[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen3.8 Max (0902) # Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Alibaba · released 2026-09 · closed weights **score 74.4** ±0.8 · #39 of 732 · from 10 benchmark results across 4 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen3.8 Max (0902) among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task         vs the others         rank  counts  tests
agent tasks  ▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄●▂▁   #35 of 313*    8.7%      2
coding       ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄●▁   #11 of 469*     11%      1
math         ▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄●▁▁    #28 of 431     56%      3
agent tasks · #35 of 313 · 8.7% of its score Beats [GPT-5.6 Terra](gpt-5-6-terra.md), [GPT-5.6 Luna](gpt-5-6-luna.md), [Grok 4.6](grok-4-6.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Grok 4.7](grok-4-7.md), [Grok 4.5](grok-4-5.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
Terminal-Bench 4.0                   27.0%  █▅▅▅●·▅▃▃▅▅▅ beats 10/20  very hard · avg 0.5%    6.1%  sharp
Video2World V2WScore (coding agen…   26.6%  ●··▄█·▄····▄ beats 1/6    very hard · avg 7.3%    2.6%  at its level
coding · #11 of 469 · 11% of its score Beats [GPT-6.1 Terra](gpt-6-1-terra.md), [GPT-5.6 Sol](gpt-5-6-sol.md), [Claude Fable 5](claude-fable-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run    difficulty  counts  why
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)  1675.9  ▁▁▃▂▅█▃▆▅●▁▂ beats 118/129  avg 981        11%  sharp
math · #28 of 431 · 56% of its score Beats [Gemini 3.8 Flash](gemini-3-8-flash.md), [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](deepseek-v4-1-flash.md), [Grok 4.6](grok-4-6.md) here, though they rank higher overall.
test                       result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v2   65.6%  ▂··▁▁▃▄▄●▆▄▃ beats 51/86    very hard · avg 1.2%     28%  sharp · at its level
FrontierMath tier 4 v2      34.1%  ▁▂▁▂█●▂▃▂▁▁▁ beats 40/67    very hard · avg 0.1%     27%  sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025   100.0%  ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂● beats 192/197  very hard · avg 7.2%    0.9%  sharp · maxed out · noisy
other tests (4)
test                        result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Furniture Assembly (Epoch)   20.0%  ●▆▆▆▆▂▆▂▂▂▂▅ beats 0/32     very hard · avg 1.2%     11%  sharp · at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)        40.0%  █▁▁▁▁▂▃▃●▂▁▁ beats 119/137  very hard · avg 5.8%    6.1%  sharp · at its level · noisy
GPQA Diamond                 92.3%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█● beats 189/211  hard · avg 39%          4.3%  sharp
SimpleQA Verified            47.3%  ▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆●▄▂▅ beats 49/81    very hard · avg 8.0%    2.5%  at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Epoch AI                                        7   80% ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1   11% ▇
Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard…        1    6% ▇
Video2World: Benchmarking Coding Agents…        1    3% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 74.4
Licences: Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard submissions ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/terminal-bench-leaderboard-submissions-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Video2World: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Interactive World Modeling from Embodied Videos ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio) · $3.00/M blended · $2 in / $6 out per 1M tokens · [alibabacloud.com](https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/text-generation-model) [price source](https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Singapore (International), dated snapshot qwen3.8-max-0902, thinking and non-thinking modes, 0\ [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen3-8-max-0902) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)