[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-5.4 nano # GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI · released 2026-03 · closed weights **score 67.7** ±0.7 · #105 of 732 · from 23 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-5.4 nano among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅●▄▄▂▁     #97 of 313     17%      7
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁    #88 of 469*    6.5%      2
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆●▇▃   #114 of 402*    5.6%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█●▂▁▁     #64 of 431     35%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂●▇█▄    #86 of 153*    8.3%      2
web search          ▁▁▁●▄█▃▄·▁·▁     #72 of 84*    3.5%      1
agent tasks · #97 of 313 · 17% of its score Beats [Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning)](grok-4-20.md), [GPT-5.1](gpt-5-1.md), [o3-pro](o3-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B)](mistral-medium-3-5.md), [Hy3 preview (295B-A21B)](hy3-preview.md), [MiniMax-M2.7](minimax-m2-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (maker)           46.3%  █●···██··███ beats 1/6    hard · avg 15%         3.5%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   37.7%  ▃·●·▅····▅·█ beats 1/8    very hard · avg 12%    3.5%  at its level
Toolathlon (Tool Decathlon) (make…   35.5%  ▃··●··▃··▃█▅ beats 1/8    very hard · avg 13%    3.5%  at its level
OSWorld-Verified (maker)             39.0%  ●▄·····▄·▄▄▄ beats 1/6    hard · avg 16%         2.6%  at its level
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)             92.5%  ▃·▅▅▃▃··●▃▃▅ beats 7/13   hard · avg 16%         2.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
SWE-bench Pro (maker)                52.4%  ▄·····●·▄▄▄█ beats 1/6    hard · avg 29%         1.5%  blunt · at its level
T1-Bench multi-domain conversatio…    7.2%  ●▂··▂·▂·▂▂█▄ beats 0/11   hard · avg 25%         0.0%  blunt · at its level · noisy
coding · #88 of 469 · 6.5% of its score Beats [Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning)](grok-4-20.md), [GPT-5.4 mini](gpt-5-4-mini.md), [GPT-5.1](gpt-5-1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [GLM-4.7](glm-4-7.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   64.9%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃●▃█▇ beats 17/49  hard · avg 17%    5.0%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Pro (maker)                52.4%  ▄·····●·▄▄▄█ beats 1/6    hard · avg 29%    1.5%  blunt · at its level
chat & writing · #114 of 402 · 5.6% of its score Beats [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Nemotron-Cascade-8B](nemotron-cascade-8b.md), [Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B)](mistral-large-3.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1401.2  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆●█▃ beats 247/385  avg 1260      5.6%  blunt
math · #64 of 431 · 35% of its score Beats [Qwen3.6 Max Preview](qwen3-6-max-preview.md), [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2   44.9%  ▂··▁▁▃▄●█▆▄▃ beats 31/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     24%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v2      12.2%  ▁▂▁●█▅▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 13/67    very hard · avg 0.1%    7.8%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025    87.8%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇●▃▂▅ beats 136/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.7%  sharp · noisy
vision & documents · #86 of 153 · 8.3% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1 mini](gpt-4-1-mini.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md), [Gemma 4 12B](gemma-4-12b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
MMMU Pro (maker)                  66.1%  ●·····▃·▃·█▃ beats 0/7     hard · avg 40%    4.5%  at its level
Arena vision (style controlled)  1198.8  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄●▅█▇ beats 71/152  avg 1061          3.8%  blunt
web search · #72 of 84 · 3.5% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash (Preview, Apr 2026)](deepseek-v4-flash-preview.md), [Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B](nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1 nano](gpt-4-1-nano-2025-04-14.md), [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   37.7%  ▃·●·▅····▅·█ beats 1/8    very hard · avg 12%    3.5%  at its level
other tests (9)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         78.5%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 122/211  hard · avg 39%          7.2%  sharp
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)         24.3%  ▃··●·▃▃···▃█ beats 1/7      very hard · avg 4.4%    4.8%  typical
ARC-AGI-1 public evaluation set (…   51.6%  ▁·▇▃▁·●▇▁·▇▃ beats 9/27     very hard · avg 4.0%    4.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
ARC-AGI-2 public evaluation set (…    3.5%  █··●▅▁▃▁▃·▁▃ beats 7/24     very hard · avg 0.3%    3.5%  sharp · noisy
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)          5.0%  ●··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 11/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    3.2%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                30.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃●▂▁▁ beats 103/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    2.8%  sharp · noisy
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   89.0%  ▁▁▃▁●▄▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 10/49    easy · avg 77%          2.0%  typical
SimpleQA Verified                    11.7%  ▁▁●▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂▅ beats 4/81     very hard · avg 8.0%    1.9%  at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   96.9%  ▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁● beats 98/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        7   50% ▇▇▇▇▇▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        8   26% ▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    9% ▇
ARC Prize Foundation model_baseline out…        2    8% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    7% ▇
T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario A…        1    0% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 67.7
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · ARC Prize Foundation model\_baseline outputs on ARC-AGI-1/2 public evaluation sets ([MIT](../../licenses/arcprize-model-baseline-outputs-MIT.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario Agents in Real-World Domains ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $0.46/M blended · $0.2 in / $1.25 out per 1M tokens · [platform.openai.com](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/openai/models/gpt-5.4-nano.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/openai/gpt-5.4-nano.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-5-4-nano) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)