[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / o1 (2024-12-17) # o1 (2024-12-17) OpenAI · released 2024-12 · proprietary **score 65.8** ±0.6 · #130 of 732 · from 39 benchmark results across 19 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks o1 (2024-12-17) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #237 of 313    4.5%      4
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁   #118 of 469     21%      5
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆●▇▃   #113 of 402    8.1%      3
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁   #141 of 431     23%      8
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂●▇█▄    #88 of 153    6.5%      4
web search          ▁▁▁▅▄█▃▄·●·▁     #4 of 84*    2.7%      1
agent tasks · #237 of 313 · 4.5% of its score Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking](lfm2-5-1-2b-thinking.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…   21.4%  █·▃▃·█▅▅●▅▃▅ beats 12/18   very hard · avg 5.5%    2.7%  sharp · at its level
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    6.4%  ▄···▄▄·▄▄·▄● beats 7/7     very hard · avg 2.6%    0.9%  blunt · too hard for it
BFCL v3                              56.1%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅●▅▄▁▁ beats 62/114  medium · avg 51%        0.7%  blunt · at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too…   87.6%  ▃▃▃▃▆▅●▅█▂▅▂ beats 18/31   easy · avg 78%          0.3%  typical
coding · #118 of 469 · 21% of its score Beats [Grok 4.3](grok-4-3.md), [Qwen3.5 Plus](qwen3-5-plus.md), [DeepSeek V3.2](deepseek-v3-2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [Solar Pro 4](solar-pro-4.md), [Laguna XS 2.1 (33B-A3B)](laguna-xs-2-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw…   61.7%  ▂·▂▃▅▂▃█●▄▂▂ beats 37/49  very hard · avg 7.6%    8.2%  sharp · at its level
LiveCodeBench official (Jan 1–Nov…   72.4%  ▁▁·▁▂▄▆█▅▂·● beats 31/31  hard · avg 23%          7.9%  sharp · at its level
Aider code editing (133 Exercism …   84.2%  ▁·▁▂▄▁▆▄█▆▂● beats 61/62  medium · avg 51%        3.2%  sharp
HumanEval (Vector Institute, Insp…   97.0%  ▄·▄·█·█·█·●▄ beats 8/9    easy · avg 77%          1.2%  sharp · maxed out
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    6.4%  ▄···▄▄·▄▄·▄● beats 7/7    very hard · avg 2.6%    0.9%  blunt · too hard for it
chat & writing · #113 of 402 · 8.1% of its score Beats [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md), [GPT-5.4 nano](gpt-5-4-nano.md), [Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B)](step-3-5-flash.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Nemotron-Cascade-8B](nemotron-cascade-8b.md), [Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B)](mistral-large-3.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
Arena-Hard v2.0 hard prompts (sty…   61.0%  ▂·▃▅▅·▃█●▂▂▂ beats 19/22    very hard · avg 12%    3.8%  sharp · at its level
LMArena (text)                      1402.3  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆●█▃ beats 248/385  avg 1260               3.4%  blunt
Arena-Hard v2.0 creative writing …   59.9%  ▆▂▂▆▂▂▃●▂▃·▂ beats 15/22    hard · avg 19%         0.8%  sharp · at its level · noisy
math · #141 of 431 · 23% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Olmo 3 32B Think](olmo-3-32b-think.md), [Nemotron-Cascade-8B](nemotron-cascade-8b.md), [Olmo 3.1 32B Think](olmo-3-1-32b-think.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            14.7%  ▂··▁▁●▄▄█▆▄▃ beats 8/86     very hard · avg 1.2%     12%  sharp
MATH level 5                         94.7%  ▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂●▄ beats 81/92    hard · avg 28%          2.3%  sharp
MATH (Vector Institute, Inspect E…   95.9%  ▄··██▄··▄·●█ beats 7/9      medium · avg 50%        2.1%  sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             73.3%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇●█▃▂▅ beats 108/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.1%  sharp · noisy
MATH-500 (simple-evals) (maker)      96.4%  ▃··▅▅▃···●·█ beats 6/9      medium · avg 61%        1.4%  sharp · maxed out
AIME 2025                            71.4%  █··▄··●··▄·▄ beats 4/6      hard · avg 32%          1.2%  sharp · noisy
MGSM (simple-evals) (maker)          89.3%  ▁····▁▅▁●▁▃▁ beats 7/16     easy · avg 80%          0.8%  typical
AIME 2024                            74.6%  ▄···▄●·▄▄··▄ beats 2/6      medium · avg 43%        0.7%  sharp · noisy
vision & documents · #88 of 153 · 6.5% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1 mini](gpt-4-1-mini.md), [Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B)](mistral-large-3.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
Arena vision (style controlled)     1192.7  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄●▅█▇ beats 69/152  avg 1061          2.3%  blunt
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   55.1%  ▄··▂●··▂···▄ beats 3/9     hard · avg 32%    2.0%  at its level
CharXiv descriptive questions (ma…   88.9%  ▄▄·····▄·▄●▄ beats 5/6     easy · avg 71%    1.7%  typical
PhysBench physical-world understa…   55.1%  ▅▃█··▅▃····● beats 9/9     hard · avg 42%    0.5%  blunt · at its level
web search · #4 of 84 · 2.7% of its score Beats [GPT-6 Astra](gpt-6-astra.md), [Claude Opus 5.5](claude-opus-5-5.md), [GPT-6.1 Sol](gpt-6-1-sol.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1](gpt-4-1.md), [o4-mini](o4-mini.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Finance Agent Benchmark v1 (537 q…   21.4%  █·▃▃·█▅▅●▅▃▅ beats 12/18  very hard · avg 5.5%    2.7%  sharp · at its level
other tests (15)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         76.8%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 119/211  hard · avg 39%          9.3%  sharp · at its level · several runs
ZebraLogic (ZeroEval, 1,000 puzzl…   81.0%  ▁▁▃▆██▁▁·▁●▁ beats 56/57    hard · avg 15%          7.2%  sharp · at its level
GPQA Diamond (simple-evals) (make…   75.7%  █▃▃█·▃▃▅▃●▃▅ beats 13/16    hard · avg 39%          5.7%  sharp · at its level
GPQA Diamond (Vector Institute, I…   75.5%  ▃··▃▃▃▃·▃·▃● beats 8/9      hard · avg 40%          4.3%  sharp · at its level
MMLU-Pro (Vector Institute, Inspe…   84.5%  ▃····▃▅·▃▅·● beats 9/9      medium · avg 58%        2.1%  typical
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, …   84.3%  ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄▅▄● beats 66/66    hard · avg 29%          1.8%  at its level
MMLU (simple-evals, zero-shot CoT…   91.8%  ▂▂·█▄▄▂·█●·▂ beats 15/16    easy · avg 79%          1.7%  typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                15.0%  █▁▁▁▁●▃▃▃▂▁▁ beats 69/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    1.3%  sharp · noisy
HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception…   79.6%  ▁▁▁▁·▂·█▆█●▁ beats 30/31    medium · avg 46%        1.3%  typical
SimpleQA Verified                    41.1%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆●█▄▂▅ beats 37/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    1.1%  at its level
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   65.4%  ▁··▃▁▁▁▅█●▁▅ beats 18/24    hard · avg 51%          0.7%  blunt · at its level
SimpleQA (simple-evals) (maker)      42.6%  ▄·▁▁▁▁··●▁·▁ beats 12/14    hard · avg 17%          0.4%  at its level · noisy
DROP F1, 3-shot (simple-evals) (m…   90.2%  ▂▂▄▆▆█·▂···● beats 16/16    easy · avg 78%          0.3%  blunt
Omni-MATH                            67.5%  █·█·●·██··██ beats 2/6      medium · avg 64%        0.2%  blunt · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   97.6%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆●▂▂▁ beats 116/140  very easy · avg 94%     0.1%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        6   24% ▇▇▇
OpenAI simple-evals README benchmark re…        6   10% ▇
Vector Institute Evaluation Leaderboard         4   10% ▇
Aider polyglot benchmark runs                   1    8% ▇
LiveCodeBench official website results          1    8% ▇
WildEval ZeroEval published results             1    7% ▇
Microsoft                                       4    6% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    6% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard        2    5% ▇
OpenAI vendor-reported benchmark scores…        2    4% ▇
Aider code editing benchmark runs               1    3% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             2    3% ▇
Finance Agent Benchmark                         1    3% ▇
Multi-SWE-bench experiments                     1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing V…        1    1% ▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       1    0% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 65.8
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · OpenAI simple-evals README benchmark results ([MIT](../../licenses/openai-simple-evals-MIT.txt)) · Vector Institute Evaluation Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/vector-inspect-evals-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Aider polyglot benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LiveCodeBench official website results ([CC-BY-SA-4.0](../../licenses/lcb-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · WildEval ZeroEval published results ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/zeroeval-published-results-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Microsoft ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2504.21318v1.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Aider code editing benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Finance Agent Benchmark ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Multi-SWE-bench experiments ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/multi-swe-bench-experiments-Apache-2.0.txt)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (OpenAI) · $26.25/M blended · $15 in / $60 out per 1M tokens · [developers.openai.com](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/o1) [price source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/o1): USD per 1M tokens, OpenAI API standard processing, model page 'o1' whose default snapshot is o1-2024-12-17: input $15, output $60; cached-input, Batch and other tiers excluded. Currency: USD. OpenAI official model page, observed 2026-09-28. · [context source](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/o1): OpenAI model page for o1 (default snapshot o1-2024-12-17): 200,000 context window. Observed 2026-09-28. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/o1-2024-12-17) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)