[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Yi 34B Chat # Yi 34B Chat 01.AI · released 2023-11 · 34.39B params · apache-2.0 **score 44.9** ±1.0 · #479 of 732 · from 8 benchmark results across 7 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Yi 34B Chat among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests chat & writing ▁▁▁▃●▄▆█▆▇▇▃ #319 of 402 81% 5 math ▁▁●▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁ #397 of 431* 11% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled 27.2% ▁▂▂▃▆▆●▆▄▄▁▁ beats 72/122 medium · avg 35% 36% sharp Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judg… 23.1% ▂▁▁▅●▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 19/60 medium · avg 47% 22% sharp · at its level LMArena (text) 1183.8 ▁▁▁▂●▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 61/385 avg 1260 11% blunt Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-… 1101.0 ▂▁▂▁▃▇●▆▇▄▂▂ beats 46/95 avg 1187 10% typical AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-… 94.1% ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█●▄▂ beats 39/45 very easy · avg 94% 1.3% sharp · noisy
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why MATH level 5 5.1% ●▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 2/92 hard · avg 28% 11% sharp
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper … 51.0% ▂··▄·▂▆▄▂●·▂ beats 11/14 medium · avg 53% 5.0% at its level Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (… 70.8% ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 173/276 medium · avg 72% 2.7% at its level · noisy GPQA Diamond 14.7% ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 0/322 hard · avg 39% — failed run: Well below the 25% guess ra…
source results share of the score AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards 2 37% ▇▇▇▇ Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard 1 22% ▇▇▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 1 11% ▇ Epoch AI 1 11% ▇ Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-A… 1 10% ▇ EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Ben… 1 5% ▇ Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard 1 3% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 44.9Licences: AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/arena-hard-auto-v0-1-Apache-2.0.txt)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Epoch AI ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/paper-2312.06281v2-CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt))
source test score why Epoch AI GPQA Diamond 14.7% failed run: Well below the 25% guess rate. Peers of similar age and size score 0.25 to 0.27 in the same Epoch run (deepseek-llm-67b-chat 0.246, Llama-2-70b-chat 0.263), which suggests answer-format failures.