[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Muse Spark 1.2 # Muse Spark 1.2 Meta · released 2026-08 · closed weights **score 72.9** ±1.1 · #51 of 732 · from 9 benchmark results across 3 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Muse Spark 1.2 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅●▄▂▁    #61 of 313     47%      4
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅●▃▁   #46 of 469*     23%      1
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇●   #11 of 402*     13%      1
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█●   #10 of 153*    8.7%      1
web search          ●··········█      #2 of 2*    2.9%      1
agent tasks · #61 of 313 · 47% of its score Beats [Muse Spark 1.1](muse-spark-1-1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Beam 1.0 501B A23B](beam-1-0-501b-a23b.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md), [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                     result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggrega…  -0.0754 IPS  ▁▁▁●▃▂█▁▂▂▁▁ beats 9/59   avg -0.379 IPS       33%  sharp
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker)                82.9%  ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆█●█ beats 48/63  hard · avg 26%      6.4%  sharp · small run
JobBench (maker)                          61.6%  ●·█····█···█ beats 0/3    hard · avg 25%      4.3%  at its level
DeepSearchQA (maker)                      85.9%  ▄·▄▄···▄●··█ beats 4/6    medium · avg 54%    2.9%  small run
coding · #46 of 469 · 23% of its score Beats [GPT-5.5](gpt-5-5.md), [GPT-5.6 Terra](gpt-5-6-terra.md), [GPT-5.4](gpt-5-4.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Qwen3.8 27B](qwen3-8-27b.md), [GLM-5.2](glm-5-2.md), [Gemini 3.6 Flash](gemini-3-6-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run   difficulty  counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)  1533.7  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃●▅▅▁▂ beats 82/129  avg 981        23%  sharp
chat & writing · #11 of 402 · 13% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md), [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1492.2  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█● beats 375/385  avg 1260       13%  blunt
vision & documents · #10 of 153 · 8.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Fable 5.1](claude-fable-5-1.md), [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1292.7  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▅█● beats 144/152  avg 1061      8.7%  blunt
web search · #2 of 2 · 2.9% of its score
test                  result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
DeepSearchQA (maker)   85.9%  ▄·▄▄···▄●··█ beats 4/6    medium · avg 54%    2.9%  small run
other tests (2)
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SimpleQA Verified                    60.3%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█●▂▅ beats 67/81  very hard · avg 8.0%    5.1%  at its level
AutomationBench public set (Zapie…   38.2%  ●······▄█··█ beats 1/6    very hard · avg 13%     2.2%  at its level · small run
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     4   79% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Meta vendor-reported benchmark scores f…        4   16% ▇▇
Epoch AI                                        1    5% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        1% ▇
weighted average                                   = 72.9
Licences: LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Meta) · $2.00/M blended · $1.25 in / $4.25 out per 1M tokens · [dev.meta.ai](https://dev.meta.ai/docs) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/meta/models/muse-spark-1.2.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/meta/muse-spark-1.2.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/muse-spark-1-2) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)