[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) # MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) Xiaomi · released 2026-04 · 1023B params (42B active) · mit **score 68.6** ±0.9 · #92 of 732 · from 21 benchmark results across 6 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅●▄▂▁    #76 of 313     61%     13
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅●▃▁    #61 of 469     31%      5
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃   #38 of 402*    8.7%      1
web search      ······●·····      #1 of 1*    2.2%      1
agent tasks · #76 of 313 · 61% of its score Beats [GPT-5 Pro](gpt-5-pro.md), [GPT-5](gpt-5.md), [Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)](gemini-3-flash-preview.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                     result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  -0.0893 IPS  ▁▁▁●▃▂█▁▂▂▁▁ beats 6/59     avg -0.379 IPS           22%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker)                65.2%  ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆●▅█ beats 34/63    hard · avg 23%          5.4%  sharp · at its level · small run
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…        57.2%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃●▇▂▁ beats 38/58    very hard · avg 9.7%    5.4%  sharp · at its level · small run
SWE-bench Verified (maker)                78.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█●▁▁ beats 128/138  hard · avg 26%          4.9%  sharp · small run
GameLogicBench solve rate (72 God…        16.7%  ●▄·█·▄·██▄·▄ beats 1/11     very hard · avg 5.1%    4.8%  typical
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (maker)                 1.5%  ▁·●··▁▆▆▅██▃ beats 1/33     very hard · avg 0.5%    4.6%  sharp · small run
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (maker)                68.4%  ▂▂▅▅████▆●▃▃ beats 32/36    hard · avg 17%          3.4%  at its level · small run
EEGAgentBench overall (tool-based…        49.1%  ▂·▁▁··▇▇●▂·▁ beats 16/25    hard · avg 28%          2.6%  blunt · at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…        48.0%  ▁·▁▂▂▁▄▄●█▄▅ beats 31/62    very hard · avg 15%     2.2%  at its level · small run
Agents' Last Exam (metric/harness…        13.2%  ●·▂·█▄▂·▂▂▄▄ beats 0/14     very hard · avg 6.5%    1.8%  small run
Toolathlon-Verified (maker)               49.1%  ▂·▂▂●▃···▂██ beats 5/18     hard · avg 32%          1.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
τ³-bench (maker)                          72.9%  ▁▁▂▁·▁▁·▁▁▂● beats 23/25    medium · avg 37%        1.4%  at its level · small run
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)           19.0%  ●····▂▁▁▆███ beats 1/31     hard · avg 19%          1.0%  at its level · noisy · small run
coding · #61 of 469 · 31% of its score Beats [GPT-5.4](gpt-5-4.md), [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)           1480.4  ▁▁▃▂▅█●▆▅▅▁▂ beats 68/129   avg 981                  15%  sharp
SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified)…   57.2%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃●▇▂▁ beats 38/58    very hard · avg 9.7%    5.4%  sharp · at its level · small run
SWE-bench Verified (maker)           78.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█●▁▁ beats 128/138  hard · avg 26%          4.9%  sharp · small run
GameLogicBench solve rate (72 God…   16.7%  ●▄·█·▄·██▄·▄ beats 1/11     very hard · avg 5.1%    4.8%  typical
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) (maker)      19.0%  ●····▂▁▁▆███ beats 1/31     hard · avg 19%          1.0%  at its level · noisy · small run
chat & writing · #38 of 402 · 8.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Sol](gpt-6-sol.md), [MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B)](mimo-v2-6-flash.md), [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1466.6  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 342/385  avg 1260      8.7%  blunt
web search · #1 of 1 · 2.2% of its score
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   48.0%  ▁·▁▂▂▁▄▄●█▄▅ beats 31/62  very hard · avg 15%    2.2%  at its level · small run
other tests (6)
test                            result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
WildClawBench                    43.0%  ▃·▅▅█·▅●▅▃▃▃ beats 11/17   very hard · avg 11%     4.2%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)     34.0%  ▁▁▁▄▆▆▇█●▆▁▃ beats 84/111  very hard · avg 6.0%    3.3%  at its level · small run
AutomationBench v1.0.6 (maker)   16.0%  ▃···●·▃▃··█▅ beats 1/8     very hard · avg 7.2%    2.2%  at its level · small run
SEC-Bench Pro (pass@1) (maker)   17.7%  ●·▄·▄·█▄···▄ beats 0/6     very hard · avg 7.5%    2.1%  at its level · small run
Claw-Eval Pass^3 (maker)         63.8%  █▄▄·▄·▄▄·●·▄ beats 7/8     hard · avg 29%          1.6%  at its level · small run
ExploitGym (pass@1) (maker)       0.2%  ●·▄··█·▄▄··▄ beats 0/6     very hard · avg 0.7%    1.2%  too hard for it · noisy · small run
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     3   46% ▇▇▇▇▇▇
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro model card (su…        7   22% ▇▇▇
Xiaomi MiMo official model cards and do…        8   20% ▇▇
GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agent…        1    5% ▇
WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-Wor…        1    4% ▇
EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents …        1    3% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 68.6
Licences: LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro model card ([MIT](../../licenses/XiaomiMiMo--MiMo-V2.5-Pro.txt)) · GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Runtime Game Logic with Tick-Level State Assertions ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Short- and Long-Horizon EEG Analysis ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Novita AI) · $0.65/M blended · $0.522 in / $1.044 out per 1M tokens · [novita.ai](https://novita.ai/models/llm/xiaomimimo-mimo-v2.5-pro) [price source](https://novita.ai/pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Novita AI serverless chat completions, model xiaomimimo/mimo-v2.5-pro (status active; 1M context): input $0.522, output $1.044; cache read excluded. Xiaomi's own API lists mimo-v2.5-pro at $0.435/$0.87 (overseas, cache miss) but marks it 'to be deprecated' on 2026-10-21. Currency: USD. Novita AI official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro.toml) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~614.3 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~307.4 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL` · ud-iq1_m (~153.95 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF:UD-IQ1_M` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~614.3 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~307.4 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y` · ud-iq1_m (~153.95 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiMo-V2.5-Pro-GGUF@UD-IQ1_M -y` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/XiaomiMiMo](https://huggingface.co/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5-Pro) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/mimo-v2-5-pro) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)