[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Phi-4-mini 3.8B # Phi-4-mini 3.8B Microsoft · released 2025-02 · 3.84B params · mit **score 45.2** ±0.6 · #472 of 732 · from 40 benchmark results across 10 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Phi-4-mini 3.8B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁●▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #307 of 313    2.4%      3
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅●█▇▅▄▃▁   #317 of 469    7.2%      4
chat & writing  █··········●      #1 of 2*    0.6%      1
math            ▁▁▃▅●▆▄█▄▂▁▁   #306 of 431     22%      5
agent tasks · #307 of 313 · 2.4% of its score Beats [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Lite Instruct (16B-A2.4B)](deepseek-coder-v2-lite-instruct.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Granite 4.0 350M](granite-4-0-350m.md), [Granite 4.0 H 350M](granite-4-0-h-350m.md), [Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct](qwen2-5-0-5b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
BFCL v3                              28.2%  ▁▁●▁▁▃▅█▅▄▁▁ beats 6/114  medium · avg 51%    1.0%  blunt · at its level
BFCL V4 (2025-11-03 archive, mode…   21.7%  ●··▅▃▃·▅·▃·█ beats 0/10   hard · avg 33%      0.8%  at its level
BFCL (version not stated) (maker)    70.3%  ▄▆▄●·█▆·▄··▂ beats 7/17   easy · avg 76%      0.6%  blunt · at its level · small run
coding · #317 of 469 · 7.2% of its score Beats [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md), [Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct](qwen3-vl-30b-a3b-instruct.md), [Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507](qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat](deepseek-llm-67b-chat.md), [WizardLM 70B V1.0](wizardlm-70b-v1-0.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
HumanEval (maker)    74.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▂▆▆●▅▂▁ beats 155/205  easy · avg 82%    2.6%  sharp · at its level · small run
HumanEval+ (maker)   68.3%  ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄●▅▄▃ beats 74/145   easy · avg 78%    2.4%  sharp · at its level · small run
MBPP (maker)         65.3%  ▁▁▁▄▅█▆●▄▁▂▁ beats 61/86    easy · avg 74%    1.3%  at its level · small run
MBPP+ (maker)        63.8%  ▁··▁▁▃▄●▆▄▁▁ beats 58/120   easy · avg 70%    0.9%  at its level · small run
chat & writing · #1 of 2 · 0.6% of its score
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) …   70.1%  ▁▂▄▂●▄▆██▅▂▁ beats 32/145  easy · avg 74%    0.6%  at its level · small run
math · #306 of 431 · 22% of its score Beats [Molmo 2 8B](molmo-2-8b.md), [Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct](llama-3-1-nemotron-70b.md), [GPT-4 (0613)](gpt-4-0613.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B](deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b.md), [Gemma 7B (base)](gemma-7b-base.md), [Mistral 7B v0.1 (base)](mistral-7b-v0-1.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test               result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
MGSM (maker)        63.9%  ▅▃▃█·●···▃·▃ beats 7/10   easy · avg 72%         9.1%  sharp · at its level
GSM8K (maker)       88.6%  █·█▄▄█···●·▄ beats 8/10   very easy · avg 90%    7.7%  sharp
MATH (maker)        64.0%  █▄██···▄▄●·▄ beats 9/10   medium · avg 61%       3.1%  at its level
AIME 2024 (maker)   10.0%  ▁▁▁●▁▃▁▅███▃ beats 9/85   medium · avg 44%       1.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH-500 (maker)    71.8%  ▁▃▂●▄▇▅▇█▄▂▁ beats 14/85  easy · avg 84%         0.7%  noisy
other tests (27)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
ARC Challenge (maker)                83.7%  ▂▂▂●▂···▄··▂ beats 6/10     very easy · avg 89%    7.6%  sharp
CLIcK Korean (Daekeun Kim)           42.8%  ●▄▄▄█▄▂·▄█·▄ beats 0/23     medium · avg 56%       7.2%  at its level
MMLU (maker)                         67.3%  █▄█▄●▄·▄▄··▄ beats 6/10     easy · avg 75%         6.6%  at its level
HAE-RAE 1.0 (Daekeun Kim)            44.5%  ●▄▄▂▂█▂▄▂█▂▄ beats 1/22     medium · avg 61%       6.5%  at its level
BIG-Bench Hard (maker)               70.4%  ██▄·█▄·●▄··▄ beats 8/10     medium · avg 71%       5.4%  sharp · at its level
OpenBookQA (maker)                   79.2%  ▂··●█▂·▂···▄ beats 1/10     easy · avg 85%         4.2%  at its level
MMLU-Pro (maker)                     52.8%  █▄▄·█▄▄●·▄·▄ beats 8/10     medium · avg 54%       3.8%  at its level
CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju…   43.4%  ▁▂●▂▃█▃▆▅▄▂▃ beats 11/95    medium · avg 65%       3.5%  at its level
Multilingual MMLU (Microsoft) (ma…   49.3%  █●▄██··█···▄ beats 2/10     medium · avg 63%       3.3%  at its level
Polish EQ-Bench v2 (SpeakLeash)      50.8%  ▁··▁▁▂▂▆●▆█▆ beats 25/70    medium · avg 62%       2.7%  at its level
GPQA Diamond (maker)                 36.9%  ▁▁▁▁▂●▅▅███▄ beats 38/322   hard · avg 49%         2.6%  sharp
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…   24.5%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂●▃▄▆█▃ beats 17/97    hard · avg 31%         2.2%  blunt · at its level
HellaSwag (maker)                    69.1%  ●▅█·▃▃▃···▃▃ beats 0/10     easy · avg 82%         1.6%  at its level
KCL-Essay vanilla                     6.0%  ●···▁▃▂█▂▃▃▂ beats 0/23     hard · avg 17%         1.5%  typical
WinoGrande (maker)                   67.0%  ▃····▃▃█●·▅▅ beats 6/10     medium · avg 71%       1.4%  at its level
Social IQA (maker)                   72.5%  ▃·▃●▅█·▃···▃ beats 2/10     medium · avg 76%       1.3%  blunt · at its level
BoolQ (maker)                        81.2%  ▃··▃··█●▃·▃▃ beats 7/10     easy · avg 83%         1.1%  at its level
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   66.5%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 127/276  medium · avg 72%       1.0%  at its level · noisy
GPQA (subset unspecified) (maker)    25.2%  ●··▄▂··▂▂··▄ beats 3/10     very hard · avg 32%    0.9%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
BigCodeBench (Complete) (maker)      43.0%  ▂▁▁▃▂▅▇●▅▂▂▂ beats 35/60    medium · avg 49%       0.8%  at its level · small run
KMMLU-HARD (Daekeun Kim, zero-sho…   25.3%  ●···▁▁▁▂▃·▆▂ beats 5/23     very hard · avg 29%    0.6%  sharp · too hard for it
KCL-MCQA vanilla                     22.0%  ●···█▂▆▆██▆▂ beats 0/23     very hard · avg 29%    0.6%  too hard for it
BigCodeBench (Instruct) (maker)      33.8%  ▁▁··▁▁▂▅●▅▅▅ beats 20/49    hard · avg 34%         0.5%  at its level · small run
PIQA (maker)                         77.6%  ▃·▅·▃●·▃▅··▃ beats 4/10     medium · avg 82%       0.4%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   96.6%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄█●▃▂▂▁ beats 96/140   very easy · avg 94%    0.3%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
TruthfulQA MC2 (maker)               66.4%  ▂·█▂●▄····▂▂ beats 6/10     medium · avg 64%       0.2%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   76.5%  ●▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 1/98     very easy · avg 90%    0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct model car…       16   58% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs           3   14% ▇▇
Microsoft (submitted / maker-reported)         11   14% ▇▇
SpeakLeash CPTUB                                1    3% ▇
SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard          1    3% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    2% ▇
Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Towar…        2    2% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        2    2% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               2    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 45.2
Licences: microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct model card ([MIT](../../licenses/card-microsoft-phi-4-mini-instruct.txt)) · Daekeun Kim Korean LLM benchmark runs ([MIT](../../licenses/korean-personal-benchmark-runs-MIT.txt)) · Microsoft ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2503.01743v2.txt)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs’ Legal Reasoning Capabilities ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/cards-final-NOTICE.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Microsoft Azure) · $0.13/M blended · $0.075 in / $0.3 out per 1M tokens · [azure.microsoft.com](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/ai-foundry-models/microsoft) [price source](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/ai-foundry-models/microsoft): USD per 1M tokens, Azure AI Foundry Models pay-as-you-go (Microsoft models table), 'Phi-4-mini' (Azure model id Phi-4-mini-instruct, GA), 128K context: input $0.075, output $0.30, region US East. Fine-tuned hosting/training rates excluded. Currency: USD. Microsoft Azure official pricing page (price cells carry the amounts in the page's own data), observed 2026-09-25. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/microsoft/phi-4-mini.toml): model catalogue context ceiling (not a promise by a hosted API) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Phi-4-mini 3.8B (Q4_K_M, needs ~2.5 GB, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF/tree/009f2b81869a0afd6b9aae23d29fa7b7ee2dcac9)) ```sh llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~4.1 GB) `llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Phi-4-mini 3.8B (Q4_K_M, needs ~2.5 GB, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF/tree/009f2b81869a0afd6b9aae23d29fa7b7ee2dcac9)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~4.1 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · 4bit (~2.2 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit -y` · 8bit (~4.1 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Phi-4-mini 3.8B (Q4_K_M, needs ~2.8 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/phi4-mini/tags)) ```sh ollama run phi4-mini:3.8b ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~5.11 GB) `ollama run phi4-mini:3.8b-q8_0` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Phi-4-mini 3.8B (4bit, needs ~2.2 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit/tree/ac1c269cb4222a4e136a3d09edad301056c1f36a)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~4.1 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/Phi-4-mini-instruct-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/microsoft](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct) ## Quantization evidence How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent. They don't describe every download of that precision.
precision                       test                                full → quantized   kept
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (weights sym…  MMLU with chain-of-thought prompt…       0.67 → 0.67  99.9%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (weights sym…  MMLU-Pro (lm-evaluation-harness, …     0.468 → 0.456  97.5%
Each kept value links to its source. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/phi-4-mini) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)