[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Grok 3 Mini Beta # Grok 3 Mini Beta SpaceXAI (xAI) · released 2025-04 · proprietary **score 63.2** ±1.0 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 10 benchmark results across 8 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Grok 3 Mini Beta among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▂●█▄▅▄▄▃▁▁ #284 of 354* 9.4% 2 coding ▁▁▁▃▄▆█●▅▄▃▁ #161 of 539* 35% 2 chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▅▄▇█●▇▇▃ #177 of 474* 11% 1 math ▁▁▃▆██●█▃▁▁▁ #183 of 530 21% 3 web search ▂▁▂▆▅█▅▄▁▂●▁ #4 of 96* 7.2% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q… 30.9% █·▃▃·█▅▅▅●▃▅ beats 15/18 very hard · avg 5.5% 7.2% sharp BFCL v3 53.0% ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 51/114 medium · avg 51% 2.1% blunt · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw… 49.3% ▂·▂▃▅▂▃●▆▄▂▂ beats 26/49 very hard · avg 7.6% 28% sharp · at its level LiveCodeBench official (Aug 1, 20… 66.7% ▃▃▅▃··▃▅●▅▅▃ beats 10/15 hard · avg 24% 7.1% sharp · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LMArena (text) 1363.7 ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆●▇█▃ beats 206/385 avg 1260 11% blunt
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why MATH level 5 88.1% ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃●▂▃▄ beats 75/92 hard · avg 28% 11% sharp OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 77.8% ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇●█▃▂▅ beats 111/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 8.2% sharp · at its level · noisy THINK-Bench final-answer accuracy… 91.8% ▄█·▄····▄●·█ beats 5/7 easy · avg 76% 1.3% typical
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q… 30.9% █·▃▃·█▅▅▅●▃▅ beats 15/18 very hard · avg 5.5% 7.2% sharp
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why GPQA Diamond 75.5% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄●▇█▅ beats 113/211 hard · avg 39% 17% sharp · at its level EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc… 1146.8 ▁·▂▁▄●▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 19/62 avg 1034 6.5% typical
source results share of the score Epoch AI 3 37% ▇▇▇▇ Aider polyglot benchmark runs 1 28% ▇▇▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 1 11% ▇ Finance Agent Benchmark 1 7% ▇ LiveCodeBench official website results 1 7% ▇ EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results 1 6% ▇ Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r… 1 2% ▇ THINK-Bench: Evaluating Thinking Effici… 1 1% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 63.2Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Aider polyglot benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Finance Agent Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LiveCodeBench official website results ([CC-BY-SA-4.0](../../licenses/lcb-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · THINK-Bench: Evaluating Thinking Efficiency and Chain-of-Thought Quality of Large Reasoning Models ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/grok-3-mini-beta) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)