{ "@context": { "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm", "body": { "@id": "CIP100:body", "@context": { "references": { "@id": "CIP100:references", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference", "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference", "label": "CIP100:reference-label", "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri", "referenceHash": { "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash", "@context": { "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm" } } } }, "comment": "CIP100:comment", "externalUpdates": { "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates", "@context": { "title": "CIP100:update-title", "uri": "CIP100:uri" } } } }, "authors": { "@id": "CIP100:authors", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "witness": { "@id": "CIP100:witness", "@context": { "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm", "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey", "signature": "CIP100:signature" } } } } }, "authors": [], "body": { "comment": "I vote yes for this proposal because I believe open-source, neutral, and community-owned governance tools are essential to keeping governance alive and improving participation. I think the full amount (Level 3) should be allocated not only to maintain but also to improve the tool. Other governance tools, like Tempo, offer features that I believe GovTool should implement, some of which are already included in the proposed roadmap and require funding. Overall, GovTool provides a much stronger foundation and has a proven track record. It's good to have multiple options for users, but I see GovTool as the backbone of Cardano governance, and as such, it should be prioritized for development. I was disappointed that it wasn't included in the Intersect budget for 2025, and I hope this new proposal will be approved." }, "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256" }