[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) # Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) Meta · released 2025-04 · 402B params (17B active) · llama-4 **score 57.2** ±0.8 · #241 of 732 · from 27 benchmark results across 20 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃●█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #252 of 313    9.1%      5
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇●▇▅▄▃▁   #221 of 469     17%      3
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆●▆▇▇▃   #197 of 402     14%      3
math                ▁▁▃▅█●▄█▄▂▁▁   #203 of 431     19%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃●▂▆▇█▄   #101 of 153     11%      4
web search          ▁▁▁▅●█▃▄·▁·▁    #57 of 84*    2.7%      1
agent tasks · #252 of 313 · 9.1% of its score Trails [Granite 4.0 1B](granite-4-0-1b.md), [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct](qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive)      37.3%  ▁▁▁▂██●▅▆▂▂▂ beats 42/77   hard · avg 31%          3.0%  at its level
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…    3.1%  ●·▃▃·█▅▅▅▅▃▅ beats 2/18    very hard · avg 5.5%    2.7%  sharp
BFCL v3                              52.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 49/114  medium · avg 51%        1.4%  blunt · at its level
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    6.1%  ▄···▄▄·▄▄·▄● beats 6/7     very hard · avg 2.6%    1.1%  blunt · too hard for it
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too…   74.1%  ▃▃●▃▆▅▆▅█▂▅▂ beats 4/31    easy · avg 78%          0.9%  typical
coding · #221 of 469 · 17% of its score Beats [Qwen3.5 4B](qwen3-5-4b.md), [Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct](qwen3-vl-32b-instruct.md), [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-3b-reasoning.md), [s1.1 32B](s1-1-32b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw…   15.6%  ▂·▂●▅▂▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 6/49   very hard · avg 7.6%     13%  sharp · at its level
WebApp1K-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)     76.9%  ▃▁▁█▁▄▅●▄▇▁▄ beats 19/31  medium · avg 40%        2.5%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    6.1%  ▄···▄▄·▄▄·▄● beats 6/7    very hard · avg 2.6%    1.1%  blunt · too hard for it
chat & writing · #197 of 402 · 14% of its score Beats [Gemma 2 9B IT SimPO](gemma-2-9b-simpo.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md), [Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B)](mistral-small-4.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct](lfm2-5-1-2b-instruct.md), [LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking](lfm2-5-1-2b-thinking.md), [LFM2.5 8B-A1B](lfm2-5-8b-a1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
Arena-Hard v2.0 hard prompts (sty…   17.2%  ▂·▃▅●·▃█▆▂▂▂ beats 7/22     very hard · avg 12%    6.6%  sharp · at its level
LMArena (text)                      1327.0  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▆▇█▃ beats 165/385  avg 1260               6.3%  blunt
Arena-Hard v2.0 creative writing …   10.5%  ●▂▂▆▂▂▃█▂▃·▂ beats 2/22     hard · avg 19%         1.5%  sharp · at its level · noisy
math · #203 of 431 · 19% of its score Beats [MiniMax-M2.1](minimax-m2-1.md), [DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)](deepseek-v3.md), [Qwen3 235B-A22B (Apr 2025, hybrid)](qwen3-235b-a22b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 (base)](mixtral-8x7b-v0-1.md), [Olmo 3 7B Instruct](olmo-3-7b-instruct.md), [Phi-4-mini-reasoning 3.8B](phi-4-mini-reasoning.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
MATH level 5                         73.0%  ▂▂▅▆▄█▆●▅▂▃▄ beats 62/92   hard · avg 28%           13%  sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             20.6%  ▃▃▄▃●▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 58/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    4.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MathNet-Solve-Test micro-average …   14.7%  ●▃···█▃·▃·▃▃ beats 0/8     very hard · avg 15%     1.6%  at its level
vision & documents · #101 of 153 · 11% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [GPT-4o (2024-05-13)](gpt-4o-2024-05-13.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)     1145.4  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃●▅▅█▇ beats 46/152  avg 1061               4.2%  blunt
CharXiv (reasoning questions)        55.0%  ▂▅▃▅▅●▆▅▆█▆▂ beats 35/101  medium · avg 36%       2.7%  at its level · small run
CharXiv descriptive questions        87.7%  ▂▄▄▅▇▄█●▇▂▁▂ beats 41/59   easy · avg 71%         2.2%  small run
VMMU (Vietnamese multimodal under…   38.4%  ▅······▃·●·█ beats 3/7     very hard · avg 36%    1.4%  noisy
web search · #57 of 84 · 2.7% of its score Beats [Kimi K2.6](kimi-k2-6.md), [GPT-5 Pro](gpt-5-pro.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash (Preview, Apr 2026)](deepseek-v4-flash-preview.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md), [Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B)](llama-4-scout.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…    3.1%  ●·▃▃·█▅▅▅▅▃▅ beats 2/18   very hard · avg 5.5%    2.7%  sharp
other tests (10)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         67.0%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄●▇█▅ beats 101/211  hard · avg 39%          10%  sharp · at its level
KCL-Essay vanilla                    25.6%  ▁···▁▃●█▂▃▃▂ beats 6/23     hard · avg 17%         4.0%  at its level
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1062.0  ▁·▂▁●▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 8/62     avg 1034               3.8%  typical
CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju…   78.7%  ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅●▂▃ beats 77/95    medium · avg 65%       3.8%  typical
KINA (Knowledge Index of Noah's A…   31.6%  ▁▁▂▁▃▄█●▄▅▂▃ beats 24/39    very hard · avg 21%    3.4%  typical
KCL-MCQA vanilla                     43.3%  ▂···█▂▆▆●█▆▂ beats 13/23    very hard · avg 29%    1.9%  typical
LongSocialBench (full-context, 4-…   41.2%  ▆▂·▄●·▂▂·▄▄▂ beats 6/16     very hard · avg 36%    1.8%  blunt
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   63.3%  ▁··▃▁▁▁▅●▅▁▅ beats 15/24    hard · avg 51%         1.3%  blunt · at its level
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   80.1%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 260/276  medium · avg 72%       1.2%  at its level · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   91.8%  ▁▂▁▂▅█●▃▄▃▁▁ beats 62/98    very easy · avg 90%    0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        3   27% ▇▇▇
Aider polyglot benchmark runs                   1   13% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2   11% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard        2    8% ▇
Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Towar…        2    6% ▇
Apriel-1.5-15b-Thinker                          2    5% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        2    4% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    4% ▇
SpeakLeash CPTUB                                1    4% ▇
Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark                   1    3% ▇
Finance Agent Benchmark                         1    3% ▇
WebApp1K models leaderboard                     1    3% ▇
LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs U…        1    2% ▇
MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark …        1    2% ▇
VMMU: A Vietnamese Multitask Multimodal…        1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
Multi-SWE-bench experiments                     1    1% ▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 57.2
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Aider polyglot benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs’ Legal Reasoning Capabilities ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/cards-final-NOTICE.txt)) · Apriel-1.5-15b-Thinker ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Finance Agent Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · WebApp1K models leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/webapp1k-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs Understand Online Discussion Threads? ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2604.18584v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · VMMU: A Vietnamese Multitask Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Multi-SWE-bench experiments ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/multi-swe-bench-experiments-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Amazon Bedrock) · $0.42/M blended · $0.24 in / $0.97 out per 1M tokens · [docs.aws.amazon.com](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/model-card-meta-llama-4-maverick-17b-instruct.html) [price source](https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Amazon Bedrock on-demand Llama 4 Maverick 17B (Meta Llama 4 On-Demand table), US East (N. Virginia)/Ohio and US West (Oregon/N. California). Batch pricing excluded. Table cells are rendered from AWS's own price data file for the page (published 2026-09-25T06:55:02Z). Currency: USD. Amazon Bedrock official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25. · [context source](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/0e0b8c519242d5833d8c11bffc1232b77ad7f301/models/llama4/MODEL_CARD.md): Meta Llama 4 model card (llama-models repo, pinned): Llama 4 Maverick (17Bx128E) context length 1M (stated rounded). Model ceiling, not a promise by any hosted API. Observed 2026-09-25. ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) (ud-q2_k_xl, needs ~121.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL ``` Other versions: ud-iq1_s (~60.8 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF:UD-IQ1_S` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) (ud-q2_k_xl, needs ~121.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: ud-iq1_s (~60.8 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF@UD-IQ1_S -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B) (Q4_K_M, needs ~241.7 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/llama4/tags)) ```sh ollama run llama4:maverick ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/meta-llama](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/llama-4-maverick) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)