[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-Neo 125M # GPT-Neo 125M EleutherAI · released 2021-03 · 0.125B params · mit **score -3.4** ±2.2 · #729 of 732 · from 20 benchmark results across 6 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-Neo 125M among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task  vs the others          rank  counts  tests
math  ▁▁▃●█▆▄█▄▂▁▁   #381 of 431*    3.5%      1
math · #381 of 431 · 3.5% of its score Beats [Yi 34B Chat](yi-34b-chat.md), [Llama 3 8B Instruct](llama-3-8b.md), [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test    result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
MathQA   22.8%  ▃·●▃█▅··▃·▃▃ beats 1/10   hard · avg 33%    3.5%  blunt · too hard for it
other tests (19)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
COPA                                 64.0%  ▁·▁▁●▅▅█▆▂▁▁ beats 6/67    very easy · avg 96%     14%  at its level
COPEN concept identification in c…   28.8%  ●···▃▃·▃·▃·█ beats 0/7     easy · avg 81%          12%  too hard for it
HellaSwag                            28.7%  ●·······▄·█▄ beats 0/5     easy · avg 82%          11%  too hard for it
ARC Easy                             43.7%  ●·······▄▄·█ beats 1/5     easy · avg 87%          11%  blunt
CoNLL-2003 English NER, few-shot …   15.5%  ●···▅·▃▅··▃█ beats 0/9     very easy · avg 85%     11%  typical
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-wo…   37.4%  ▁·····▁▁●▃██ beats 5/86    very easy · avg 87%    8.1%  blunt · at its level
UD English-GUM UPOS tagging, few-…   64.3%  ●·▄▄·······█ beats 0/4     very easy · avg 92%    6.5%  blunt · at its level
WinoGrande                           50.4%  ▁●▁▁▂▁▁▅▇█▃▁ beats 4/131   easy · avg 85%         4.8%  too hard for it
Natural Questions (closed book)       0.5%  ●·▁·▁▂▁▂·▅▂█ beats 0/28    medium · avg 48%       4.0%  too hard for it
PIQA                                 63.0%  ▁●▁▂▂▃▅█▅▃▁▁ beats 4/123   easy · avg 87%         3.9%  blunt · small run
ARC Challenge                        19.1%  ●·········▂▂ beats 3/5     medium · avg 60%       2.5%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
COPEN conceptual similarity judgm…    7.9%  ▄···●···██·▄ beats 1/7     hard · avg 22%         1.5%  blunt · too hard for it
PubMedQA                             55.1%  ▂·····▅●▅▆▆█ beats 4/24    medium · avg 73%       1.3%  blunt · at its level
TruthfulQA MC2                       45.6%  ▅▃█●▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 21/31   medium · avg 57%       1.3%  blunt · at its level
TriviaQA                              1.6%  ●··▁█▃▃▁▄▅▄█ beats 0/28    easy · avg 73%         1.1%  too hard for it · noisy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   25.6%  ●▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 21/276  medium · avg 72%       0.7%  too hard for it · noisy
TruthfulQA generation, % true (hu…   43.6%  ██····█·██·● beats 5/5     medium · avg 42%       0.1%  blunt · at its level
HaluEval QA hallucination detecti…   46.5%  ●▁▁·▁▁·▁▁▁▁▁ beats 14/27   hard · avg 66%         0.1%  too hard for it · noisy
COPEN conceptual property judgmen…   47.6%  ●·······▁··▁ beats 2/7     very hard · avg 52%    0.1%  blunt · too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Preserving Privacy Through Dememorizati…        9   60% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Prompting Language Models for Linguisti…        2   17% ▇▇
COPEN                                           3   13% ▇▇
Hallucinations Leaderboard results              4    6% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic …        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        2% ▇
weighted average                                   = -3.4
Licences: Preserving Privacy Through Dememorization: An Unlearning Technique For Mitigating Memorization Risks In Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-265-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-367-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · COPEN ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/copen-emnlp2022-zero-shot-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Hallucinations Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2022-acl-long-229-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Other ways to run it 1. Run it as published (fp32, needs ~0.53 GB, from [huggingface.co/EleutherAI](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125m/tree/21def0189f5705e2521767faed922f1f15e7d7db)) ```sh uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125m')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])" ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/EleutherAI](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-125m) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-neo-125m) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)