[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Nova Lite # Nova Lite Amazon · released 2024-12 · closed weights **score 49.7** ±1.9 · #376 of 732 · from 8 benchmark results across 4 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Nova Lite among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃●█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁    #243 of 313     31%      4
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄●█▆▇▇▃   #271 of 402*     39%      1
vision & documents  ▁▁▂●▁▃▄▂▆▇█▄   #135 of 153*     26%      1
agent tasks · #243 of 313 · 31% of its score Beats [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [Llama 4 Maverick (402B-A17B)](llama-4-maverick.md), [DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B](deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Phi-3.5-mini-instruct](phi-3-5-mini-instruct.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
BFCL v3                              55.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 60/114  medium · avg 51%    8.7%  blunt · at its level
BFCL V4 (2025-11-03 archive, mode…   33.2%  ▃··●▃▃·▅·▃·█ beats 1/10    hard · avg 33%      8.0%  at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too…   86.8%  ▃▃▃▃▆▅●▅█▂▅▂ beats 16/31   easy · avg 78%      7.8%  typical
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (act…   16.0%  ●▃·▃▃▅▅█▃█▅▅ beats 0/19    hard · avg 26%      6.3%  at its level
chat & writing · #271 of 402 · 39% of its score Beats [Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-14b-reasoning.md), [Ministral 3 14B](ministral-3-14b.md), [OpenThinker2 32B](openthinker2-32b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Flan-T5 XXL](flan-t5-xxl.md), [North Micro Vision Instruct (2.4B)](north-micro-vision-instruct.md), [Granite 4.0 H 1B](granite-4-0-h-1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run   difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1260.4  ▁▁▁▂▃▃●▆▆▇█▃ beats 94/385  avg 1260       39%  blunt
vision & documents · #135 of 153 · 26% of its score Trails [Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct](qwen2-vl-7b.md), [Qwen3.5 2B](qwen3-5-2b.md), [InternVL2-26B](internvl2-26b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                             result  vs the others in its run   difficulty  counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)  1018.8  ▁▁▂●▂▂▃▄▅▅█▇ beats 15/152  avg 1061       26%  blunt
other tests (2)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   98.2%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃●▂▁ beats 126/140  very easy · avg 94%    2.5%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   93.9%  ▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃●▃▁▁ beats 77/98    very easy · avg 90%    0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2   65% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        2   17% ▇▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       2   14% ▇▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               2    3% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        2% ▇
weighted average                                   = 49.7
Licences: LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Amazon Bedrock) · $0.10/M blended · $0.06 in / $0.24 out per 1M tokens · [docs.aws.amazon.com](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/model-card-amazon-nova-lite.html) [price source](https://aws.amazon.com/nova/pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Standard tier, geo cross-Region inference and in-Region, US East (N. Virginia). Amazon Nova Lite (amazon.nova-lite-v1:0). Observed 2026-09-28 (page price data $0.00006/$0.00024 per 1K tokens). · [context source](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/nova/latest/userguide/what-is-nova.html): Context limit from the maker's documentation, observed 2026-10-06. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/nova-lite) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)