[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen2.5 72B Instruct # Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba · released 2024-09 · 72B params · qwen **score 55.9** ±0.5 · #260 of 732 · from 62 benchmark results across 30 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen2.5 72B Instruct among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆●▄▅▅▄▄▂▁   #209 of 313    5.8%      6
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇●▇▅▄▃▁   #224 of 469     29%     16
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆●▆▇▇▃   #219 of 402     15%      9
math            ▁▁▃▅█●▄█▄▂▁▁   #233 of 431     12%      6
agent tasks · #209 of 313 · 5.8% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)](deepseek-r1.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct](mellum2-12b-a2-5b-instruct.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   33.0%  ▃···▃·▃·▃●·▃ beats 5/7     hard · avg 17%          2.7%  sharp · at its level
ContractBench success rate (33 ob…   23.2%  ▆··▆●▂▄▂▆▆█▄ beats 6/23    very hard · avg 13%     1.5%  sharp
BFCL v3                              63.4%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█●▄▁▁ beats 90/114  medium · avg 51%        0.5%  blunt · at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (act…   51.0%  ▅▃·▃▃▅▅█▃●▅▅ beats 13/19   hard · avg 26%          0.4%  at its level
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    2.6%  ●···▄▄·▄▄·▄█ beats 0/7     very hard · avg 2.6%    0.4%  blunt · too hard for it
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v1 (too…   81.7%  ▃▃▃▃●▅▆▅█▂▅▂ beats 11/31   easy · avg 78%          0.4%  typical
coding · #224 of 469 · 29% of its score Beats [Qwen3.5 4B](qwen3-5-4b.md), [Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct](qwen3-vl-32b-instruct.md), [Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B)](solar-open-100b.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [QwQ-32B-Preview](qwq-32b-preview.md), [Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512](ministral-3-3b-reasoning.md), [s1.1 32B](s1-1-32b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
LiveCodeBench official (Jan 1–Nov…   41.7%  ▁▁·▁▂▄▆█●▂·▂ beats 26/31    hard · avg 23%          5.6%  sharp · at its level
CRUXEval (ZeroEval, 800 problems)    73.9%  ▁▂▆▃▆█●▃▂·▁▁ beats 33/47    medium · avg 57%        5.0%  sharp · at its level
Aider code editing (133 Exercism …   65.4%  ▁·▁▂▄▁▆▄●▆▂▂ beats 37/62    medium · avg 51%        4.0%  sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Verified                   33.0%  ▃···▃·▃·▃●·▃ beats 5/7      hard · avg 17%          2.7%  sharp · at its level
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, tw…    8.0%  █▄··●·█····▄ beats 3/7      very hard · avg 5.5%    2.4%  sharp · noisy
HumanEval+                           78.4%  ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄█●▄▃ beats 104/145  easy · avg 72%          1.8%  sharp
LiveCodeBench v5 (Oct 2024–Feb 20…   26.3%  ▄▄·▄·····●▄█ beats 3/7      hard · avg 18%          1.5%  at its level
WebApp1K-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)     35.4%  ▃▁▁█●▄▅▃▄▇▁▄ beats 10/31    medium · avg 40%        1.0%  sharp · at its level · noisy
MBPP+                                88.6%  ██·██···██●█ beats 6/7      easy · avg 78%          1.0%  typical
CodeReviewQA: change localisation…   58.3%  █▂▁▁▂▂▂▃▅▅▅● beats 40/47    hard · avg 33%          0.9%  sharp · at its level · noisy
BIRD-SQL (dev)                       50.1%  ▄··▄·●·█··▄█ beats 2/7      medium · avg 47%        0.8%  at its level
CodeReviewQA: automated code refi…   48.7%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃█▅● beats 46/47    hard · avg 32%          0.7%  at its level
HumanEval (simple-evals)             80.4%  ▂●▆█▅▃··▂··▂ beats 2/19     easy · avg 76%          0.6%  typical
CodeReviewQA: solution identifica…   90.9%  ▃··▁▂▂▃▂█▃▄● beats 47/47    medium · avg 51%        0.6%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Multi-SWE-bench, 7 languages (Mag…    2.6%  ●···▄▄·▄▄·▄█ beats 0/7      very hard · avg 2.6%    0.4%  blunt · too hard for it
CodeReviewQA: change type recogni…   79.8%  ▁▁▁······▁▃● beats 47/47    easy · avg 67%          0.0%  blunt · at its level · noisy
chat & writing · #219 of 402 · 15% of its score Beats [Gemma 2 9B IT SimPO](gemma-2-9b-simpo.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md), [Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B)](mistral-small-4.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct](lfm2-5-1-2b-instruct.md), [Granite 4.0 H Micro 3B](granite-4-0-h-micro.md), [Gemma 3n E4B](gemma-3n-e4b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judg…   78.0%  ▂▁▁▅█▅▄▃▃●▃▁ beats 50/60    medium · avg 47%       4.8%  sharp · at its level
LMArena (text)                      1302.9  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃●▆▇█▃ beats 129/385  avg 1260               2.3%  blunt
Arena-Hard v2.0 hard prompts (sty…   10.1%  ▂·●▅▅·▃█▆▂▂▂ beats 1/22     very hard · avg 12%    2.2%  sharp · at its level
Arabic IFEval prompt-level (Incep…   67.3%  ▁·▁▁▂▁▄▄▆▄█● beats 36/38    medium · avg 46%       1.8%  sharp · at its level
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled       47.7%  ▃▃·▁▁█▇●·▁·▁ beats 18/22    medium · avg 39%       1.5%  sharp · at its level
Arena-Hard (version/judge unspeci…   78.4%  ▃▃▂▅▃▆▅█▅●▂▃ beats 25/30    medium · avg 65%       1.0%  typical
Arena-Hard v2.0 creative writing …   10.2%  ●▂▂▆▂▂▃█▂▃·▂ beats 1/22     hard · avg 19%         0.5%  sharp · at its level · noisy
IFEval prompt-level loose            87.6%  ▁▃▁▃▁▄▁▁█▃●▁ beats 20/22    easy · avg 78%         0.4%  typical
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)     85.0%  ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆●█▅▂▁ beats 75/145   easy · avg 76%         0.3%  typical
math · #233 of 431 · 12% of its score Beats [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [Command A (03-2025)](command-a.md), [GPT-4o (2024-05-13)](gpt-4o-2024-05-13.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 7B (base)](gemma-7b-base.md), [Phi-2 (2.7B)](phi-2.md), [Granite 8B Code Base (4K)](granite-8b-code-base-4k.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty            counts  why
MATH level 5                         63.2%  ▂▂▅▆▄█●▃▅▂▃▄ beats 53/92   hard · avg 28%          5.1%  sharp · at its level
MATH Level 5 (ZeroEval, 721 probl…   60.2%  ▁▁▁▆█▂▇▇●··▂ beats 34/38   hard · avg 30%          3.2%  sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025              8.1%  ▃▃▄●▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 46/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    1.4%  sharp · noisy
MATH (subset unspecified)            75.9%  ▃▃█▂▂●·····▁ beats 19/22   medium · avg 58%        0.7%  at its level
GSM8K                                89.5%  ▂▃··▃▂▅█▆●▂▃ beats 18/22   very easy · avg 88%     0.6%  sharp · maxed out
MGSM (simple-evals)                  87.3%  ▁·▁▁·▁●▃█▁▃▁ beats 8/20    easy · avg 81%          0.6%  typical
other tests (27)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
MMLU-Redux (ZeroEval, 2,778 quest…   85.6%  ▁·▁▁▄▄▄▅█●▂▁ beats 45/53    easy · avg 75%         7.7%  typical
ZebraLogic (ZeroEval, 1,000 puzzl…   26.6%  ▁▁▃▆█●▁▁·▁▁▁ beats 41/57    hard · avg 15%         4.7%  sharp · at its level
GPQA Diamond                         49.1%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄●▄▅▇█▅ beats 68/211   hard · avg 39%         3.6%  sharp · at its level
MMLU                                 85.5%  ▁▂·▁·▁▁█·▃▃● beats 20/22    easy · avg 75%         2.5%  typical
BIG-Bench Hard                       80.4%  ▁▄·▁▁·▅█·●▄▁ beats 17/22    medium · avg 72%       2.3%  sharp
GPQA Diamond (simple-evals)          49.0%  ▁·····▄●▂▂▃▃ beats 6/22     hard · avg 39%         2.1%  sharp · at its level
CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju…   78.9%  ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅●▂▃ beats 79/95    medium · avg 65%       1.5%  at its level
MMLU-Pro                             69.6%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂●▅█▁ beats 87/188   medium · avg 58%       1.4%  at its level
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligenc…  1076.0  ▁·▂▁●▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 9/62     avg 1034               1.4%  typical
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…   41.6%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆●▃ beats 83/97    hard · avg 31%         1.4%  blunt · at its level
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, …   48.9%  ▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄●▄▄ beats 41/66    hard · avg 29%         1.4%  at its level
RepoQA (32K, threshold 0.8)          83.2%  ▄▄▄··●▄··▄·█ beats 3/7      easy · avg 80%         1.3%  typical
LiveBench 2024-08-31                 52.9%  ▄█·▄·●▄·▄··▄ beats 4/7      medium · avg 40%       1.3%  at its level
KINA (Knowledge Index of Noah's A…   23.0%  ▁▁▂▁●▄█▆▄▅▂▃ beats 7/39     very hard · avg 21%    1.2%  typical
Polish EQ-Bench v2 (SpeakLeash)      68.9%  ▁··▁▁▂▂▆▅▆●▆ beats 49/70    medium · avg 62%       1.1%  at its level
BigCodeBench (Instruct)              43.6%  ▄··▄▄···▄●█▄ beats 4/7      hard · avg 35%         1.1%  at its level
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 a…   65.6%  ▂▄▂▃█▄▃▆●▅▂▂ beats 65/81    medium · avg 57%       1.0%  blunt · at its level
EvalPerf correctness (118 tasks, …   88.3%  ▂·▂▂▂▆▅▆▆▆▃● beats 27/29    easy · avg 74%         1.0%  typical
PopQA                                30.6%  ▁▁▁▃▃▃▁●▁▃·▄ beats 14/21    hard · avg 31%         0.8%  at its level
MMLU (simple-evals, zero-shot CoT)   85.3%  ▁···▂▁●█▂▂▃▁ beats 7/22     easy · avg 80%         0.7%  typical
SurgiQ surgical MCQ (zero-shot, l…   68.0%  ▂···▂▂·▃▂▃█● beats 17/17    medium · avg 53%       0.6%  at its level
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenan…   61.2%  ▁··▃▁▁▁▅●▅▁▅ beats 11/24    hard · avg 51%         0.5%  blunt · at its level
Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (…   81.2%  ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█●▁ beats 264/276  medium · avg 72%       0.5%  at its level · noisy
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …   96.3%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄● beats 146/146  easy · avg 82%         0.2%  noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   95.7%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄●▆▃▂▂▁ beats 80/140   very easy · avg 94%    0.1%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
DROP F1, 3-shot (simple-evals)       76.7%  ●▂▆█▆·▃·▂▅·▂ beats 2/23     easy · avg 79%         0.1%  blunt
TruthfulQA MC2                       69.9%  ▃▃▂·▃▃·▅█▂●▂ beats 18/21    medium · avg 60%       0.1%  blunt · at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
WildEval ZeroEval published results             4   21% ▇▇
Cohere                                          7   11% ▇
Epoch AI                                        3   10% ▇
2 OLMo 2 Furious                                8    9% ▇
Microsoft Research                              9    9% ▇
LiveCodeBench official website results          1    6% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard                1    5% ▇
Aider code editing benchmark runs               1    4% ▇
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards             2    3% ▇
Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard        2    3% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1    2% ▇
CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehen…        4    2% ▇
SpeakLeash CPTUB                                1    1% ▇
ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve …        1    1% ▇
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results        1    1% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    1% ▇
LiveBench model judgments                       1    1% ▇
Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark                   1    1% ▇
SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard          1    1% ▇
Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2                 1    1% ▇
EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio…        1    1% ▇
WebApp1K models leaderboard                     1    1% ▇
Galileo Agent Leaderboard                       2    1% ▇
SurgiQ: A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Benc…        1    1% ▇
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard r…        1    1% ▇
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based…        1    0% ▇
Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard                 1    0% ▇
Multi-SWE-bench experiments                     1    0% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           1    0% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 55.9
Licences: WildEval ZeroEval published results ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/zeroeval-published-results-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Cohere ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2504.00698v2.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · 2 OLMo 2 Furious ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2501.00656v3-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Microsoft Research ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/report-2412.08905v1.txt)) · LiveCodeBench official website results ([CC-BY-SA-4.0](../../licenses/lcb-sharealike-NOTICE.txt)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-v0-1-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Aider code editing benchmark runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/aider-polyglot-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v2.0-Preview leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehension Assessment for Large Language Models ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve Observation Contracts? ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results ([MIT](../../licenses/eqbench3-MIT.txt)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · LiveBench model judgments ([Apache-2.0 (stated in the LiveBench datasheet)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · SpeakLeash Polish EQ-Bench leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · WebApp1K models leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/webapp1k-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · Galileo Agent Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/galileo-agent-leaderboard-Apache-2.0.txt)) · SurgiQ: A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Benchmark for Evaluating Surgical Understanding in Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/bfcl-result-archive-v4-Apache-2.0.txt)) · DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Multi-SWE-bench experiments ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/multi-swe-bench-experiments-Apache-2.0.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (DeepInfra) · $0.37/M blended · $0.36 in / $0.4 out per 1M tokens · [deepinfra.com](https://deepinfra.com/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct) [price source](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/blob/c19ce71bcdad234ca87a7af10cee45375ce811a8/model_prices_and_context_window.json): USD per 1M text tokens, standard uncached input and output. Product: Serverless text generation. API model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct. Settings: service tier=standard, batch=no, cache=uncached input. Additional/excluded charges: Tools, cache storage, priority service and other modalities excluded.. Currency: USD. · [context source](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/blob/c19ce71bcdad234ca87a7af10cee45375ce811a8/model_prices_and_context_window.json): provider maximum input tokens; not an intrinsic model maximum or legacy max\_tokens ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~44 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/tree/7ca3bc388f97b264c4283bc9bf1055e2abc38441)) ```sh llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF:q4_k_m ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF:q4_k_m ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~77.5 GB) `llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF:q8_0` · Q2_K (~27.3 GB) `llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF:q2_k` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~44 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/tree/7ca3bc388f97b264c4283bc9bf1055e2abc38441)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF@q4_k_m -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~77.5 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF@q8_0 -y` · Q2_K (~27.3 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF@q2_k -y` · 4bit (~40.9 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-4bit -y` · 8bit (~77.3 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/GGorman/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q8-mlx -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Q4_K_M, needs ~43.7 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/qwen2.5/tags)) ```sh ollama run qwen2.5:72b ``` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (4bit, needs ~40.9 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-4bit/tree/36a74b07390031bb18c9f12fb7c06699bc6273c4)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~77.3 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model GGorman/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q8-mlx` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen2-5-72b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)