[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / GPT-3.5 text-davinci-003 # GPT-3.5 text-davinci-003 OpenAI · released 2022-11 · proprietary **score 46.1** ±0.5 · comparison only: no current run option verified · from 70 benchmark results across 40 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks GPT-3.5 text-davinci-003 among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task            vs the others          rank  counts  tests
chat & writing  ▁▁●▃▅▄▇█▇▇▇▃   #460 of 474*    0.3%      1
math            ▁▁▃▆█●▅█▃▁▁▁    #283 of 530     29%      2
chat & writing · #460 of 474 · 0.3% of its score Trails [Gemma 3 270M IT](gemma-3-270m.md), [SmolLM2 360M Instruct](smollm2-360m.md), [Granite 4.0 350M](granite-4-0-350m.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test                                result  vs the others in its run  difficulty           counts  why
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-…   50.0%  ▂▂·●·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 9/45   very easy · avg 94%    0.3%  sharp · noisy
math · #283 of 530 · 29% of its score Beats [GPT-4o (2024-08-06)](gpt-4o-2024-08-06.md), [Command A (03-2025)](command-a.md), [GPT-4o (2024-05-13)](gpt-4o-2024-05-13.md) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails [Gemma 7B (base)](gemma-7b-base.md), [CodeGemma 7B (v1.0)](codegemma-7b.md), [Phi-2 (2.7B)](phi-2.md) here, though they rank lower overall.
test   result  vs the others in its run  difficulty        counts  why
GSM8K   56.5%  █··█······▄● beats 5/5    easy · avg 67%       23%  sharp · at its level · several runs
MGSM    36.0%  ▆·▂·▄▂▂▂▂●▄▆ beats 13/18  medium · avg 48%    6.4%  sharp · at its level · several runs
other tests (41)
test                                result  vs the others in its run    difficulty           counts  why
AQuA-RAT                             46.9%  █··▁▁▁··▁●▁▁ beats 25/27    medium · avg 56%        16%  sharp · at its level · several runs
CommonsenseQA                        62.8%  █·····▂▂▃▂▄● beats 34/38    easy · avg 80%         8.7%  sharp · at its level · small run · seve…
SVAMP                                79.5%  █▆▆▅▂▅▂▅▂▂▅● beats 29/30    easy · avg 84%         6.4%  sharp · several runs
MMLU                                 64.8%  ▁···▁··▃▁▅●█ beats 12/18    easy · avg 74%         6.2%  at its level · several runs
BIG-Bench Hard                       50.9%  ▂▂▂▂·▅·▃▂●▃▃ beats 14/18    medium · avg 60%       4.1%  sharp · at its level
OpenBookQA                           81.6%  ▅▁▁▁▂▂▃█▃▁●▁ beats 103/107  easy · avg 78%         3.5%  at its level · small run · several runs
StrategyQA                           71.5%  █····▂▂▁▂▂▂● beats 23/25    medium · avg 72%       2.2%  at its level · small run · several runs
BoolQ                                67.7%  ▁····▁▂█▆▅●▄ beats 89/103   medium · avg 75%       1.7%  at its level · small run · several runs
TyDiQA-GoldP (1-shot, EM, 8-langu…   43.7%  ▂··▂·▂▄▄·●██ beats 9/18     medium · avg 61%       1.7%  at its level
COPA                                 93.2%  ▁·▁▁▁▅▅█▆▂●▁ beats 63/67    very easy · avg 96%    1.5%  several runs
HaluEval knowledge-grounded dialo…   68.4%  █·········▄● beats 3/3      medium · avg 68%       1.4%  sharp · at its level · noisy
Integer-sequence completion, unam…   66.0%  ▄········●·█ beats 1/3      easy · avg 73%         1.4%  at its level
EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper …   43.7%  ▂··▄·▂▆●▂█·▂ beats 7/14     medium · avg 53%       1.4%  at its level
clembench v1.0 clemscore (self-pl…   15.8%  ▄······●·█·▄ beats 1/4      medium · avg 38%       1.3%  sharp · at its level
Integer-sequence explanation as P…   31.2%  █······●··██ beats 1/3      medium · avg 47%       1.2%  at its level
JEEBench total score (zero-shot, …   12.2%  █··●····█··█ beats 1/3      very hard · avg 20%    0.9%  too hard for it
ZeroSCROLLS Qasper (zero-shot F1)    52.7%  ▂▂··▂·▂··▂█● beats 9/10     medium · avg 56%       0.8%  blunt · at its level
CoNLL-2003 English NER, few-shot …   77.2%  ▃···▅·▃▅··●█ beats 6/9      easy · avg 83%         0.8%  small run
ZeroSCROLLS QuALITY (zero-shot ac…   69.0%  ▃····▃·▃▃●▅▅ beats 5/10     easy · avg 81%         0.8%  at its level
Anthropic HH helpful preference c…   63.0%  █········█·● beats 2/2      hard · avg 65%         0.7%  at its level · small run
SciTab 3-class claim verification…   41.4%  █···▄▄·▄▄▄·● beats 7/7      medium · avg 51%       0.7%  blunt · at its level
ACE05-E event argument extraction…   60.4%  █·····█····● beats 2/2      medium · avg 65%       0.7%  at its level · small run
WinoGrande                           73.5%  ▁▁▁▁▂▁▁▅▇●▃▁ beats 108/131  medium · avg 73%       0.7%  at its level
SummEdits factual-consistency det…   70.7%  ▄····▄·█···● beats 4/4      hard · avg 65%         0.6%  noisy
RadNLI (3-class radiology NLI), z…   55.9%  █·●········█ beats 1/2      easy · avg 65%         0.6%  at its level · small run
CSK-PN boolean commonsense QA (10…   84.2%  ▃·▃·····▃▃▃● beats 5/7      easy · avg 87%         0.6%  blunt · at its level
HellaSwag                            71.4%  ▁▁▁▂▂▂▄▆●▇▄▂ beats 71/135   easy · avg 77%         0.5%  at its level
SelfAware unanswerable-question d…   51.4%  █▄●▄·······▄ beats 3/5      medium · avg 63%       0.4%  blunt · at its level
Social IQA                           73.3%  ▁·▁██▄▅▁▂▃●▁ beats 50/59    medium · avg 70%       0.4%  blunt · at its level · small run
ZeroSCROLLS NarrativeQA (zero-sho…   24.6%  ▃··▃·█▃·●▃·▃ beats 6/10     hard · avg 29%         0.4%  blunt · at its level
HateCheck functional tests, zero-…   76.1%  █·····●·█··█ beats 1/3      easy · avg 84%         0.4%  blunt · at its level
Zero-shot relation extraction, va…   47.6%  █····▄····█● beats 5/5      medium · avg 50%       0.3%  blunt · at its level
PIQA                                 76.9%  ▁▁▁▂▂▃▅●▅▃▁▁ beats 60/123   easy · avg 84%         0.3%  blunt · at its level · small run
ConvRe Re2Text, normal relation, …   85.4%  ▂▂▄··▂▂●▄··▂ beats 9/12     easy · avg 90%         0.3%  at its level · noisy
CREPE event likelihood change (3-…   42.3%  ██····●····█ beats 2/3      medium · avg 52%       0.3%  blunt · at its level
HaluEval QA hallucination recogni…   49.6%  ●··········▃ beats 1/3      very hard · avg 56%    0.2%  noisy
FANToM BeliefQ [Choice], short co…   17.7%  ●·····▂····▁ beats 1/11     very hard · avg 55%    0.2%  sharp · too hard for it · noisy
StoryAnalogy multiple-choice stor…   37.1%  █·······●··█ beats 1/2      hard · avg 42%         0.2%  blunt · noisy · small run
ZeroSCROLLS MuSiQue (zero-shot F1)   33.5%  ▄·█··●█·▄▄▄▄ beats 4/10     medium · avg 43%       0.1%  blunt · at its level
HaluEval summarization hallucinat…   48.1%  ●··········▃ beats 1/3      very hard · avg 50%    0.0%  blunt · too hard for it · noisy
Natural Questions (closed book)      29.9%  ▂▁▁▁▂▄▄▃▅█●▁ beats 60/68    medium · avg 48%          —  not counted yet: no other model in the …
## How the score was worked out Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard that test is and who ran it. The model's score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its *counts* column above; here it is added up by who ran the tests. [Method](../method.md)
source                                    results  share of the score
Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language …        4   15% ▇▇
Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning             3   13% ▇▇
Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural La…        7   10% ▇
INFORM : Information eNtropy based mult…        1    7% ▇
Batch Prompting: Efficient Inference wi…        3    6% ▇
Unnatural Error Correction: GPT-4 Can A…        1    4% ▇
Increasing Probability Mass on Answer C…        3    3% ▇
PAL: Program-aided Language Models              1    3% ▇
Examining Inter-Consistency of Large La…        5    3% ▇
Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augment…        2    3% ▇
Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled D…        2    3% ▇
Self-Consistency of Large Language Mode…        2    3% ▇
Small Language Models Fine-tuned to Coo…        1    2% ▇
ZeroSCROLLS: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for …        4    2% ▇
Not All Languages Are Created Equal in …        1    2% ▇
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought …        1    2% ▇
MoT: Memory-of-Thought Enables ChatGPT …        2    2% ▇
HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination E…        3    2% ▇
In-Context Demonstration Selection with…        2    1% ▇
Bridging the Resource Gap: Exploring th…        1    1% ▇
EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Ben…        1    1% ▇
clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate …        1    1% ▇
Exploring the Curious Case of Code Prom…        2    1% ▇
Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challengin…        1    1% ▇
Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-…        1    1% ▇
Is ChatGPT a Good Causal Reasoner? A Co…        1    1% ▇
trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinf…        1    1% ▇
SCITAB: A Challenging Benchmark for Com…        1    1% ▇
Code4Struct: Code Generation for Few-Sh…        1    1% ▇
SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Fac…        1    1% ▇
Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Ra…        1    1% ▇
Say What You Mean! Large Language Model…        1    1% ▇
Do Large Language Models Know What They…        1    0% ▇
InstructSafety: A Unified Framework for…        1    0% ▇
AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards             1    0% ▇
Aligning Instruction Tasks Unlocks Larg…        1    0% ▇
An Investigation of LLMs' Inefficacy in…        1    0% ▇
Causal Reasoning of Entities and Events…        1    0% ▇
FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing …        1    0% ▇
StoryAnalogy: Deriving Story-level Anal…        1    0% ▇
prior: pull toward the middle                        0% ▇
weighted average                                   = 46.1
Licences: Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2210.11416v5-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-ijcnlp-main-20-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-85-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-216-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Batch Prompting: Efficient Inference with Large Language Model APIs ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-industry-74-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Unnatural Error Correction: GPT-4 Can Almost Perfectly Handle Unnatural Scrambled Text ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-550-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve Accuracy ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-522-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · PAL: Program-aided Language Models ([CC0 1.0](../../licenses/paper-2211.10435v2-pal-CC0-1-0.txt)) · Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debate ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-508-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Self-Knowledge Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-691-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for Chain-of-Thought Prompting ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-41-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Self-Consistency of Large Language Models under Ambiguity ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-blackboxnlp-1-7-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Small Language Models Fine-tuned to Coordinate Larger Language Models improve Complex Reasoning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-225-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · ZeroSCROLLS: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Long Text Understanding ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-536-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-826-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-153-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · MoT: Memory-of-Thought Enables ChatGPT to Self-Improve ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-392-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-397-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · In-Context Demonstration Selection with Cross Entropy Difference ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-81-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Bridging the Resource Gap: Exploring the Efficacy of English and Multilingual LLMs for Swedish ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-resourceful-1-13-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2312.06281v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agents ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-689-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Exploring the Curious Case of Code Prompts ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-nlrse-1-2-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-468-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-710-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Is ChatGPT a Good Causal Reasoner? A Comprehensive Evaluation ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-743-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-530-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · SCITAB: A Challenging Benchmark for Compositional Reasoning and Claim Verification on Scientific Tables ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-483-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Code4Struct: Code Generation for Few-Shot Event Structure Prediction ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-202-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of Summarization ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-600-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-891-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledge ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-acl-long-550-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know? ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-551-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · InstructSafety: A Unified Framework for Building Multidimensional and Explainable Safety Detector through Instruction Tuning ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-emnlp-700-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Aligning Instruction Tasks Unlocks Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Relation Extractors ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-acl-50-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · An Investigation of LLMs' Inefficacy in Understanding Converse Relations ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-429-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · Causal Reasoning of Entities and Events in Procedural Texts ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-findings-eacl-31-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-890-CC-BY-4-0.txt)) · StoryAnalogy: Deriving Story-level Analogies from Large Language Models to Unlock Analogical Understanding ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/acl-2023-emnlp-main-706-CC-BY-4-0.txt))
Not counted (18)
source                  test                            score  why
Plan-and-Solve Prompt…  GSM8K                           58.4%  only model in this source's run
Plan-and-Solve Prompt…  AQuA-RAT                        48.4%  only model in this source's run
Plan-and-Solve Prompt…  SVAMP                           80.3%  only model in this source's run
Plan-and-Solve Prompt…  CommonsenseQA                   78.3%  only model in this source's run
Plan-and-Solve Prompt…  StrategyQA                      71.2%  only model in this source's run
Evaluating Open-Domai…  Natural Questions (closed boo…  29.9%  too few models have it yet
IAG: Induction-Augmen…  StrategyQA                      71.5%  only model in this source's run
INFORM : Information …  AQuA-RAT                        43.7%  only model in this source's run
INFORM : Information …  CommonsenseQA                   77.5%  only model in this source's run
INFORM : Information …  StrategyQA                      68.2%  only model in this source's run
Auto-Instruct: Automa…  BIG-Bench Hard                  50.3%  only model in this source's run
Self-Polish: Enhance …  GSM8K                           56.1%  only model in this source's run
Self-Polish: Enhance …  AQuA-RAT                        44.9%  only model in this source's run
Self-Polish: Enhance …  SVAMP                           80.3%  only model in this source's run
CAR: Conceptualizatio…  CommonsenseQA                   68.9%  only model in this source's run
CAR: Conceptualizatio…  PIQA                            67.8%  only model in this source's run
CAR: Conceptualizatio…  Social IQA                      68.0%  only model in this source's run
CAR: Conceptualizatio…  WinoGrande                      60.7%  only model in this source's run
## How to run it No verified API or local download yet. [interactive version](https://whatmodel.sh/model/text-davinci-003) · [JSON](https://whatmodel.sh/api?format=json&all=1)