[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-5.2 # GPT-5.2 OpenAI · released 2025-12 · closed weights **score 72.4** ±0.5 · #57 of 732 · from 51 benchmark results across 27 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-5.2 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅●▄▂▁    #65 of 313     21%     14
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁    #85 of 469     10%      3
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #71 of 402*    2.5%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█●▂▁▁    #34 of 431     30%      9
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆●█▄    #48 of 153    4.9%      5
web search          ▁▁▁▅●█▃▄·▁·▁    #56 of 84*    0.9%      1
agent tasks · #65 of 313 · 21% of its score Trails [GLM-5.1](glm-5-1.md), [Beam 1.0 501B A23B](beam-1-0-501b-a23b.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   73.8%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄●▄▁ beats 14/29  hard · avg 19%          4.4%  sharp
MCP-Atlas (public set)               68.0%  ▄······▄▄▄▄● beats 6/6    hard · avg 26%          2.9%  at its level · several runs
Terminal-Bench 2.0 with Terminus …   54.0%  ▃··▃·▃▃██▅▃● beats 13/14  very hard · avg 6.1%    2.3%  sharp · at its level
ContractBench success rate (33 ob…   74.7%  ▆··▆▄▂▄▂▆▆█● beats 22/23  very hard · avg 13%     1.7%  sharp · at its level
τ³-bench banking_knowledge (v1.0.…   32.2%  ▃▃▂▃·▆▃●█▅▅▂ beats 13/25  very hard · avg 4.3%    1.6%  at its level
τ²-bench aggregate                   87.1%  ▄····█▄●···▄ beats 4/5    medium · avg 45%        1.2%  typical
Vibe Code Bench (test split, 50 w…   53.5%  ▃··▃·▃██▃▃▃● beats 13/14  very hard · avg 2.8%    1.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Thinkingbox-bench pass@1 (507 sta…   46.3%  ▅··▃·▃·█▃●██ beats 8/15   very hard · avg 5.1%    1.1%  sharp · at its level
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive)      55.9%  ▁▁▁▂██▅▅●▂▂▂ beats 66/77  hard · avg 31%          1.1%  at its level
τ³-bench airline (tau2-bench ≥ v1…   83.0%  ▃······▃·▃●▃ beats 5/6    medium · avg 51%        0.9%  typical
τ³-bench retail (tau2-bench ≥ v1.…   81.6%  ▄▄·█··▄·●··▄ beats 5/6    medium · avg 48%        0.8%  typical
τ³-bench telecom (tau2-bench ≥ v1…   89.7%  █·●█▄······▄ beats 2/6    medium · avg 64%        0.7%  maxed out
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)             98.7%  ▃·▅▅▃▃··█▃▃● beats 13/13  hard · avg 16%          0.6%  sharp · noisy
τ²-Bench-Verified (GPT-5.1 user)     80.3%  ▂··▄···▂▄▄●▄ beats 11/13  medium · avg 45%        0.4%  typical
coding · #85 of 469 · 10% of its score Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [GLM-4.7](glm-4-7.md), [Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite](gemini-3-5-flash-lite.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1416.4  ▁▁▃▂▅●▃▆▅▅▁▂ beats 50/129  avg 981                 4.5%  sharp
SWE-bench Verified                   73.8%  ▁··▁·▁▂▁▄●▄▁ beats 14/29   hard · avg 19%          4.4%  sharp
Vibe Code Bench (test split, 50 w…   53.5%  ▃··▃·▃██▃▃▃● beats 13/14   very hard · avg 2.8%    1.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
chat & writing · #71 of 402 · 2.5% of its score Beats [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)](deepseek-v4-flash.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 4 26B-A4B](gemma-4-26b-a4b.md), [Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B](nemotron-cascade-2-30b-a3b.md), [Gemma 4 31B](gemma-4-31b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1437.3  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 299/385  avg 1260      2.5%  blunt
math · #34 of 431 · 30% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.8 Flash](gemini-3-8-flash.md), [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](deepseek-v4-1-flash.md), [DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)](deepseek-v4-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            67.4%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█●▄▃ beats 56/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     12%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v2               31.7%  ▁▂▁▂█●▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 36/67    very hard · avg 0.1%    8.6%  sharp · at its level
MathArena ArXivMath February 2026…   37.5%  ▁▁▁▁█●▄▃▁▃·▃ beats 10/24    very hard · avg 9.4%    3.0%  at its level
MathArena ArXivMath January 2026 …   67.9%  ▂··▄▂▄█▆▆●▄█ beats 17/23    hard · avg 23%          2.0%  at its level
MathArena ArXivMath December 2025…   52.2%  ▃·▃▃█▁·●·▁▁▁ beats 15/18    hard · avg 19%          1.5%  at its level
MathArena BrokenArXiv February 20…   25.8%  ▃▂▂▃█▃●·▃··▂ beats 13/16    very hard · avg 0.9%    0.9%  sharp · noisy
MATH-Vision                          83.0%  █·····●▄·▄·▄ beats 2/5      medium · avg 47%        0.8%  typical
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             96.1%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█●▂▅ beats 166/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.5%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
FormalProofBench (200 graduate-le…   13.5%  ▃▅·▃··●▃█··▃ beats 5/10     very hard · avg 3.1%    0.5%  noisy
vision & documents · #48 of 153 · 4.9% of its score Beats [MiMo-V2.6-Pro](mimo-v2-6-pro.md), [MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B)](mimo-v2-6-flash.md), [GPT-6 Luna](gpt-6-luna.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Qwen3.6 Flash](qwen3-6-flash.md), [Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite](gemini-3-5-flash-lite.md), [Kimi K2.5](kimi-k2-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)     1242.8  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅●▇ beats 99/152  avg 1061            1.7%  blunt
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   82.1%  ▄··▂█··▂···● beats 9/9     hard · avg 32%      1.2%  typical
Arena document (style controlled)   1423.2  ▁▁●▃▄▃▇█▅▇▄▅ beats 3/37    avg 1331            0.9%  blunt
MATH-Vision                          83.0%  █·····●▄·▄·▄ beats 2/5     medium · avg 47%    0.8%  typical
Diagram-MMU diagram question answ…   81.7%  ▄·····▄●·█·█ beats 2/6     medium · avg 56%    0.3%  blunt
web search · #56 of 84 · 0.9% of its score Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B)](llama-4-scout.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty  counts  why
Arena search systems (style contr…  1161.4  ▁·▁▁▂●▂█▆▃▂▂ beats 7/36   avg 1069      0.9%  blunt
other tests (20)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           38.3%  █▆▆●▆▂▆▂▂▂▂▅ beats 15/32    very hard · avg 1.2%    3.8%  sharp · at its level
EBR-bench (Epoch)                    23.0%  ▄▂·▆█▂●▆▄▆·▆ beats 11/25    very hard · avg 0.3%    3.7%  sharp
KMMLU-HARD (Daekeun Kim, zero-sho…   74.6%  █···▁▁▁▂▃·●▂ beats 18/23    very hard · avg 29%     3.4%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         23.0%  █··▂▃▇●█▂▄▂▁ beats 41/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    3.1%  sharp · noisy
ARC-AGI-2 public evaluation set (…   27.6%  █··▂▅▁▃●▃·▁▃ beats 17/24    very hard · avg 0.3%    2.7%  sharp · at its level · noisy
WebCompass (overall)                 61.9%  ▅·▃▃▃···▃·●█ beats 6/9      hard · avg 18%          2.4%  at its level
GPQA Diamond                         91.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇●▅ beats 185/211  hard · avg 39%          2.1%  sharp
KINA (Knowledge Index of Noah's A…   39.5%  ▁▁▂▁▃▄█▆▄●▂▃ beats 33/39    very hard · avg 21%     2.1%  at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                49.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▁▁ beats 129/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    2.1%  sharp · noisy
Medmarks-V weighted mean win rate…   62.4%  ▂▃▅▂▆▃█▅█▅▃● beats 32/34    medium · avg 41%        1.8%  blunt · at its level
CLIcK Korean (Daekeun Kim)           90.9%  ▆▄▄▄█▄▂·▄●·▄ beats 18/23    medium · avg 56%        1.6%  typical
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1314.3  ▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃█●▁▁ beats 53/62    avg 1034                1.5%  typical
ARC-AGI-1 public evaluation set (…   95.0%  ▁·▇▃▁·█▇▁·●▃ beats 22/27    very hard · avg 4.0%    1.2%  sharp · noisy
HAE-RAE 1.0 (Daekeun Kim)            91.8%  ▄▄▄▂▂█▂▄▂●▂▄ beats 16/22    medium · avg 61%        1.2%  typical
RPC-Bench overall, text input (Z.…   35.2%  ▄··▄▄·▄▄█·●▄ beats 7/8      very hard · avg 12%     1.1%  at its level
SimpleQA Verified                    37.1%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃●▆█▄▂▅ beats 32/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.0%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   47.0%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃●▄▄█ beats 18/38    very hard · avg 14%     0.9%  at its level
HLE-Verified full set, text-only …   43.3%  █·█·····●··█ beats 2/3      very hard · avg 15%     0.7%  at its level
FinSheet-Bench accuracy (501 ques…   80.4%  █···█●·····█ beats 2/3      medium · avg 53%        0.6%  typical
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   89.2%  ▁▂▁▂▅●▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 35/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                       10   41% ▇▇▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     5   10% ▇
MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArX…        4    7% ▇
Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs           3    6% ▇
τ²/τ³-bench leaderboard: Sierra's own e…        4    4% ▇
ARC Prize Foundation model_baseline out…        2    4% ▇
WebCompass: Towards Multimodal Web Codi…        1    2% ▇
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on …        1    2% ▇
Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark                   1    2% ▇
Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card               2    2% ▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        2    2% ▇
Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source L…        1    2% ▇
ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve …        1    2% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    2% ▇
zai-org/GLM-5 model card                        1    1% ▇
GLM-5 Team                                      1    1% ▇
Vibe Code Bench                                 1    1% ▇
One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinking…        1    1% ▇
RPC-Bench leaderboard                           1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
HLE-Verified: A Systematic Verification…        1    1% ▇
FinSheet-Bench: From Simple Lookups to …        1    1% ▇
FormalProofBench                                1    0% ▇
Amazon AGI                                      1    0% ▇
Diagram-MMU: A Multi-Modal Benchmark fo…        1    0% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 72.4
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathArena ArXivMath / BrokenArXiv / ArXivLean model-output datasets ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/matharena-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs ([MIT](../../licenses/korean-personal-benchmark-runs-MIT.txt)) · τ²/τ³-bench leaderboard: Sierra's own evaluation runs ([MIT](https://opensource.org/license/mit)) · ARC Prize Foundation model\_baseline outputs on ARC-AGI-1/2 public evaluation sets ([MIT](../../licenses/arcprize-model-baseline-outputs-MIT.txt)) · WebCompass: Towards Multimodal Web Coding Evaluation for Code Language Models ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2601.11868v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.txt)) · Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2605.01417v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve Observation Contracts? ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · zai-org/GLM-5 model card ([MIT](../../licenses/zai-org--GLM-5.txt)) · GLM-5 Team ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2602.15763v2.txt)) · Vibe Code Bench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinkingbox ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · RPC-Bench leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · HLE-Verified: A Systematic Verification and Structured Revision of Humanity's Last Exam ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2602.13964v4-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · FinSheet-Bench: From Simple Lookups to Complex Reasoning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2603.07316v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · FormalProofBench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Amazon AGI ([MIT](../../licenses/tau2-verified-MIT.txt)) · Diagram-MMU: A Multi-Modal Benchmark for Scientific Diagrams ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $4.81/M blended · $1.75 in / $14 out per 1M tokens · [platform.openai.com](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/openai/models/gpt-5.2.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/openai/gpt-5.2.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-5-2) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)