[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Llama 2 70B Chat # Llama 2 70B Chat Meta · released 2023-07 · 68.98B params · llama2 **score 40.6** ±0.7 · #554 of 732 · from 31 benchmark results across 19 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Llama 2 70B Chat among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
coding          ▁▁▁●▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁   #430 of 469*    3.3%      1
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃●▄▆█▆▇▇▃    #342 of 402     36%      7
math            ▁▁●▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁    #399 of 431     14%      4
coding · #430 of 469 · 3.3% of its score Beats [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-7b.md), [Qwen3.5 2B](qwen3-5-2b.md), [DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B](deepseek-r1-distill-llama-8b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.2 1B Instruct](llama-3-2-1b.md), [SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct](smollm2-1-7b.md), [Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1](mistral-7b-instruct-v0-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
Tulu 2: CodexEval pass@10   52.1%  ▃▃▃·●▃▃█▃▂▂▅ beats 8/25   easy · avg 83%    3.3%  sharp · at its level
chat & writing · #342 of 402 · 36% of its score Beats [OpenThinker3 7B](openthinker3-7b.md), [Code Llama 70B Instruct](codellama-70b-instruct.md), [Gemma 4 E2B](gemma-4-e2b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.0 H 350M](granite-4-0-h-350m.md), [LFM2 350M](lfm2-350m.md), [Gemma 3 1B](gemma-3-1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                                      result  vs the others in its run   difficulty                counts  why
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled                             14.7%  ▁▂▂▃●▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 36/122  medium · avg 35%             12%  sharp
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judg…                         11.6%  ▂▁●▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 5/60    medium · avg 47%            6.2%  sharp
LMArena (text)                                            1170.7  ▁▁▁▂●▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 49/385  avg 1260                    5.2%  blunt
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-…                        1108.0  ▂▁▂▁▃▇█●▇▄▂▂ beats 51/95   avg 1187                    4.8%  typical
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer gra…  6.8600 MT-Bench score (1-10)  ▆▂▂▆▆▄█●▂▄▄▆ beats 20/28   avg 8.539 MT-Bench scor…    3.7%  sharp · noisy
Arabic IFEval prompt-level (Incep…                          3.0%  ▁·▁●▂▁▄▄▆▄█▄ beats 2/38    medium · avg 46%            2.8%  sharp
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-…                         92.7%  ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█●▄▂ beats 35/45   very easy · avg 94%         0.9%  sharp · noisy
math · #399 of 431 · 14% of its score Beats [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md), [Molmo 7B-D (0924)](molmo-7b-d.md), [Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3](mistral-7b-instruct-v0-3.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-Neo 125M](gpt-neo-125m.md), [OPT-125M](opt-125m.md), [GPT-2 XL (1.5B)](gpt-2-xl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
GSM8K                      59.0%  ▆▂▅█▅▅●▆···▂ beats 19/25  easy · avg 80%          8.2%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MGSM                       34.1%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▁▂●█▃▂ beats 14/42  medium · avg 63%        3.4%  sharp · at its level · small run
MATH level 5                3.3%  ●▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 0/92   hard · avg 28%          2.2%  sharp · too hard for it
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025    0.0%  ●▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 1/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.1%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
other tests (16)
test                                          result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
BIG-Bench Hard                                 49.0%  ▁·····▂●▂▅·▁ beats 10/25    easy · avg 74%          12%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MMLU                                           60.9%  ▁▁▃▃▄█▄●█··▁ beats 18/25    medium · avg 73%       6.2%  at its level · several runs
WildBench v2 WB-Score (task macro)  20.6596 WB-Score  ▁·▁▁·●█▄▇▆▅▆ beats 3/52     avg 43.019 WB-Score    5.5%  sharp
F2WTQ free-form table QA, 2-shot …             37.6%  ▄···█·▄●··▄▄ beats 5/7      medium · avg 56%       4.6%  at its level
ARC Challenge                                  67.7%  ▄▁▁▂▁▄█▇●▂▃▂ beats 114/140  easy · avg 82%         3.2%  sharp · at its level
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…             32.6%  ●▄▂▃█▄▃▆▃▅▂▂ beats 3/81     medium · avg 57%       2.4%  blunt · at its level
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…             25.1%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂●▃▄▆█▃ beats 18/97    hard · avg 31%         2.4%  blunt
AGIEval English                                46.7%  █●▄··▄··▄█·█ beats 2/9      easy · avg 65%         2.2%  at its level
EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper …             51.6%  ▂··▄·▂▆▄▂●·▂ beats 12/14    medium · avg 53%       2.2%  at its level
GPQA Diamond                                   26.3%  ▁●▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 7/211    hard · avg 39%         1.8%  sharp · too hard for it
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…             65.7%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 118/276  medium · avg 72%       1.2%  at its level · noisy
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …             57.5%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁●▄█▄▃ beats 29/146   easy · avg 82%         0.9%  at its level · noisy
Tulu 2: TyDiQA gold passage, 1-sh…             44.4%  ▂··▁▃▂●▂█▅▁▂ beats 8/25     medium · avg 59%       0.8%  blunt · at its level
ARC Easy                                       82.2%  ▁▃▂▄▆█▅●▁··▁ beats 94/100   easy · avg 85%         0.7%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…             94.1%  ▁▁▂▃▄●█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 51/140   very easy · avg 94%    0.5%  blunt · noisy
FANToM BeliefQ [Choice], short co…             38.4%  ●·····▂····▁ beats 3/11     very hard · avg 55%    0.2%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Orca 2: Teaching Small Language Models …        6   19% ▇▇
Tulu 2                                          5   18% ▇▇
AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards             2   13% ▇▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard                1    6% ▇
WildBench v2 leaderboard data                   1    6% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1    5% ▇
Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-A…        1    5% ▇
Investigating Table-to-Text Generation …        1    5% ▇
Epoch AI                                        3    4% ▇
LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard Space: …        1    4% ▇
Not All Languages Are Created Equal in …        1    3% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             1    3% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    2% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    2% ▇
EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Ben…        1    2% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    1% ▇
FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing …        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 40.6
Licences: Orca 2: Teaching Small Language Models How to Reason ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Tulu 2 ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-v0-1-Apache-2.0.txt)) · WildBench v2 leaderboard data ([Apache-2.0](https://github.com/allenai/WildBench/blob/d6b8dcaf377d173d031980f97c16e1a82618c03d/LICENSE)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Investigating Table-to-Text Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models in Real-World Information Seeking Scenarios ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-industry-17-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard Space: MT-Bench column of the published leaderboard table ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-826-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2312.06281v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-890-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Llama 2 70B Chat (Q4_K_M, needs ~41.4 GB, from [huggingface.co/TheBloke](https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF/tree/798ec30fbdbdde983a1189c8396ea41b8980aa16)) ```sh llama cli -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q2_K (~29.3 GB) `llama cli -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF:Q2_K` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Llama 2 70B Chat (Q4_K_M, needs ~41.4 GB, from [huggingface.co/TheBloke](https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF/tree/798ec30fbdbdde983a1189c8396ea41b8980aa16)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q2_K (~29.3 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-70B-Chat-GGUF@Q2_K -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Llama 2 70B Chat (Q4_0, needs ~41.89 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/llama2/tags)) ```sh ollama run llama2:70b-chat ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~83.28 GB) `ollama run llama2:70b-chat-q8_0` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/meta-llama](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-chat-hf) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/llama-2-70b-chat) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)