[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503) # Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503) Mistral · released 2025-03 · 24.01B params · apache-2.0 **score 54.7** ±0.9 · #288 of 732 · from 28 benchmark results across 13 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁ #231 of 313 5.6% 3 coding not ranked yet — 2 chat & writing ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆●▆▇▇▃ #228 of 402* 11% 2 math ▁▁▃▅●▆▄█▄▂▁▁ #276 of 431 26% 4 vision & documents ▁▁▂▂▁▃●▂▆▇█▄ #111 of 153 14% 5 web search ▁▁▁▅▄█▃●·▁·▁ #12 of 84* 2.6% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q… 10.8% █·▃▃·●▅▅▅▅▃▅ beats 5/18 very hard · avg 5.5% 2.6% sharp BFCL v3 57.7% ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 72/114 medium · avg 51% 1.7% blunt · at its level Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too… 91.2% ▃▃▃▃▆▅▆▅●▂▅▂ beats 26/31 easy · avg 78% 1.3% typical
test result vs the others in its run counts why MBPP+ pass@5 (maker) 74.6% ●··········█ beats 0/1 — not counted yet: no other model in the … HumanEval+ pass@5 (maker) 89.0% ●··········█ beats 0/1 — not counted yet: no other model in the …
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LMArena (text) 1302.6 ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▆▇█▃ beats 128/385 avg 1260 7.7% blunt Arena-Hard v2 aggregate (maker) 19.6% ▁●··▄▃▁▃█▁▁▇ beats 1/22 hard · avg 21% 3.0% sharp · at its level · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why MATH level 5 46.8% ▂▂▅▆▄●▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 40/92 hard · avg 28% 17% sharp · at its level OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 3.9% ▃▃●▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 25/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 3.9% sharp · noisy MATH (subset unspecified) (maker) 69.3% ▂▄▄▃█●▅▆▄▃▄▁ beats 41/80 medium · avg 60% 3.2% at its level · small run MathVista (testmini) (maker) 68.9% ▁··▁▄▄▆●▄▅█▄ beats 24/48 medium · avg 62% 2.2% at its level · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Arena vision (style controlled) 1127.4 ▁▁▂▂▂▂●▄▅▅█▇ beats 38/152 avg 1061 5.1% blunt MMMU (val) (maker) 64.0% ▁····▁▁▃█●▆▅ beats 27/53 medium · avg 56% 4.3% at its level · small run · several runs MathVista (testmini) (maker) 68.9% ▁··▁▄▄▆●▄▅█▄ beats 24/48 medium · avg 62% 2.2% at its level · small run ChartQA (maker) 86.2% ▁··▁▁▁▁▁▂▅●█ beats 27/44 easy · avg 81% 1.4% blunt · small run · several runs DocVQA (maker) 94.1% ▁··▃▁▁▁▇●▇▄▅ beats 12/28 very easy · avg 93% 0.8% blunt · maxed out · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q… 10.8% █·▃▃·●▅▅▅▅▃▅ beats 5/18 very hard · avg 5.5% 2.6% sharp
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why GPQA Diamond 41.9% ▁▁▁▁▂▄●▄▅▇█▅ beats 44/211 hard · avg 39% 17% sharp · at its level · several runs CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju… 78.0% ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆●▄▂▃ beats 75/95 medium · avg 65% 5.1% at its level EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc… 1055.9 ▁·▂●▄▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 5/62 avg 1034 4.7% typical BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a… 39.7% ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆●▃ beats 68/97 hard · avg 31% 4.6% blunt · at its level MMLU (maker) 80.6% ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██●▄ beats 170/214 medium · avg 72% 3.6% at its level · small run MMLU-Pro (maker) 66.8% ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂●▅█▁ beats 78/188 medium · avg 57% 2.8% at its level · small run SimpleQA (maker) 10.4% ▄▄▄▆●▆███·▂█ beats 12/32 very hard · avg 7.4% 2.6% small run DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan… 61.2% ▁··▃▁▁▁▅●▅▁▅ beats 10/24 hard · avg 51% 1.6% blunt · at its level EuroEval HellaSwag (English), tes… 93.1% ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄● beats 99/100 medium · avg 67% 1.3% sharp · at its level · noisy EuroEval Life in the UK (English … 94.4% ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄● beats 139/146 easy · avg 82% 0.7% noisy Chess Puzzles (Epoch) 1.0% ●▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 4/137 very hard · avg 5.8% 0.6% sharp · too hard for it · noisy Vectara hallucination leaderboard… 94.4% ▁▁▂▃▄●█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 52/140 very easy · avg 94% 0.4% blunt · maxed out · noisy WildBench v2 (maker) 55.6% ●··········█ beats 0/1 — not counted yet: no other model in the … GPQA Main (maker) 44.4% █··········● beats 1/1 — not counted yet: no other model in the …
source results share of the score Epoch AI 4 33% ▇▇▇▇ mistralai/Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruc… 9 25% ▇▇▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 2 13% ▇▇ SpeakLeash CPTUB 1 5% ▇ Mistral AI vendor-reported benchmark sc… 3 5% ▇ EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results 1 5% ▇ BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard 1 5% ▇ Finance Agent Benchmark 1 3% ▇ EuroEval leaderboards 2 2% ▇ Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r… 1 2% ▇ DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based… 1 2% ▇ Galileo Agent Leaderboard 1 1% ▇ Vectara hallucination leaderboard 1 0% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 54.7Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · mistralai/Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-2506 model card ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/mistralai--Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-2506.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Finance Agent Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0))
source test score why mistralai/Mistral-Sma… WildBench v2 55.6% too few models have it yet mistralai/Mistral-Sma… GPQA Main 44.4% too few models have it yet mistralai/Mistral-Sma… MBPP+ pass@5 74.6% too few models have it yet mistralai/Mistral-Sma… HumanEval+ pass@5 89.0% too few models have it yet