[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-3 davinci (API base model) # GPT-3 davinci (API base model) OpenAI · released 2020-06 · proprietary **score 31.5** ±0.7 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 54 benchmark results across 19 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-3 davinci (API base model) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task  vs the others         rank  counts  tests
math  ▁▁●▆██▅█▃▁▁▁   #488 of 530    6.6%      2
math · #488 of 530 · 6.6% of its score Beats [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md), [Molmo 7B-D (0924)](molmo-7b-d.md), [Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3](mistral-7b-instruct-v0-3.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-Neo 125M](gpt-neo-125m.md), [OPT-125M](opt-125m.md), [GPT-2 XL (1.5B)](gpt-2-xl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
GSM8K    0.0%  ▂▂▂▂●▄▅▇██▆▄ beats 34/206  medium · avg 62%    4.4%  sharp · small run · several runs
MGSM     5.7%  ▆·▂·▄●▂▂▂█▄▆ beats 6/18    medium · avg 48%    2.2%  sharp · too hard for it
other tests (36)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
ARC Challenge                        43.5%  ▄····▄···█▄● beats 5/5     easy · avg 78%          14%  sharp · several runs
WinoGrande                           72.0%  ▄·▄·▄▄▄··█·● beats 7/7     easy · avg 87%          10%  at its level · several runs
HellaSwag                            78.0%  ▄·█·█··▄▄··● beats 7/7     easy · avg 83%         8.2%  at its level · several runs
CommonsenseQA                        58.2%  █·····▂▂▃●▄▄ beats 26/38   very easy · avg 93%    8.0%  sharp · at its level · small run · seve…
MMLU                                 39.7%  ▁···▁··●▁▅▅█ beats 3/18    easy · avg 74%         7.2%  several runs
OpenBookQA                           33.6%  ▅·······█··● beats 5/5     hard · avg 49%         4.8%  several runs
DMath (English) few-shot CoT accu…   17.1%  █·●······▄·▄ beats 2/4     medium · avg 64%       2.9%  typical
TriviaQA                             40.9%  █···█·███··● beats 5/5     easy · avg 68%         2.8%  at its level
BIG-Bench Hard                       33.6%  ▂▂▂●·▅·▃▂█▃▃ beats 3/18    medium · avg 60%       2.5%  sharp
ARC Easy                             76.2%  ▄···▄··█·▄·● beats 5/5     easy · avg 87%         2.4%  blunt · at its level · several runs
LogiQA (harness)                     22.7%  ······●····· beats 0/5     very hard · avg 25%    2.4%  too hard for it
Integer-sequence completion, unam…   20.2%  ●········▄·█ beats 0/3     easy · avg 73%         2.2%  at its level
BoolQ                                62.0%  ▁····▁▂●▆▅▆▄ beats 24/103  medium · avg 78%       2.1%  at its level
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-wo…   75.0%  █·▄··█··█··● beats 7/7     very easy · avg 88%    2.1%  blunt · several runs
ANLI Round 1 (prompted)              36.3%  █··▂·······● beats 5/5     hard · avg 46%         2.1%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
TyDiQA-GoldP (1-shot, EM, 8-langu…   21.6%  ▂··▂·▂▄●·███ beats 5/18    medium · avg 61%       1.9%  typical
PIQA                                 80.0%  █··▃··▃▃·▃·● beats 7/7     easy · avg 88%         1.7%  blunt · at its level · several runs
COPA                                 80.0%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅●▆▂▁▁ beats 30/67   easy · avg 92%         1.6%  at its level
Integer-sequence explanation as P…    6.0%  ●······█··██ beats 0/3     medium · avg 47%       1.2%  typical
Natural Questions (closed book)       0.0%  ●▁▁▁▂▄▄▃▅█▅▁ beats 0/68    very hard · avg 13%    1.2%  too hard for it
ANLI Round 3 (prompted)              36.9%  ▃······▃█··● beats 5/5     hard · avg 43%         1.1%  too hard for it
CSK-PN boolean commonsense QA (10…   70.8%  ▃·●·····▃▃▃█ beats 1/7     easy · avg 87%         1.1%  blunt · at its level
ANLI Round 2 (prompted)              37.5%  ██·███·····● beats 5/5     very hard · avg 43%    1.0%  too hard for it · noisy
Super-NaturalInstructions English…   45.0%  █····●··█··█ beats 1/3     easy · avg 71%         1.0%  at its level
API-Bank evaluation system, zero-…    0.6%  ●······█··▄▄ beats 0/4     medium · avg 50%       1.0%  typical
HaluEval knowledge-grounded dialo…   50.0%  ●·········▄▄ beats 1/3     medium · avg 68%       1.0%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
SciQ                                 94.9%  ██····███··● beats 5/5     very easy · avg 98%    1.0%  blunt · maxed out
PROST (harness, micro accuracy)      26.7%  ▃······●···▅ beats 1/5     very hard · avg 35%    0.8%  blunt · too hard for it
QA4MRE 2013 (harness)                42.6%  ▄····▄█▄···● beats 5/5     medium · avg 57%       0.8%  blunt · at its level
SelfAware unanswerable-question d…   45.7%  ●▄▄▄·······▄ beats 0/5     medium · avg 63%       0.8%  blunt · at its level
Super-NaturalInstructions English…    6.8%  ●·▄······▄▄█ beats 0/5     medium · avg 63%       0.6%  at its level · noisy · small run
HEAD-QA (English, harness)           35.6%  █··█····█··● beats 3/3     medium · avg 58%       0.6%  blunt · at its level
SuperGLUE WSC (prompted)             54.8%  █··········● beats 4/5     hard · avg 62%         0.6%  blunt
LMentry accuracy (zero-shot)         38.0%  ▂▆·●▄█▂·▂··▂ beats 5/14    medium · avg 65%       0.3%  blunt · at its level
HaluEval QA hallucination recogni…   49.2%  ●··········▃ beats 2/3     very hard · avg 56%    0.2%  too hard for it · noisy
HaluEval summarization hallucinat…   51.2%  █··········● beats 3/3     very hard · avg 50%    0.0%  blunt · too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregres…       17   33% ▇▇▇▇
UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for …        8   18% ▇▇
Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language …        4   12% ▇
EleutherAI GPT-J-6B model card                  4    7% ▇
Making Language Models Better Reasoners…        2    6% ▇
GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained…        1    4% ▇
Self-Consistency of Large Language Mode…        2    3% ▇
Increasing Probability Mass on Answer C…        2    3% ▇
It Ain't Over: A Multi-aspect Diverse M…        1    3% ▇
WinoDict: Probing language models for i…        1    2% ▇
Exploring the Curious Case of Code Prom…        2    2% ▇
Bridging the Resource Gap: Exploring th…        1    2% ▇
HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination E…        3    1% ▇
Say What You Mean! Large Language Model…        1    1% ▇
Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalizati…        1    1% ▇
API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for…        1    1% ▇
Do Large Language Models Know What They…        1    1% ▇
Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models…        1    1% ▇
LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of …        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 31.5
Licences: GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2204.06745v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluation ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-758-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.11416v5-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · EleutherAI GPT-J-6B model card ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/eleutherai-gpt-j-6b-card-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Making Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifier ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-291-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.02414v2-glm130b-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Self-Consistency of Large Language Models under Ambiguity ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-blackboxnlp-1-7-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-522-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · It Ain't Over: A Multi-aspect Diverse Math Word Problem Dataset ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-927-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · WinoDict: Probing language models for in-context word acquisition ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-eacl-main-7-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Exploring the Curious Case of Code Prompts ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-nlrse-1-2-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Bridging the Resource Gap: Exploring the Efficacy of English and Multilingual LLMs for Swedish ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-resourceful-1-13-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-397-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-550-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2022-emnlp-main-340-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-187-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-551-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-754-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of Elementary Language Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-666-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-3-davinci) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)