[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-3 text-davinci-001 # GPT-3 text-davinci-001 OpenAI · released 2022-01 · proprietary **score 33.8** ±1.1 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 20 benchmark results across 11 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-3 text-davinci-001 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
chat & writing  ●▁▁▃▅▄▇█▇▇▇▃   #469 of 474*     18%      2
math            ▁▁▃●██▅█▃▁▁▁   #421 of 530*     10%      1
chat & writing · #469 of 474 · 18% of its score Trails [Gemma 3 270M IT](gemma-3-270m.md), [SmolLM2 360M Instruct](smollm2-360m.md), [OpenAssistant SFT-4 Pythia 12B](oasst-sft-4-pythia-12b.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run   difficulty           counts  why
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled        9.0%  ▁▂▂●▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 19/122  medium · avg 35%        15%  sharp · too hard for it
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-…   15.2%  ●▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 0/45    very easy · avg 94%    3.0%  sharp · at its level · noisy
math · #421 of 530 · 10% of its score Beats [Athene-70B](athene-70b.md), [GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)](gpt-3-5-turbo-0125.md), [DBRX Instruct](dbrx-instruct.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [OPT-2.7B](opt-2-7b.md), [Gemma 2B (base)](gemma-2b-base.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run   difficulty      counts  why
GSM8K   26.5%  ▂▂▂▂▃●▅▇██▆▄ beats 55/206  easy · avg 76%     10%  sharp · at its level · small run
other tests (17)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
New Yorker Caption Contest matchi…   35.6%  █·····●··▅·▃ beats 3/6      medium · avg 71%        15%  sharp
ARC Challenge                        46.2%  ▄▁▁▂▁▄●▇▃▂▃▂ beats 74/140   easy · avg 78%          14%  sharp · at its level
BoolQ                                64.2%  ▁····▁▂●▆▅▆▄ beats 34/103   medium · avg 78%       4.9%  at its level
OpenBookQA                           52.8%  ▅▁▁▁▂▂▃●▃▁▃▁ beats 77/107   easy · avg 77%         4.7%  at its level
HellaSwag                            77.6%  ▁▁▁▂▂▂▄▆█●▄▂ beats 102/135  very easy · avg 90%    4.3%  at its level
EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper …   15.2%  ●··▄·▂▆▄▂█·▂ beats 0/14     medium · avg 53%       4.2%  at its level
WinoGrande                           66.3%  ▁▁▁▁▂▁▁▅●█▃▁ beats 69/131   easy · avg 86%         4.1%  at its level
COPA                                 83.0%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅●▆▂▁▁ beats 35/67    easy · avg 92%         3.4%  at its level
Natural Questions (closed book)       4.8%  ▂▁▁▁▂●▄▃▅█▅▁ beats 14/68    very hard · avg 13%    2.9%  too hard for it
CSK-PN boolean commonsense QA (10…   80.6%  ▃·▃·····●▃▃█ beats 2/7      easy · avg 87%         2.4%  blunt · at its level
ARC Easy                             67.0%  ▁▃▂▄▆●▅▃▁··▁ beats 50/100   easy · avg 81%         2.3%  blunt · at its level
Super-NaturalInstructions English…   52.1%  █····█··●··█ beats 2/3      easy · avg 71%         2.3%  at its level
SelfAware unanswerable-question d…   49.6%  █●▄▄·······▄ beats 2/5      medium · avg 63%       1.7%  blunt · at its level
Super-NaturalInstructions English…   40.8%  ▄·▄······▄▄● beats 4/5      medium · avg 63%       1.5%  at its level · noisy · small run
PIQA                                 79.1%  ▁▁▁▂▂▃▅●▅▃▁▁ beats 85/123   easy · avg 86%         1.4%  blunt · at its level
SummEdits factual-consistency det…   51.9%  ●····▄·█···▄ beats 0/4      hard · avg 65%         1.3%  noisy
LMentry accuracy (zero-shot)         63.1%  ▂▆·▄▄█▂·●··▂ beats 13/14    medium · avg 65%       0.8%  blunt · at its level
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for …        9   42% ▇▇▇▇▇
AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards             2   18% ▇▇
Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep? Hu…        1   15% ▇▇
PAL: Program-aided Language Models              1   10% ▇
EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Ben…        1    4% ▇
Say What You Mean! Large Language Model…        1    2% ▇
Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalizati…        1    2% ▇
Do Large Language Models Know What They…        1    2% ▇
Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models…        1    1% ▇
SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Fac…        1    1% ▇
LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of …        1    1% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 33.8
Licences: UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluation ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-758-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep? Humor \`\`Understanding'' Benchmarks from The New Yorker Caption Contest ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-41-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · PAL: Program-aided Language Models ([CC0 1.0](../../licenses/paper-2211.10435v2-pal-CC0-1-0.txt)) · EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2312.06281v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-550-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2022-emnlp-main-340-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-551-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-754-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of Summarization ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-600-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of Elementary Language Tasks ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-666-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) ## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/text-davinci-001) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)