[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-Neo 2.7B # GPT-Neo 2.7B EleutherAI · released 2021-03 · 2.7B params · mit **score 17.9** ±0.9 · #705 of 732 · from 47 benchmark results across 14 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-Neo 2.7B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task    vs the others          rank  counts  tests
coding  ▁●▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁   #463 of 469*     20%      2
math    ▁▁●▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁    #401 of 431    4.0%      2
coding · #463 of 469 · 20% of its score Beats [Molmo 7B-D (0924)](molmo-7b-d.md), [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b.md), [ChatGLM-6B](chatglm-6b.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test        result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
HumanEval     7.9%  ▁·●▁▃▄▆▅█▃▁▁ beats 2/99   easy · avg 76%     11%  sharp · too hard for it
HumanEval+    6.7%  ▁·●▁▁▃▄▄▄█▃▁ beats 2/99   easy · avg 70%    8.1%  sharp · too hard for it
math · #401 of 431 · 4.0% of its score Beats [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md), [Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3](mistral-7b-instruct-v0-3.md), [Llama-3-Instruct-8B-SimPO-v0.2](llama-3-instruct-8b-simpo-v0-2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-Neo 125M](gpt-neo-125m.md), [OPT-125M](opt-125m.md), [GPT-2 XL (1.5B)](gpt-2-xl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test    result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
GSM8K     1.5%  ▂●▂▂▃▄▅▇██▆▄ beats 11/206  easy · avg 68%    2.2%  sharp · too hard for it
MathQA   24.1%  ▃·▃▃█●··▃·▃▃ beats 7/10    hard · avg 33%    1.8%  blunt · too hard for it · several runs
other tests (21)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
HellaSwag                            42.7%  ▃▃●··▅····▃█ beats 2/8     easy · avg 82%          15%  at its level · several runs
ARC Challenge                        27.4%  ▅····●▃···▅█ beats 2/8     medium · avg 60%        10%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy · sever…
WinoGrande                           57.7%  ●··█···█▄▄·▄ beats 0/8     easy · avg 86%         9.0%  small run · several runs
ARC Easy                             61.1%  ▅·●▃··▃··▃·█ beats 2/8     easy · avg 87%         5.7%  blunt · at its level · several runs
COPA                                 79.0%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅●▆▂▁▁ beats 28/67   very easy · avg 96%    4.7%  at its level · several runs
ImageNetVC visual commonsense, te…   41.6%  ▂·▄·▂●▄▄█▄▂▆ beats 6/21    easy · avg 74%         4.6%  blunt · at its level
PIQA                                 72.9%  ▄▄··●·▄·▄·██ beats 2/8     easy · avg 88%         4.4%  blunt · at its level · several runs
BoolQ                                61.8%  ▄●▄···▄··█▄▄ beats 2/8     easy · avg 88%         4.3%  at its level · several runs
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-wo…   62.2%  █·▄··●··█··▄ beats 3/7     very easy · avg 88%    4.3%  blunt · at its level · several runs
Natural Questions (closed book)       5.7%  ▁·▁·▁▂●▂·▅▂█ beats 6/28    medium · avg 48%       3.4%  too hard for it · several runs
CoNLL-2003 English NER, few-shot …   40.2%  ▃···●·▃▅··▃█ beats 2/9     very easy · avg 85%    2.7%  at its level
OpenBookQA                           23.2%  ●······▂·▆·▂ beats 1/8     easy · avg 77%         2.4%  several runs
12-dataset text classification, 4…   51.5%  ▂▂··●·█···▂▂ beats 2/8     easy · avg 79%         1.5%  blunt · at its level
Social IQA                           40.0%  ●▄····█▄▄··▄ beats 1/7     medium · avg 60%       1.2%  blunt
UD English-GUM UPOS tagging, few-…   70.4%  ▄·▄●·······█ beats 2/4     very easy · avg 92%    0.8%  blunt
PubMedQA                             58.3%  ▂·····▅●▅▆▆█ beats 7/24    medium · avg 74%       0.6%  blunt · at its level · several runs
TriviaQA                             20.1%  ▁··▁█▃●▁▄▅▄█ beats 11/28   easy · avg 73%         0.6%  noisy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   28.0%  ●▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 20/276  medium · avg 72%       0.6%  noisy
TruthfulQA MC2                       39.9%  ▅▃●▆▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 9/31    medium · avg 57%       0.2%  blunt · at its level
HaluEval QA hallucination detecti…   43.2%  ●▁▁·▁▁·▁▁▁▁▁ beats 13/27   hard · avg 66%         0.1%  too hard for it · noisy
TruthfulQA generation, % true (hu…   40.0%  ██····█·█●·█ beats 4/5     medium · avg 42%       0.0%  blunt · at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio…        2   20% ▇▇
UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for …        9   17% ▇▇
Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 …        8   16% ▇▇
Preserving Privacy Through Dememorizati…        7   14% ▇▇
EleutherAI GPT-J-6B model card (submitt…        4   10% ▇
RedPajama                                       4    6% ▇
ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual C…        1    5% ▇
Hallucinations Leaderboard results              4    4% ▇
Prompting Language Models for Linguisti…        2    3% ▇
Coverage-based Example Selection for In…        1    2% ▇
Generative Calibration for In-context L…        1    1% ▇
EleutherAI GPT-Neo 2.7B model card (sub…        2    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic …        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 17.9
Licences: EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluation ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-758-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2309.05463v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Preserving Privacy Through Dememorization: An Unlearning Technique For Mitigating Memorization Risks In Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-265-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EleutherAI GPT-J-6B model card ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/eleutherai-gpt-j-6b-card-Apache-2.0.txt)) · RedPajama ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/redpajama-2024-original-zero-shot-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual Commonsense Evaluation on 1000 ImageNet Categories ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-133-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Hallucinations Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-367-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-930-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Generative Calibration for In-context Learning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-152-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EleutherAI GPT-Neo 2.7B model card ([MIT](../../licenses/eleutherai-gpt-neo-2-7b-card-MIT.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2022-acl-long-229-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Other ways to run it 1. Run it as published (fp32, needs ~10.67 GB, from [huggingface.co/EleutherAI](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B/tree/e24fa291132763e59f4a5422741b424fb5d59056)) ```sh uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])" ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/EleutherAI](https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-neo-2.7B) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/gpt-neo-2-7b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)