[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Gemma 4 26B-A4B # Gemma 4 26B-A4B Google · released 2026-04 · 25.2B params (3.8B active) · apache-2.0 **score 63.5** ±0.5 · #162 of 732 · from 64 benchmark results across 19 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Gemma 4 26B-A4B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█●▅▅▄▄▂▁   #167 of 313     25%     13
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁   #128 of 469     22%     10
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #70 of 402*    3.4%      2
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁    #97 of 431    7.0%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆●█▄    #59 of 153    8.7%      5
web search          ●▁▁▅▄█▃▄·▁·▁    #81 of 84*    0.8%      1
agent tasks · #167 of 313 · 25% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [DeepSeek R1 0528](deepseek-r1-0528.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   35.8%  ▄●·····▄▄▄▄█ beats 1/7    hard · avg 16%          3.6%  sharp · at its level
Terminal-Bench 2.1                   27.3%  ▄······●▄▄█▄ beats 2/7    very hard · avg 7.2%    3.1%  sharp · at its level
Terminal-Bench Hard (maker)          14.0%  ██··█·●·█··█ beats 3/5    very hard · avg 4.7%    3.0%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)     9.6%  ●···▄···▄▄██ beats 0/7    very hard · avg 6.2%    2.7%  sharp · at its level
ContractBench success rate (33 ob…   38.4%  ▆··▆▄▂●▂▆▆█▄ beats 10/23  very hard · avg 13%     2.6%  sharp · at its level
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)             43.0%  ▄····█··●·▄▄ beats 3/5    very hard · avg 13%     2.2%  sharp · at its level · noisy
τ²-bench aggregate (maker)           68.2%  ▄·▄··▄····●▄ beats 3/5    medium · avg 39%        2.2%  at its level · small run · several runs
SWE-bench Multilingual               27.3%  ▄·●·····█▄█▄ beats 1/7    hard · avg 18%          1.8%  at its level
Tau2 – airline (maker)               76.0%  ▃·▃··▃·····● beats 5/5    medium · avg 42%        1.5%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   17.2%  ▁·▁●▂▁▄▄▇█▄▅ beats 3/62   very hard · avg 9.9%    0.8%  small run
SWE-bench Pro public set, Qwen-re…   13.8%  ●·····▂·▂█▃▅ beats 0/12   hard · avg 16%          0.7%  at its level
Tau2 – retail (maker)                85.5%  ▄····▄··▄·▄● beats 4/5    medium · avg 40%        0.5%  noisy
T1-Bench multi-domain conversatio…   37.7%  ▂▂··▂·▂·▂▂█● beats 10/11  hard · avg 25%          0.0%  blunt · at its level · noisy
coding · #128 of 469 · 22% of its score Beats [Qwen3.5 Plus](qwen3-5-plus.md), [Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B)](qwen3-coder-next.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [Solar Pro 4](solar-pro-4.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1358.8  ▁▁▃▂●█▃▆▅▅▁▂ beats 32/129  avg 981                 5.6%  sharp
SWE-bench Verified                   35.8%  ▄●·····▄▄▄▄█ beats 1/7     hard · avg 16%          3.6%  sharp · at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   38.9%  ▁▁▁▁·●▂▃▅▃█▇ beats 7/49    hard · avg 17%          2.9%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)     9.6%  ●···▄···▄▄██ beats 0/7     very hard · avg 6.2%    2.7%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Multilingual               27.3%  ▄·●·····█▄█▄ beats 1/7     hard · avg 18%          1.8%  at its level
SciCode (level unspecified)          30.8%  ▄···▄▄●▄·▄·▄ beats 4/7     very hard · avg 13%     1.4%  at its level
SciCode (maker)                      40.0%  █▄·······▄●▄ beats 4/5     hard · avg 21%          1.3%  at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecif…   77.1%  ▂▃▄▄▅██●▄▇▄▆ beats 43/67   medium · avg 47%        1.3%  small run
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025) (…   77.1%  ▄··▄·▄···▄·● beats 4/5     medium · avg 43%        0.9%  at its level
SWE-bench Pro public set, Qwen-re…   13.8%  ●·····▂·▂█▃▅ beats 0/12    hard · avg 16%          0.7%  at its level
chat & writing · #70 of 402 · 3.4% of its score Beats [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)](deepseek-v4-flash.md), [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
LMArena (text)  1437.6  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 300/385  avg 1260               3.1%  blunt
IFEval (maker)   98.5%  ▄··▄··█···●▄ beats 4/5      very easy · avg 94%    0.3%  maxed out
math · #97 of 431 · 7.0% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B](nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md), [Granite 4.2 30B](granite-4-2-30b.md), [Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct](qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
AIME 2026 (maker)          88.3%  ▄·▄▄····▄··● beats 4/5      medium · avg 51%        2.6%  sharp · small run · several runs
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   82.2%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇●█▃▂▅ beats 118/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.4%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH-Vision (maker)        82.4%  ██·█·····█●█ beats 4/5      medium · avg 53%        2.1%  several runs
vision & documents · #59 of 153 · 8.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Luna](gpt-6-luna.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5](gpt-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
MMMU Pro (maker)                  73.8%  ██·█····█·●█ beats 4/5     medium · avg 48%    2.4%  at its level · several runs
Arena vision (style controlled)  1241.7  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅●▇ beats 96/152  avg 1061            2.1%  blunt
MATH-Vision (maker)               82.4%  ██·█·····█●█ beats 4/5     medium · avg 53%    2.1%  several runs
InfographicVQA (maker)            89.3%  ▄█·······●·▄ beats 4/5     easy · avg 70%      1.1%  typical
OmniDocBench 1.5 ↓ (maker)        14.9%  █·█·····██●█ beats 4/5     avg 31%             1.0%  blunt · several runs
web search · #81 of 84 · 0.8% of its score Beats [GLM-4.5](glm-4-5.md), [Claude Haiku 4.5](claude-haiku-4-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1 nano](gpt-4-1-nano-2025-04-14.md), [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   17.2%  ▁·▁●▂▁▄▄▇█▄▅ beats 3/62   very hard · avg 9.9%    0.8%  small run
other tests (25)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         73.2%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄●▇█▅ beats 111/211  hard · avg 39%           11%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MedXPertQA MM (maker)                58.1%  ▂···▂·▃··▆●█ beats 8/13     very hard · avg 30%     4.2%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MMLU-Pro (maker)                     82.6%  ▄··█···▄··●▄ beats 4/5      medium · avg 60%        2.7%  several runs
MRCR v2 8-needle, 128k (maker)       44.1%  ▄▄·▄···●···▄ beats 4/5      hard · avg 22%          2.6%  at its level · several runs
MMMLU (maker)                        86.3%  ██··█···█·●█ beats 4/5      medium · avg 69%        2.4%  several runs
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…   44.5%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆█● beats 93/97    hard · avg 31%          2.0%  blunt · at its level
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1272.3  ▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃●▄▁▁ beats 40/62    avg 1034                1.9%  typical
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, …   67.3%  ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄▅●▄ beats 53/66    hard · avg 29%          1.8%  at its level
KOPA-Bench (pass@1)                  35.3%  ▄·█··▄··●▄·█ beats 5/8      very hard · avg 14%     1.6%  at its level
CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju…   84.3%  ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅▄●▃ beats 88/95    medium · avg 65%        1.5%  typical
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   90.9%  ▁▁▃▁●▄▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 19/49    easy · avg 77%          1.4%  typical
IFBench (maker)                      72.0%  ▄▄·▄······●█ beats 3/5      medium · avg 40%        1.2%  at its level
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…   70.7%  ▂▄▂▃█▄▃▆▃●▂▂ beats 75/81    medium · avg 57%        1.2%  blunt · at its level
Big Bench Extra Hard micro avg (m…   64.8%  █··▄···▄·●·▄ beats 4/5      hard · avg 28%          1.2%  at its level
NL2Repo                              11.6%  ●▂▂·▃▃▅█▃▂▅▃ beats 0/22     very hard · avg 7.0%    1.1%  typical
QwenClawBench (Qwen internal)        38.7%  ●·▄····▄···█ beats 0/4      hard · avg 23%          1.0%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)          8.7%  ▁▁▁▄●▆▇██▆▁▃ beats 17/111   very hard · avg 3.9%    1.0%  small run
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …   93.4%  ▂·▂▂·▂·▃▃·●▃ beats 12/14    easy · avg 80%          1.0%  typical
EuroEval HellaSwag (English), val…   82.3%  ▂··▂▂·▂▆▆●·▄ beats 13/15    medium · avg 63%        0.9%  typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                 6.0%  █●▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 48/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    0.9%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
BFCL multi-turn (version not stat…   55.4%  ▄▄···▄·▄█●▄▄ beats 6/8      hard · avg 26%          0.8%  at its level
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   63.2%  ▁··▃▁▁▁▅●▅▁▅ beats 14/24    hard · avg 51%          0.7%  blunt · at its level
HLE (maker)                           8.7%  █···●······█ beats 1/2      very hard · avg 4.0%    0.5%  small run
SkillsBench 78-task subset (OpenC…   12.3%  ▄·····●···▄█ beats 1/4      very hard · avg 7.4%    0.5%  typical
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   94.8%  ▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄●▁▁ beats 87/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Gemma Team (submitted / maker-reported)        20   29% ▇▇▇
google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it model …       12   14% ▇▇
Kwaipilot/KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev model card         5   13% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     3   11% ▇
Epoch AI                                        3    8% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    4% ▇
Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model card                 4    3% ▇
ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve …        1    3% ▇
Multi-Step Tool-Calling over Korean Ope…        2    2% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    2% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           2    2% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    2% ▇
google/gemma-4-31B-it model card (submi…        2    2% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             1    2% ▇
SpeakLeash CPTUB                                1    1% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    1% ▇
T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario A…        1    0% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 63.5
Licences: Gemma Team ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it/blob/f7f5b7f5fa82ffc52addd066915886d497f5517b/README.md)) · Kwaipilot/KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev model card ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.txt)) · ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve Observation Contracts? ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Multi-Step Tool-Calling over Korean Open Public APIs: A Benchmark and a Data-Synthesis Recipe ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · google/gemma-4-31B-it model card ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/google--gemma-4-31B-it.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario Agents in Real-World Domains ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (DeepInfra) · $0.14/M blended · $0.07 in / $0.34 out per 1M tokens · [deepinfra.com](https://deepinfra.com/google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it) [price source](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/blob/c19ce71bcdad234ca87a7af10cee45375ce811a8/model_prices_and_context_window.json): USD per 1M text tokens, standard uncached input and output. Product: Serverless text generation. API model: google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it. Settings: service tier=standard, batch=no, cache=uncached input. Additional/excluded charges: Tools, cache storage, priority service and other modalities excluded.. Currency: USD. · [context source](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/blob/c19ce71bcdad234ca87a7af10cee45375ce811a8/model_prices_and_context_window.json): provider maximum input tokens; not an intrinsic model maximum or legacy max\_tokens ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Gemma 4 26B-A4B (Q4_K_M, needs ~16.8 GB, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF/tree/f6e6747823b2912661935db7e0009287c4838073)) ```sh llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~26.9 GB) `llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Gemma 4 26B-A4B (Q4_K_M, needs ~16.8 GB, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF/tree/f6e6747823b2912661935db7e0009287c4838073)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~26.9 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · 4bit (~15.6 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-4bit -y` · 8bit (~28 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Gemma 4 26B-A4B (Q4_K_M, needs ~15.62 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/gemma4/tags)) ```sh ollama run gemma4:26b ``` Other versions: qat (~15.62 GB) `ollama run gemma4:26b-a4b-it-qat` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Gemma 4 26B-A4B (4bit, needs ~15.6 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-4bit/tree/79290e197d238113e50abe4cbd4731b65288f88e)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~28 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MLX-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/google](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it) ## Published speed measurements Reference results for the hardware, engine and settings below. These are not verified speeds of the downloads above or predictions for your machine.
hardware                      precision               speed  engine and settings
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Stri…  UD-Q4_K_M         55.45 tok/s  llama.cpp 0eca4d490 (build_number…
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Stri…  UD-Q4_K_M         54.18 tok/s  llama.cpp 4fc4ec554 (build_number…
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Stri…  Gemma QAT GGUF …   74.8 tok/s  llama.cpp ac4cddeb0 (build_number…
Radeon RX 9070 XT             q4_k_m · layers…  34.85 tok/s  ollama (version not recorded) · l…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 wit…  q4_k_m · layers…   5.15 tok/s  ollama (version not recorded) · l…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 wit…  q4_k_m · layers…   5.18 tok/s  ollama (version not recorded) · l…
Each speed links to its source, which has the full settings. ## Quantization evidence How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent. They don't describe every download of that precision.
precision                       test                                full → quantized    kept
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  AIME 2025 0-shot pass@1, mean of …     0.887 → 0.917  103.3%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  GPQA Diamond 0-shot pass@1 (witho…     0.732 → 0.748  102.1%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  MATH-500 0-shot pass@1 (without t…     0.848 → 0.859  101.3%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  IFEval 0-shot prompt-level strict…     0.944 → 0.951  100.7%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  MATH-500 0-shot pass@1 (with thin…     0.859 → 0.859  100.1%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  AIME 2025 0-shot pass@1, mean of …         0.8 → 0.8  100.0%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  MMLU-Pro 0-shot custom-extract (w…     0.852 → 0.851   99.9%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  MMLU-Pro 0-shot custom-extract (w…     0.835 → 0.833   99.7%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  IFEval 0-shot prompt-level strict…       0.9 → 0.893   99.3%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  LiveCodeBench v6 0-shot pass@1 (w…     0.745 → 0.739   99.2%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  GPQA Diamond 0-shot pass@1 (with …     0.808 → 0.801   99.2%
FP8 dynamic (data-free; FP8 w…  LiveCodeBench v6 0-shot pass@1 (w…      0.779 → 0.76   97.6%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  MATH-500 0-shot pass@1 (without t…     0.848 → 0.876  103.3%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  IFEval 0-shot prompt-level strict…     0.944 → 0.942   99.7%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  MATH-500 0-shot pass@1 (with thin…     0.859 → 0.851   99.1%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  GPQA Diamond 0-shot pass@1 (witho…     0.732 → 0.724   98.9%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  MMLU-Pro 0-shot custom-extract (w…     0.835 → 0.817   97.8%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  MMLU-Pro 0-shot custom-extract (w…     0.852 → 0.833   97.8%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  IFEval 0-shot prompt-level strict…       0.9 → 0.872   97.0%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  GPQA Diamond 0-shot pass@1 (with …     0.808 → 0.776   96.0%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  LiveCodeBench v6 0-shot pass@1 (w…     0.779 → 0.728   93.4%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  LiveCodeBench v6 0-shot pass@1 (w…     0.745 → 0.682   91.6%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  AIME 2025 0-shot pass@1, mean of …     0.887 → 0.813   91.5%
NVFP4 (FP4 weights/activation…  AIME 2025 0-shot pass@1, mean of …       0.8 → 0.662   82.8%
Each kept value links to its source. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gemma-4-26b-a4b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)