[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GLM-5.1 # GLM-5.1 Z.ai · released 2026-04 · 744B params (40B active) · mit **score 69.5** ±0.4 · #82 of 732 · from 81 benchmark results across 17 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GLM-5.1 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅●▄▂▁    #63 of 313     26%     19
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅●▃▁    #58 of 469     18%      9
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #41 of 402*    2.5%      2
math            ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁    #76 of 431     32%     16
web search      ▁▁▁▅●█▃▄·▁·▁     #52 of 84    5.0%      5
agent tasks · #63 of 313 · 26% of its score Beats [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md), [Gemini 3.6 Flash](gemini-3-6-flash.md), [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   74.2%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄●▄▁ beats 16/29  hard · avg 19%          7.8%  sharp · at its level · several runs
Terminal-Bench 2.1                   59.3%  █··▄█·●····▄ beats 5/6    very hard · avg 13%     2.5%  sharp · at its level · several runs
SWE-bench Multilingual               74.8%  ▄··▄▄···●▄·█ beats 3/6    hard · avg 30%          1.8%  at its level
MCP-Atlas (public set) (maker)       71.8%  █··●·██·████ beats 1/7    hard · avg 30%          1.7%  at its level · several runs
Humanity's Last Exam with tools      50.4%  ▄····▄·█·●·▄ beats 4/5    hard · avg 15%          1.5%  at its level · several runs
BrowseComp                           59.4%  ▄·▄▄···▄··●▄ beats 5/6    hard · avg 18%          1.4%  at its level · several runs
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   58.4%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 41/58  very hard · avg 9.6%    1.2%  sharp · at its level · small run
τ³-bench                             69.7%  ▄····●·█·▄·█ beats 1/6    medium · avg 42%        1.1%  at its level · several runs
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web…   30.7%  ▃····█··▃●·▃ beats 6/8    very hard · avg 3.6%    1.1%  typical
Toolathlon (Tool Decathlon) (make…   40.7%  ▂▂▄▂▄▄●▂█▆██ beats 11/27  very hard · avg 13%     1.0%  at its level · small run · several runs
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (maker)           63.5%  ▂▂▅▅████●▂▃▃ beats 28/36  hard · avg 15%          0.9%  at its level · small run
Thinkingbox-bench pass@1 (507 sta…   33.2%  ▅··▃·▃·●▃▅██ beats 6/15   very hard · avg 5.1%    0.8%  sharp · at its level
EEGAgentBench overall (tool-based…   46.7%  ▂·▁▁··▇●█▂·▁ beats 14/25  hard · avg 28%          0.6%  blunt · at its level
Legal Research Bench (agentic, al…   27.6%  ▄█··▄▄▄●█·▄█ beats 6/12   very hard · avg 6.3%    0.6%  typical
τ³-bench telecom (tau2-bench ≥ v1…   96.9%  ▄·▄···▄·●·█▄ beats 3/6    easy · avg 79%          0.4%  maxed out
BrowseComp with context managemen…   79.3%  ▄·▄▂·█●·▆▄·▂ beats 9/15   medium · avg 46%        0.4%  small run
KlinikeBench strict pass@1 (333 i…    4.8%  ▁▁·▁▁▁●▅▃█▅█ beats 5/27   very hard · avg 2.4%    0.4%  typical
TerminalWorld-Verified (200 tasks…   57.0%  ▄··▄·▄·●···▄ beats 3/5    hard · avg 28%          0.4%  blunt · at its level
SWE-bench Pro (maker)                58.4%  ▄▂▂▂▄▂▆●·▂·▂ beats 11/16  hard · avg 32%          0.3%  blunt · at its level · small run
coding · #58 of 469 · 18% of its score Beats [GPT-5.4](gpt-5-4.md), [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   74.2%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄●▄▁ beats 16/29   hard · avg 19%          7.8%  sharp · at its level · several runs
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1507.9  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃●▅▅▁▂ beats 73/129  avg 981                 3.5%  sharp
SWE-bench Multilingual               74.8%  ▄··▄▄···●▄·█ beats 3/6     hard · avg 30%          1.8%  at its level
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   58.4%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█●▂▁ beats 41/58   very hard · avg 9.6%    1.2%  sharp · at its level · small run
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecif…   85.7%  ██···●··████ beats 2/6     medium · avg 46%        1.1%  typical
SciCode subproblems                  47.7%  ▃····▃··●·▃▃ beats 2/6     hard · avg 19%          1.0%  at its level
SciCode (level unspecified)          43.8%  ▄·····▄█●▄·▄ beats 4/6     hard · avg 16%          1.0%  at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025)      86.4%  ▄··█····▄▄·● beats 5/6     medium · avg 47%        0.8%  typical
SWE-bench Pro (maker)                58.4%  ▄▂▂▂▄▂▆●·▂·▂ beats 11/16   hard · avg 32%          0.3%  blunt · at its level · small run
chat & writing · #41 of 402 · 2.5% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Sol](gpt-6-sol.md), [MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B)](mimo-v2-6-flash.md), [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B)](mimo-v2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                              result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
LMArena (text)                    1465.4  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 340/385  avg 1260          2.0%  blunt
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)   93.9%  ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆██▅●▁ beats 138/145  easy · avg 80%    0.5%  maxed out
math · #76 of 431 · 32% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md), [Qwen3.7 Plus](qwen3-7-plus.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.2 30B](granite-4-2-30b.md), [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507](qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            36.8%  ▂··▁▁▃▄●█▆▄▃ beats 27/86    very hard · avg 1.2%    9.3%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath April 2026 (4…   36.3%  ▁·····●██▄·▁ beats 4/20     very hard · avg 7.6%    4.1%  sharp · at its level
AIME 2026                            95.4%  ▄·▄·▄▄··●··▄ beats 5/6      medium · avg 63%        2.7%  sharp · maxed out · small run · several…
MathArena ArXivMath February 2026…   39.1%  ▁▁▁▁█●▄▃▁▃·▃ beats 11/24    very hard · avg 9.4%    2.3%  at its level
HMMT February 2026 (maker)           82.6%  ▃▃▂▅·███●▅▃▅ beats 23/35    hard · avg 30%          2.2%  sharp · small run · several runs
MathArena ArXivMath March 2026 (3…   49.2%  █●▅·█▃▃·▅·▃▃ beats 3/14     hard · avg 16%          1.9%  at its level
IMO-AnswerBench                      86.8%  ▄····▄·●▄·█▄ beats 2/6      medium · avg 40%        1.8%  small run · several runs
MathArena ArXivMath January 2026 …   65.2%  ▂··▄▂▄█▆▆●▄█ beats 16/23    hard · avg 23%          1.6%  at its level
MathArena ArXivMath May 2026 (40 …   52.5%  ▁··▁▄●▄▁·▃·▁ beats 6/17     very hard · avg 11%     1.5%  at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv April 2026 …    8.2%  ▂●▆█▃▃▂▂▂··▂ beats 1/18     very hard · avg 0.8%    1.0%  sharp · noisy
MathArena BrokenArXiv May 2026 (5…   10.0%  ●█·▄▄▄····▄▄ beats 1/8      very hard · avg 1.9%    0.7%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             93.3%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇●▃▂▅ beats 156/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.7%  sharp · noisy
MathArena BrokenArXiv March 2026 …    6.5%  ●·▆█▂·▂▂···▂ beats 2/14     very hard · avg 1.0%    0.6%  sharp · noisy
MathArena BrokenArXiv February 20…    9.3%  ▃▂▂●█▃▂·▃··▂ beats 4/16     very hard · avg 0.9%    0.6%  sharp · noisy
HMMT November 2025 (maker)           94.0%  ▁▁····▁▅▃█●▁ beats 20/23    easy · avg 73%          0.5%  maxed out · small run
MathArena ArXivLean March 2026 (4…    2.4%  ▂····●·····█ beats 1/5      very hard · avg 1.2%    0.5%  too hard for it
web search · #52 of 84 · 5.0% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md), [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md), [Kimi K2.6](kimi-k2-6.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B)](llama-4-scout.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools      50.4%  ▄····▄·█·●·▄ beats 4/5    hard · avg 15%          1.5%  at its level · several runs
BrowseComp                           59.4%  ▄·▄▄···▄··●▄ beats 5/6    hard · avg 18%          1.4%  at its level · several runs
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web…   30.7%  ▃····█··▃●·▃ beats 6/8    very hard · avg 3.6%    1.1%  typical
Legal Research Bench (agentic, al…   27.6%  ▄█··▄▄▄●█·▄█ beats 6/12   very hard · avg 6.3%    0.6%  typical
BrowseComp with context managemen…   79.3%  ▄·▄▂·█●·▆▄·▂ beats 9/15   medium · avg 46%        0.4%  small run
other tests (18)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         89.9%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇●▅ beats 174/211  hard · avg 44%          8.6%  sharp · several runs
Humanity's Last Exam                 27.2%  ▄··●▄··▄·▄·▄ beats 2/6      very hard · avg 5.7%    5.2%  at its level · several runs
GPQA (subset unspecified)            86.1%  ●█▄▄·▄·····▄ beats 0/6      hard · avg 47%          3.0%  sharp
MMLU-Pro                             85.9%  ▄·····●▄▄·▄█ beats 1/6      medium · avg 53%        2.6%  several runs
Global-MMLU-Lite                     90.3%  ▃······▅··●▃ beats 3/6      medium · avg 61%        1.5%  typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                19.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂●▃▃▂▁▁ beats 75/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    1.2%  sharp · noisy
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1309.6  ▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃●▄▁▁ beats 51/62    avg 1034                1.2%  typical
NL2Repo (maker)                      42.7%  ▂▂▂·▃▃▅●▃▂▅▃ beats 12/22    very hard · avg 12%     1.2%  at its level · small run · several runs
AgentWorldBench (open-ended, over…   51.3%  ▄▄··▄●·▄█▄██ beats 3/11     hard · avg 26%          1.0%  blunt · at its level
WildClawBench                        48.2%  ▃·▅▅█·▅█●▃▃▃ beats 13/17    very hard · avg 11%     1.0%  at its level
IFBench (aggregation unspecified)    76.3%  ▃······█●▃·▃ beats 4/6      medium · avg 45%        0.9%  typical
MMLU-ProX                            85.8%  ▄·····▄·▄▄●▄ beats 5/6      medium · avg 58%        0.9%  typical
IFBench prompt-level (loose)         76.6%  ▄▄·●··▄▄···█ beats 2/6      medium · avg 47%        0.8%  typical
MultiChallenge                       63.0%  ▁··········● beats 1/6      hard · avg 28%          0.7%  at its level
SimpleQA Verified                    34.0%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃●▆█▄▂▅ beats 27/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    0.7%  at its level
CritPt                                3.7%  ▄····▄●···█▄ beats 3/6      very hard · avg 1.1%    0.7%  too hard for it · noisy · several runs
Legal Research Bench (single-shot…    3.1%  ▃▃●▃·▅···█▃▃ beats 4/12     very hard · avg 0.8%    0.6%  too hard for it
CyberGym (maker)                     68.7%  ▄···▄··●█▄█▄ beats 2/8      hard · avg 28%          0.3%  at its level · small run
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
NVIDIA                                         17   22% ▇▇▇
Epoch AI                                        6   18% ▇▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…       10   15% ▇▇
zai-org/GLM-5.1 model card (submitted /…       13   10% ▇
A.X K2 Technical Report                         7   10% ▇
zai-org/GLM-5.2 model card (submitted /…       13   10% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    5% ▇
LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B mode…        3    3% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    1% ▇
Legal Research Bench                            2    1% ▇
K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benc…        1    1% ▇
Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B model card         1    1% ▇
WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-Wor…        1    1% ▇
One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinking…        1    1% ▇
EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents …        1    1% ▇
KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Model…        1    0% ▇
TerminalWorld: Benchmarking Agents on R…        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 69.5
Licences: NVIDIA ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2606.15007v1.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · zai-org/GLM-5.1 model card ([mit](../../licenses/zai-org--GLM-5.1.txt)) · A.X K2 Technical Report ([CC BY 4.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · zai-org/GLM-5.2 model card ([mit](../../licenses/zai-org--GLM-5.2.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B/blob/fec0c8dd25fdd20ffd09869d5af5277966d5523d/LICENSE)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · Legal Research Bench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benchmark Grounded in Korean Contexts ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B/blob/60d2b0434a53d2e62a7c00a489586815d94ebffb/README.md)) · WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinkingbox ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Short- and Long-Horizon EEG Analysis ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Models Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · TerminalWorld: Benchmarking Agents on Real-World Terminal Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2605.22535v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Z.AI) · $2.15/M blended · $1.4 in / $4.4 out per 1M tokens · [docs.z.ai](https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/zai/models/glm-5.1.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/zhipuai/glm-5.1.toml) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run GLM-5.1 (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~446.9 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~223.7 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL` · ud-iq1_m (~112.1 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF:UD-IQ1_M` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run GLM-5.1 (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~446.9 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~223.7 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y` · ud-iq1_m (~112.1 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-5.1-GGUF@UD-IQ1_M -y` · 4bit (~418.6 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/catalystsec/GLM-5.1-4bit -y` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run GLM-5.1 (4bit, needs ~418.6 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/catalystsec](https://huggingface.co/catalystsec/GLM-5.1-4bit/tree/486f24ddc83059f6cac2fe0a6ceabca5af76ad20)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model catalystsec/GLM-5.1-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model catalystsec/GLM-5.1-4bit ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/zai-org](https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-5.1) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/glm-5-1) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)