[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Llama 2 7B Chat # Llama 2 7B Chat Meta · released 2023-07 · 6.74B params · llama2 **score 32.0** ±0.9 · #650 of 732 · from 30 benchmark results across 19 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Llama 2 7B Chat among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
coding          ▁●▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁   #462 of 469*    4.9%      1
chat & writing  ▁▁▁●▆▄▆█▆▇▇▃    #386 of 402     35%      7
math            ▁▁▃●█▆▄█▄▂▁▁   #370 of 431*    3.7%      1
coding · #462 of 469 · 4.9% of its score Beats [Molmo 7B-D (0924)](molmo-7b-d.md), [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Phi-1 (1.3B)](phi-1.md), [Pythia 6.9B](pythia-6-9b.md), [GPT-J 6B](gpt-j-6b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
Tulu 2: CodexEval pass@10   24.0%  ●▃▃·▆▃▃█▃▂▂▅ beats 0/25   easy · avg 83%    4.9%  sharp · at its level
chat & writing · #386 of 402 · 35% of its score Beats [Phi-2 (2.7B)](phi-2.md), [Nous-Hermes-13b](nous-hermes-13b.md), [Qwen1.5 4B Chat](qwen1-5-4b-chat.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 3 270M IT](gemma-3-270m.md), [SmolLM2 360M Instruct](smollm2-360m.md), [Granite 4.0 350M](granite-4-0-350m.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                                      result  vs the others in its run   difficulty                counts  why
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled                              5.3%  ▁▂●▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 8/122   medium · avg 35%            8.2%  sharp · too hard for it
LMArena (text)                                            1108.0  ▁▁▁●▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 16/385  avg 1260                    7.8%  blunt
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-…                        1036.0  ▂▁▂▁▃●█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 21/95   avg 1187                    7.1%  typical
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer gra…  6.2700 MT-Bench score (1-10)  ▆▂▂▆▆▄●█▂▄▄▆ beats 14/28   avg 8.539 MT-Bench scor…    5.5%  sharp · noisy
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judg…                          4.6%  ●▁▁▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 2/60    medium · avg 47%            2.4%  sharp · too hard for it
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-…                         71.4%  ▂▂·▆·●▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 16/45   very easy · avg 94%         2.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Arabic IFEval prompt-level (Incep…                          0.7%  ●·▁▁▂▁▄▄▆▄█▄ beats 0/38    medium · avg 46%            1.9%  sharp · too hard for it
math · #370 of 431 · 3.7% of its score Beats [GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)](gpt-3-5-turbo-0125.md), [DBRX Instruct](dbrx-instruct.md), [Command R Plus (04-2024)](command-r-plus-04-2024.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [OPT-1.3B](opt-1-3b.md), [OPT-2.7B](opt-2-7b.md), [Gemma 2B (base)](gemma-2b-base.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
GSM8K   12.0%  ●▂▅█▅▅▃▆···▂ beats 3/25   easy · avg 72%    3.7%  sharp
other tests (21)
test                                         result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
LiveBench 2024-07-26                          11.6%  ▁▁▁●▂▃▂█▆▃▅▃ beats 6/61    medium · avg 38%         13%  typical
WildBench v2 WB-Score (task macro)  8.2621 WB-Score  ▁·▁●·▃█▄▇▆▅▆ beats 2/52    avg 43.019 WB-Score     8.3%  sharp
BIG-Bench Hard                                25.6%  ●·····▂█▂▅·▁ beats 0/25    easy · avg 74%          6.5%  sharp
Natural Questions (closed book)               23.7%  ▁·▁·▁▂▁▂·▅●█ beats 18/28   medium · avg 48%        5.9%  typical
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…            31.7%  ●▄▂▃█▄▃▆▃▅▂▂ beats 2/81    medium · avg 57%        3.3%  blunt · at its level
MMLU                                          46.8%  ▁▁▃▃●█▄▁█··▁ beats 7/25    medium · avg 73%        3.2%  typical
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…            16.5%  ▁▁▁●▁▂▂▃▄▆█▃ beats 6/97    hard · avg 31%          2.8%  blunt
VEC embodied concepts, zero-shot …            56.7%  ▁····▁▁·▁·▃● beats 11/11   hard · avg 63%          2.8%  typical
EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper …            25.4%  ▂··●·▂▆▄▂█·▂ beats 2/14    medium · avg 53%        2.6%  at its level
HaluEval knowledge-grounded dialo…            44.0%  ●·········▄▄ beats 0/3     medium · avg 68%        1.5%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…            52.2%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁●▂█▅▁ beats 72/276  medium · avg 72%        1.3%  noisy
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …            54.3%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁●▄█▄▃ beats 25/146  easy · avg 82%          1.2%  at its level · noisy
Tulu 2: TyDiQA gold passage, 1-sh…            22.7%  ●··▁▃▂▂▂█▅▁▂ beats 0/25    medium · avg 59%        1.1%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…            88.7%  ▁▁▂●▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 19/140  very easy · avg 94%     1.1%  blunt · noisy
TriviaQA                                       8.8%  ▁··▁●▃▃▁▄▅▄█ beats 3/28    easy · avg 73%          0.9%  at its level · noisy
HaluEval QA hallucination detecti…            52.3%  █▁▁·▁●·▁▁▁▁▁ beats 20/27   hard · avg 66%          0.4%  too hard for it · noisy
HaluEval QA hallucination recogni…            49.6%  ●··········▃ beats 0/3     very hard · avg 56%     0.3%  too hard for it · noisy
TruthfulQA MC2                                45.3%  ▅▃█●▁▂▅···▁▁ beats 20/31   medium · avg 57%        0.2%  blunt · at its level
VEC visual concepts, zero-shot pe…            63.8%  ▅▅▃●·▃··▃·▃▃ beats 7/11    hard · avg 66%          0.0%  blunt · at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                          0.0%  ●▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 8/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    0.0%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
HaluEval summarization hallucinat…            49.5%  ●··········▃ beats 0/3     very hard · avg 50%     0.0%  blunt · too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Tulu 2                                          5   19% ▇▇
LiveBench model judgments                       1   13% ▇▇
AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards             2   10% ▇
WildBench v2 leaderboard data                   1    8% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1    8% ▇
Hallucinations Leaderboard results              4    7% ▇
Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-A…        1    7% ▇
LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard Space: …        1    6% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    3% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    3% ▇
Can Language Models Understand Physical…        2    3% ▇
EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Ben…        1    3% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard                1    2% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             1    2% ▇
HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination E…        3    2% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    1% ▇
Epoch AI                                        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 32.0
Licences: Tulu 2 ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · LiveBench model judgments ([Apache-2.0 (stated in the LiveBench datasheet)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · WildBench v2 leaderboard data ([Apache-2.0](https://github.com/allenai/WildBench/blob/d6b8dcaf377d173d031980f97c16e1a82618c03d/LICENSE)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Hallucinations Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard Space: MT-Bench column of the published leaderboard table ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-726-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2312.06281v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-v0-1-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-397-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Llama 2 7B Chat (Q4_K_M, needs ~4.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/TheBloke](https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF/tree/191239b3e26b2882fb562ffccdd1cf0f65402adb)) ```sh llama cli -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~7.2 GB) `llama cli -hf TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Llama 2 7B Chat (Q4_K_M, needs ~4.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/TheBloke](https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF/tree/191239b3e26b2882fb562ffccdd1cf0f65402adb)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~7.2 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Llama 2 7B Chat (Q4_0, needs ~4.54 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/llama2/tags)) ```sh ollama run llama2:7b-chat ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~8.59 GB) `ollama run llama2:7b-chat-q8_0` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/meta-llama](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/llama-2-7b-chat) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)