[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen2.5 14B Instruct # Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Alibaba · released 2024-09 · 14.8B params · apache-2.0 **score 52.3** ±0.8 · #332 of 732 · from 36 benchmark results across 13 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen2.5 14B Instruct among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #227 of 313*    6.0%      2
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇●▇▅▄▃▁    #247 of 469     17%      7
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄●█▆▇▇▃    #255 of 402    8.8%      4
math            ▁▁▃▅█●▄█▄▂▁▁    #252 of 431     13%      4
agent tasks · #227 of 313 · 6.0% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)](deepseek-r1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct](mellum2-12b-a2-5b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test              result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
τ²-bench Telecom   17.5%  ▁·●█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 9/89    very hard · avg 12%    4.6%  sharp · small run
BFCL v3            58.7%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█●▄▁▁ beats 78/114  medium · avg 51%       1.4%  blunt · at its level
coding · #247 of 469 · 17% of its score Beats [Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct](qwen3-vl-32b-instruct.md), [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md), [GLM-4.7-Flash](glm-4-7-flash.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [InternLM2.5 20B Chat](internlm2-5-20b-chat.md), [Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-3b-reasoning.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
HumanEval+                           79.1%  ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄█●▄▃ beats 106/145  easy · avg 72%      5.9%  sharp
HumanEval                            72.1%  ▁▁▁▁▂▂▆▆●▅▂▁ beats 146/205  easy · avg 71%      3.3%  sharp · small run
CodeReviewQA: change localisation…   57.1%  █▂▁▁▂▂▂▃▅▅●▇ beats 39/47    hard · avg 33%      2.3%  sharp · at its level · noisy
HumanEval (simple-evals)             72.1%  ●▅▆█▅▃··▂··▂ beats 0/19     easy · avg 76%      1.9%  typical
CodeReviewQA: solution identifica…   81.9%  ▃··▁▂▂▃▂█▃●▂ beats 44/47    medium · avg 51%    1.8%  sharp · at its level · noisy
CodeReviewQA: automated code refi…   36.8%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃█●▄ beats 36/47    hard · avg 32%      1.6%  at its level
CodeReviewQA: change type recogni…   73.3%  ▁▁▁······▁▃● beats 26/47    easy · avg 67%      0.1%  blunt · at its level · noisy
chat & writing · #255 of 402 · 8.8% of its score Beats [Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B)](mistral-small-4.md), [Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct](qwen2-5-coder-32b.md), [Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-14b-reasoning.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Flan-T5 XXL](flan-t5-xxl.md), [Granite 4.0 H 1B](granite-4-0-h-1b.md), [Granite 4.0 1B](granite-4-0-1b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty        counts  why
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled       34.6%  ▃▃·▁▁●▇▅·▁·▁ beats 11/22   medium · avg 39%    4.1%  sharp · at its level
Arena-Hard (version/judge unspeci…   70.2%  ▃▃▂▅▃▆▅●▅▅▂▃ beats 20/30   medium · avg 65%    2.9%  at its level
IFEval prompt-level loose            82.4%  ▁▃▁▃▁▄▁▁●▃▃▁ beats 13/22   easy · avg 78%      1.1%  typical
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)     78.7%  ▁▂▄▂▂●▆██▅▂▁ beats 48/145  easy · avg 76%      0.8%  typical
math · #252 of 431 · 13% of its score Beats [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [Command A (03-2025)](command-a.md), [GPT-4o (2024-05-13)](gpt-4o-2024-05-13.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 7B (base)](gemma-7b-base.md), [CodeGemma 7B (v1.0)](codegemma-7b.md), [Phi-2 (2.7B)](phi-2.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
MATH (subset unspecified)   70.6%  ▃▃█▂▂●·····▁ beats 17/22  easy · avg 72%         4.7%  small run · several runs
MGSM                        79.6%  ▂·▁▁▁▁▁▂▅█▃● beats 40/42  easy · avg 72%         4.3%  sharp · small run
GSM8K                       83.9%  ▂▃··▃▂▅●▆▃▂▃ beats 12/22  very easy · avg 88%    2.5%  sharp
MGSM (simple-evals)         79.6%  ▁·●▁·▁▇▃█▁▃▁ beats 1/20   easy · avg 81%         1.7%  typical
other tests (17)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
MMLU                                 81.1%  ▁▂·▁·▁▁█·●▃▅ beats 15/22    easy · avg 75%           11%  at its level · several runs
BIG-Bench Hard                       78.4%  ▁▄·▁▁·▅█·●▄▁ beats 16/22    medium · avg 72%        7.3%  sharp · at its level
GPQA Diamond (simple-evals)          42.9%  ▁·····●█▂▂▃▃ beats 4/22     hard · avg 39%          4.6%  sharp
CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju…   70.9%  ▁▂▂▂▃█▃●▅▄▂▃ beats 56/95    medium · avg 65%        4.3%  at its level
MMLU-Pro                             63.2%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂●▅█▁ beats 67/188   medium · avg 58%        4.0%  at its level
Polish EQ-Bench v2 (SpeakLeash)      69.6%  ▁··▁▁▂▂▆▅▆●▆ beats 52/70    medium · avg 62%        3.4%  at its level
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, …   36.9%  ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█●▅▄▄ beats 35/66    hard · avg 29%          3.3%  at its level
EvalPerf correctness (118 tasks, …   82.5%  ▂·▂▂▂▆▅▆▆●▃█ beats 20/29    easy · avg 74%          3.2%  typical
GPQA (subset unspecified)            42.9%  ▂▁▂▂▄▃●▃▅█▃▃ beats 45/106   hard · avg 44%          2.9%  sharp · at its level · small run
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…   55.6%  ▂▄▂▃█▄●▆▃▅▂▂ beats 45/81    medium · avg 57%        2.8%  blunt · at its level
MMLU (simple-evals, zero-shot CoT)   79.9%  ▁···●▁▅█▂▂▃▁ beats 1/22     easy · avg 80%          2.1%  typical
PopQA                                21.1%  ▁▁▁▃▃●▁█▁▃·▄ beats 7/21     hard · avg 31%          1.9%  at its level
SimpleQA                              5.4%  ▄▄●▆█▆███·▂█ beats 5/32     very hard · avg 4.6%    1.8%  too hard for it · small run
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   79.0%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 249/276  medium · avg 72%        1.4%  at its level · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   95.8%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 81/140   very easy · avg 94%     0.4%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
DROP F1, 3-shot (simple-evals)       85.5%  ▅▂▆█▆·●·▂▅·▂ beats 17/23    easy · avg 79%          0.3%  blunt
TruthfulQA MC2                       70.8%  ▃▃▂·▃▃·▅█▂●▂ beats 20/21    medium · avg 60%        0.2%  blunt · at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
2 OLMo 2 Furious                                8   27% ▇▇▇
Microsoft Research                              9   24% ▇▇▇
microsoft/phi-4 model card                      6   18% ▇▇
CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehen…        4    6% ▇
Reinforcing Real-world Service Agents: …        1    5% ▇
SpeakLeash CPTUB                                1    4% ▇
SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard          1    3% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             1    3% ▇
EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio…        1    3% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    3% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 52.3
Licences: 2 OLMo 2 Furious ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2501.00656v3-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Microsoft Research ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2412.08905v1.txt)) · microsoft/phi-4 model card ([MIT](../../licenses/card-microsoft-phi-4.txt)) · CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehension Assessment for Large Language Models ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Reinforcing Real-world Service Agents: InteractCS-RL ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~9 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF/tree/b466e1f8c07172155743e8e1307507d8a4f91fbd)) ```sh llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF:q4_k_m ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF:q4_k_m ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~15.7 GB) `llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF:q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~9 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF/tree/b466e1f8c07172155743e8e1307507d8a4f91fbd)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF@q4_k_m -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~15.7 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-GGUF@q8_0 -y` · 4bit (~8.3 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-4bit -y` · 8bit (~15.7 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~9.38 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/qwen2.5/tags)) ```sh ollama run qwen2.5:14b ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~18.26 GB) `ollama run qwen2.5:14b-instruct-q8_0` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (4bit, needs ~8.3 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-4bit/tree/e794b039d17334adc84cef973411dea4eff24a70)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~15.7 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-MLX-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct) ## Quantization evidence How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent. They don't describe every download of that precision.
precision                       test                                full → quantized    kept
INT8 W8A8 (weights INT8 per-c…  GSM8K — published row 'GSM-8K (5-…     0.836 → 0.855  102.4%
INT8 W8A8 (weights INT8 per-c…  OpenLLM v1 average of 6 tasks (MM…     0.778 → 0.781  100.4%
INT8 W8A8 (weights INT8 per-c…  MMLU — published row 'MMLU (5-sho…     0.799 → 0.797   99.8%
Each kept value links to its source. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen2-5-14b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)