[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125) # GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125) OpenAI · released 2024-01 · proprietary **score 47.8** ±0.5 · #411 of 732 · from 35 benchmark results across 17 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃●█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #256 of 313*    0.5%      1
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇●▇▅▄▃▁    #277 of 469     21%      3
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆●▆█▆▇▇▃    #299 of 402     12%      5
math            ▁▁▃●█▆▄█▄▂▁▁    #373 of 431     13%      7
agent tasks · #256 of 313 · 0.5% of its score Beats [DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B](deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b.md), [Sky-T1 32B Preview](sky-t1-32b-preview.md), [Magistral Small 1.0 (2506)](magistral-small-2506.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.0 1B](granite-4-0-1b.md), [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct](qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test     result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
BFCL v3   52.5%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 47/114  medium · avg 51%    0.5%  blunt · at its level
coding · #277 of 469 · 21% of its score Beats [Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct](qwen3-vl-32b-instruct.md), [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md), [GLM-4.7-Flash](glm-4-7-flash.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat](deepseek-llm-67b-chat.md), [Mistral NeMo Instruct (2407)](mistral-nemo-instruct-2407.md), [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
HumanEval                            76.8%  ▁█▄▅▇█·▄▇▅●▄ beats 38/42  easy · avg 75%       10%  sharp · at its level
CRUXEval (ZeroEval, 800 problems)    54.8%  ▁▂▆▃●█▆▃▂·▁▁ beats 15/47  medium · avg 57%    6.9%  sharp · at its level
Aider code editing (133 Exercism …   50.4%  ▁·▁▂▄▁●▄█▆▂▂ beats 15/62  medium · avg 51%    4.7%  sharp · at its level
chat & writing · #299 of 402 · 12% of its score Beats [Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-14b-reasoning.md), [Gemma 4 E4B](gemma-4-e4b.md), [OpenThinker3 7B](openthinker3-7b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct](exaone-3-5-2-4b.md), [LFM2 700M](lfm2-700m.md), [Flan-T5 XXL](flan-t5-xxl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judg…   23.3%  ▂▁▁▅●▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 20/60   medium · avg 47%    5.7%  sharp · at its level
LMArena (text)                      1225.6  ▁▁▁▂▃●▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 80/385  avg 1260            2.5%  blunt
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-…  1147.0  ▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆●▄▂▂ beats 64/95   avg 1187            2.3%  typical
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled       38.7%  ▃▃·▁▁█●▅·▁·▁ beats 13/22   medium · avg 39%    1.5%  sharp · at its level
IFEval prompt-level loose            66.9%  ▁▃▁▃●▄▁▁█▃▃▁ beats 6/22    easy · avg 78%      0.5%  typical
math · #373 of 431 · 13% of its score Trails [OPT-1.3B](opt-1-3b.md), [OPT-2.7B](opt-2-7b.md), [Gemma 2B (base)](gemma-2b-base.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
GSM8K (ZeroEval, zero-shot)          80.4%  ▁▄·▁▄●▅▅▅███ beats 12/43   very easy · avg 87%     3.7%  sharp
MATH level 5                         11.6%  ▂▂●▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 8/92    hard · avg 28%          3.5%  sharp
MATH Level 5 (ZeroEval, 721 probl…   13.7%  ▁▁●▆█▂▇▇▄··▂ beats 2/38    hard · avg 30%          2.4%  sharp
GSM8K                                74.3%  ▂▃··▃●▅█▆▃▂▃ beats 5/22    very easy · avg 88%     1.6%  sharp
MATH (subset unspecified)            41.2%  ▃▃●▂▂▆·····▁ beats 10/22   medium · avg 58%        0.9%  at its level
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2             0.0%  ●··▁▁▃▄▄█▆▄▃ beats 1/86    very hard · avg 1.2%    0.4%  sharp · too hard for it
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025              2.2%  ▃●▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 17/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.3%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
other tests (19)
test                                          result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
MMLU-Redux (ZeroEval, 2,778 quest…             68.4%  ▁·▁▁▄●▄▅█▄▂▁ beats 13/53    easy · avg 75%           11%  at its level
LiveBench 2024-07-26                           34.5%  ▁▁▁▂▂▃▂█●▃▅▃ beats 37/61    medium · avg 38%        9.4%  at its level
EvoEval (overall)                              53.1%  ▂▂▃▄▄█▁▄▅●▁▃ beats 37/42    medium · avg 52%        7.0%  at its level
MMLU                                           70.2%  ▁▂·▁·▁▁●·▃▃▅ beats 10/22    easy · avg 75%          3.8%  at its level
BIG-Bench Hard                                 66.6%  ▁▄·▁▁·●█·▄▄▁ beats 9/22     medium · avg 72%        3.4%  sharp · at its level
BigCodeBench (Instruct)                        38.2%  ▃▂·▆▆██●▅▃▃▃ beats 22/33    medium · avg 39%        2.8%  at its level
BigCodeBench (Complete)                        50.6%  ▂▁▁▄▂▅▇█▆●▂▂ beats 51/58    medium · avg 48%        2.7%  at its level
WildBench v2 WB-Score (task macro)  30.0160 WB-Score  ▁·▁▁·▃●▄▇▆▅▆ beats 14/52    avg 43.019 WB-Score     2.6%  sharp
ZebraLogic (ZeroEval, 1,000 puzzl…             10.1%  ▁▁▃●██▁▁·▁▁▁ beats 10/57    hard · avg 15%          2.4%  sharp
GPQA Diamond                                   27.2%  ▁▁●▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 10/211   hard · avg 39%          2.0%  sharp
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…             35.3%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄●█▃ beats 47/97    hard · avg 31%          1.3%  blunt · at its level
HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception…             49.1%  ▁▁▁▁·▂·●▆█▇▁ beats 6/31     medium · avg 46%        1.3%  at its level
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…             50.7%  ▂▄▂▃●▄▃▆▃▅▂▂ beats 35/81    medium · avg 57%        1.2%  blunt · at its level
PopQA                                          45.0%  ▁▁▁▃▃▃▁█▁▃·● beats 19/21    hard · avg 31%          0.7%  at its level
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…             72.2%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 193/276  medium · avg 72%        0.6%  at its level · noisy
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…             12.9%  ▁▁●▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄█ beats 2/38     very hard · avg 14%     0.4%  typical
TruthfulQA MC2                                 62.9%  ▃▃▂·▃▃·●█▂▅▂ beats 10/21    medium · avg 60%        0.1%  blunt · at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                           0.0%  ●▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 14/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    0.1%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)                    3.0%  ●··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 3/77     very hard · avg 9.4%    0.0%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
WildEval ZeroEval published results             5   27% ▇▇▇
Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Pr…        2   17% ▇▇
2 OLMo 2 Furious                                8   12% ▇
LiveBench model judgments                       1    9% ▇
Epoch AI                                        6    6% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard                1    6% ▇
BigCodeBench paper                              2    6% ▇
Aider code editing benchmark runs               1    5% ▇
WildBench v2 leaderboard data                   1    3% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1    2% ▇
Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-A…        1    2% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    1% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             1    1% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 47.8
Licences: WildEval ZeroEval published results ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/zeroeval-published-results-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Proficiency ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2403.19114v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · 2 OLMo 2 Furious ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2501.00656v3-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · LiveBench model judgments ([Apache-2.0 (stated in the LiveBench datasheet)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-v0-1-Apache-2.0.txt)) · BigCodeBench paper ([CC BY 4.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Aider code editing benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · WildBench v2 leaderboard data ([Apache-2.0](https://github.com/allenai/WildBench/blob/d6b8dcaf377d173d031980f97c16e1a82618c03d/LICENSE)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $0.75/M blended · $0.5 in / $1.5 out per 1M tokens · [developers.openai.com](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-3.5-turbo) [price source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-3.5-turbo): USD per 1M tokens, OpenAI API standard processing, model page 'gpt-3.5-turbo' whose default snapshot is gpt-3.5-turbo-0125: input $0.5, output $1.5; cached-input, Batch and other tiers excluded. Currency: USD. OpenAI official model page, observed 2026-09-28. · [context source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-3.5-turbo): OpenAI model page for gpt-3.5-turbo (default snapshot gpt-3.5-turbo-0125): 16,385 context window. Observed 2026-09-28. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-3-5-turbo-0125) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)