[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen3.6 Plus # Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba · released 2026-04 · closed weights **score 68.9** ±0.8 · #89 of 732 · from 14 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen3.6 Plus among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█▄●▅▄▄▂▁   #120 of 313*     17%      2
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅●▃▁    #68 of 469*     25%      2
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇●▃    #60 of 402*    6.4%      1
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█●▂▁▁     #69 of 431     33%      3
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂▆▇●▄    #28 of 153*     10%      2
agent tasks · #120 of 313 · 17% of its score Beats [o3-pro](o3-pro.md), [Grok 4.3](grok-4-3.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md), [Devstral 2 (2512)](devstral-2.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
SWE-bench Verified                   57.9%  ▁··▁·●▂▁▄█▄▁ beats 3/29   hard · avg 19%           14%  sharp · at its level
Agents' Last Exam overall full-pa…    8.6%  ▄···●▄▄▄█▄·█ beats 1/10   very hard · avg 1.9%    3.8%  typical
coding · #68 of 469 · 25% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)](gemini-3-1-pro.md), [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5.2](gpt-5-2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B)](mimo-v2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
SWE-bench Verified          57.9%  ▁··▁·●▂▁▄█▄▁ beats 3/29    hard · avg 19%     14%  sharp · at its level
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)  1461.6  ▁▁▃▂▅█●▆▅▅▁▂ beats 63/129  avg 981            11%  sharp
chat & writing · #60 of 402 · 6.4% of its score Beats [Claude Haiku 5.5](claude-haiku-5-5.md), [GPT-6 Luna](gpt-6-luna.md), [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 4 31B](gemma-4-31b.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md), [Claude Sonnet 4.5](claude-sonnet-4-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test            result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
LMArena (text)  1443.0  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇●▃ beats 310/385  avg 1260      6.4%  blunt
math · #69 of 431 · 33% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [Claude Opus 4.5](claude-opus-4-5.md), [Qwen3.7 Plus](qwen3-7-plus.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md), [Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B)](qwen3-coder-next.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2            38.2%  ▂··▁▁▃▄●█▆▄▃ beats 28/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     29%  sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025             93.3%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇●▃▂▅ beats 155/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    2.5%  sharp · noisy
MathConstraint full release, no t…   47.4%  ▄··▄▄·▄▄●▄·▄ beats 6/8      very hard · avg 11%     1.4%  at its level
vision & documents · #28 of 153 · 10% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 5.5](claude-sonnet-5-5.md), [GPT-6 Sol](gpt-6-sol.md), [MiMo-V2.6-Pro](mimo-v2-6-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   81.5%  ▄▂▄▆▄▄▆··●█▂ beats 16/21  medium · avg 38%    8.3%  typical
BEAR-Bench (bilingual RU/EN enter…   65.0%  ▃▃·▅·▃·█·█●▅ beats 11/14  hard · avg 24%      2.1%  at its level
other tests (5)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA Diamond                         88.4%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇●▅ beats 164/211  hard · avg 39%          7.4%  sharp
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)         12.0%  █··●▃▇▄█▂▄▂▁ beats 19/77    very hard · avg 9.4%    4.5%  sharp · noisy
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)                17.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂●▃▃▂▁▁ beats 72/137   very hard · avg 5.8%    3.7%  sharp · noisy
AgentWorldBench (open-ended, over…   50.8%  ▄▄··●▄·▄█▄██ beats 2/11     hard · avg 26%          3.3%  blunt · at its level
SimpleQA Verified                    44.1%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆●█▄▂▅ beats 41/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    2.3%  at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        7   63% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2   18% ▇▇
Qwen (submitted / maker-reported)               1    8% ▇
Agents' Last Exam                               1    4% ▇
Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B model card…        1    3% ▇
BEAR-Bench: A Bilingual Enterprise and …        1    2% ▇
MathConstraint: Automated Generation of…        1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 68.9
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Agents' Last Exam ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2606.05405v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B model card ([Apache-2.0](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B/blob/60d2b0434a53d2e62a7c00a489586815d94ebffb/README.md)) · BEAR-Bench: A Bilingual Enterprise and Academic Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Models ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · MathConstraint: Automated Generation of Verified Combinatorial Reasoning Instances for LLMs ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2605.08498v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Together AI) · $1.13/M blended · $0.5 in / $3 out per 1M tokens · [docs.together.ai](https://docs.together.ai/docs/serverless-models) [price source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/providers/togetherai/models/Qwen/Qwen3.6-Plus.toml): Standard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/alibaba/qwen3.6-plus.toml) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen3-6-plus) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)