[whatmodel.sh](../../README.md) / Zephyr 7B beta # Zephyr 7B beta Hugging Face · released 2023-10 · 7.24B params · mit **score 35.4** ±0.6 · #623 of 732 · from 20 benchmark results across 9 sources Score within the [LMArena (text)](https://whatmodel.sh/?set=lmarena-text&score=set) comparison set only. ## What it's good at ● marks Zephyr 7B beta among every model on that task or test, worst to best.
task vs the others rank counts tests coding ▁▁▁●▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #436 of 469 59% 4 chat & writing ▁▁▁●▆▄▆█▆▇▇▃ #369 of 402 15% 4 math ▁▁▃▅●▆▄█▄▂▁▁ #331 of 431* 2.5% 1
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why HumanEval 30.0% ▁·▁▁●▄▆▅█▃▁▁ beats 15/99 easy · avg 76% 31% sharp · at its level · several runs HumanEval+ 23.2% ▁·▁▁▁●▄▄▄█▃▁ beats 11/99 easy · avg 70% 21% sharp · at its level MBPP+ 34.7% ▁···▁●▂▅▇█▆▂ beats 3/75 easy · avg 66% 4.7% at its level Tulu 2: CodexEval pass@10 54.3% ▃▃▃·●▃▃█▃▂▂▅ beats 9/25 easy · avg 83% 2.8% sharp · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled 13.2% ▁▂▂▃●▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 32/122 medium · avg 35% 6.1% sharp LMArena (text) 1130.9 ▁▁▁●▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 28/385 avg 1260 4.1% blunt Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-… 1049.0 ▂▁▂▁▃●█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 25/95 avg 1187 3.8% typical AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-… 90.6% ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆●▆▄▂ beats 32/45 very easy · avg 94% 1.0% sharp · at its level · noisy
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why GSM8K 28.0% ▆▂▅●▅▅▃▆···▂ beats 8/25 easy · avg 72% 2.5% sharp · at its level
test result vs the others in its run difficulty counts why LiveBench 2024-07-26 16.7% ▁▁▁▂●▃▂█▆▃▅▃ beats 10/61 medium · avg 38% 8.6% typical BIG-Bench Hard 44.9% ▁·····▂●▂▅·▁ beats 5/25 easy · avg 74% 4.4% sharp MMLU 58.6% ▁▁▃▃▄█●▁█··▁ beats 17/25 medium · avg 73% 3.9% at its level · several runs Natural Questions (closed book) 25.2% ▁·▁·▁▂▁▂·▅▂● beats 20/28 medium · avg 48% 3.6% typical Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (… 64.5% ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂●▅▁ beats 111/276 medium · avg 72% 0.8% at its level · noisy Tulu 2: TyDiQA gold passage, 1-sh… 23.7% ●··▁▃▂▂▂█▅▁▂ beats 1/25 medium · avg 59% 0.6% blunt · at its level TriviaQA 64.4% ▁··▁█▃▃▁▄▅▄● beats 24/28 easy · avg 73% 0.5% at its level · noisy HaluEval QA hallucination detecti… 51.8% █▁▁·●▁·▁▁▁▁▁ beats 19/27 hard · avg 66% 0.3% noisy TruthfulQA MC2 55.1% ▅▃█▆▁▂●···▁▁ beats 26/31 medium · avg 57% 0.1% blunt · at its level
source results share of the score EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluatio… 3 54% ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Tulu 2 5 12% ▇ LiveBench model judgments 1 9% ▇ AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards 2 7% ▇ OpenChat 3.5 model card 2 5% ▇ Hallucinations Leaderboard results 4 4% ▇ LMArena leaderboard dataset 1 4% ▇ Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-A… 1 4% ▇ Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard 1 1% ▇ prior: pull toward the middle 0% ▇ weighted average = 35.4Licences: EvalPlus / EvalPerf published evaluation runs ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/evalplus-published-runs-Apache-2.0.txt)) · Tulu 2 ([CC BY 4.0](../../licenses/CC-BY-4.0.txt)) · LiveBench model judgments ([Apache-2.0 (stated in the LiveBench datasheet)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leaderboards ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · OpenChat 3.5 model card ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · Hallucinations Leaderboard results ([Apache-2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)) · LMArena leaderboard dataset ([CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation ([CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)) · Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboard ([Apache-2.0](../../licenses/hf-leaderboard-spaces-Apache-2.0.txt))
source test score why OpenChat 3.5 model ca… BIG-Bench Hard 16.0% failed run: Few-shot CoT format failure in a chat-mode harness: 16.0 vs 44.9 for the same checkpoint in the Tulu 2 paper (3-shot CoT), and below BBH's published random average of 25.7. OpenChat 3.5 model ca… GSM8K 5.1% failed run: Same few-shot CoT format failure: 5.1 vs 28.0 in the Tulu 2 paper's 8-shot CoT run.