[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Gemini 3.8 Flash # Gemini 3.8 Flash Google · released 2026-09 · closed weights **score 75.5** ±0.5 · #28 of 732 · from 33 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Gemini 3.8 Flash among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others        rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄●▂▁   #25 of 313     21%      9
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄●▁   #35 of 469     12%      5
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●   #9 of 402*    3.0%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█●▂▁▁   #35 of 431     45%     10
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●   #6 of 153*    4.7%      2
agent tasks · #25 of 313 · 21% of its score Beats [Hy4 preview (770B-A49B)](hy4-preview.md), [GPT-5.6 Terra](gpt-5-6-terra.md), [Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B)](qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md), [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](deepseek-v4-1-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  0.0265 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃▂●▁▂▂▁▁ beats 39/59  avg -0.379 IPS          7.6%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 4.0                       19.1%  █▅●▅▅·▅▃▃▅▅▅ beats 6/20   very hard · avg 0.5%    3.1%  sharp · at its level
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker)               90.8%  ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆█▅● beats 63/63  hard · avg 25%          3.0%  sharp · small run · several runs
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…       61.6%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 45/58  very hard · avg 6.0%    1.8%  sharp · at its level · small run
E2E-SWE (build a working codebase…       36.7%  ▃··▅··●█▃▅▃▅ beats 3/12   very hard · avg 3.7%    1.8%  sharp · at its level
Video2World V2WScore (coding agen…       30.1%  █··●█·▄····▄ beats 2/6    very hard · avg 7.3%    1.2%  at its level
KlinikeBench strict pass@1 (333 i…       18.9%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▁▅▃█●█ beats 18/27  very hard · avg 2.4%    0.9%  typical
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)          73.7%  ▂····▂▁▁▆██● beats 25/31  hard · avg 25%          0.9%  at its level · small run
τ³-bench Banking (maker)                 38.1%  ▂▂·▅█▂▃▃▃▆▂● beats 24/24  very hard · avg 7.9%    0.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
coding · #35 of 469 · 12% of its score Beats [GPT-5.5](gpt-5-5.md), [GPT-5.6 Terra](gpt-5-6-terra.md), [Claude Opus 4.8](claude-opus-4-8.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GLM-5.2](glm-5-2.md), [GLM-5.3-Flash](glm-5-3-flash.md), [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1583.3  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆●▅▁▂ beats 96/129  avg 981                 5.3%  sharp
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   84.6%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 44/49   hard · avg 17%          1.9%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   61.6%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 45/58   very hard · avg 6.0%    1.8%  sharp · at its level · small run
E2E-SWE (build a working codebase…   36.7%  ▃··▅··●█▃▅▃▅ beats 3/12    very hard · avg 3.7%    1.8%  sharp · at its level
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      73.7%  ▂····▂▁▁▆██● beats 25/31   hard · avg 25%          0.9%  at its level · small run
chat & writing · #9 of 402 · 3.0% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md), [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Opus 4.6](claude-opus-4-6.md), [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1495.9  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 377/385  avg 1260      3.0%  blunt
math · #35 of 431 · 45% of its score Trails [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md), [Qwen3.7 Max](qwen3-7-max.md), [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2               22.0%  ▁▂▁▂●▅▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 24/67    very hard · avg 0.1%     13%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            68.4%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█●▄▃ beats 57/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     12%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath June 2026 (48…   67.4%  ▂···▄·█●▆▆▄▂ beats 10/19    very hard · avg 5.1%    6.1%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4…   64.2%  ▁·····▅█●▄·▁ beats 16/20    very hard · avg 7.6%    5.9%  sharp · at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 …   33.6%  ▂▂▆█●▃▂▂▂··▂ beats 11/18    very hard · avg 0.8%    2.4%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MathArena ArXivMath May 2026 (40 …   58.3%  ▁··▁▄●▄▁·▃·▁ beats 10/17    very hard · avg 11%     2.0%  at its level
MathArena ArXivLean June 2026 (46…   19.6%  ▄····▄▄●██·▄ beats 4/9      very hard · avg 0.9%    1.8%  sharp
MathArena ArXivMath August 2026, …   40.4%  ●▄·▄·······█ beats 1/5      very hard · avg 5.9%    1.2%  sharp · at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv August 2026…   27.4%  ▄●·····▄·▄·█ beats 1/5      very hard · avg 6.9%    0.5%  at its level · noisy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             98.9%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 181/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.3%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #6 of 153 · 4.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md), [Gemini 3.7 Flash](gemini-3-7-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   86.2%  ▃·▃·▃▃▃·▃▃█● beats 11/11    medium · avg 38%    2.7%  typical
Arena vision (style controlled)     1291.0  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 143/152  avg 1061            2.0%  blunt
other tests (8)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         47.0%  █··▂▃▇▄█●▄▂▁ beats 64/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    5.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           31.7%  █▆●▆▆▂▆▂▂▂▂▅ beats 9/32     very hard · avg 1.2%    5.2%  sharp · at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                61.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂●▁ beats 135/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    3.0%  sharp · at its level · noisy
GPQA Diamond                         95.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█● beats 209/211  hard · avg 39%          1.7%  sharp
SimpleQA Verified                    69.7%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 75/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.2%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   63.5%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄●█ beats 28/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.1%  at its level
LVBench (maker)                      87.1%  ▇·█▅▅▄▄··▃●▁ beats 27/28    medium · avg 59%        0.9%  typical
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   96.5%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃●▂▂▂ beats 35/49    easy · avg 77%          0.7%  maxed out
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        8   42% ▇▇▇▇▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…        7   20% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     4   18% ▇▇
Google DeepMind Gemini model page and m…        4    6% ▇
Google Cloud developer's guides to Gemi…        3    4% ▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    3% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    3% ▇
E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building …        1    2% ▇
Video2World: Benchmarking Coding Agents…        1    1% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Model…        1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 75.5
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Google Cloud developer's guides to Gemini 3.8 Flash and 3.7 Flash ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Video2World: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Interactive World Modeling from Embodied Videos ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Models Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Google) · $1.50/M blended · $0.75 in / $3.75 out per 1M tokens · [ai.google.dev](https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/google/models/gemini-3.8-flash.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/google/gemini-3.8-flash.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gemini-3-8-flash) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)