[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-5 nano # GPT-5 nano OpenAI · released 2025-08 · closed weights **score 61.5** ±0.8 · #188 of 732 · from 26 benchmark results across 13 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-5 nano among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁    #184 of 313     19%      6
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█●▇▇▃   #180 of 402*    6.3%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁    #136 of 431     33%      7
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃●▂▆▇█▄    #99 of 153*    6.1%      2
agent tasks · #184 of 313 · 19% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [DeepSeek R1 0528](deepseek-r1-0528.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
BrowserGym WorkArena-L1 (AgentLab…   40.6%  █···●▄▄·▄█·█ beats 3/10   hard · avg 28%          3.9%  at its level
Terminal-Bench 2.0 with Terminus …    7.9%  ▃··●·▃▃██▅▃▅ beats 1/14   very hard · avg 6.1%    3.8%  sharp
BrowserGym WorkArena-L2 (AgentLab…    3.4%  ▃▅●·▅▃▃··█·▃ beats 3/11   very hard · avg 3.6%    3.6%  sharp · noisy
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive)      51.4%  ▁▁▁▂██▅▅●▂▂▂ beats 59/77  hard · avg 31%          3.0%  at its level
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)             35.5%  ▃·●▅▃▃··█▃▃▅ beats 2/13   hard · avg 16%          2.9%  sharp · at its level · noisy
BrowserGym MiniWoB (AgentLab Gene…   64.8%  ▅····▅●▃▃·▃█ beats 5/11   medium · avg 53%        2.3%  blunt · at its level
chat & writing · #180 of 402 · 6.3% of its score Beats [Seed-OSS 36B Instruct](seed-oss-36b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct](lfm2-5-1-2b-instruct.md), [LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking](lfm2-5-1-2b-thinking.md), [LFM2.5 8B-A1B](lfm2-5-8b-a1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1337.7  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆●▇█▃ beats 176/385  avg 1260      6.3%  blunt
math · #136 of 431 · 33% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Olmo 3.1 32B Think](olmo-3-1-32b-think.md), [Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking](qwen3-vl-30b-a3b-thinking.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            20.0%  ▂··▁▁●▄▄█▆▄▃ beats 14/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     13%  sharp
MATH level 5                         94.9%  ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂●▄ beats 82/92    hard · avg 28%          8.4%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             81.1%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇●█▃▂▅ beats 116/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    5.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH-Vision                          62.2%  ▁▁·▁··▄▁●▇▇█ beats 7/24     medium · avg 47%        1.9%  at its level
MathNet-Solve-Test micro-average …   42.2%  ▃▃···●▃·▃·▃▃ beats 4/8      very hard · avg 15%     1.9%  at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v2                2.4%  ▁●▁▂█▅▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 7/67     very hard · avg 0.1%    1.8%  sharp · too hard for it
FormalProofBench (200 graduate-le…   12.5%  ▃▅·▃··●▃█··▃ beats 4/10     very hard · avg 3.1%    0.7%  too hard for it · noisy
vision & documents · #99 of 153 · 6.1% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4o (2024-11-20)](gpt-4o-2024-11-20.md), [Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking](qwen3-vl-30b-a3b-thinking.md), [Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B)](mistral-small-4.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1147.4  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃●▅▅█▇ beats 47/152  avg 1061            4.2%  blunt
MATH-Vision                       62.2%  ▁▁·▁··▄▁●▇▇█ beats 7/24    medium · avg 47%    1.9%  at its level
other tests (11)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         69.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄●▇█▅ beats 104/211  hard · avg 39%           11%  sharp · at its level
CLIcK Korean (Daekeun Kim)           72.0%  ▆▄▄▄●▄▂·▄█·▄ beats 9/23     medium · avg 56%        7.5%  typical
KMMLU-HARD (Daekeun Kim, zero-sho…   51.7%  █···▁▁▁▂●·▆▂ beats 13/23    very hard · avg 29%     6.6%  sharp
HAE-RAE 1.0 (Daekeun Kim)            78.6%  ▄▄▄▂▂●▂▄▂█▂▄ beats 10/22    medium · avg 61%        6.0%  typical
SimpleQA Verified                    11.7%  ▁▁●▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂▅ beats 3/81     very hard · avg 8.0%    1.6%  typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                27.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃●▃▂▁▁ beats 100/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    1.4%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
SimpleQA (maker)                     11.0%  ▄▄▄▆█●███·▂█ beats 13/32    very hard · avg 9.2%    1.2%  noisy
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)          8.0%  ●··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 8/77     very hard · avg 9.4%    1.1%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   79.8%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 257/276  medium · avg 72%        1.0%  noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   95.3%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 69/140   very easy · avg 94%     0.2%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   89.5%  ▁▂▁▂▅●▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 39/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        8   43% ▇▇▇▇▇
Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs           3   20% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2   10% ▇
ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard               3   10% ▇
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on …        1    4% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    3% ▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        1    3% ▇
Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card                      1    2% ▇
MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark …        1    2% ▇
OpenAI (submitted / maker-reported)             1    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
FormalProofBench                                1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               2    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 61.5
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs ([MIT](../../licenses/korean-personal-benchmark-runs-MIT.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2601.11868v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-4B.txt)) · MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2604.18584v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · FormalProofBench ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $0.14/M blended · $0.05 in / $0.4 out per 1M tokens · [platform.openai.com](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/openai/models/gpt-5-nano.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/openai/gpt-5-nano.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-5-nano) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)