[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / OPT-30B # OPT-30B Meta · released 2022-05 · 30B params · opt-175b-license-noncommercial **score 28.0** ±0.7 · #676 of 732 · from 48 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks OPT-30B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.

other tests (25)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
ARC Challenge                        34.6%  █··▁·▁▁·▁▂▁● beats 18/19   easy · avg 81%          29%  sharp · several runs
WinoGrande                           68.2%  ▄····▄▆▂▄▆▆● beats 18/19   easy · avg 88%          16%  at its level · several runs
ARC Easy                             70.0%  ▃·▅▃▃▅·██▃█● beats 17/19   easy · avg 87%          11%  blunt · at its level · several runs
PIQA                                 77.6%  ▂·▄▄·▄▂▆▂▄█● beats 18/19   easy · avg 87%         6.5%  blunt · at its level · several runs
Story Cloze Test                     77.3%  ▂▂▄▂·▂·▆·▂●▂ beats 12/14   easy · avg 89%         4.4%  blunt · at its level · several runs
TriviaQA                             45.9%  ▁▁▂▂▄▄▃▆●█▅▂ beats 43/80   easy · avg 77%         4.0%  at its level · small run · several runs
ImageNetVC visual commonsense, te…   53.2%  ▂·▄·▂█▄▄●▄▂▆ beats 15/21   easy · avg 74%         3.7%  blunt · at its level
MMLU                                 25.9%  ▁●▁▁▁▂▂▅██▆▄ beats 4/214   medium · avg 59%       3.6%  too hard for it · small run · several r…
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-wo…   71.5%  ▃··▅▃▃▅▅▅██● beats 18/19   very easy · avg 87%    3.1%  blunt · at its level · several runs
SciQ                                 91.1%  ▂··▂▃▂▂▆▃▃●▂ beats 18/19   very easy · avg 98%    2.7%  blunt · several runs
COPA (maker)                         84.0%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅●▆▂▁▁ beats 39/67   very easy · avg 95%    2.4%  at its level · small run · several runs
BIG-Bench Hard (maker)               28.4%  ▁▁▁●▂▄▅▆█▃▃▁ beats 7/155   medium · avg 59%       2.0%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy · small…
OpenBookQA (maker)                   57.2%  ▅▁▁▁▂▂▃█●▁▃▁ beats 87/107  hard · avg 48%         1.9%  too hard for it · small run · several r…
RTE (prompted) (maker)               58.1%  ▅▃·▃··▅·●▅▃█ beats 6/13    medium · avg 75%       1.6%  small run
WiC (prompted) (maker)               50.2%  ●·▂▁······▁▁ beats 0/13    medium · avg 71%       1.3%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy · small…
HellaSwag                            54.3%  ●█······▃▃·▅ beats 1/8     easy · avg 86%         1.3%  at its level
Natural Questions (closed book)      15.0%  ▂▁▁▁▂▄▄▃●█▅▁ beats 35/68   medium · avg 39%       1.1%  small run
CommonsenseQA                        53.2%  █·····▂▂▃●▄▄ beats 24/38   very easy · avg 91%    1.1%  sharp · noisy
12-dataset text classification, 4…   57.0%  ▂▂··▂·●···▂▂ beats 4/8     easy · avg 79%         1.0%  blunt · at its level
BoolQ (maker)                        64.0%  ▁····▁▂●▆▅▆▄ beats 31/103  easy · avg 84%         0.9%  at its level · small run
Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC273…   83.5%  █▃·▅▃▃█▅●█▅▃ beats 13/21   easy · avg 92%         0.8%  blunt · at its level · small run
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   39.5%  ▃▁▁▁▁●▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 48/276  medium · avg 72%       0.8%  noisy
SuperGLUE WSC (prompted)             59.6%  █·······▂·●▃ beats 6/8     medium · avg 68%       0.4%  blunt · noisy · several runs
CommitmentBank (prompted) (maker)    28.6%  ●▃·▂█▂▂▂·▂·▂ beats 0/13    medium · avg 60%       0.2%  blunt · at its level · small run
LogiQA (harness)                     21.7%  ●··········▁ beats 1/14    very hard · avg 25%    0.0%  too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Lan…        6   22% ▇▇▇
GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantizati…        5   20% ▇▇
EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness result…        8   19% ▇▇
OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruc…       15   18% ▇▇
Outlier Suppression+: Accurate quantiza…        5    8% ▇
ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual C…        1    4% ▇
Increasing Probability Mass on Answer C…        3    4% ▇
Recitation-Augmented Language Models            2    3% ▇
Adaptation with Self-Evaluation to Impr…        1    2% ▇
Generative Calibration for In-context L…        1    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 28.0
Licences: Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2304.01373v2-CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt)) · GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.17323v2-gptq-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness results folder ([MIT](../../licenses/lm-eval-harness-results-2023-05-MIT.txt)) · OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2212.12017v3-opt-iml-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Outlier Suppression+: Accurate quantization of large language models by equivalent and effective shifting and scaling ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-102-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual Commonsense Evaluation on 1000 ImageNet Categories ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-133-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-522-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Recitation-Augmented Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.01296v2-recitation-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Adaptation with Self-Evaluation to Improve Selective Prediction in LLMs ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-345-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Generative Calibration for In-context Learning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-152-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Other ways to run it 1. Run it as published (fp16, needs ~59.95 GB, from [huggingface.co/facebook](https://huggingface.co/facebook/opt-30b/tree/ceea0a90ac0f6fae7c2c34bcb40477438c152546)) ```sh uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='facebook/opt-30b', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])" ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/facebook](https://huggingface.co/facebook/opt-30b) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/opt-30b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)