[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Granite 4.0 350M
# Granite 4.0 350M
IBM · released 2025-10 · 0.352B params · apache-2.0
**score 28.1** ±1.0 · #675 of 732 · from 24 benchmark results across 3 sources
Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only.
## What it's good at
● marks Granite 4.0 350M among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests
agent tasks ▁▁●▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁ #300 of 313* 3.6% 2
coding ●··········█ #3 of 4 39% 7
chat & writing ▁▁▁●▆▄▆█▆▇▇▃ #366 of 402* 7.4% 2
math ▁▁●▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁ #414 of 431 26% 6
agent tasks · #300 of 313 · 3.6% of its score
Beats [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Lite Instruct (16B-A2.4B)](deepseek-coder-v2-lite-instruct.md), [Olmo 3 7B Instruct](olmo-3-7b-instruct.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) 19.0% ▁▁▁●██▅▅▆▂▂▂ beats 4/77 hard · avg 31% 1.8% typical
BFCL v3 (maker) 39.3% ▁▁▁▁●▃▅█▆▅▄▁ beats 14/171 medium · avg 62% 1.7% blunt · at its level
coding · #3 of 4 · 39% of its score
Beats [Granite 4.0 H 350M](granite-4-0-h-350m.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
HumanEval (maker) 39.0% ▁▁▁▁▂▂●▆█▅▂▁ beats 64/205 very easy · avg 89% 12% sharp · at its level
HumanEval+ (maker) 37.0% ▁·▁▁▂▃●▄█▅▄▃ beats 28/145 very easy · avg 86% 10% sharp · at its level
MBPP (maker) 48.0% ▁▁▁▄▅●▆▅▄▁▂▁ beats 31/86 easy · avg 81% 4.9% at its level
MBPP+ (maker) 38.0% ▁··▁▁●▄█▆▄▁▁ beats 7/120 easy · avg 72% 3.4% at its level
MultiPL-E (maker) 16.0% ●··▄·▅▅▇▄█▃▄ beats 1/31 medium · avg 51% 3.3% typical
BigCodeBench (maker) 11.1% ●····▃·█▃▅█▃ beats 0/12 medium · avg 40% 3.1% typical
CRUXEval-O (maker) 23.8% ●▂██▅▂▁·▁·▁▁ beats 1/51 medium · avg 48% 1.9% blunt
chat & writing · #366 of 402 · 7.4% of its score
Beats [Code Llama 70B Instruct](codellama-70b-instruct.md), [Gemma 4 E2B](gemma-4-e2b.md), [Code Llama 34B Instruct](codellama-34b-instruct.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 3 270M IT](gemma-3-270m.md), [SmolLM2 360M Instruct](smollm2-360m.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
IFEval instruction-level strict (… 61.6% ●▄····▄▄█▄·█ beats 0/8 very easy · avg 88% 3.8% at its level
IFEval prompt-level strict (maker) 49.2% ▁▁··●··▂▇█▃▃ beats 2/26 easy · avg 81% 3.5% at its level
math · #414 of 431 · 26% of its score
Beats [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md), [Llama 2 13B Chat](llama-2-13b-chat.md), [Flan-T5 Large](flan-t5-large.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-Neo 125M](gpt-neo-125m.md), [OPT-125M](opt-125m.md), [GPT-2 XL (1.5B)](gpt-2-xl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
GSM8K (maker) 30.7% ▂▂▂▂▃▄●▇██▆▄ beats 61/206 very easy · avg 89% 12% sharp · at its level
GSM-Symbolic (maker) 26.8% ●▃····▃·▅▅█▃ beats 0/10 easy · avg 78% 4.4% at its level
DeepMind Mathematics (maker) 8.5% ●····▅·█▃▃·▅ beats 1/10 medium · avg 50% 3.7% typical
Minerva MATH (maker) 13.0% ▁·▃▁●▂▁█▄▁▃▃ beats 5/27 medium · avg 59% 3.0% typical
MGSM, 5 languages (en, es, fr, ja… 14.7% ●·▄▄██···█·▄ beats 0/10 medium · avg 46% 2.4% typical
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 0.3% ●▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 2/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 0.0% sharp · too hard for it · noisy
other tests (8)
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why
BIG-Bench Hard (maker) 33.1% ▁▁▁▁●▄▅▆█▃▃▁ beats 19/155 easy · avg 75% 6.9% sharp
MMLU (maker) 35.0% ▁▁▁▁▁●▂▅██▆▄ beats 20/214 easy · avg 74% 6.7% typical
GPQA (subset unspecified) (maker) 24.1% ●▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▃▃ beats 1/106 hard · avg 37% 3.3% sharp · too hard for it
MMLU-Pro (maker) 12.1% ●▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅█▁ beats 0/188 medium · avg 46% 2.8% too hard for it
INCLUDE (maker) 27.7% ●····▂▂▄▄▄█▄ beats 1/36 medium · avg 52% 2.4% too hard for it
MMMLU (maker) 28.2% ●▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅██▃ beats 1/46 medium · avg 56% 2.1% typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch) 0.0% ●▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 10/137 very hard · avg 5.8% 0.0% sharp · too hard for it · noisy
GPQA Diamond 11.2% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 0/322 hard · avg 39% — failed run: Far below guessing. At 350M…
## How the score was worked out
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source results share of the score
ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-1b model card… 21 98% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r… 1 2% ▇
Epoch AI 2 0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇
weighted average = 28.1
Licences: ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-1b model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-1b/blob/d18cca4c121edb87d022116d281ce212c9136f57/README.md)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/))
Not counted (1)
source test score why
Epoch AI GPQA Diamond 11.2% failed run: Far below guessing. At 350M this is more plausibly a format failure (no parseable letter) than knowledge 'worse than random'.
## How to run it
### llama.cpp (recommended)
1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md)
```sh
# macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
# Windows
irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex
```
2. Run Granite 4.0 350M (Q4_K_M, needs ~0.2 GB, from [huggingface.co/ibm-granite](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF/tree/b8208a86a58427e1739265318028eb5895b74bf2))
```sh
llama cli -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF:Q4_K_M
```
3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
```sh
llama serve -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF:Q4_K_M
```
Other versions: Q8_0 (~0.4 GB) `llama cli -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF:Q8_0`
### LM Studio
1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download)
2. Run Granite 4.0 350M (Q4_K_M, needs ~0.2 GB, from [huggingface.co/ibm-granite](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF/tree/b8208a86a58427e1739265318028eb5895b74bf2))
```sh
lms get https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
```
3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Other versions: Q8_0 (~0.4 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · 4bit (~0.2 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-4bit -y` · 8bit (~0.4 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-8bit -y`
### Ollama
1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download)
```sh
# Linux
curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
```
2. Run Granite 4.0 350M (BF16, needs ~1.34 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/granite4/tags))
```sh
ollama run granite4:350m
```
### MLX (Mac)
1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only.
```sh
# with uv
uv tool install mlx-lm
# or
pip install mlx-lm
```
2. Run Granite 4.0 350M (4bit, needs ~0.2 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-4bit/tree/f118e62936e8a845680a4c614997e14d7441f26e))
```sh
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-4bit
```
3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
```sh
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-4bit
```
Other versions: 8bit (~0.4 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/granite-4.0-350m-8bit`
Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/ibm-granite](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-350m)
[interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/granite-4-0-350m) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)