[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-6.1 Sol # GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI · released 2026-09 · proprietary **score 83.0** ±0.7 · #5 of 732 · from 21 benchmark results across 6 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-6.1 Sol among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂●    #4 of 313*     19%      2
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃●    #5 of 469*     10%      2
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●   #21 of 402*    4.9%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂▁●     #2 of 431     17%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●    #8 of 153*    3.2%      1
web search          ▁▁▁▅▄█▃●·▁·▁     #9 of 84*    1.8%      1
agent tasks · #4 of 313 · 19% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  0.1247 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃▂█▁▂●▁▁ beats 54/59  avg -0.379 IPS           12%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 4.0                       58.2%  █▅▅▅▅·▅▃▃▅●▅ beats 18/20  very hard · avg 0.5%    6.3%  sharp · at its level
coding · #5 of 469 · 10% of its score Beats [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1750.6  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆▅▅▁● beats 125/129  avg 981           8.6%  sharp
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   87.0%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 47/49    hard · avg 17%    1.8%  sharp
chat & writing · #21 of 402 · 4.9% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemini 3.6 Flash](gemini-3-6-flash.md), [Muse Spark 1.2](muse-spark-1-2.md), [Muse Spark 1.1](muse-spark-1-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1481.3  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 362/385  avg 1260      4.9%  blunt
math · #2 of 431 · 17% of its score Beats [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md), [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2     100.0%  ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▃▂▁▁● beats 67/67    very hard · avg 0.1%     10%  sharp
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2   93.7%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▆▄● beats 85/86    very hard · avg 1.2%    6.6%  sharp · maxed out
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   100.0%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 191/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.1%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #8 of 153 · 3.2% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Claude Opus 4.7](claude-opus-4-7.md), [Gemini 3.7 Flash](gemini-3-7-flash.md), [Gemini 3.8 Flash](gemini-3-8-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1293.5  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 146/152  avg 1061      3.2%  blunt
web search · #9 of 84 · 1.8% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [GPT-4.1 mini](gpt-4-1-mini.md), [GPT-4.1](gpt-4-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty  counts  why
Arena search systems (style contr…  1249.9  ▁·▁▁▂▂▂█▆▃▂● beats 35/36  avg 1069      1.8%  blunt
other tests (11)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
EBR-bench (Epoch)                    54.3%  ▄▂·▆█▂█▆▄●·▆ beats 21/25    very hard · avg 0.3%     12%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         80.0%  █··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂● beats 76/77    very hard · avg 9.4%     10%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           80.0%  █▆▆▆▆▂▆▂▂▂▂● beats 30/32    very hard · avg 1.2%    7.8%  sharp · at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                61.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂●▁ beats 134/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    4.9%  sharp · at its level · noisy
HealthBench Professional (maker)     64.2%  ▄·▄··▄▄·▄█·● beats 7/8      hard · avg 20%          1.7%  blunt · at its level
SimpleQA Verified                    73.9%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▄▂● beats 80/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.6%  at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   68.2%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄● beats 34/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.6%  at its level
HealthBench Hard (maker)             33.4%  ▂··▂····▂▄·● beats 5/8      very hard · avg 9.6%    1.2%  blunt · at its level
GPQA Diamond                         95.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█● beats 208/211  hard · avg 39%          1.1%  sharp · maxed out
HealthBench (maker)                  56.7%  ▃·▃·····█●▃▅ beats 5/8      hard · avg 24%          1.0%  blunt · at its level
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   98.6%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂▂● beats 48/49    easy · avg 77%          0.7%  maxed out
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        9   55% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     5   31% ▇▇▇▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    6% ▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        3    4% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    2% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    2% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 83.0
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $4.00/M blended · $2 in / $10 out per 1M tokens · [developers.openai.com](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6.1-sol) [price source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6.1-sol): Observed 2026-10-06. USD per million tokens, Standard, prompts up to 272K input tokens; longer prompts 2x input and 1.5x output. Fast/regional premiums excluded. · [context source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6.1-sol): Official 1,050,000-token total window; maximum input 922,000 and maximum output 128,000. Observed 2026-10-06. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-6-1-sol) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)