[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking # Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking Alibaba · released 2025-09 · 235B params (22B active) · apache-2.0 **score 63.3** ±0.7 · #167 of 732 · from 51 benchmark results across 5 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task                vs the others          rank  counts  tests
agent tasks         ▁▁▃▆█●▅▅▄▄▂▁    #162 of 313     13%      3
coding              ▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇●▄▃▁   #137 of 469*    1.6%      1
chat & writing      ▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆●▇▃   #124 of 402*    6.3%      2
math                ▁▁▃▅█▆▄●▄▂▁▁    #131 of 431     13%      6
vision & documents  ▁▁▂▂▁▃▄▂●▇█▄     #85 of 153     31%     18
agent tasks · #162 of 313 · 13% of its score Beats [o1 (2024-12-17)](o1-2024-12-17.md), [o3-mini](o3-mini.md), [DeepSeek R1 0528](deepseek-r1-0528.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [SmolLM3 3B](smollm3-3b.md), [Jamba 1.5 Mini](jamba-1-5-mini.md), [Jamba 1.5 Large](jamba-1-5-large.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                      result  vs the others in its run  difficulty            counts  why
τ²-bench Telecom (maker)   44.7%  ▃·█········● beats 4/6    very hard · avg 9.8%    9.3%  sharp · at its level
OSWorld-Verified (maker)   38.1%  ●▃·▂▅▂▃▂▅▃▆▆ beats 1/27   hard · avg 18%          1.8%  at its level · small run
BFCL v3 (maker)            71.8%  █▄··▄█·█▄█▄● beats 13/13  medium · avg 59%        1.8%  blunt · at its level
coding · #137 of 469 · 1.6% of its score Beats [Qwen3.5 Plus](qwen3-5-plus.md), [Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B)](qwen3-coder-next.md), [Gemini 2.5 Pro](gemini-2-5-pro.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1](llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b.md), [Gemma 4 12B](gemma-4-12b.md), [Seed-OSS 36B Instruct](seed-oss-36b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025) (…   70.1%  ▁▁▃▁█▅▄●▅▅▃█ beats 21/38  medium · avg 42%    1.6%  at its level · small run
chat & writing · #124 of 402 · 6.3% of its score Beats [LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B)](longcat-2-0.md), [Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B)](step-3-5-flash.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [LFM2.5 2.6B](lfm2-5-2-6b.md), [Nemotron-Cascade-8B](nemotron-cascade-8b.md), [DeepSeek V3 0324](deepseek-v3-0324.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty      counts  why
LMArena (text)                      1394.7  ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆●█▃ beats 240/385  avg 1260          5.3%  blunt
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) …   88.2%  ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆█●▅▂▁ beats 96/145   easy · avg 76%    1.0%  small run
math · #131 of 431 · 13% of its score Beats [Claude Sonnet 4.6](claude-sonnet-4-6.md), [MiniMax-M3](minimax-m3.md), [MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B)](mimo-v2-5.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Olmo 3.1 32B Think](olmo-3-1-32b-think.md), [Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking](qwen3-vl-30b-a3b-thinking.md), [Granite 4.2 8B](granite-4-2-8b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty        counts  why
AIME 2025 (maker)                    89.7%  ▁·▁▁▁▂▅▆█▇●▁ beats 115/133  medium · avg 57%    3.5%  sharp · small run
HMMT 2025 (edition unspecified) (…   77.4%  ▃█▇▅●▅▁·▁··▁ beats 22/32    medium · avg 36%    3.5%  sharp · small run
MATH-Vision (maker)                  74.6%  ●·····▄▄·▄·▄ beats 1/5      medium · avg 47%    2.5%  at its level
MathVista (testmini) (maker)         85.8%  ▁··▁▄▄▆▇▄▅●▄ beats 41/48    medium · avg 66%    1.6%  small run
DynaMath (maker)                     82.8%  ▂·····▂··●▄▆ beats 3/10     medium · avg 65%    1.2%  small run
We-Math (maker)                      74.8%  ●··········▃ beats 0/3      medium · avg 58%    1.0%  small run
vision & documents · #85 of 153 · 31% of its score Beats [DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)](deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp.md), [GPT-5.4 nano](gpt-5-4-nano.md), [GPT-5 mini](gpt-5-mini.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [GPT-4.1 mini](gpt-4-1-mini.md), [Gemini 2.5 Flash](gemini-2-5-flash.md), [Gemma 4 12B](gemma-4-12b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
CharXiv (reasoning questions) (ma…   66.1%  ▄▂▄▆▄▄●··▄█▂ beats 14/21   medium · avg 38%       8.6%  at its level
CharXiv descriptive questions (ma…   90.5%  ▄··▂▂▂·▂▄▄▂● beats 14/14   easy · avg 74%         4.0%  typical
Arena vision (style controlled)     1188.8  ▁▁▂▂▂▂▃▄●▅█▇ beats 67/152  avg 1061               3.5%  blunt
MATH-Vision (maker)                  74.6%  ●·····▄▄·▄·▄ beats 1/5     medium · avg 47%       2.5%  at its level
MathVista (testmini) (maker)         85.8%  ▁··▁▄▄▆▇▄▅●▄ beats 41/48   medium · avg 66%       1.6%  small run
MMMU (val) (maker)                   80.6%  ▁····▁▁▃█▆▆● beats 47/53   medium · avg 59%       1.5%  at its level · small run
MMMU Pro (maker)                     69.3%  ▂▃▁▃▆▇▃▇●██▅ beats 33/52   medium · avg 47%       1.5%  at its level · small run
ChartQA (maker)                      90.3%  ▂··▂·▂▃·▅▂▆● beats 17/17   easy · avg 85%         1.2%  blunt
MMStar (maker)                       78.7%  ▃▅▂▃▂▂▆██●█▅ beats 27/35   medium · avg 63%       1.2%  at its level · small run
ScreenSpot-Pro (maker)               61.8%  ▂····▂▄··▂█● beats 10/11   medium · avg 46%       1.2%  blunt · at its level
DocVQA (maker)                       96.5%  ▃··▅▃▅▃█▃█●▅ beats 15/17   very easy · avg 94%    1.0%  blunt · maxed out
CountBench (maker)                   93.7%  ▂▂▃▂·▂▂▃●·▅█ beats 10/18   very easy · avg 89%    1.0%  maxed out · small run
SimpleVQA (maker)                    61.3%  ▃·▃·▃·▃·█●▃▃ beats 8/10    medium · avg 38%       0.9%  blunt · at its level · small run
HallusionBench (maker)               66.7%  ▂▁·▂▂▂▃▅▃●▅▅ beats 25/33   medium · avg 55%       0.6%  blunt · at its level · small run
RealWorldQA (maker)                  81.3%  ▁▃▁▇▃▇▇▅█●▅▅ beats 31/39   easy · avg 72%         0.4%  blunt · small run
CC-OCR (maker)                       81.5%  ▁·▂··▂▂▃▃▂▆● beats 22/26   easy · avg 72%         0.4%  blunt · small run
OCRBench (maker)                     87.5%  ▁·▃▁▆▅▂█●█▁▃ beats 23/37   easy · avg 83%         0.3%  blunt · small run
AI2D test (maker)                    89.2%  ▁▁▅▇▃▇·●·█·▃ beats 18/28   easy · avg 85%         0.2%  blunt · small run
other tests (23)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty            counts  why
GPQA (subset unspecified) (maker)    77.1%  ▂····▂·▂▂█▆● beats 14/14    hard · avg 49%          7.1%  sharp · at its level
WebCompass (overall)                 38.8%  ▅·▃●▃···▃·▃█ beats 3/9      hard · avg 18%          5.3%  at its level
AndroidWorld (maker)                 62.0%  ▃··▃▅▃▃▃▃▃·● beats 9/11     medium · avg 43%        2.9%  at its level
Humanity's Last Exam (maker)         13.6%  ▁▁▁▄▆●▇██▆▁▃ beats 34/111   very hard · avg 4.4%    2.0%  small run
MMLU-Pro (maker)                     83.8%  ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅●▁ beats 160/188  medium · avg 58%        2.0%  small run
INCLUDE (maker)                      80.0%  ▂····▂▂▄▄▄●▄ beats 28/36    medium · avg 58%        1.7%  at its level · small run
MMLU-Redux (maker)                   93.7%  ▁▁▃▁▂▃▄▅▇▅█● beats 58/63    easy · avg 81%          1.7%  small run
Creative Writing v3 (maker)          85.7%  ▂····▂▆··▆●▆ beats 9/14     easy · avg 67%          1.3%  small run
SuperGPQA (maker)                    64.3%  ▂▁▂▂▅▆▃▇▇▇●▃ beats 39/46    medium · avg 39%        1.2%  at its level · small run
VideoMMMU (maker)                    80.0%  ▂···▂···▂▂●▆ beats 4/10     medium · avg 62%        1.2%  small run
MMLU-ProX (maker)                    80.6%  ▁·▁▁▁▂▁▃▃●▅▄ beats 25/36    medium · avg 59%        1.2%  small run
WritingBench (maker)                 86.7%  ▁·▁▂▁··▅█▂●▁ beats 18/20    easy · avg 71%          1.1%  small run
LVBench (maker)                      63.6%  ▇·█▅●▄▄··▃▁▁ beats 15/28    hard · avg 51%          1.0%  at its level · small run
LiveBench 2024-11-25 (maker)         79.6%  ▄··▂·▂·▂█▆▂● beats 13/13    medium · avg 59%        1.0%  small run
MLVU (maker)                         83.8%  ▂···▂···▂●▄█ beats 3/10     easy · avg 69%          1.0%  small run
MMVU (maker)                         71.1%  ▃···▃···▃▃●█ beats 4/8      medium · avg 50%        1.0%  at its level · small run
RefSpatial-Bench (maker)             69.9%  ▃·▃····▃▃▅▅● beats 8/10     medium · avg 45%        0.9%  at its level · small run
ERQA (maker)                         52.5%  ▃··▃··●·▃█▅▅ beats 2/12     medium · avg 36%        0.9%  at its level · small run
Multi-IF (aggregation unspecified…   79.1%  ▁▁▁▁▁▁▃▄●▄▁▂ beats 29/41    medium · avg 62%        0.9%  small run
MMLongBench-Doc (maker)              56.2%  ▃···▃···▃●█▅ beats 3/9      medium · avg 37%        0.9%  at its level · small run
EmbSpatial-Bench (maker)             84.3%  ▁·····▁·▁·▃● beats 7/10     easy · avg 69%          0.8%  small run
Video-MME (without subtitles) (ma…   79.0%  ▁▃▁▃▁·█▄▄●·▇ beats 21/27    medium · avg 67%        0.8%  blunt · at its level · small run
MVBench (maker)                      75.2%  ▁··▃▄▁▃▄▄▄●▄ beats 22/26    medium · avg 66%        0.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Qwen (submitted / maker-reported)               9   37% ▇▇▇▇
Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card (subm…       25   25% ▇▇▇
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking model card …       14   24% ▇▇▇
LMArena leaderboard dataset                     2    9% ▇
WebCompass: Towards Multimodal Web Codi…        1    5% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 63.3
Licences: Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card ([apache-2.0](../../licenses/Qwen--Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.txt)) · Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking model card ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · WebCompass: Towards Multimodal Web Coding Evaluation for Code Language Models ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)) ## How to run it ### llama.cpp (recommended) 1. Install llama.cpp. Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead. [Other ways to install](https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/install.md) ```sh # macOS / Linux curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh # Windows irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex ``` 2. Run Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking (Q4_K_M, needs ~142.2 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF/tree/e3423a389728d101f209c908b79b68367fdfa062)) ```sh llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` 3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931) ```sh llama serve -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF:Q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~249.9 GB) `llama cli -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF:Q8_0` ### LM Studio 1. Install LM Studio. Open the app once before using the lms command. [Download it (macOS / Windows / Linux)](https://lmstudio.ai/download) 2. Run Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking (Q4_K_M, needs ~142.2 GB, from [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF/tree/e3423a389728d101f209c908b79b68367fdfa062)) ```sh lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y ``` 3. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name Other versions: Q8_0 (~249.9 GB) `lms get https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-GGUF@Q8_0 -y` · 3bit (~104 GB, Mac only) `lms get https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-3bit -y` ### Ollama 1. Install Ollama. [Download it (macOS / Windows)](https://ollama.com/download) ```sh # Linux curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh ``` 2. Run Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking (Q4_K_M, needs ~141.5 GB, from [ollama.com](https://ollama.com/library/qwen3-vl/tags)) ```sh ollama run qwen3-vl:235b-a22b-thinking-q4_K_M ``` Other versions: Q8_0 (~282.5 GB) `ollama run qwen3-vl:235b-a22b-thinking-q8_0` ### MLX (Mac) 1. Install MLX (Mac). Apple silicon Macs only, text only. ```sh # with uv uv tool install mlx-lm # or pip install mlx-lm ``` 2. Run Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking (3bit, needs ~104 GB, Mac only, from [huggingface.co/mlx-community](https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-3bit/tree/ef8a1eef86e928dc5e2de6323ad24ee369050ee5)) ```sh mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-3bit ``` 3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1 ```sh mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking-3bit ``` Model repository and documentation: [huggingface.co/Qwen](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking) [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-thinking) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)