[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B # Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVIDIA · released 2026-06 · 550B params (55B active) · openmdw **score 68.3** ±0.7 · #95 of 732 · from 32 benchmark results across 5 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆█▄▅●▄▄▂▁    #87 of 313     22%      7
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁    #90 of 469     20%      6
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆●▇▃   #84 of 402*    4.7%      1
math            ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁   #113 of 431    6.2%      3
web search      ▁▁●▅▄█▃▄·▁·▁    #75 of 84*    4.4%      2
agent tasks · #87 of 313 · 22% of its score Beats [Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning)](grok-4-20.md), [GPT-5.1](gpt-5-1.md), [o3-pro](o3-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [MiniMax-M2.7](minimax-m2-7.md), [Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B)](step-3-5-flash.md), [Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B A9B](nemotron-3-5-bolt-74b-a9b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
SWE-bench Verified (maker)           70.7%  ●····██·████ beats 0/6    hard · avg 21%         6.2%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)       67.7%  ●··▄▄···▄▄·█ beats 0/6    hard · avg 30%         4.4%  at its level
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker)           56.4%  █··▄●·▄····▄ beats 4/6    very hard · avg 13%    4.1%  sharp · at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   37.4%  ●····▄·█·▄·▄ beats 0/5    hard · avg 15%         2.4%  at its level
BrowseComp (maker)                   44.4%  ▄·●▄···▄··█▄ beats 1/6    hard · avg 18%         2.0%  at its level
τ³-bench (maker)                     70.9%  ▄····▄·●·▄·█ beats 2/6    medium · avg 42%       1.9%  at its level
τ³-bench telecom (tau2-bench ≥ v1…   92.9%  ▄·●···▄·▄·█▄ beats 1/6    easy · avg 79%         1.2%  maxed out
coding · #90 of 469 · 20% of its score Beats [Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning)](grok-4-20.md), [GPT-5.4 mini](gpt-5-4-mini.md), [GPT-5.1](gpt-5-1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [GLM-4.7](glm-4-7.md), [GPT-5.4 nano](gpt-5-4-nano.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
SWE-bench Verified (maker)           70.7%  ●····██·████ beats 0/6    hard · avg 21%      6.2%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Multilingual (maker)       67.7%  ●··▄▄···▄▄·█ beats 0/6    hard · avg 30%      4.4%  at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecif…   89.0%  ██···█··●███ beats 3/6    medium · avg 46%    2.8%  typical
SciCode subproblems (maker)          44.6%  ▃····●··█·▃▃ beats 1/6    hard · avg 19%      2.4%  at its level
SciCode (level unspecified)          39.9%  ▄·····●█▄▄·▄ beats 1/6    hard · avg 16%      2.2%  at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025)      76.4%  ▄··●····▄▄·█ beats 2/6    medium · avg 47%    2.1%  typical
chat & writing · #84 of 402 · 4.7% of its score Beats [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md), [Muse Glimmer 30B](muse-glimmer-30b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 4 12B](gemma-4-12b.md), [Gemma 4 26B-A4B](gemma-4-26b-a4b.md), [Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B)](mistral-medium-3-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1426.5  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆●█▃ beats 283/385  avg 1260      4.7%  blunt
math · #113 of 431 · 6.2% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [gpt-oss-120b](gpt-oss-120b.md), [Qwen3-VL 32B Thinking](qwen3-vl-32b-thinking.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
IMO-AnswerBench (maker)    88.6%  ▄····▄·▄●·█▄ beats 3/6      medium · avg 41%        2.3%  typical
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   86.7%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇●▃▂▅ beats 135/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.0%  sharp · noisy
AIME 2026                  85.4%  ●·▄·▄▄··█··▄ beats 0/6      medium · avg 57%        1.9%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
web search · #75 of 84 · 4.4% of its score Trails [GPT-4.1 nano](gpt-4-1-nano-2025-04-14.md), [GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)](gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18.md), [Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503)](mistral-small-3-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
Humanity's Last Exam with tools (…   37.4%  ●····▄·█·▄·▄ beats 0/5    hard · avg 15%    2.4%  at its level
BrowseComp (maker)                   44.4%  ▄·●▄···▄··█▄ beats 1/6    hard · avg 18%    2.0%  at its level
other tests (15)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         85.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 147/211  hard · avg 44%           14%  sharp · several runs
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)         26.7%  ▄··●▄··▄·▄·▄ beats 1/6      very hard · avg 5.7%    8.3%  at its level · several runs
GPQA (subset unspecified) (maker)    87.0%  ▄●▄▄·▄·····▄ beats 2/6      hard · avg 47%          7.7%  sharp
MMLU-Pro (maker)                     86.8%  ▄·····▄▄●·▄█ beats 3/6      medium · avg 53%        4.5%  typical
Global-MMLU-Lite                     90.9%  ▃······▅··●▃ beats 5/6      medium · avg 61%        3.9%  typical
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         20.0%  █··▂▃●▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 35/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    3.0%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                12.0%  █▁▁▁▁●▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 62/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    2.5%  sharp · noisy
LongBench v2 (maker)                 61.9%  ▂·▁·▂▃▁▄▄▃█● beats 29/33    very hard · avg 34%     2.4%  at its level
MMLU-ProX (maker)                    83.0%  ▄·····●·▄▄█▄ beats 1/6      medium · avg 58%        2.3%  typical
IFBench (aggregation unspecified)    81.4%  ▃······█▃▃·● beats 6/6      medium · avg 45%        2.3%  typical
IFBench prompt-level (loose) (mak…   81.7%  ▄▄·▄··▄▄···● beats 5/6      medium · avg 47%        2.0%  typical
MultiChallenge (maker)               63.8%  ▁··········● beats 4/6      hard · avg 28%          1.8%  at its level
CritPt (maker)                        3.1%  ▄····▄●···█▄ beats 2/6      very hard · avg 1.1%    0.9%  too hard for it · noisy
WMT25 Terminology Translation (te…   84.8%  ▂·▂··▂·●▂·█▆ beats 4/12     medium · avg 63%        0.7%  noisy
WMT26 General MT (GEMBA-ESA, LLM …   67.1%  ▄·●▄▄·▄██▄█▄ beats 1/12     medium · avg 65%        0.3%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                               results  share of the score
NVIDIA (submitted / maker-reported)       18   56% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
A.X K2 Technical Report                    7   25% ▇▇▇
Epoch AI                                   4   13% ▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                1    5% ▇
Cohere                                     2    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                   0% ▇
weighted average                              = 68.3
Licences: NVIDIA ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2606.15007v1.txt)) · A.X K2 Technical Report ([CC BY 4.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Cohere ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Together AI) · $1.35/M blended · $0.6 in / $3.6 out per 1M tokens · [docs.together.ai](https://docs.together.ai/docs/serverless-models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/togetherai/models/nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b.toml) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~330.5 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL ``` Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~165.5 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL` · ud-iq1_m (~83 GB) `llama cli -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-IQ1_M` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B (ud-q4_k_xl, needs ~330.5 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~165.5 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y` · ud-iq1_m (~83 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF@UD-IQ1_M -y` · 4bit (~309.3 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit -y` · 8bit (~583.8 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-8bit -y` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B (4bit, needs ~309.3 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/pipenetwork](https://huggingface.co/pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit/tree/d64007dfeb7eb87eba579f34fdb03cf329077fd8)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~583.8 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/nvidia](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)