[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / OPT-6.7B # OPT-6.7B Meta · released 2022-05 · 6.7B params · opt-175b-license-noncommercial **score 23.7** ±0.7 · #693 of 732 · from 40 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks OPT-6.7B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task    vs the others          rank  counts  tests
coding  ●▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁   #467 of 469*    1.8%      1
math    ▁▁●▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁   #413 of 431*    5.2%      1
coding · #467 of 469 · 1.8% of its score Trails [GPT-Neo 2.7B](gpt-neo-2-7b.md), [Phi-1 (1.3B)](phi-1.md), [Pythia 6.9B](pythia-6-9b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test       result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
HumanEval    0.6%  ●······▄·▄▄█ beats 0/5    medium · avg 59%    1.8%  sharp · too hard for it
math · #413 of 431 · 5.2% of its score Beats [Command R (03-2024)](command-r-03-2024.md), [Llama 2 13B Chat](llama-2-13b-chat.md), [Flan-T5 Large](flan-t5-large.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-Neo 125M](gpt-neo-125m.md), [OPT-125M](opt-125m.md), [GPT-2 XL (1.5B)](gpt-2-xl.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run  difficulty      counts  why
GSM8K    3.0%  ●···▄▄····▄▄ beats 0/5    easy · avg 67%    5.2%  sharp · too hard for it · several runs
other tests (21)
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
ARC Challenge                        34.8%  ▁·▁··▁▁●▂█▆▃ beats 6/26    easy · avg 82%          31%  sharp · several runs
WinoGrande                           65.4%  ▁····▁··▁▂●▄ beats 12/26   easy · avg 88%          12%  at its level · several runs
ARC Easy                             60.1%  ▁▁·▁▁●▅▄█▅▁▃ beats 6/26    easy · avg 87%          11%  blunt · at its level · several runs
PIQA                                 76.3%  ▁·▁··▁▁▃●▅█▂ beats 13/26   easy · avg 87%         7.3%  blunt · at its level · several runs
SciQ                                 90.1%  ▁·▁·▁·▃●▃█▄▁ beats 6/26    very easy · avg 97%    5.5%  blunt · several runs
LAMBADA (OpenAI version), last-wo…   67.6%  ▁··▂▁▁▁▂●█▅▃ beats 10/26   very easy · avg 87%    4.3%  blunt · at its level · several runs
BoolQ                                66.0%  ▂▃▂▅●▂▅▆█▂▂▂ beats 10/26   easy · avg 88%         3.4%  at its level
ImageNetVC visual commonsense, te…   48.5%  ▂·▄·▂█▄●█▄▂▆ beats 11/21   easy · avg 74%         3.2%  blunt · at its level
HellaSwag                            67.2%  ▃···▁▇●█▇▃▁▁ beats 9/26    very easy · avg 91%    2.9%  at its level
Story Cloze Test                     74.6%  ▂▂▄▂·▂·▆·●█▂ beats 9/14    easy · avg 89%         2.4%  blunt · at its level
BIG-Bench Hard                       28.5%  ●···▄··▄··▄▄ beats 1/5     easy · avg 74%         2.1%  sharp · too hard for it
WebQSP closed-book zero-shot (ans…   29.8%  ██···█●····█ beats 3/4     easy · avg 66%         1.6%  at its level
OpenBookQA                           27.6%  █·▁▁▃·●▃▅▇▃▄ beats 10/26   hard · avg 49%         1.1%  too hard for it
MMLU                                 24.6%  ●·▄····▄·▄·█ beats 0/5     easy · avg 75%         1.0%  noisy
Social IQA                           42.6%  ▁···▁▃●▁▁▁·▁ beats 18/26   hard · avg 56%         0.9%  blunt
COPA                                 81.0%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅●▆▂▁▁ beats 33/67   very easy · avg 96%    0.7%  at its level · small run
Mintaka (English) closed-book zer…   27.2%  ▄····▄···▄·● beats 4/4     medium · avg 48%       0.5%  blunt
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   28.6%  ●▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 12/276  medium · avg 72%       0.5%  noisy
MenatQA (all factors), exact matc…   16.1%  ▂····▂··●·█▄ beats 2/8     medium · avg 36%       0.3%  blunt
SuperGLUE WSC (prompted)             42.3%  ●·······▂·▂▃ beats 0/8     medium · avg 68%       0.2%  blunt · noisy
LogiQA (harness)                     23.5%  ●··········▁ beats 3/14    very hard · avg 25%    0.0%  too hard for it · noisy
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Stability AI                                   10   34% ▇▇▇▇
Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Lan…        6   18% ▇▇
GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantizati…        5   16% ▇▇
EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness result…        8   15% ▇▇
How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the St…        4    7% ▇
ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual C…        1    3% ▇
INFORM : Information eNtropy based mult…        1    3% ▇
Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Prom…        2    2% ▇
Revisiting Block-based Quantisation: Wh…        1    1% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the …        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 23.7
Licences: Stability AI ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/stablelm-original-eval-json-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling ([CC BY-SA 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2304.01373v2-CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt)) · GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.17323v2-gptq-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness results folder ([MIT](../../licenses/lm-eval-harness-results-2023-05-MIT.txt)) · How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resources ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2306.04751v2-tulu1-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · ImageNetVC: Zero- and Few-Shot Visual Commonsense Evaluation on 1000 ImageNet Categories ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-133-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-216-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Prompting for Zero-Shot Knowledge Graph Question Answering ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-nlrse-1-7-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Revisiting Block-based Quantisation: What is Important for Sub-8-bit LLM Inference? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-617-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-100-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Other ways to run it 1. Run it as published (fp16, needs ~13.32 GB, from [huggingface.co/facebook](https://huggingface.co/facebook/opt-6.7b/tree/a45aa65bbeb77c1558bc99bedc6779195462dab0)) ```sh uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='facebook/opt-6.7b', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])" ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/facebook](https://huggingface.co/facebook/opt-6.7b) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/opt-6-7b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)