[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-5 nano # GPT-5 nano OpenAI · released 2025-08 · closed weights **score 61.5** ±0.8 · #188 of 732 · from 26 benchmark results across 13 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-5 nano among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁ #184 of 313 19% 6 chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█●▇▇▃ #180 of 402* 6.3% 1 math ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁ #136 of 431 33% 7 vision & documents ▁▁▂▂▁▃●▂▆▇█▄ #99 of 153* 6.1% 2
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why BrowserGym WorkArena-L1 (AgentLab… 40.6% █···●▄▄·▄█·█ beats 3/10 hard · avg 28% 3.9% at its level Terminal-Bench 2.0 with Terminus … 7.9% ▃··●·▃▃██▅▃▅ beats 1/14 very hard · avg 6.1% 3.8% sharp BrowserGym WorkArena-L2 (AgentLab… 3.4% ▃▅●·▅▃▃··█·▃ beats 3/11 very hard · avg 3.6% 3.6% sharp · noisy BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) 51.4% ▁▁▁▂██▅▅●▂▂▂ beats 59/77 hard · avg 31% 3.0% at its level τ²-bench Telecom (maker) 35.5% ▃·●▅▃▃··█▃▃▅ beats 2/13 hard · avg 16% 2.9% sharp · at its level · noisy BrowserGym MiniWoB (AgentLab Gene… 64.8% ▅····▅●▃▃·▃█ beats 5/11 medium · avg 53% 2.3% blunt · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LMArena (text) 1337.7 ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆●▇█▃ beats 176/385 avg 1260 6.3% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2 20.0% ▂··▁▁●▄▄█▆▄▃ beats 14/86 very hard · avg 1.2% 13% sharp MATH level 5 94.9% ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂●▄ beats 82/92 hard · avg 28% 8.4% sharp OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 81.1% ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇●█▃▂▅ beats 116/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 5.1% sharp · at its level · noisy MATH-Vision 62.2% ▁▁·▁··▄▁●▇▇█ beats 7/24 medium · avg 47% 1.9% at its level MathNet-Solve-Test micro-average … 42.2% ▃▃···●▃·▃·▃▃ beats 4/8 very hard · avg 15% 1.9% at its level FrontierMath tier 4 v2 2.4% ▁●▁▂█▅▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 7/67 very hard · avg 0.1% 1.8% sharp · too hard for it FormalProofBench (200 graduate-le… 12.5% ▃▅·▃··●▃█··▃ beats 4/10 very hard · avg 3.1% 0.7% too hard for it · noisy
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Arena vision (style controlled) 1147.4 ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃●▅▅█▇ beats 47/152 avg 1061 4.2% blunt MATH-Vision 62.2% ▁▁·▁··▄▁●▇▇█ beats 7/24 medium · avg 47% 1.9% at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why GPQA Diamond 69.4% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄●▇█▅ beats 104/211 hard · avg 39% 11% sharp · at its level CLIcK Korean (Daekeun Kim) 72.0% ▆▄▄▄●▄▂·▄█·▄ beats 9/23 medium · avg 56% 7.5% typical KMMLU-HARD (Daekeun Kim, zero-sho… 51.7% █···▁▁▁▂●·▆▂ beats 13/23 very hard · avg 29% 6.6% sharp HAE-RAE 1.0 (Daekeun Kim) 78.6% ▄▄▄▂▂●▂▄▂█▂▄ beats 10/22 medium · avg 61% 6.0% typical SimpleQA Verified 11.7% ▁▁●▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂▅ beats 3/81 very hard · avg 8.0% 1.6% typical Chess Puzzles (Epoch) 27.0% █▁▁▁▁▂▃●▃▂▁▁ beats 100/137 very hard · avg 5.8% 1.4% sharp · too hard for it · noisy SimpleQA (maker) 11.0% ▄▄▄▆█●███·▂█ beats 13/32 very hard · avg 9.2% 1.2% noisy Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch) 8.0% ●··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 8/77 very hard · avg 9.4% 1.1% sharp · too hard for it · noisy Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (… 79.8% ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 257/276 medium · avg 72% 1.0% noisy Vectara hallucination leaderboard… 95.3% ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 69/140 very easy · avg 94% 0.2% blunt · maxed out · noisy Vectara hallucination leaderboard… 89.5% ▁▂▁▂▅●▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 39/98 very easy · avg 90% 0.0% blunt
source results share of the score Epoch AI 8 43% ▇▇▇▇▇ Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs 3 20% ▇▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 2 10% ▇ ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard 3 10% ▇ Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on … 1 4% ▇ Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r… 1 3% ▇ OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores… 1 3% ▇ Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card 1 2% ▇ MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark … 1 2% ▇ OpenAI (submitted / maker-reported) 1 1% ▇ Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard 1 1% ▇ FormalProofBench 1 1% ▇ Vectara hallucination leaderboard 2 0% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 61.5Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs ([MIT](../../licenses/korean-personal-benchmark-runs-MIT.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2601.11868v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-4B.txt)) · MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2604.18584v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · FormalProofBench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $0.14/M blended · $0.05 in / $0.4 out per 1M tokens · [platform.openai.com](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/openai/models/gpt-5-nano.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/openai/gpt-5-nano.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-5-nano) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)