[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen3.6 27B # Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba · released 2026-04 · 27.8B params · apache-2.0 **score 68.3** ±0.5 · #97 of 732 · from 79 benchmark results across 10 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen3.6 27B among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests agent tasks ▁▁▃▆█▄▅●▄▄▂▁ #81 of 313 20% 12 coding ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁ #84 of 469 15% 7 math ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁ #84 of 431 25% 9 vision & documents ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆●█▄ #52 of 153 10% 14 web search ▁▁▁▅●█▃▄·▁·▁ #54 of 84* 0.8% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why SWE-bench Verified (maker) 77.2% ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█●▁▁ beats 118/138 hard · avg 25% 2.9% sharp SWE-bench Pro public set, Qwen-re… 53.5% ▄······▄█·●▄ beats 4/5 hard · avg 19% 2.7% at its level · several runs SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) 50.2% ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃●▇▂▁ beats 27/58 very hard · avg 8.0% 2.5% sharp · at its level · small run OSWorld-Verified (maker) 63.9% █▃·▂▅▂▃▂●▃▆▆ beats 17/27 hard · avg 26% 2.5% at its level · small run · several runs Terminal-Bench 2.1 (maker) 63.4% ▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▆●▅█ beats 28/63 hard · avg 17% 2.0% sharp · at its level · small run SWE-bench Multilingual (maker) 71.3% ▁··▁▃▁▅█●▂▂▁ beats 39/65 hard · avg 29% 1.4% at its level · small run Terminal-Bench 2.0 (maker) 59.3% ▂▂▅▅███●▆▂▃▃ beats 26/36 hard · avg 15% 1.3% at its level · small run Thinkingbox-bench pass@1 (507 sta… 32.9% ▅··▃·▃·●▃▅██ beats 5/15 very hard · avg 5.1% 1.1% sharp · at its level EEGAgentBench overall (tool-based… 43.3% ▂·▁▁··●▇█▂·▁ beats 6/25 hard · avg 28% 0.9% blunt · at its level MCP-Atlas (public set) 62.5% ▂·▁▂▂·▁▃●▆▆▂ beats 14/39 hard · avg 29% 0.9% at its level · small run DeepSearchQA 71.1% ▄·●▄···▄▄··█ beats 1/6 medium · avg 42% 0.8% at its level · small run WebArena-Verified (maker) 48.8% ●···█······█ beats 0/2 hard · avg 24% 0.7% at its level · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why SWE-bench Verified (maker) 77.2% ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█●▁▁ beats 118/138 hard · avg 25% 2.9% sharp SWE-bench Pro public set, Qwen-re… 53.5% ▄······▄█·●▄ beats 4/5 hard · avg 19% 2.7% at its level · several runs Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpe… 51.9% ▁▁▁▁·▁●▃▅▃█▇ beats 9/49 hard · avg 17% 2.6% sharp · at its level SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) 50.2% ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃●▇▂▁ beats 27/58 very hard · avg 8.0% 2.5% sharp · at its level · small run LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecif… 83.9% ▂▃▄▄▅██▆▄●▄▆ beats 50/67 medium · avg 47% 1.8% small run SWE-bench Multilingual (maker) 71.3% ▁··▁▃▁▅█●▂▂▁ beats 39/65 hard · avg 29% 1.4% at its level · small run LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025) (… 83.9% ▁▁▃▁█▅▄▇▅▅▃● beats 34/38 medium · avg 48% 1.4% typical
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2 35.1% ▂··▁▁▃▄●█▆▄▃ beats 25/86 very hard · avg 1.2% 13% sharp · at its level HMMT February 2026 (maker) 84.3% ▃▃▂▅·███●▅▃▅ beats 26/35 medium · avg 36% 3.2% sharp AIME 2026 (maker) 94.1% ▁▁▁▂▂▂▆█●▂·▁ beats 38/52 medium · avg 59% 2.4% sharp · maxed out · small run IMO-AnswerBench (maker) 80.8% ▁▁·▁▁▁▄▆●▄▂▃ beats 25/44 medium · avg 36% 1.9% small run OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 91.1% ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇●▃▂▅ beats 147/197 very hard · avg 7.2% 1.3% sharp · noisy HMMT February 2025 (maker) 93.8% ▁▁▁▃▁▅▅▃█●▁▄ beats 23/31 easy · avg 65% 1.1% maxed out · small run MathVista (testmini) (maker) 87.4% ▁··▁▄▄▆▇▄▅█● beats 45/48 medium · avg 63% 0.8% small run HMMT November 2025 (maker) 90.7% ▁▁····▁▅▃●▇▁ beats 15/23 easy · avg 68% 0.8% small run DynaMath (maker) 85.6% ▂·····▂··█●▆ beats 7/10 medium · avg 63% 0.6% small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma… 78.4% ▂▅▃▅▅▆▆▅▆●▆▂ beats 74/101 medium · avg 43% 2.3% small run · several runs OmniDocBench 1.5 overall (higher … 89.4% ▂··▂▂▂··▂▂●▅ beats 8/13 easy · avg 70% 1.7% small run · several runs MathVista (testmini) (maker) 87.4% ▁··▁▄▄▆▇▄▅█● beats 45/48 medium · avg 63% 0.8% small run MMMU (val) (maker) 82.9% ▁····▁▁▃█▆▆● beats 51/53 medium · avg 57% 0.8% small run MMMU Pro (maker) 75.8% ▂▃▁▃▆▇▃▇▇●█▅ beats 41/52 medium · avg 46% 0.8% at its level · small run MMStar (maker) 81.4% ▃▅▂▃▂▂▆██▆●▅ beats 32/35 medium · avg 62% 0.6% small run RealWorldQA (maker) 84.1% ▁▃▁▇▃▇▇▅█▁●▅ beats 34/39 easy · avg 72% 0.5% blunt · small run · several runs CountBench (maker) 97.8% ▂▂▃▂·▂▂▃▃·▅● beats 16/18 very easy · avg 91% 0.5% maxed out · small run ScreenSpot-Pro 76.1% ▂▃▅▆██●▂···▂ beats 22/24 medium · avg 52% 0.5% blunt · at its level · small run SimpleVQA (maker) 56.1% ▃·▃·▃·▃·●▅▃▃ beats 5/10 hard · avg 34% 0.5% blunt · at its level · small run MMBench-EN dev v1.1 (maker) 92.3% █▄···▂··▄▂●▆ beats 10/14 easy · avg 82% 0.4% blunt · maxed out · small run CC-OCR (maker) 81.2% ▁·▂··▂▂▃▃▂▆● beats 21/26 easy · avg 72% 0.2% blunt · small run OCRBench (maker) 89.4% ▁·▃▁▆▅▂█▅●▁▃ beats 28/37 easy · avg 83% 0.2% blunt · small run PureDocBench document parsing (Av… 65.6% ▂·▁·▂●▅█·▁▂▂ beats 5/22 medium · avg 62% 0.1% blunt · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why DeepSearchQA 71.1% ▄·●▄···▄▄··█ beats 1/6 medium · avg 42% 0.8% at its level · small run
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why GPQA Diamond 85.9% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅●█▅ beats 150/211 hard · avg 44% 11% sharp · several runs Humanity's Last Exam (maker) 24.0% ▁▁▁▄▆▆▇●█▆▁▃ beats 58/111 very hard · avg 5.1% 3.5% several runs NL2Repo (maker) 36.2% ▄·····█·▄●·▄ beats 4/5 very hard · avg 8.9% 2.4% at its level · several runs Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch) 7.0% ●··▂▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 10/77 very hard · avg 9.4% 1.9% sharp · too hard for it · noisy MMLU-Pro (maker) 86.2% ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅●▁ beats 180/188 medium · avg 56% 1.8% typical IFBench (aggregation unspecified)… 69.1% ▂▆▂▄▄▄▂▄▄●█▇ beats 57/86 medium · avg 41% 1.6% at its level · small run · several runs Chess Puzzles (Epoch) 22.0% █▁▁▁▁▂▃●▃▂▁▁ beats 90/137 very hard · avg 5.8% 1.6% sharp · noisy ERQA (maker) 62.5% ▃··▃··█·▃●▅▅ beats 8/12 medium · avg 36% 1.2% at its level · small run · several runs CPTUB average (SpeakLeash, 0-5 ju… 88.2% ▁▂▂▂▃█▃▆▅▄▂● beats 94/95 medium · avg 65% 1.1% typical AndroidWorld (maker) 70.3% ▁·▁▁▂▃█▅▂●·▂ beats 21/24 medium · avg 47% 1.1% at its level · small run · several runs WildClawBench 43.2% ▂·▄▄▆▂▄●▆▂▂▂ beats 13/20 very hard · avg 14% 1.0% at its level · small run RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (To… 89.9% ▁▁▃▁●▄▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 15/49 easy · avg 77% 1.0% typical C-Eval (maker) 91.4% ▁···▁▁▂▁▂▂▃● beats 28/33 medium · avg 70% 1.0% small run QwenClawBench (Qwen internal) (ma… 53.4% █·█··█·····● beats 3/3 hard · avg 24% 0.9% at its level MMLU-Redux (maker) 93.5% ▁▁▃▁▂▃▄▅▇▅●▄ beats 57/63 easy · avg 78% 0.9% maxed out · small run Claw-Eval Pass^3 (maker) 60.6% █▄▄·▄·▄●·▄·▄ beats 6/8 hard · avg 25% 0.7% at its level Gaia2 40.0% █·····●····█ beats 1/2 hard · avg 17% 0.7% at its level · small run SkillsBench 78-task subset (OpenC… 48.2% █▄·········● beats 3/3 very hard · avg 11% 0.7% at its level SuperGPQA (maker) 66.0% ▂▁▂▂▅▆▃▇▇▇●▃ beats 43/46 medium · avg 36% 0.6% at its level · small run SkillsBench (with skills) 46.6% █·········█● beats 2/2 hard · avg 17% 0.6% at its level · small run VideoMMMU (maker) 84.4% ▂···▂···▂▂█● beats 9/10 medium · avg 62% 0.6% small run VLMs Are Blind (maker) 97.0% ▂·▂·····▃··● beats 7/8 very easy · avg 89% 0.6% maxed out · small run Video-MME (with subtitles) (maker) 87.7% ▁▁▁▁▁·▁▃▁▁▁● beats 16/16 medium · avg 71% 0.5% small run Claw-Eval average score (maker) 72.4% ▄·▄··█▄▄▄▄▄● beats 9/9 medium · avg 48% 0.5% blunt · at its level RefSpatial-Bench (maker) 70.0% ▃·▃····▃▃▅▅● beats 9/10 medium · avg 41% 0.5% at its level · small run MLVU (maker) 86.6% ▂···▂···▂▄▄● beats 8/10 easy · avg 70% 0.5% small run EmbSpatial-Bench (maker) 84.6% ▁·····▁·▁·▃● beats 10/10 easy · avg 68% 0.5% small run WMT25 Terminology Translation (te… 89.2% ▂·▂··▂·▄▂·●▆ beats 6/12 medium · avg 63% 0.4% noisy MVBench (maker) 75.5% ▁··▃▄▁▃▄▄▄●▄ beats 23/26 medium · avg 65% 0.2% blunt · at its level · small run WMT26 General MT (GEMBA-ESA, LLM … 61.9% ●·▄▄▄·▄██▄█▄ beats 0/12 medium · avg 65% 0.2% blunt
source results share of the score Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B model card (submitted … 42 44% ▇▇▇▇▇ Epoch AI 5 21% ▇▇▇ Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B model card (submitted … 14 18% ▇▇ meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B model card 10 10% ▇ Roblox LLM Leaderboard 2 4% ▇ One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinking… 1 1% ▇ SpeakLeash CPTUB 1 1% ▇ EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents … 1 1% ▇ Cohere 2 1% ▇ How Far Is Document Parsing from Solved… 1 0% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 68.3Licences: Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.6-27B.txt)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.8-27B.txt)) · meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B model card ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/speed-meta-muse-glimmer-30b-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Roblox LLM Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/roblox-llm-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · One Success Isn't Reliability: Thinkingbox ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · SpeakLeash CPTUB ([MIT](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-MIT.txt)) · EEGAgentBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Short- and Long-Horizon EEG Analysis ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Cohere ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · How Far Is Document Parsing from Solved? PureDocBench: A Source-Traceable Benchmark across Clean ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Groq) · $1.20/M blended · $0.6 in / $3 out per 1M tokens · [console.groq.com](https://console.groq.com/docs/models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/groq/models/qwen/qwen3.6-27b.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/alibaba/qwen3.6-27b.toml) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Qwen3.6 27B (Q4_K_M, needs ~19.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/ggml-org](https://huggingface.co/ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF/tree/8a7ee08e8b9bfb857107ecc25a5599d2f38b76f8)) ```sh llama cli -hf ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~28.6 GB) `llama cli -hf ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Qwen3.6 27B (Q4_K_M, needs ~19.1 GB, from [huggingface.co/ggml-org](https://huggingface.co/ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF/tree/8a7ee08e8b9bfb857107ecc25a5599d2f38b76f8)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~28.6 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/ggml-org/Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · 4bit (~16.1 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-4bit -y` · 8bit (~29.5 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Qwen3.6 27B (Q4_K_M, needs ~17.18 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/qwen3.6/tags)) ```sh ollama run qwen3.6:27b ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~33.86 GB) `ollama run qwen3.6:27b-q8_0` · nvfp4 (~17.18 GB, Mac only) `ollama run qwen3.6:27b-mlx` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Qwen3.6 27B (4bit, needs ~16.1 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-4bit/tree/bd83f6fe15b171f1549475db2348389c0f541c21)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~29.5 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3.6-27B-MLX-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B) ## Published speed measurements Reference results for the hardware, engine and settings below. These are not verified speeds of the downloads above or predictions for your machine.
hardware precision speed engine and settings Apple M5 Pro (48GB; CPU/GPU… Q4 GGUF (4-bit;… 15.4 tok/s llama.cpp b9960, Metal backend, d… Apple M5 Pro (48GB; CPU/GPU… MLX 4-bit (grou… 18.4 tok/s mlx-lm 0.31.3 (MLX 0.32.0), defau… Apple M1 Max, 32 GB q4_k_m 9.74 tok/s ollama (version not recorded) · l… Apple M5 Max (40-core GPU),… mlx-nvfp4 28.62 tok/s ollama (version not recorded) · l… Apple M5 Pro, 64 GB mlx-nvfp4 16.18 tok/s ollama (version not recorded) · l… Apple M5 Pro, 64 GB mlx-nvfp4 16.07 tok/s ollama (version not recorded) · l… Apple M5 Pro, 64 GB mlx-nvfp4 15.85 tok/s ollama (version not recorded) · l…Each speed links to its source, which has the full settings. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen3-6-27b) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)