[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Gemma 7B (base) # Gemma 7B (base) Google · released 2024-02 · 8.54B params · gemma **score 37.1** ±0.5 · #607 of 732 · from 37 benchmark results across 9 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Gemma 7B (base) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task    vs the others         rank  counts  tests
coding  ▁▁▁●▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁   #425 of 469     70%      7
math    ▁▁▃▅█●▄█▄▂▁▁   #227 of 431    5.6%      2
coding · #425 of 469 · 70% of its score Beats [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-7b.md), [Qwen3.5 2B](qwen3-5-2b.md), [DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B](deepseek-r1-distill-llama-8b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.2 1B Instruct](llama-3-2-1b.md), [SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct](smollm2-1-7b.md), [Granite 3B Code Base (2K)](granite-3b-code-base-2k.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
HumanEval                            35.4%  ▁·▁▁▃●▆▅█▃▁▁ beats 20/99  easy · avg 76%       39%  sharp · at its level · several runs
HumanEval+                           28.7%  ▁·▁▁▁▃●▄▄█▃▁ beats 17/99  easy · avg 70%       16%  sharp · at its level
HumanEvalSynthesize (HumanEvalPac…   34.4%  ▁·▂▁▂▆●█▄▄▁▂ beats 12/35  medium · avg 62%    4.5%  at its level
MBPP+                                43.4%  ▁···▁▁●▅▇█▆▂ beats 9/75   easy · avg 66%      3.4%  at its level
MBPP (maker)                         44.4%  ▁▁▁▄●█▆▅▄▁▂▁ beats 25/86  easy · avg 71%      2.8%  at its level · several runs
HumanEvalExplain (HumanEvalPack, …   15.0%  ▄▇●▃▄▇▄▁▇▃·▁ beats 9/35   medium · avg 46%    2.4%  typical
HumanEvalFix (HumanEvalPack, 6-la…    7.4%  ▁·▁▁●██▄█▁▅▅ beats 3/35   medium · avg 51%    2.0%  sharp
math · #227 of 431 · 5.6% of its score Beats [MiniMax-M2.1](minimax-m2-1.md), [DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)](deepseek-v3.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
GSM8K   53.3%  ▄··▄···▄··●▄ beats 4/5    easy · avg 78%      3.5%  sharp · at its level · small run · seve…
MATH    24.1%  ▃·▃····▃···● beats 5/5    medium · avg 49%    2.1%  small run · several runs
other tests (22)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
EvoEval (overall)                    23.0%  ▂▂▃●▄█▁▄▅▃▁▃ beats 7/42     medium · avg 52%       6.2%  typical
CommonsenseQA (maker)                71.3%  █·····▂▂▃▂●▄ beats 31/38    very easy · avg 94%    2.2%  sharp · at its level · small run
MedQA (USMLE, 4 options)             48.7%  ▁▁··▄▁▁··▄●█ beats 10/17    medium · avg 71%       2.1%  sharp · at its level
BIG-Bench Hard (maker)               55.1%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅●█▃▃▁ beats 76/155   easy · avg 79%         1.9%  sharp · at its level · small run
ARC Challenge (maker)                53.2%  ▄▁▁▂▁▄█●▃▂▃▂ beats 95/140   easy · avg 78%         1.6%  sharp · at its level · small run
MMLU (maker)                         64.3%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅●█▆▄ beats 102/214  easy · avg 81%         1.2%  at its level · small run
MedMCQA                              49.3%  ▂▂··▄▄▂▂·▄●█ beats 12/17    medium · avg 63%       1.0%  at its level
OpenBookQA (maker)                   52.8%  ▅▁▁▁▂▂▃●▃▁▃▁ beats 78/107   medium · avg 68%       1.0%  at its level · small run
WinoGrande (maker)                   72.3%  ▁▁▁▁▂▁▁▅▇●▃▁ beats 102/131  easy · avg 84%         0.8%  at its level · small run
Natural Questions (closed book) (…   23.0%  ▂▁▁▁▂▄▄▃▅●▅▁ beats 48/68    medium · avg 40%       0.8%  small run
AGIEval English (Gemma report) (m…   41.7%  ▄··········● beats 2/2      medium · avg 62%       0.7%  at its level · small run
TriviaQA (maker)                     63.4%  ▁▁▂▂▄▄▃▆▅●▅▂ beats 54/80    easy · avg 81%         0.7%  at its level · small run
HellaSwag (maker)                    81.2%  ▁▁▁▂▂▂▄▆█▇●▂ beats 117/135  easy · avg 89%         0.6%  at its level · small run
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   64.2%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 109/276  medium · avg 72%       0.6%  at its level · noisy
BoolQ (maker)                        83.2%  ▁····▁▂█▆▅●▄ beats 84/103   easy · avg 89%         0.6%  at its level · small run
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …   84.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄●▄▃ beats 98/146   easy · avg 82%         0.5%  at its level · noisy
EuroEval HellaSwag (English), tes…   33.5%  ▃·▁▁●▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 17/100   medium · avg 67%       0.4%  sharp · noisy
Social IQA (maker)                   51.8%  ▁·▁██▄●▁▂▃▇▁ beats 38/59    medium · avg 63%       0.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
ARC Easy (maker)                     81.5%  ▁▃▂▄▆█▅●▁··▁ beats 93/100   easy · avg 87%         0.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
PIQA (maker)                         81.2%  ▁▁▁▂▂▃▅█●▃▁▁ beats 101/123  easy · avg 86%         0.2%  blunt · at its level · small run
PubMedQA                             75.6%  ▂·▂▆·▄▂▄▄▂●▂ beats 16/17    medium · avg 75%       0.1%  blunt · at its level
TruthfulQA MC2                       44.9%  ▅▃█●▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 19/31    medium · avg 57%       0.1%  blunt · at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio…        3   41% ▇▇▇▇▇
Gemma report (submitted / maker-reporte…       18   20% ▇▇
Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Pr…        2   18% ▇▇
Granite Code Models: A Family of Open F…        5   11% ▇
CodeGemma: Open Code Models Based on Ge…        2    5% ▇
Open Medical-LLM Leaderboard results            3    3% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           2    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
Hallucinations Leaderboard results              1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 37.1
Licences: EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Gemma report ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Proficiency ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2403.19114v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligence ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2405.04324v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · CodeGemma: Open Code Models Based on Gemma ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2406.11409v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Open Medical-LLM Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Hallucinations Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Gemma 7B (base) (Q4_K_M, needs ~5.3 GB, from [huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi](https://huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF/tree/84a72b826b704384e4684ccd0eaa747123e2c004)) ```sh llama cli -hf MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~9.1 GB) `llama cli -hf MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Gemma 7B (base) (Q4_K_M, needs ~5.3 GB, from [huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi](https://huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF/tree/84a72b826b704384e4684ccd0eaa747123e2c004)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~9.1 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/MaziyarPanahi/gemma-7b-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Gemma 7B (base) (Q4_K_M, needs ~5.5 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/gemma/tags)) ```sh ollama run gemma:7b-text-q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~9.1 GB) `ollama run gemma:7b-text-q8_0` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/google](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gemma-7b-base) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)