[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-6 Sol # GPT-6 Sol OpenAI · released 2026-09 · closed weights **score 80.1** ±0.6 · #11 of 732 · from 23 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-6 Sol among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄●▁    #11 of 313     20%      4
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄●▁    #10 of 469     12%      3
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #45 of 402*    4.3%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂●▁     #6 of 431     25%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇●▄   #35 of 153*    2.9%      1
web search          ▁▁▁▅▄█●▄·▁·▁    #21 of 84*    1.5%      1
agent tasks · #11 of 313 · 20% of its score
test                                    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  0.0796 IPS  ▁▁▁▃▃▂█▁●▂▁▁ beats 49/59  avg -0.379 IPS           11%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 4.0                       49.4%  █▅▅▅▅·▅▃▃●▅▅ beats 15/20  very hard · avg 0.5%    5.5%  sharp · at its level
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)          68.8%  █··●▃····▃·▃ beats 3/6    hard · avg 22%          2.0%  at its level
Agents' Last Exam (metric/harness…       56.4%  ▂·▂·█▄▂·▂▂▄● beats 13/14  very hard · avg 12%     1.5%  at its level
coding · #10 of 469 · 12% of its score Beats [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1678.2  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆▅●▁▂ beats 119/129  avg 981           7.6%  sharp
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      68.8%  █··●▃····▃·▃ beats 3/6      hard · avg 22%    2.0%  at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe…   82.7%  ▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█● beats 39/49    hard · avg 17%    2.0%  sharp
chat & writing · #45 of 402 · 4.3% of its score Trails [MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B)](mimo-v2-5-pro.md), [GLM-5.1](glm-5-1.md), [Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning)](grok-4-20.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1458.3  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 333/385  avg 1260      4.3%  blunt
math · #6 of 431 · 25% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md), [Claude Opus 5](claude-opus-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tier 4 v2      90.0%  ▁▂▁▂█▅▂▃●▁▁▁ beats 62/67    very hard · avg 0.1%     15%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2   89.8%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄█▆▄● beats 81/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     10%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   100.0%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 189/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.2%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
vision & documents · #35 of 153 · 2.9% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Qwen3.6 Flash](qwen3-6-flash.md), [Qwen3.6 Plus](qwen3-6-plus.md), [Qwen3.7 Plus](qwen3-7-plus.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1266.0  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅●▇ beats 121/152  avg 1061      2.9%  blunt
web search · #21 of 84 · 1.5% of its score Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty  counts  why
Arena search systems (style contr…  1228.2  ▁·▁▁▂▂▂█▆●▂▂ beats 31/36  avg 1069      1.5%  blunt
other tests (11)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
EBR-bench (Epoch)                    53.3%  ▄▂·▆█▂█▆▄●·▆ beats 20/25    very hard · avg 0.3%     11%  sharp · at its level
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         56.0%  █··▂▃▇▄█▂●▂▁ beats 68/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    9.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)           58.3%  █▆▆▆▆▂●▂▂▂▂▅ beats 25/32    very hard · avg 1.2%    7.7%  sharp · at its level
SimpleQA Verified                    60.7%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█●▂▅ beats 68/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.6%  at its level
HealthBench Professional (maker)     60.8%  ▄·▄··▄▄·▄●·█ beats 6/8      hard · avg 20%          1.5%  blunt · at its level
Icelandic LLM Leaderboard average…   65.6%  ▁▁▃▂▂▄▁▃▄▄▄● beats 32/38    very hard · avg 14%     1.5%  at its level
GPQA Diamond                         94.3%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█● beats 204/211  hard · avg 39%          1.4%  sharp · maxed out
HealthBench Hard (maker)             22.1%  ●··▂····▂▄·█ beats 0/8      very hard · avg 9.6%    1.0%  blunt · at its level
HealthBench (maker)                  47.1%  ●·▃·····█▃▃▅ beats 0/8      hard · avg 24%          0.9%  blunt · at its level
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To…   97.8%  ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂●▂ beats 44/49    easy · avg 77%          0.7%  maxed out
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   93.5%  ▁▂▁▂▅█▂●▄▃▁▁ beats 73/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        8   56% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     5   27% ▇▇▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        5    7% ▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    6% ▇
Roblox LLM Leaderboard                          2    3% ▇
Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard               1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 80.1
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Miðeind Icelandic LLM Leaderboard ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/mideind-icelandic-llm-leaderboard-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $4.00/M blended · $2 in / $10 out per 1M tokens · [platform.openai.com](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/openai/models/gpt-6-sol.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/openai/gpt-6-sol.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-6-sol) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)