[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking # Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking Alibaba · released 2025-09 · 80B params (3B active) · apache-2.0 **score 62.7** ±0.6 · #174 of 732 · from 52 benchmark results across 9 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks     ▁▁▃▆█●▅▅▄▄▂▁    #158 of 313     15%      8
coding          ▁▁▁▃▅▇█●▅▄▃▁   #147 of 469*    3.0%      1
chat & writing  ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█●▇▇▃    #143 of 402    8.8%      3
math            ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁    #130 of 431     12%      5
agent tasks · #158 of 313 · 15% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o4-mini](o4-mini.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)             43.9%  ▁·▅█●▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 37/89    very hard · avg 9.2%    5.3%  sharp · at its level
τ-bench Retail (maker)               69.6%  ▁····▃·▂▇●▂▆ beats 20/28    medium · avg 37%        2.4%  at its level
τ²-bench Retail (maker)              67.8%  ▁····▂▁▃▆●▃▁ beats 23/44    medium · avg 37%        2.2%  at its level
τ²-bench Airline (maker)             60.5%  ▁▁·▂▁▃▂▁█●▂▃ beats 33/42    hard · avg 32%          1.6%  at its level
τ-bench Airline (maker)              49.0%  ▁▁▁·▅▄▁█●▁▁▇ beats 20/28    hard · avg 22%          1.6%  at its level
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) (…   49.7%  ▁▁▁▂▆▆▅▆●▂▄▃ beats 71/114   medium · avg 35%        0.9%  at its level
τ²-bench aggregate (maker)           57.4%  ▁▁▁·▁▁●▃▃▄█▁ beats 8/39     medium · avg 40%        0.7%  at its level · noisy
BFCL v3 (maker)                      72.0%  ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▆▅●▁ beats 160/171  medium · avg 59%        0.6%  blunt · at its level
coding · #147 of 469 · 3.0% of its score Beats [Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B)](qwen3-coder-next.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md), [Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite](gemini-3-1-flash-lite.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [Devstral Small 2 24B](devstral-small-2.md), [Gemma 4 12B](gemma-4-12b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025) (…   68.7%  ▁▁▃▁█▅▄●▅▅▃█ beats 19/38  medium · avg 41%    3.0%  at its level · several runs
chat & writing · #143 of 402 · 8.8% of its score Beats [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [INTELLECT-3](intellect-3.md), [MiniMax-M2](minimax-m2.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 8B-A1B](lfm2-5-8b-a1b.md), [LFM2.5 2.6B](lfm2-5-2-6b.md), [Spark-X2.5 1.7B](spark-x2-5-1-7b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
LMArena (text)                      1369.2  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆●▇█▃ beats 212/385  avg 1260          4.1%  blunt
Arena-Hard v2 aggregate (maker)      62.3%  ▁▁··▄▃▁▃●▁▁▇ beats 11/22    hard · avg 28%    3.7%  sharp · at its level
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) …   88.9%  ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆█●▅▂▁ beats 103/145  easy · avg 78%    1.0%  typical
math · #130 of 431 · 12% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Olmo 3.1 32B Think](olmo-3-1-32b-think.md), [Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking](qwen3-vl-30b-a3b-thinking.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
HMMT 2025 (edition unspecified) (…   73.9%  ▃█▇▅●▅▁·▁··▁ beats 20/32    hard · avg 34%      3.9%  sharp · at its level
PolyMATH (maker)                     56.3%  ▁···▃▁·▇█▄●▄ beats 18/23    hard · avg 32%      2.9%  at its level · several runs
AIME 2025 (maker)                    87.8%  ▁·▁▁▁▂▅▆█●▅▁ beats 106/133  medium · avg 51%    2.3%  sharp · small run
HMMT February 2025 (maker)           73.7%  ▁▁▁▃▁▅●▃██▁▄ beats 11/31    medium · avg 49%    1.8%  typical
HMMT November 2025 (maker)           81.2%  ▁▁····▁●▃█▇▁ beats 6/23     medium · avg 62%    1.5%  typical
other tests (30)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
Medmarks-V mean win rate (19 veri…  0.5888  ▁▄▃▃▇▄█▃▅●▁▁ beats 28/30    avg 0.418               7.6%  sharp
GPQA Diamond (maker)                 77.2%  ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█●█▄ beats 191/322  hard · avg 47%          5.1%  sharp · at its level
GPQA (subset unspecified) (maker)    77.2%  ▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█●▃ beats 92/106   hard · avg 49%          4.2%  sharp · at its level
INCLUDE (maker)                      78.9%  ▂····▂▂▄▄▄●▄ beats 24/36    medium · avg 59%        3.8%  at its level · several runs
MMLU-Pro (maker)                     82.7%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅●▁ beats 152/188  medium · avg 61%        3.7%  several runs
Medmarks-V weighted mean win rate…   58.9%  ▂▃▅▂▆▃█▅█▅●▆ beats 29/34    medium · avg 41%        3.3%  blunt · at its level
KINA (Knowledge Index of Noah's A…   28.3%  ▁▁▂▁▃▄●▆▄▅▂▃ beats 15/39    very hard · avg 21%     2.7%  typical
BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot a…   43.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆█● beats 90/97    hard · avg 31%          2.6%  blunt · at its level
MMLU-ProX (maker)                    78.7%  ▁·▁▁▁▂▁▃▃●▅▄ beats 20/36    medium · avg 61%        2.6%  several runs
LongBench v2 (maker)                 48.0%  ▂·▁·▂▃▁▄●▃█▄ beats 16/33    very hard · avg 35%     2.5%  at its level
C-Eval (maker)                       89.7%  ▁···▁▁▂▁▂▂▃● beats 21/33    medium · avg 73%        2.2%  typical
MMMLU (maker)                        81.3%  ▂▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅●█▃ beats 32/46    medium · avg 63%        2.0%  at its level
MMLU-Redux (maker)                   92.5%  ▁▁▃▁▂▃▄▅▇▅●▄ beats 47/63    easy · avg 82%          1.9%  typical
OJBench (maker)                      29.7%  ▁···▁▃·▅▄▅●█ beats 16/26    very hard · avg 13%     1.9%  at its level
Global PIQA (maker)                  83.5%  ▃▃··▃··▃▃●█▅ beats 6/11     medium · avg 71%        1.5%  at its level
VitaBench (maker)                    29.5%  ▄··▂▄▆▆●▄▄▄▂ beats 13/21    very hard · avg 11%     1.5%  at its level
MultiChallenge (maker)               51.3%  ▁·▁·▁▃▆▅●▂█▅ beats 15/30    hard · avg 31%          1.4%  at its level
IFBench (aggregation unspecified)…   61.5%  ▂▆▂▄▄▄▂●▄▆█▇ beats 45/86    medium · avg 39%        1.4%  at its level
SuperGPQA (maker)                    60.8%  ▂▁▂▂▅▆▃▇▇●█▃ beats 36/46    medium · avg 39%        1.4%  at its level
MAXIFE (maker)                       79.9%  ▂·▂·▂···●·▄█ beats 5/11     medium · avg 64%        1.3%  typical
WritingBench (maker)                 84.6%  ▁·▁▂▁··▅●▂▂▁ beats 9/20     easy · avg 71%          1.2%  typical
LiveBench 2024-11-25 (maker)         76.6%  ▄··▂·▂·▂█●▂▂ beats 9/13     medium · avg 61%        1.1%  typical
Multi-IF (aggregation unspecified…   77.8%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▃▄●▄▁▂ beats 27/41    medium · avg 63%        1.0%  typical
NOVA-63 (maker)                      53.3%  ▃▃·▃···▃●▃▃█ beats 4/11     medium · avg 39%        0.9%  blunt · at its level
EuroEval HellaSwag (English), tes…   88.1%  ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇●▁ beats 87/100   medium · avg 67%        0.4%  sharp · noisy
DeepPlanning (maker)                  0.4%  ●·····▂··▄█▄ beats 0/9      very hard · avg 7.1%    0.4%  noisy
EuroEval Life in the UK (English …   95.9%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄● beats 145/146  easy · avg 82%          0.2%  noisy
WMT24++ (maker)                      57.4%  ▁·▁▁·●·▁▂▆█▃ beats 3/27     easy · avg 66%          0.1%  blunt · at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   96.3%  ▁▁▂▃▄▄█●▃▂▂▁ beats 94/140   very easy · avg 94%     0.1%  blunt · maxed out · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard…   90.7%  ▁▂▁▂▅●▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 52/98    very easy · avg 90%     0.0%  blunt
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Qwen/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking model …       22   45% ▇▇▇▇▇
Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B model card (submitted /…       18   24% ▇▇▇
Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source L…        2   11% ▇
Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card (submitted /…        3    9% ▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     1    4% ▇
Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark                   1    3% ▇
BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard                      1    3% ▇
EuroEval leaderboards                           2    1% ▇
Vectara hallucination leaderboard               2    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 62.7
Licences: Qwen/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-9B.txt)) · Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2605.01417v1-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-4B.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard ([MIT](../../licenses/bridge-medical-leaderboard-MIT.txt)) · EuroEval leaderboards ([MIT](https://github.com/EuroEval/leaderboards/blob/1a77f1d2f8ba1ba05ab73287fb090d76bf41b2e0/LICENSE)) · Vectara hallucination leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) ## How to run it ### Through an API api (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio) · $0.41/M blended · $0.15 in / $1.2 out per 1M tokens · [alibabacloud.com](https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/models) [price source](https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/model-pricing): USD per 1M tokens, Singapore (International), qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking, thinking mode only. Observed 2026-09-25. · [context source](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/blob/a668908cfe7073faa0363699486fc41a3ff52412/models/alibaba/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking.toml) ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking (ud-q2_k_xl, needs ~24.5 GB, from [huggingface.co/unsloth](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-GGUF/tree/main)) ```sh llama cli -hf unsloth/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf unsloth/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-GGUF:UD-Q2_K_XL ``` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking (4bit, needs ~44.8 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-4bit/tree/740e760a50c07f96cb3fb62bd1d861382fd0a03a)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-4bit -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: ud-q2_k_xl (~24.5 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-GGUF@UD-Q2_K_XL -y` · 8bit (~84.7 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-8bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking (Q4_K_M, needs ~48.5 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/qwen3-next/tags)) ```sh ollama run qwen3-next:80b-a3b-thinking-q4_K_M ``` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking (4bit, needs ~44.8 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/lmstudio-community](https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-4bit/tree/740e760a50c07f96cb3fb62bd1d861382fd0a03a)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-4bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-4bit ``` Other versions: 8bit (~84.7 GB, Mac only) `mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking-MLX-8bit` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking) ## Quantization evidence How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent. They don't describe every download of that precision.
precision                       test                                full → quantized    kept
FP8 (Qwen official checkpoint…  GPQA Diamond (reasoning table; pe…     0.737 → 0.768  104.1%
FP8 (Qwen official checkpoint…  MATH-500 (reasoning table; per si…      0.94 → 0.876   93.2%
FP8 (Qwen official checkpoint…  AIME 2025 (reasoning table; per s…         0.6 → 0.5   83.3%
FP8 block (E4M3; weights stat…  GPQA Diamond (reasoning table; pe…     0.737 → 0.768  104.1%
FP8 block (E4M3; weights stat…  MATH-500 (reasoning table; per si…      0.94 → 0.944  100.4%
FP8 block (E4M3; weights stat…  AIME 2025 (reasoning table; per s…         0.6 → 0.5   83.3%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  GPQA Diamond pass@1 (n=8; lightev…     0.737 → 0.748  101.4%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  GSM8K 5-shot strict-match (OpenLL…     0.846 → 0.848  100.2%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  MMLU 5-shot acc (OpenLLM v1 confi…      0.85 → 0.851  100.1%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  MMLU-Pro 5-shot acc (OpenLLM v2 l…     0.727 → 0.728  100.1%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  OpenLLM v1 average (6 tasks: ARC-…     0.732 → 0.732  100.0%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  OpenLLM v2 average (6 tasks: IFEv…     0.391 → 0.384   98.3%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  IFEval inst-level strict acc 0-sh…     0.448 → 0.424   94.7%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  Reasoning average (3 tasks: AIME …     0.759 → 0.705   92.9%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  MATH-500 pass@1 (n=8; lighteval, …      0.94 → 0.868   92.3%
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (E4M3; weigh…  AIME 2025 pass@1 (n=8; lighteval,…         0.6 → 0.5   83.3%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  IFEval inst-level strict acc 0-sh…      0.448 → 0.46  102.7%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  GPQA Diamond pass@1 (n=8; lightev…     0.737 → 0.737  100.0%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  OpenLLM v1 average (6 tasks: ARC-…     0.732 → 0.729   99.6%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  MMLU 5-shot acc (OpenLLM v1 confi…      0.85 → 0.846   99.5%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  OpenLLM v2 average (6 tasks: IFEv…     0.391 → 0.389   99.5%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  GSM8K 5-shot strict-match (OpenLL…     0.846 → 0.838   99.0%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  MMLU-Pro 5-shot acc (OpenLLM v2 l…     0.727 → 0.714   98.3%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  MATH-500 pass@1 (n=8; lighteval, …      0.94 → 0.872   92.8%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  Reasoning average (3 tasks: AIME …     0.759 → 0.703   92.6%
INT4 W4A16 (GPTQ, symmetric, …  AIME 2025 pass@1 (n=8; lighteval,…         0.6 → 0.5   83.3%
Each kept value links to its source. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)