flash) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)