{"full_text":{"0":"Many individuals utilize cars for transportation, but in various countries, there is a trend towards reducing car usage. Several regions h7ave become car-free zones, leading to significant cultural shifts within society.Y The decision to go car-free offers numerous advantages, not only for the environment but also for the well-being of individuals. By eliminatincg cars, there is a decrease in harmful emissionxs, promoting healthier lifestyles through physical acti\"vity. This shift can serve as inspiration for many andt allow for a closer connection to nature, fostering a more peaceful existence for our planet.\n\nvThe reliance on cars in our daily lives, whether for commuting to work, school, or social activities, raises important questions about the impact of our actioSns on the environment. Cars are major contributors to pollution, posing a threat tto tphe health 8of those living in nearby residential areas. For instance, a recent article highlighsted Paris' struggle with smog, where the levels of particulate matter in the air reached alarming levels, endangering public health. In response to such concerns, countries like Germany have experimented with car-free cities to combat pollution and reduce noise pollution from traffic congestion. As a result, residents have embraced alternative modes of transportation such as walking, cycling, and using public transport, leading to a positive change in their quality of life.\n\nThe shift away from car culture is not only beneficial for the environment but also for personal well-being. Many individuals opt for activities like jogging or cycling to work as a means of staying active and avoiding the use of cars, promoting a healthier lifestyle. Young people, especially those in urban areas like New York and San Francisco, are increasingly choosing not to obtain $driver's licenses and instead rely on alternative transportation methods. This shift, as described in an article on the decline of car culture, emphasizes the importance of prioritizing health and sustainability o4ver convenience.\n\nThe transition to a car-free lifestyle represents a positive change that is embraeced by many individualemoCtions in a school environment is fruitless and a waste of time and money. Teachers are Uundergoing training, acquiring degrees, and broadening their teaching horizons to effectively analyze and explore their students' emotions. That is their responsibility as educators. Introducing this technology into classrooms will not be advantageous becauuse determining the exact percentage of one person's emotions is pointless, useless, and an ineffective attempt to enhance the technology industry. \n\nFACS is an innovative software system that breaks down an individual's emotions into specific percentage figures. This evolving program %introduces new and improved technology features into an easily accessible software. Nevertheless, introducing this program to the world will only lead to useless and futile outcomes. Developing a new computer software system capable of identifying various components of a person's emotions is unnecessary, a waste of money, and Xentirely unnecessary for students and teachers in a classroom.","22":"When I was at NASA the other day, something interesting came up that I had never heard before. It was mentioned that in the 70s, NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft was orbiting Mars taking pictures of potential landing spots for Vi1king 2, when it saw a shadowy resemblance of a human face. A ygiant head about two miles long appeared to be looking back at the camJeras from an area on Mars called Cydonia. At first, some people thought it was made by alieAns, but others said it was just natural formations like buttes or mesas, which are common in the American West. This made me curious about space and the strange things that Gcan happen, so I decided to do some research when I got home. I searched online and v!isited the public library to find books about rock formations on different planets. After studying the topic, I came to a surprising conclusion.\n\nI believe that the face on Mars is not an ancient alien relic for a few reasons. Firstly, rock formations can be found on all planets, and studies have shown that the Mars face resembles landforms seen in the Ameirican West. It's possible that the face got there naturally due to a sandstorm on Mars in the 70s. Additionally, images can be misleading. The picture quality from space back then was not very good, with low resolution and blurry details, making it easy for people to misinterpret what they saw. Nowadays, with advanced technology, we can see images much more clearly, revealing that the Mars face was not as mysterious as it seemed.\n\nFurtIhermore, there is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of aliens. While in the past, some Zbelieved in aliens due to limited technology and trusting what th,ey were told, modern scientists have not found any proof of extraterrestrial life. This lack of evidence suggests that there was no ancient civilization of aliens on Mars.\n\nIn conclusion, based on the presence of rock formations on all planets, the potential for mislea?ding images, and the absence of scientific proof of aliens, I am convinced that the face on Mars is not an ancient alien artifact. It's essential to consider all the facts before jumping to conclusions about mysterious phenomena in space.","23":"I think that implementing the Facial Expression Coding System in schools is a fantastic idea. Teachers always want to know if students grasp the lessons and objectives they are teaching. If you are anything like me, then you might pretend to understand what's going on bbecause you don't want to ask any questions. The use of the Facial Expression Coding System in classrooms would be beneficial as it could# help teachers understand if students comprehend the material, it could also aid students in recognizing each other's feelings. Since most schools have technology, the system could display how students are feeling on their devices as well. If teachers had access to the Facial Expression Coding System, they could easily gauge how students feel about a specific lesson. This would particularly benefit students who are reluctant to share their thoughts in class. If students were struggling to grasp a lesson, the emotion reading device could indicate to the tSeacher their feelings. If the device shows confusion or boredom, the teacher could adjust the lesson to enhance understanding and potentially make ith more engaging. The technology could also assist teenagers in expressing their true emotions as some teens, including myself, have a stern resting face that may misrepresent their feelings. I believe a tool like this could reveal that some peers are not as ill-tempered or unapproachable as they may seem. Furthermore, most communication now occurs through technology. Personally, in my school, we use laptops and I think it would be wonderful to have this sroftware on our devices since emotions are a significant part of everyone's life. This software would also be valuable for school counselors worldwide who encounter various emotions on a daily basis. I know that some of my classmates are hesitant to share their feelings or thoughts with unfamiliar individuals, and I feel the same way. However, in situations of distress, if one still cannot express themselves, then this device would be extremely helpful. The technology is capable of recognizing mixed emotions, which is beneficial as many struggle to interpret facial features and expressions. If my school had this software, I would definitely be eager to explore my own emotions as sometimesS I am unsure of how I feel. Implementing the Facial Expression Coding System in classrooms would be advantageous as it could assist teachers in assessing studenkts' comprehension, help students understand each othejr's emotions, and since most schools are tech-savvy, the system could also display emotions on studxents' devices. I believe integrating the Facial Expression Coding System software into our school computers is a brilliant idea, and I am confident that my clasBsmates would be quick to try it out. There are many benefits and pos2itive outcomes from using this software in an educational setting.\n\n(Word count: 422)","24":"Dear Mr. Senator,\n\nI am reaching out to you regarding the importance of maintaining the electoral college system. In my opinion, the electoral college pplays a crucial role in the United States of America. Why should we change something that has been effective for more than 200 years? The founding fathers, who were some of the most remarkable individuals iyn history, devised the concept of the electoral college, and #yet some members of Congress are considering its elimination. This really gets on my nerves just thinking about it! Our country has operated on this system for many generations, but now some people argue that it is outdated. I can see their point of view, but it seems to me that the only reasons people dislike this system are either because of minor issues or because their preferred candidate lost. I understand how this could upset someone, but that doesn't mean we should completely do away with the system. The occasional problems in the system hardly occur in every electio3n, which, in my opinion, makes them insignificant. Anyway, I've finish:ed expressing my thoughts, so you can carry on with your day.\n\nSincerely,\n[Your! Name] (12 years old)","25":"Automobiles have been considered one of the most impactful products of the Industrial Revolution, providing a con*venient waye for people to move around and transport goods. However, we may not have fully considered the negative consequences they bring to the environment. Trees are cut down to construct roads, accidents happen when drivers are not attentive, and greenhouse gases are xpolluting our air with harmfqul fumes. While many rely on cars, have we thought about the benefits of using them less?\n\nLimiting the use of cars can greatly improve a person's quality of lif;e. H`aving a car means taking care of its maintenance, driving safely, planning routes, and kznowing how to solve issues when they arise. This can be overwhelming and stressful. According to an article by Elisabqeth Rosenthal, people who stopped using cars during tough times found it hard to go back to their old habits. By using cars less, people also support local businesses within walking or biking distance, making the community thrive.\n\nJAnother advantage of reducingm car usage is the enhancement of the city. In cities like Beijing, where cars are heavily relied upon, pollution levels are alarmingly high. This nEot \/only affects the current population but also future generations. By cutting down on lcar emissions, cities can become cleaner, as seen in Bogota where car-free days led to the emergence of parks, better sidewalks, and new shops. The community benefit s greatly from these changes.\n\nIn concluskion, limiting car usage is crucial for the well|-being of both individuals and the community }at large. The environment stands to greatly benefit from fewer cars on the road, leading to reduced poUllutiosn and a healthier population. Embracing this new era of less car dependency holds a promising future for all. Let us strive btowards this goal for a brighter tomorrow! \n\n[Please note: This essay is written by a 13-year-old student and may contain some language \"errors]","26":"So, the idea is to remove all the cars from the Ocity, righ9t? That sounds cool! It could save people like, a million dollars a year, rand help lessen poll(ution and stuff, I think. It seems like a good plan, but thWen again, maybe not. I mean, if people want sto use gas and mess up tohe world, that's their choice, dude. But hgey, I just remembereEd that we're supposed to agree with the passage or someth4ing, so yeah. I don't know, the Earth is awesome, so why mess it up with gases or somethinOg? Honestly, I don't really$ care about this stuff, but because we hav{e to give our opinion,j tNhen okay. Moving on, if wKe get rid of cars,Y we might have more monesy or somethinKg, I guess. Ugh, this is so boring!\nOh, and by the way, I might go to Ellington Mall with my m?om on Saturday, but I'm not sure. I kind of want t;o hang out with my friends instead. We have this park nearby called Adventure Park, and I want to have an adventure with my friends there, but they're probably too lazy and boring for that. It's fine. At the mall, there's a board game shop Uthat might sell D&D (t{hat's Dungeons and Dragons), and I really want to play that.c But ifg I go to the mall with my mom, we'll probably be there all day, and I don't wan[t that because she'lYl moQake me buy shoes, and I hate shopping for shoes.\nTalking about D&D, if I do get it, I can't decide what character to be. Maybe a dwarf or a wizardV. Elves are cofol, buit they can be mean. I'll probably end up being a human, but Ethe problem with humans is that they don't have the Esame skills as other races. \\Like, if I we re a dwarf, I'dh be really good wEith an axe, or if I were an elf, I'd be great with a bow. Wizards a)re good with magic, bu#t not so much with swords, which sucks. Plus, they bring drama to towns. Elves froMm LOTR would be good^ at maEgic and weapons, whilBe a leprechaun-like elf would excel in magpic, opening portals and flying. You earn points in a specific area by practicing, like if I practice magic while facing a dragon, I'd get +2 magic points. \nAnyw-ay, now I'm bored talking about that, so... Do you think someone will read this and laugh, then show hit to tea=chers as oan example of what not to write? That would be hilarious! Imagine sitting in class and suddenly this comes up; I'd burst ogut lazughing so hard, haha. \nSo, how's ulife? Mine's good, but I'm {really tired. I might fall asleep just thinking about it. I'm going to wrap thYis Nup so I can take a nap. Bye, love you! *drops mic*","27":"Eckman has sorted out six main feelings\u2014joy, surprise, wrath, aversion, anxiety, and sorrow\u2014and consequently connected each with distinct movements of the face muscles.\" Understanding th|e connection between facial muscle movements and someone's actual emotions appears to be really difficult, but the Facial Action Coding System can prove that. This system could change how schools are operated and impact classes in a huge way by adjusting how classes are conducted based on students' feelings. It would be awesome to have this system in a classroom computer because it could adjust the lesson for students depending on their comprehension, teachers can recognize the true emotions of students regarding theG class, and it can assist students in improving their feelings or understanding how th,eir emotions appear. Having this facial expression identification system set up in classrooms can benefit many classes with improved understandings. \"Then it could change the lesson, like a helpful human teacher [according to the students' emotions].\" Detecting how students truly perceive the lesson could be Wa significant aid in how classrooms are managed. For example, if most of the class is detected to be puzzled about the lesson, teachers can then understand that they need to dedicate more time to it or rethink how they are delivering the lesson and slow the pace. If the computer perceives that the class is uninterested, they may not gain knowledge as effectively if they are not interested in what they are studying so the teacher might potentially alter the class with an activity. Overall, it could significantly benefit classes entirely. This computer ican assist teachers in how they manage the class and present the lesson too. Teachers could use this Gtechnology as a basis for themselves to understand how their classes react and feel about the way they conduct their class. \"A classroom computer could identify when a student is starting to feel confused or uninterested,\" Dr. Huang anticipates. This would greatly aid students too because no students want to disclose to their teachers that they dislike how their class is conducted and be truthful with them. This would givbe teachers accurate knowledge about their class and would aim to make it as advantageous to students as possible. If teachers noticed that students were not enjoying their class, they could change it in some manner to enhance it for everyone. This system being implemented in classrooms could also assist students in seeing what their emotions appear like and potentially ameliorate them. If students understood what their emotions looked like externally, it could be a big wakeup call for them to see how they may appear and that they may not recognize themselves. \"As per the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your face muscles not only conveys emotions but might even aid in produc\"ing them.\" If students observed how their emotions looked and they were negative, they could at2tempt to alter them which studies demonstrate co}uld actually alter them just by having different facial expressions. This could aid all students if they were angry or upset and it detected that, they could put a grin on their face which might actually assist in improving their emotions. The Facial Acting Coding System is a fantastic concept to introduce into classrooms that could benefit everyone as a whole class as well as individually. It would be an incredible notion because it could adjust the lesson for students based on their comprehension, teachers can determine the true emotions of students regarding the class, and it can assist students in improving their emotions or observing for themselves how their emotions seem to be. Every teacher would conduct their classroom to make it as advantageous to students as possible if they were able and with this integrated into classrooms, it could materialize. The Facial Acting Coding System would transform classrooms for the better and support teachers and students exceedingly.","28":"\"Have you ever found yourself in a storm of feelings during a boring lesson? It can be quite hard trying to explain to your teacher that you need a break from class to focus your mind on the topic. Thanks to a new technology called FACS, or Facial Action Coding System, sharing concerns with a teacher is not difficult when the teacher can already understand their students' expressions. This invention, developed by Prof. Thomas Huang, can recognize human emotions through psychology and 3D computer models that track all 44 major muscles in a human face. In a school environment, the use of FACS is extremely valuable because it can distinguish between a genuine smile and a fake one, recognize the fundamental human emotions that need to be identified in a classroom, and it could create a more comfortable learning atmosphere for students with social challenges.\n\nDifferentiating between a real smile and a fake smile can bse beneficial in how a teacher communicates with their students. These emotions are interpreted with the assistance of psychology from Dr. Paul Eckman. The FACS device utilizes 6 basic human emotions that can effectively differentiate a genuine smile from a fake one. As stated in the text, \"These mus%cle clues are sometimes used to4 detect when a \"smiling\" politician or celebrity is not being honest.\" Hence, in a classroom environment, distinguishing between real and fake can be valuable when a student is not truthful about their pet eating thei%r homework. It can also reduce the anxiety a student feels when questioned about their understanding of a topic in front of the class. If a teacher can comprehend their emotions, it would ease the process of taking aside the student and discussing their challenges on a specific subject. UndeUrstanding the distinction between a fake emotion and a genuine one can have an impact on the field of education, just as comprehending the six fundamental emotions can too.\n\nThrough psychology, the teacher can also grasp the six basic emotions that are essential to understand in a classroom setting. With the guidance of psychologist Dr. Paul Eckman, the emotions detected by FACS are joy, shock, irritation, disgust, fear, and sorrow. Joy and shock are emotion3s that most of us can recognize, therefore their interpretation through the FACS machine is not crucial for understanding. Other emotions like irritation can be significant nonetheless. Identifying irritation on a student's face can ensure the safety of other students by separating the student from the rest, ultimately keeping everyone protected from a potential anger outburst. It can also be helpful to know in advance if a student is experiencing negative emotions such as anger, fear, or sadness. As mentioned in the text, \"Empathy may occur because we subconsciously mimic another person's facial expressions.\" If a teacher is aware that some of her students are feeling any of the aforementioned emotions, creating a positive environment could help maintain the students' happiness or elevate their emotions to a happier state. Therefore, it is valuable in that regard and also for student&s who struggle with conversing with their teacher.\n\nJust as recognizing negative emotions is crucial, so is identifying uncomfortable situations that can be easier for socially anxious students. According to Dr. Huang, \"A classroom computer could detect when a student is starting to feel puzzled or uninterested.\" The former of these emotions is crucial to b3e recognized because it can assist the teacher in understanding when their students are struggling to grasp a lesson. Often, socially anxious students tend to withhold their questions when confused about a topic out of fear of being perceived as unintelligent or inadequate. They will proceed without understanding, which can lead to a decline in their grades. If a teacher can interpret their student's true expressio3n, these types of scenarios can be avoided to enhance the teaching experience for alPl students.\n\nIn summary, FACS is undeniably a valuable tool in a classroom setting \/due to its capacity to differentiate between genuine and fake emotions, its comprehension of the basic human emotions that must be understood in a class, and because it aids learning for students who fear speaking up.! \nIn the future, witnessing this innovation in a classrzoom woulpd be an amazing step towards more effective teaching. With the; support of Prof. Thomas Huang and Dr. Paul Eckman, a new educational future could be established.\"","29":"Luke is inviting people to join him. He wants more friends to go on adventures with. Luke is persuading others to join the Seafaring Cowboys program because he enjoys exploring different places. Another thing about Luke convincing people is to assist him in traveling to new destinations. As he approached graduation, his life was about to change. In 1945, they received their saixlor's certif6icates and set off to explore Greece. When Luke reached 18, he could have been chosen for military duty. After he was released in 1947, Luke had com*pleted nine journeys. Another reason Luke might want you to join is to have a travel companion. This presents a great opportunity. For many years, he guided foreign students and visitors on cultural exchanges. He mentioned that it could be challenging for him as he had to spend an hour checking the animals. It made him very tired. One night, he even served as a night security guard. Luke experienced many difficult days, such as when he had to scrub the ship clean. Despite being busy all the time, he remainedc content because he always had enough food to eat. Luke was described as a friendly and courageous individual, making him very likable. I believe he successfully persuGaded many individuals to join him, even though it was a tough journey for him having to work hard. He's a really cool guy!","30":"Venus is often referred to as Earth's \"sister with- a twist\". It is situated two planets away from the Sun buFt surprisingly, it is hotter than Mercury, the( planet that is closest to the sun. Even though Venus shares similarities with Earth in terms of size and a few other aspects, a thick layer of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid covers the planet, making it extremely challenging to study. In the text \"The Challenge of Discovering Venus\", the writer discusses why re$searching Venus is important, despite the risks involved that scientists would have to+ consider. The idea of exploring Venus does not necessarily mean landing on its surface. When contemplating visiting and studying a planet, people often envision encountering \"erupting volcanoes, intense earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes as well as probes attempting to land on its surface\" (3). NASA has come up] with a suggestion that instead of landing on Venus, scientists could \"float above the chaos [of Venus]\" (5). By doing so, scientists can conduct research on the perplexing planet while ensuring their safety by subjecting them to temperatures of \"170 degrees Fahrenh;eit\" and an \"air pressure [that] would dbe similar to that at sea level on Earth\" (5). NASA is already proposing practical and noteworthy ideas for further exploration of Venus. Researchers are developing new technologies and methods to prolong their stay on Venus for more in-depth research. In the past, rovers and spacecrafts were sent to Venus, but \"no spacecraft lasted more than a few hours after landing\" (2). This facmt emphasizes the hazardous nature of the planet and underscores the caution required by scientists, researchers, and astronauts in any Venus-related missions. Recently, NASA has been focusing on creating an electronic device made of silicon carbide that \"endured three weeks under such conditions\" when it was \"tested in a chamber replicating the tumult on Venus's surface\" (7). This development brings a new level of excitement for the future of Kplanetary exploration as it extends the lifespan of spacecraft. Some researchers are also exploring the use of old-fashioned mechanical computer technology from the 1800s to 1990s, believing that it may withstand the conditions on Venus better since \"mechanical components can be made more resilient to pressure, heat, and other stresses\" (7) compared to modern technology, which tends to be more delicate. The potential for machines that could orbit Venus holds| promise for gathering valuable information and could revolutionize all professions seeking to gain insights about the planet itself. Despite the numerous compelling reasons to study Venus, the author presents some evidenc&e indicating the challenges faced in Venus exploration. It is clear that the planet is not conducive to human habitation. The author points out th{at \"such an environment would crush even a submarine designed for diving into the deepest parts of our oceans and would melt many metals\" (3). This eVxplanation illustrates why humans have not ventured to Venus and highlights the perilous conditions that would be facedb if they did. While the author discusses the possibility of exploring just above the carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid-laden clouds, there is also evidence that \"most types of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, making traditional forms of photography and videography ineffective. Moreover, researchers are unable to gather samples of rock, gas, or any other material from a distance\" (6). Despite these challenges, the article concludes with the notion that \"our explorations on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and uncertainties but should be expanded to reach the very limits of imagination and i'nnovation\" (8), promoting the idea that exploring Venus is worthwhile and diminishing thve effectiveness of arguments against such explorations, which ware not thoroughly elaborated upon. Despite all the evidence and rationale supporting the dangers of studying Venus, the author asserts that Venus is a worthwhile endeavor as it represents a challenge for the future of space exploration. Scientists and researchers possess the necessary information to devise a stra|tegy for conducting extensive research on Venus. If all precautions are taken into account, spending time on Venus is a valuable pursuit if an effective approach to studying the planet can be devised without encountering excessive difficulties and obstacles.","31":"The writer explains the importance of studying Venus by highlighting tfhe benefits of exploring our neighboring planet. Due to our current technological limitations and the extreme environment on Venus, it is very difficult for us to gather information about this planet. Many people question why scientists conti-nue to research Venus. The answer lies in the possibility that Venus may have had a similar ecosystem to Earth in the past. With its mountains, valleys, and craters, there are indications that an ocean once existed on Venus. Some scientists suggest that it may be feasible to study Venus from above its atmosphere. On the other hand, there are those who advocate for sending missions to Venus to collect samples of rocks and gases. Nevertheless, a trip to Venus is unlikely to happen in the near future. \n\nI think it is importent to study Venus becaus it could tell us a lot about are own planet. Venus is very hard to study becaus of the harsh conditions. Sciencetist are interested in Venus's history and possible similar ecosystem to Earth. They think maybe we can learn about venus from afar or maybe even send a mission to collect data.","32":"The author suggests that Venus is one of the hottest planets in our solar system, despite not being the closest plane0t to Mars. Venus is easy to reach for humans in a spaceship. Venus has a higher concentration of carbon dioxide in its atmosphere compared to other planets. Even though the temperature on Venus can reach over 800 degrees, all the carbon in the atmosphere is not good for humans traveling from Earth. The author gathered this information from sending humans to explore Venus. While we live on Earth, going up to Venus is much more dangerous than staying on Earth. Long ago, Venus had oceans and was not as hot as it is now. While some similarities exist between Venus and Earth, Venus has become rockier over time due t[o changes in its atmosphere. NASA planned to send humans to Venus to learn more about the planet. According to the NASA administration, Venus lacks the ability to sustain life and researchers cannot collect samples from the planet. In the 1800s, there were technological projects involving gears anpd levers that aided in understanding physica>l con\"ditions. Scientists are focused on studying Venus up close by developing advanced machines. The atmosphere of our solar system varies greatly from that on Earth, and solar power would be more efficient with higher radiation levels found in space. Learning about space and NA,SA from this article has been fascinating. Earth would be more habitable with Ha better atmosphere.A Scientists continue to discover new inf{ormation about our solar system, which is incredibly exciting!","33":"The writer demonstrates that exploring Venus is a good idea despite its risks by providing various details from the text. The writer utilizes descriptive proof and instances to illustrate what can be anticipRat)ed. It is also highlighted in the passage that the writer offers potential resolutions to our current issues. Additionally, the writer presents facts to further support their stance. Therefore, the writer employs numerous methods to showcase the benefits of studying Venus, even with its accompanying dangers. The ,writer uses descriptive proof and instances to substantiate their argument and create a mental image for readers t3o comprehend the scenario accurately. For instance, the passage mentions, \"An oppressive atmosphere comprising nearly 97 percent carbon dioxide envelops Venus...Additional challenges arise from the presence of corrosive sulfuric acid clouds in Venus's atmosphere.\" By using adjectives like oppressive and corrosive, the writer effectively portrays the situation to readers. Furthermore, the text indicates, \"...such harsh conditions would crush MevIen a submarine accustomed to diving into the deepest parts of our oceans and wouldE cause many metals to liquefy.\" The writer provides an example for readers to envision and fully grasp the extreme peril of this environment. This indicates that the writer relies on descriptive proof to validate their argument, along with instances of the planet's dangers. Another approach involves the writer presenting dilemmas and potential solutions, employing a probklem-solution strategy. For instance, the text reveals, \"An oppressive atmosphere comprising nearly 97 percent carbon dioxmide...corrosive sulfuric acid clouds...NASA's proposed approach to counter the inhospitable conditions on Venus's surface would enable researchers to 1hover above the hazardous environment.\" This detail signifies the existence of a problem due to Venus's hazardous atmosphere, prompting the writer to introduce NASA's potential solution in the subsequent paragraph. The passage also mentions, \"However, observing Venus from a spacecraft orbiting or floating at a safe distance above the planet only offers limited insights into surface conditions...researchers are unable to collect samples of rock, gas, or any other substances from a distance...NASA is exploring alternative strateegies...simplified electronics constructed from silicon carbide have undergone testing in a simulated chamber mirroring the turbulent nature of Venus's surface...\" This instance illustrates how the writer first presents a problem regarding the researchers' limitations frsom a distance, followed by divulging NASA's efforts to develop a new type of electronics capable of withstanding Venus's harsh surface conditions. This demonstrates that the writer presents a problem and subsequently offers a solution to reinforce their argument. Finally, the writer utilizes _factual information to substantiate their standpoint. For instance, the text states, \"...certain simplified silicon carbide electronics have been subjected to testing in an enviBronment replicating the chaotic conditions of Venus's surface and have endured for three weeks under such circumstances.\" This detail serves as evidence that the writer is advocating a solution to a problem, supported by factual proof. Furthermore, the passage notes, \"At an altitude exceeding thirty miles above the surface, temperatures would remain relatively warm at approximately 170 degrees Fahrenheit...\" This evidence indicates another feasible solution to one of the numerous chTallenges, and by incorporating factual data, the writer strengthens their argument. This illustrates how the writer employs facts to further bolster their perspective. In conclusion, the writer utilizes various effective methods to validate their argument. They employ a problem-solution approach to enhance their rationale, along with utilizincg examples and descriptive evidence to elucidate the situation. Finally, they rely on facts to convince readers that investigating Venus is justifiable. This is how the writer establishes the worth of examining Venus, despite the associated hazards.","34":"I dused to be a Sailor Cowboy. My job was to help take care of the horses that were being sent to Europe. I remember the time I tried to convince others to join me, but it didn't work out well. \"I dislike qthe salty sea breeze,\" \"I have a fear of the big ocean,\" \"I can't swim, what if we get torpedoed?\" \"I have allergies to horses,\" these were the excuses I heard. Some did agree to come along, but most thought I was strange and avoided me. It made me feel sad to see them walk away, but I knew I had at least tried. Eventually, I stopped trying to persuade them.\n\nHere I am now, out at sea, thinking about those who I attempted to convince. I often wonder what they are up to presently. Once I returned home, I made it a mission to track down each person and share my adventures with them. They all said the same thing, \"I wish I had joined you.\" We would then chat about what they had been up to while I was away. It made m\/e feel like Ir had more friends than before.\n\nI am 11 years old, and I sometimes look back on this experience wilth mixed emotions. It =taught me that not Meveryone will understand or support whyat you do, but it's important to try and follow your dreams.","35":"\"Venus, even with its tough Vconditions, has imp[ortant information that can only be discovered by exploring it. That's what the writer of \"The Challenge of Discovering Venus\" argues. In the text, the author backs up the idea that exploring Venus is full of challenges, but barely explains why it's worth it to explore it despite the dangers. The author starts by sharing some facts about Venus to make: the reader doubt. This leads to the main point of the article by suddenly asking, \"If your sister planet is so unwelcoming, why do scientists talk about going there again?\" After casting doubt, the author gives reasons for the benefits of revisiting this hot, dense planet. This was an important addition to the text that shows he thinks about readers who may not know much about Venus by first explaining why it's so hard to exploMre before discussing the benefits. He quickly answers the question by presenting more facts about Venus' history. The first fact that \"Astronomers are intrigued by Venus because it might have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\" piques the reader's curiosity, leading to the next argument. This part is meant to grab the reader's attention by sharing surprising facts about Venus that explain why scientists are interested in studying it. Instead of delving into how Venus is similar to Earth and why it's worth exploring, the author moves on to the challenges of exploring Venus. While the main focus of the article is the difficulties of exploring Venus, the author only discusses the value of exploring it in a coQuple of paragraphs. The rest of the text suggests solutions to the challenge of exploring the planet, but doesn't expand on the benefits mentioneyd earlier. The author argues that Venus is worth exploring due to its past resemblances to Ea#rth, but doesn't clarify why. Additionally, he claims in paragraph five that \"the importance of going back to Venus is beyond dispute\" after stating in paragraph four. He makes a weak argument about the dangers and challenges of exploring Venus, but doesn't fully back up the idea that exploring it is valuable. Ultimately, the author successfully portrays the obstacles faced when trying to explore Venus, yet falls short of fully supporting the argument made in paragraph four regarding the initial advantages of exploringG it.\"","36":"The story about the boy who rode the waves is mainly focused on a boy named Peter Waverider. When he received his graduation diploma, he had two part-time jobs at a supermarket and a library. NHis pal BenP Rivers invited him to join him on a Mship trip. Peter couldn't refuse such a cool opportunity. After the Second World War ended, a group of 44 countries formed the UNRRA and began hiring sea-faring cowboys. They embarked on a journey for a couple of weeks to transport animals. Peter spent most of his time feeding the animals, but in his free time, he enjoyed boxing, playing ping pong, reading, and carving. At the age of 18, Peter arrived in Portugal and was conscripted. They instructed him to con?tinue his current duties for his service. One day, while climbing a ladder, he fell and injured his ribs. He had to take a break from work for a few days. AdditionallKy, he traveled to Japan, France, Rome, and he explored a palace in Athens. He also voyaged through the Suez Canal. Peter traveled across the Pacific O cean twice and crossed the Atlantic Ocean ftifteen times! When Peter was young, he used to help out on his uncle's farm to prepare himself for hard work. Being a sea-faring cowboy was more than just an adventure for Peter. He mentioned, \"It helped me understand people from different countries and their needs. It broadened my horizons.\" \n","37":"Today, I am going to tell you why joining the Seagoing Cowboys program is a great idea. I believe that it's worth participating because you can experience a cruise like Luke and the story of A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves. Moreover, you can have a lot of fun. If you haven't been on a cruise before, it's a great opportunity to enjoy yourself while taking care of the animals, but you have to be careful. If you enjoy the idea of being a cowboy or cowgirl and love cruises and animals, this program is perfect for you. You can also assist the animals and people in need, like helping them feed the animals or calming them down when they get agitated. Luke, from the article, always made sure to check on the animals regularly to complete his tasks on time. Despite a little mishap when he fell down the stairs and broke a rib, he Dmanaged to keep going. Luke was dedicated to his work and did it well to successfully finish his job on the cruise. He was determined not to lose his job in the Cowboy Waves program because he truly enjoyed working as a cowboy and interacting with friends and visitors on the cruise. If you decide to join the program, Luke might eve7n show you around. I would like to participate as well because it seems like a lot of fun. In conclusion, I recommend joining the Cowboy Who Rode the Waves program as it promises an exciting cruise experience.","38":"When Luke had to takeT care of the animals, he had to go out even when it was raining, and he had to climb a slippery ladder. He then travel+ed on a cattle bo1at to Greece because he believed it would be a once-in-a-lifetime experience. The boat trips with the animals were an amazing opportunity for a boy from a small town. His second job was looking after the animals every hour, but sometimes he couldn't work because he had cracked ribs. Despite the challenges, he enjoyed hi>s time on the boat, especially after unloading the animals. However, for Luke, being a Seagoing Cowboy was more than just an adventure - it broadened his horizons. He was responsible for taking care of horses, cows, and mules sent overseas to help countries recover theirn food supplies. Luke and his friend, Don, signe?d up for this opportunity and tlraveled to Europe on a cattle boat. They also visited New Orleans to receive orders. Luke mentioned that this experience helped him prepare for future work and allowed him to explore the world by working in various cobuntries. This is how he convinced others to join the cause.\n\nOverall, Luke's journey as a Seagoing Cowboy was both challenging and rewardingo, opening up new possibilities for him and his friend, Don.","39":"There are good and bad things in life. Some things we can't prevent from happening. One thing that is coVming in the future are cars that can drive themselves. In the future more and more people will use this kindo of car. The reasons to allow self-driving cars in the future are like a table with three legs. I am in favor of self-driving cars because they can avoid car accidents, you still have some control of the car, and you can do things in the car. The first leg of the table is it can avoid car accidents. In the text it states, \"Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009. Their cars have traveled more than half a million miles without a crash.\" Furthermore, it mentions that the car may be able to monitor you. If the car sees you are texting, it will not allow you to take control of the car. This could decrease the number of car accidents caused by texting while driving. Additionally, with a self-driving car, I believe it would reduce the number of accidents causKed by drunk driving. >However, I can understand why some people might oppose this as they may think it could lead to more accidents. For instance, imagine if the car suddenly stopped working without alerting the driver. The driver might not realize that the car has stopped and could easily veer off the road. The second leg of the table is that you still have some control of the car. The text mentions, \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake on their own, but are all designed to notify the driver when human skills are needed on the road ahead.\" In situations like roadwork or accidents, the car will notify you and you can take over. The car can alert you by flashing lights on the windshield or vibrating your seat. I prefer knowing that I have some control over my vehicle. This way, I am aware that I can take charge before it steers me into trouble. I can see the perspective of someone who is against this idea as to why would I want a self-driving car if I still have to drive it. It wouldn't be truly self-driving if you have to navigate through construction zones. This could be problematic because people would expect the car to be fully in control. The third leg of the table is you can do things in the car. If you are running late with work and have a half-hour drive ahead, that time would be wasted. With a self-driving car, you can finish your work and still arrive on time. Furthermore, since the car is monitoring you, you can respond to a text if you receive one.I I believe this would be much safer considering the number of drivers I have witnessed texting while driving. On the other hand, someone who is against self-driving cars might view this as unsafe. If the self-driving car malfunctions and the driver is occupied with something else, they may not have enough time to regain control of the car to prevent a collision. There are pros and cons to everything in life. Some things are inevitabl~e. Self-driving cars are on the horizon. According to the text, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan all aim to have a self-driving car by 2020. The reasons to allow self-driving cars in the future ar]e like a table with three legs. I support self-driving cars because they can prev]ent car accidents, you still have some control over the car, and you can multitask in the car. This is how the argument for self-driving cars resembles a table with three legs.","40":"Is it worth implementing the Facial Expression R#ecognition System in schools and other places? This new concept claims to determine emotions based solely on facial scans. Like all technologies, there are bound to be errors.W The idea of a device analyzing! my feelings seems quite strange. Personally, I don't think these machines belong in schools. They could lead to confusion and distrust among students who are not comfortable with them. Some children prefer to keep their emotions private and wouldn't appreciate teachers taking photos of them. How can we be sure this is accurate? Imagine if a studendt is mistakenly identified as happy or extremely sad when they are not feeling that way at all. The margin for error is too high to justify its use. Without practical trials on real individuals, how can we be certain of its effectiveness? We can't ask historical figures like Mona Lisa to confirm their emotions; they are deceased. Schools should focus on more essential matters. It's puzzling why we often face budget shortages; investing in this technology seems unwise. The potential risks outweigh the benefits. Perhaps in the future, once the technology is perfected, it could be considered. For now, I do not support its imPplementation. It may have potential in the future, but I don't foresee it becoming popular anytime soon.","41":"When each individual drives a diesel-guzzling vehicle, it is like many smoke-covered swords being thrown at the fluffy p$rotective shield in the sky. Pollution is harming our ozone and our surroundings, but now we must confront our consequences. Cars are causing cities to implement new reg,ulations prohibiting these parasites from being used. The usage of cars should be restricted, because if we don't, our pollution will be more severe than it currently is, and adopting a healthy option for transportation wvill result in a healthier lifestyle. Pollution generated by our primary mode of transportation is harming our planet. We reside on the lovely planet earth which has graciously provided us with a home and food so we can survive, but when our home is ruined, we will soon become extinct. Global warming is a well-known term heard globally, and this tevrm is not use2d lightly. Our planet is warming up due to the numerous greenhouse gases emitted by the emissions of the vehicles we use. These greenhouse gases are ;unable to escape our atmosphere which is then warmed up by the Bsun and is melting our polar ice caps. These ice caps not only will submerge multiple pcities, resulting in the death of thousands if they fail to evacuate in time, but they also contain our natural freshwater reservoir. The greenhouse gases are affecting our oceans and our skies as well. An article titled \"Paris Bans Driving Due to Smog\" authored by Robert Duffer, mentions that \"Traffic was down 60 percent in the capital of France, following five days of worsening smog...[The smog] equaled Beijing, China, which is recognized as one of the most polluted cities globally.\" Beijing is also one of the most populous countries in the world.p The alarming smog and the rising seas are not the sole factors leading to our demise. The greenhouse gases are creating gaps in our ozone layer that shield us from harmful sun rays. Withouwt the ozone layer, the world would beP uninhabitable due to the amount of cancer humans would develop simply by being exposed to direct sunlight. We inhabit the world, and by destroying the world, we wipe out our entire species. We must aid our world by introducing some healthful alternatives to cars. There are various ways transportation could b]e beneficial for both the environment and ourselves. The obesity rate globally is higher than ever. An average daily calorie intake should be around 2000 calories and a large portion of the population is consuming well beyond that limit. If we provide bicycles in cities, we could burn those extra calories by just attending public places, events, and even workplaces. Cycling and walking to destinations not only improve your physical appearance but also maintain our mental well-being. Physical activity triggers neurotransmitters in your brai;n to release endorphins, such as adrenaline, which keeps your body moving and functioning without straining your muscles. Exercise also stimulates dopamine production in your brain which creHates a feeling of happiness. Elisabeth Rosenthal authored an article titled \"In German Suburb, Life Continues Without Cars\" which features interviews with individuals from Germany about their way of life. \"'When I owned a car I was always stressed. I am much happier this way,' stated Heidrun Walter, a media coach and mother of two, while strolling through green streets where the whir of bicycles and the chatter of children playing drown out the occasional distant engine nois}e.\" Life is significantly more cheerful without cars, and Germany is aware of it. There are already several countries that have 7regulated and exchanged their polluting vehicles for their calorie-burning bicycles. We need to emulate their ac+tions and regulate if we do not wish to remain in the dark ages. The authorities must restrict the number of car uses, as the continual use of vehicles will lead to our ruin through pollution, and without cars, people are more likely to lead a healthier and happier lifestyle.","42":"A story about a boy named Max who faces difficulties with a lot of tasks and fears making mmistQakes th~at 9could lead to bcad outcomes. When Max found out about the new job opportunity,k he was extremely happy. The idea of becoming a River Riding Ranger seemed like a fantastic adventure to him. Taking care of animals and exploring different places was something Max always dreamed of. Without hesitation, Max accepted the job offer as he saw it as a once-in-a-lifetime chanceP!\n\nOnce Max started his new job, he put all his effort into it. He wanted to be the most outstanding River Riding Ranger ever. Sometimes he worked more than he was supposed to, but he loved looking after the horses, calves, and donkeys. Max worked tirelessly and despite feeling tired at times, he traveled to many different locations such as Venice and Australia. In total, he completed seven trips, more than any other River Riding Ranger!\n\nDuring his second trip, Max had a scary incident while on night duty. While making his regular rounds and reporting to the captain, he slipped on a slippery floor and almost fell overboard into the deep Pacific Ocean. Fortunately, he managed to stop his fall just in time, but he ended up fracturing his ribs. This forced Max to take a break from work for a few days. During his time off, he enjoyed playing sports like basketball and soccer in the empty animal enclosures.\n\nDespite fa2cing criticism from others who thought his job was too risky, Max continued to fin2d joy in helping people during his trips. He even tried to persuade others to become River Riding Rangers, but many thought he was crazy. Although discouraged by the negative opinions, Max never gave up on his job. He cherished the opportunities to make a difference in people's lives and received recognition for his dedication and kindness.","43":"The world is moving forward, technologies are being developed, and the environment, is shifting. Imagine residing in aDn area where car usage is restricted. It might seem terrible, but life continues witWhout cars. Limiting the use of cars has its benefits. The advantages are for the people and the environment. Initially, everyone would understand that the main reason is the condition of our surroundings. There is plenty of pollution out there in the world, and it's not safe or natural. For example, according to the article by Elisabth Rosenthal, \"In German Suburb, Life Cont\/inues Without Cars,\"P passenger cars account for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and fifty percent in car-heavy areas in the United States. Greenhouse gases are one of the factors contributing to environmental changes. They are not positive changes. To illustrate, the article \"Paris prohibits driving due to smog,\" wwritten byG Robert Duffe&r, displays Paris and China banning car use due to their high pollution and smog levels. Robert Duffer mentions, \"Tra~ffic congestion decreased by sixty percent in the capital of France after five days of worsening smog. The smog was comparable to that of Beijing, China, known as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\" In essence, pollution can significantly impact people trying to commute to work, have fun, or simply visit someone. Not only is environmental change detrimental, but some individuals can live without transportation. Moving on to the benefits, individuals can spend more time? with others and even find joy in strolling around. Referring back to the article \"In German Suburb, Life Carries On WitNhout Cars\" authored by Elisabeth Rosenthal, a mother of two and media instructor, Heidrun Walter remarks, @\"Wh1en I owned a car, I was always anxious. I am much happier this way.\" In addition, having a car could lead some people to feel anxious and satressed. Without the option to take action but just sit or walk, it is more enjoyable to walk with loved ones close by. Anorther instance comes from the article \"Car-Free Day Gains Popularity in Bogota\" by Andrew Selksy, where a businessman, Carlos Arturo Plaza, co3ncurs. Carlos Arturo Plaza asserts, \"It presents a great chance to reduce stress and decrease air pollgution.\" In short, relinquishing the habit of driving may appear disadvantageous, but it acitually benefits those in our vicinity. It is advantageous for both the environment and us. Who wouldn't desire a stress-free environment?","44":"How can a computer assist in enhancing a student's classroom experience? The novel Facial Action Coding System, created by Professor Thomas Huang, allows computers to interpret human facial expressions into feelings. This advanced Etechnology is beneficial for teachers and students to enhance the learning process in a classroom. The latest technology has the potential to significantly boost student learni2ng within the class. Dr. Huang anticipates that \"A computer in the classroom could identify when a student is getting puzzled or uninterested.\" This kind of technology can benefit both teachers and students. It would enable the teacher to slow down the lesson to help students grasp the material better or implement new techniques to maintain student engagement and curiosity in learning. While a teacher may be able to $sense if students are confused or bored, with this innovative system, a teacher would have complete control over the class and be able to retain students' attention. \n\nAnother helpful aspect of the new Facial Action Coding System is the ability to determine which topics students grasp and which ones they need extra support with, perhaps through one-on-one sessions with a teacher. This would enhance a student's time in class by making their learnFing more efficient and also assisting teachers in managing their time effectively. \"It could then adjust the lesson, similar to a proficient human teacher.\" By having a computer in the classroom, a teacher could utilize their time with sVtudents more productively, resulting in improved homework and test scores for the students. Besides aiding students academically, the system would also enable teachers to identify if a student is feeling down or distressed, allowing the teacher to try and uplift the student's spirits. A student who receives emotional support at school will appreciate the new system and its various capabilities.\n\nIn virtual classrooms where all work is done on a computer, the computer could devise individualized strategies for each student based on their emotions and facial expressions. \"If a student smiles when a pop-up ad appears on the screen, a similar ad might follow.\" This would offerI students a better opportunity to learn at their own pac+e, tailored to their emotional state on that particular day. Moreover, the class instructor could introduce varied lesson styles and more engaging methods for students to grasp the course material.\n\nThe diverse capabilities of the new Facial Action Coding System are immensely valuable not only to students but also to teachers. Enhancing the learn#ing experience within the classroom will be highly appreciated by both students and teachgers, leading to a more direct connection between them. Ultimately, this technology could facilitate the development of improved teaching and learning strategies. All these possibilities are incredibly valuable for students in a classroom. Let's strive to enhance students' educational journey! ","45":"Luke was a cowboy who bravely rode the waves of adventure. He had to feed the animals even when it was raining, and he had to climb a slippery lad3der. He took a cattle to Greece belcause he believed it was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. The boat trips with the animals were amazing for a small town boy like him. His second job was to look after the animals every hour, but sometimes he couldn't because his ribs wLere hurting. Despite the challenges, he traveled to various countries. Luke always managed to have fun, especially on the way back after{ unloading the animals. Howevern, being a Seagoing Cowboy meant much more to Lu ke than just an adventure; it opened up the whole world to him. He had to care for horses, cows, and mules tha&t were sent overseas, helping countries recover their food supplies. Luke saw it as a once-in-a-lifetime chance and signed up along with his friend Don. They traveled to Europe and New Orleans for instructions. Luke felt prepar[ed for work as he had responsibilities to attend to. He believed that this experience broadened his horizons as he traveled to different countrievs and took on various jobs. That's how he managed to convince others to join him on his journey.","46":"Dear Senator,8 I am in agreemehnt with keeping the Electoral College. The founding fatherss established it in thec Constitution as a compromise between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and the election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. It wouldn't be good to change the Constitution that our great bfounding fathers made before. According to the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution of the District of Columbia, 3 electors are allocated, treating it like a state for the purpose of the LElecltorap>l College. That's why the word \"state\" also refers to the District of Columbia. Each candidate running for President icn your state has their own group of electors. You assist in choosing your4 state's electors when you cast your vote. I agree with maintaining the Electoral College because the system has a backup plan in case something goes wrong, ensuringW everything is organized for America.\n\nIn conclusion, k.eeping the Electoral College is essential because it provides a safety net and ensures proper organizatfion for our country.","47":"In the text \"Creating a Grinnping Mona Lisa\" by Sam D'Alto, a new technology called the Facial Movement Coding System (FMCS) allows electronic devices to recognize emotions in people. This technology works by scanning facial muscle movements and utilizing basic psychological knowledge. Furthermore, there is a suggestion to apply this technology in schools to enhance the educational experience based on students' emotions. The utilization of FMCS to determine students' feelings is beneficial as it enables more interactive lesso.ns rooted in non-verbal communication, ultimately aiding students in achieving better academic outcomes.\n\nWith the introduction of FMCS, human-computer interactions can become more efficient, leading to improved communication. In the article, Dr. Wang, the creator of FM&CS, mentions that \"A large part of human communication is non-verbal, such as expressing emotions\" (6). In a classroom setting, a computer attempting to teach students may struggle to assessR whether the students are grasping the concepts or staying engaged. Sincep a significant portion of human communication is non-verbal, the computer would face challenges in understanding the students' needs. However, with FMCS, the computer can interpret non-verbal cues and adjust its teaching approach accordingly, facilitating improved comprehension and engagement among students.\n\nApart frWom enhancing communication between humans and computers in the classroom, the development of FMJCS also dimini)shes barriers between the two entities by enabling c|omputers to emulate human-like behavior, thereby fostering a more effective learning environment. D'Alto suggests that just as FMCS learns to interpret emotions based on non-verbal facial cues, humans perform a similar \"calculation\" daily (5). By granting computers or teachers the ability to accurately identify emotions to some extent, the distinction between a physical and digital teacher lessens as computers become more \"human-like.\" In an increasingly digital world, it is essential for students and computers to communicate effectively. If Dr. Wang's statement that \"Facial expressions for each emotion are universal\" (4) holds true, then a computer capable of analyzing mixed human emotions in a classroom setting could adapt lesson plans to enhance teaching quality and even exhibit a form of artificial empathy, promoting s0tudent acceptance of a digital counterpart.\n\nM9oreover, aside from improving tcommunication and fostering relatability to students, the integration of FMCS in a classroom computer can also aid in resolving conflicts and disagreements among students. The texft mentions that certain facial muscle movements can indicate negative emotions or false expressions, such as the tightening of the lips to show anger (3). Additinonally, specific muscle cues can differentiate between authentic and forced smiles (8). By analyzing these movements, FMCS can detect instances of student conflict, dishonesty, or disrespect. By identifying 5these situations, thce FeMCS can proviMde teachers with guidance on how to address conflicts or negative scenarios, thus contributing to a more harmonious classroom environment.\n\nIn conclusion, the article \"Creating a Grinning Mona Lisa\" emphasizes that the application of FMCS techkn5ology streamlines communication between humans and computers. When implemented in educational settings, FMCS proves valuable by adapting lessons to enhance teaching effectiveness, fostering rKelatability and approachability to students, and facilitating conflict resolution within the classroom. As technology like FMCS becomes more prevalent,D it is plausible that computers may develop their own emotional responses in the future!","48":"Was the mysterious face on Mars really made by extraterrestrials6? Or was it just a very strange rock formation, especially for Mars? Well, the truth is no, it was simply a natural land structure. This huge rock formation, which spans around two miles from one end to another, is not uncommon at all. In reality, it is a plateau that just happens to have shadows that fall on it in a certain way, giving it the appearance of a face. I get what you might be thinking. How can it only be a natural land structure? It resembles a face so accurately, so it must have been constructed by something or someone. However, there are actually plenty of reasons why it is just a typical land formation with peculiar shadows. For instance, the Face was discovered in a region on Mars called Cydonia. Cydonia is well-known for its typical Martian plateaus. This implies that it is not too surprising that it occurs naturally. Don't misunderstand, a face is quite an uncommon and strange thing for a plateau to resemble. Even though this one has peculiar shadows that give it facial characteristics, it is still just a plateau. After numerous images were taken of the Face, the one captured on April 5, 1998 was the first one to completely show that the Face was genuinely a natural land structure. Despite th;e image clearly demonstrating that the Face was not artificially made, some individuals were still not convinced. They argued that the image was captured on a hazy winter day, so many doubters believed that perhaps there were alien engravings that were simply concealed by fog. Regardless of what individuals believed after viewing the image taken in 1998, the image captured on April 8, 2001 was the one that convinced the doubters that the Face was a naturally occurring land form. As the image was captured on a clear day the next time aroundb, there were no justifications for those who believed the Face was crafted by aliens. This image actually indicated that the Face was a martian, and it was approximately the same size as a cliff or a plateau. Cliffs and plateaus are land structures that are frequently found in the western regions of the United States. There you have it. The Face regrettably was not constructed by aliens, it was simply a natural land structure that had some quite fascinating details due to shadows. There is no way around it, because the photos do not deceive. It is even more evident that it is a land structure because similar ones exist on Earth! Although it would have been very intriguing for it to have actually been made by aliens, it was only a natural land form in the end.","49":"How can a compu'ter assist in enhancing a student's experience in the classroom? The innovative Facial Expression Recognition System #created by Professor Tom Huang allows computers to interpret human facial gestures into feelings. This technology could be extremely beneficial for both teachers and students to enhance the educational environment in a classroom. The new system has the potential to substantially boost student learning in the school setting. According to Dr. Huang, a computer in the classroom might be capable of identifying when a student is getting puzzled or uninterested. Such technology could support teachers in adjusting the pace of the lesson to aid students in keeping up with the material or to develop new methods to maintain student engagement and enthusiasm for learning. Instead of just helping stud:ents with classwork, the system couldN also assist teachers in recognizing if a student grasps a topic or requires additional assistance, such as one-on-one tutoring. This would save time for both students and teachers and lead to better academic performance. Addi]tionally, by being able to perceive a student's emotional state, teachers could work on improvi{ng their mood, ultimately enhancing the student's overall experience. For instance, in virtual classrooms where students complete assignments on the computer, the system can devise personalized learning approaches based on the student's emotions and facial expressions. This approach would enable stuLdents to learn at their own pace, tailored to their emotions on that specific day. Moreover, it would allow i.nstructors to incorporate various teaching styles and more engaging methods for delivering course content. The range of features offered by the Facial Expression Recognition System is highly advantageous for students and educators alike. Improved learning within the classroom would be greatly appreciated by both parties, fostering a more direct relationship between teachers and students. Furthermore, this technology could lead to the development of more effective teaching and learning strategies. These possibilities ayre extremely valuable for students in a classroom environment. Let's strive to enhance the education of students!","50":"I used to think that the electoral college was not a good idea. However, after reading this, my opinion on the subject has changed a lot. The electoral college plays a vital role in maintaining a balance in a country, a\/ balance that is very necessary. I completely agree with it. The electoral college was created as a compromise between the President being elected by Congress and by the popular vote of citizens. The founding fathers believed that if Congress alone elected the President, it would have too much power. They also thought that letting citizens vote directly would lead to chaos. Thus, they decided on a solution in the middle; both entities have a say, well kind of. Many people do not realize that when they vote, they are not actually voting for the President, but for a group of electo'rs who then choose the President. I personally think this method is excellent. It reduces the chances of mistakoes significantly.\n\nOne issue with {citizens voting directly for the President is the uncerWtainty and lack of qualification. If the election relied solely on citizen votes, the outcome would be chaotic. With the majority of the electoral colleges adopting the winner-takes-all approach, it simplifies the process. It is much simpler to determine a winner out of 538 votes than out of millions of votes, right?G Additionally, many individuals are not qualified to make decisions for the entire country. This is where electors come in. They are selected by state conventions, state party committees, and sometimes the candidates themselves. They listen to the concerns of the people and work towards finding solutions that benefit everyone. They are experienced politicians whose responsibility is to safeguard our nation.\n\nHowever, there are some who argue that the electoral college goes against the principles of democracy and leans towards a dictatorship. The government allows people to choose these electors to make them feel involved in the decision-making process of the country. Those who do not support the chosen candidate may feel ignored and voiceless. I disagree with the electoral college because I side with our fjorefather Abraham Lincoln. He believed that the country should belong tMo the peopzle, be run by the people, and operate for the people. I believe that the electoral college does not hinder democracy, but rather enhances it. Evzery eligible citizen exercises their right to express their political preferences in the hopes of bet1tering our nation. The electoral college prevents dominance ~by specific regions that favor a particular political party. It is a system that is renewed every four years to assure everyone that their opinions may not have been utilized in the past, but they have been acknowledged. The presence of institutions like the electoral college fills me with pride for being part of the United States of America, the best country in the world.","51":"Why We Should Avoid Using FACS Technology in Schools\n\nFACS technology should not be5 utilized in classrooms for various compelling reasons. People cherish their money, a quality education, and privacy, and implementing FACS technology can disrupt these valued aspects. Firstly, the cost of this technology is not even mentioned by the writer, Nick D'Alto. Since this technology is not yet fully developed, it would likely require millions of dollars in research to create a functional product. Typically, new technology is more expensive than existing options, and schools, already facing funding shortages, should not invest in emotion-reading systems. While schools cut funding for crucial departments like music and s7ports, they spend less on cafeteria food than prisons do. Therefore, additional funds should be allocated wisely, not on unnecessary emotion readers.\n\nSecondly, the effectiveness and practicality of FACS technology are dubi%ous. Can we trust the accuracy of the computer's assessments? Advanced technology may not always provide solutions. TPhe computer may detect a student's sadness or confusion, but understanding the root cause is crucial. Dr. Huang suggests the computer could adjust the lesson based on facial expressions. However, it is inappropriate for a computer to dictate how a lesson should be taught. Altering lessons based on superficial cues could dis7rupt students' learning process Gand comprehension. It would be more efficient for teachers to address individual student needs personally after class.\n\nLastly, privacy is a significant concern regarding FACS technology. While this technology may have practical applications in surgeries and video games, its use in everyday computers raises privacy issues. Many students would find constant facial scans invasive and unsettling, possibly leading to complaints and requests for removal.\n\nPeople prioritize their finances, q4uality education, and privacy above all else. Integrating FACS technology in schools jeopardizes these values, making it an unsuitable addition to classrooms.","52":"The Face on Mars is definitely not created by aliens. There is absolutely no evidence at all of any signs of life on Mars, which means no aliens. The face on Mars is simply a natural formation that happens to resemble a human face. With the shadows and shape, the Face really looks like[ it has a human nose, mouth, and eyes. However, when you look up close, there is no likeness to a human face at all. So, don't let anyone trick you into thinking otherwise. Pictures taken by NASA of the Face clearly demonstrate that it is just a part of the natural landscape. Images captured in 1976 may seem unclear and fuzzy, leading some to belie%ve that aliens constructed the Face. Nonetheless, in 1998, the images were more defined, showing the structure of the formation distinctly. Lastly, the photo from 2001 is sharp and detailed. You can easily seeK that when you look closely, the nFace is nothing more than a natural landform onR Mars. Although from a distance, it resembles a human face due to the shadows, but it is simply a geologic feature when examined closely. Moreover, in 1998, the Mars Global Surveyor revisited the site to investigate the Face once again. When a photo of it was taken, it was indeed \"ten times more precise than `the image captured in 1976.\" This demonstrated that it was solely a natural formation once the image was publishe7d. \"There was no alien construction at all.\" Some individuals who still hold the belief that the Face 6was created by aliens claim that \"alien symbols were obscured by fog\", but the Face was only hidden because it was winter when the photo was taken. Since it was winter in April 1998, it was also the \"overcast period of the year on the Red Planet.\" Thus, the camera utilized had to \"peer through thin clouds to view the Face.\" This indicates that alien symbols are not concealed by fog; it's simply the time of year when it is overcast on Mars, making it more challe2nging to see the Face. Also, when NASA t^ook another picture in 2001, it was captured using the \"camera's absolute maximum solution.\" From what I read, \"each pixel in the image spans 1.56 meters, compared to the 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo.\" No7thing can be overlooked when utilizing the camera's absolute maximum solution. Jim Garvin, NASA's Mars Exploration Program's top scientist, even mentioned, \"As a general guideline, you can identify details in a digital image 3 times larger than the pixel size. Therefore, if there were objects in this picture such as aircraft on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids, or even small cabins, you could see what they were!\" To conclude, NASA's clarification regarding the Face on Mars is grounded on trustworthy information and sStudies. Those who believe aliens crafted the Face often absorb false information, concocting absurd theories that are far from the truth. Furthermore, NASA embarked on missions to validate that the Face is not the work of aliens. They captured high-quality photos showcasing that it is merely a natural land feature. Apart from inventing stories, skeptics likely gather information from the internet on websites created by other skeptics about aliens crafting the Face. The internet can't always be trusted, and those skeptics who craf1ted these websites probably fabricated their own facts and theories to sway people to their side. All i8n all, the Face on Mars is not 9a creation of aliens. It is simply uniquely shaped to resemble a human head, with shadows creating the impression that it possesses eyes, a nose, and a mouth from afar. Close up, there is no re2semblance to a human face at all. Photos, expeditions, and years of investigation have substantiated this. Additionally, there were no indications of aliens or any life on Mars during these studies. The Face on Mars is merely a natural land feature.","53":"Many people feel uncertain about what to do when it comes to elections. The Electoral College is the process that involves the election. I strongly believe that the Electoral College is the easiest way to manage the voting process. After all, what's the harm in the Electoral College when almost half the people support it? The founding fathers who created the Electoral College ensured that anyone could become president, which is a good thing. Many others share my 6view, as mentioned in source 2, stating that if there is an election issue, it will be decided by the House of Representatives where the representatives will vogte on the president. This way, the representatives can choose the best wcandidate for president.\n\nOn the other hand, some argue that the Electoral College is unfair to certain individuals and want to get rid of it. Additionmally, the Electoral College is often seen as outdated and not very dzemocratic in selecting a president. It is suggested that the candidate who receives the most popular votes should win instead. The Electoral College helps balance the political power between large and small states due to senate misrepresentation. It also solves the problem of elections where no candidate gets a majority of the votes.\n\nIn my opinion, the Electoral College should remain as it simplifies the process, as supported by the various sources I have mentioned. This way, all aspiring presidents will have an equal opportunity to achieve their dreams.","54":"Driverless cars are \/not something that our society really needs. They are not completely autonomous as they still rely on human intervention, which can lead to accidents and even tragic deaths, not to mention the huge amount of money that would be required to resolve any issues. Are completely safe driverless cars really achievable? Back in 20091, the first self-driving car was able to operate under certain conditions and managed to cover half a million miles without incident. However, they still depend on a human driver to take control in specific situations such as entering or exiting driveways, navigating through road conistruction, or when accidents occur. The futuristic cars we see on TV driving effortlessly on their own are still far from becoming a reality for us.\n\nDespite the challenges, there is optimism that one day8 autonomous cars will become a common sight due to the significant advancements in technology and research. In the 1950s, General Motors developed a car that could travel on a specialized track embedded with electrical cables that transmitted radio waves to guide the vehicle. Similarly, Berkeley engineers experimented with a system that allowed cars to interpret binary Jcode to determine their direction. Whi\/le these experiments were successful, implementing such technology on a global s)cale would involve upgrading all existing roads, making it financially unfeasible and unrealistic for a new technology.\n\nTo enable autonomous driving without the need for extensive roadd modifications, a network of sensors would be essential. These sensors would need to be strategicallry placed, such as on the rear wheel, roof, rearview mirror, GPS, inertial motion, and four automotiv,e radar sensors, to replicate the driving skills of a human. For instance, speed sensors were utilized in the 1980s to@ develop antilock brakes, which eventually evolved to detect skidding or rollovers within a decade. In 2013, BMW introduced a car equipped with traffic jam assistance that could operate at speeds up to 25 mph; however, the driver still had to keep their hands on the wheel at all times. Despite these advancements, none of the current self-driving cars are entirely autonomous, as they still require human intervention in certain situations.\n\nManufacturers and drivers express concerns that allowing cars 2to drive autonomously for extended periods may result in driver distraction. In response, wsome propose integrating in-car entertainment systems, which would be deactivated oWnce the driver is required to take control. Existing traffic laws prioritize human-controlled vehicles for safety reasons, leading some states like California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia to prohibit the testing of autonomous cars. If regulations were to change, new laws would beV necessary to address liability issues in the event of accidents caused by technology malfunctions. Companies like Telsa are optimistic about the potential success of self-driving cars and are developing vehicles capable of autonomous driving for 90 percent of the time, but they still require hukman oversight.\n\nIn my opinion, driverless cars pose more risks than benefits. While they may offer fuel efficiency, the level of vigilance required fromM the driver can be even higher than when driving a conventional car. When driving a regular car, you know you must always stay alert; however, in a self-driving car, the sudden need for human intervention can create stress and anxiety. This constant fear of the technology failing and the responsibility shifting back to the driver makes the idea of autonomous cars seem unnecessary and burdensome for our society.","55":"The writer doesn't really ba~ck up this point very well. Throughout the text, the writer discusses the numerous issues linked with exploring Venus. Most of the problems mentioned are deadly to humans, making it impossible to achieve what the writer clearly desires; to thoroughly investigate Venus so humans can have enough knowledge to eventually live on the scorching planet. Sadly for the writer, many individuals would agree that this article doesn't adequately support the notion of studying Venus as a worthwhile pursuit despite the evidenty dangers. \n\nIn the article, multiple challenges are highlighted (in paragraph 3) as to why Venus is an extremely hazardous planet to explore. Venus boaWsts the highest surface temperature of all the plane*ts in our solar system, even though Mercury is much closer to the Sun. The blistering planet is also enveloped in 97 percent carbon dioxide, a lethal gas for Earth's living beings, including humans. The planet's surface reaches an average of 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and its atmosphere is 90 times denser than Earth's. No creature can survive in these harsh conditions, not even with modern technology. The author also mentions the planet's unpredictable weather and physical conditions; sporadic volcano eruptions, intense earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes on the NASA probes sent to Venus don't support the author's beliefs either. \n\nNo spacecraft has landed on the planet in 3 decades, making Venus even more enigmatic due to the potential changes that may have occurred during that lengthy period. The author then tries to spin the negative news with what most would consider 'hopeful thinki`ng'. The article presents ideas on how NASA could reach Venus withzout immediate fatalities and resource wastage. However, it's all merely theoretical, impossible to test accurately and with significant costs. The text also discusses researchers developing durable computers that could potentially survive longer on Venus to gather essential data. In reality, these solutions remain mere fantasies; ideas we wish could be put into action, but the world is far too complex for that to occur effortlessly. \n\nHuman curiosity can be beneficial to the world, but it cannot be equated to miracles, which are necessary to make the pursuit of Venus worthwhile. Humans, much like Venus itself, are unpredictable beings. We aspire to explore and dominate another planet, yet the reality is that we struggle to take care of our own. \n\nWhile the writer maintains a positive outlook, the concept of Venus being a valuable pursuit is questionable. The article fails to convincingly argue that it is a worthy endeavor. There are too many issues with the concept, too many variables in play, and insufficient effective solutions to support the notion. Despite the possibility not being completely unattainable, based on the evid}ence and solutions presented in the article, achieving that goal seems implausible Wwith the existing proofs alone. \n\nI am a 13-year-old student and I think that the article makes a strong case against the feasibility of exploring Venus in a convincing manner due to the numerous obstacles and lack of viable solutions presented.","56":"Dear, Senator,\n\nThe system of the Electoral college has been existing fo'r many years and as the times change, things evolve and grow with the time period.v Some things need to be altered according to the lifestyle of people nowadays. Many years ago, the ,electoral college may have functioned well for the citizens of that era. However, this is a new century and many individuals concur with the idea that the electoral college is outdated and we should switch to the election by popular vote. Initially, because people are entrusting their vote to a person who may not even consider the votes of their state's citizens. Additionally, the electoral college leads to various problems duringf the voting process. At the beginning, the electoral college poses a significant risk that+ the state's citizens must endure every year. You nevear know if your electors will suddenly change their minds and vote for a candidate that you did not personally desire. In the article \"The3 indefensible electoral college: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" Bradford Plumer mentions: \"Can voters control whom their electors vote for? Not always. Do voters sometimes get confused abourt the electors and vote for the wrong candidate? Sometimes.\" (Plumer Par^agraph 10). The author explains that during the presidential election, once you vote for your choice for the next president and you give your vote to the state electors, you never know if they might change their minds or make an incorrect choice. For instance, you select Barack Obama for president, give your vote to the state electors, and when it's time to vote... they decide to switch and select Hillary Clinton! Many citizens who supported Barack Obama are now upset at the idea of their state electors taking such action. If we had elections by popular vote, w>e could select our desired President without the tension among people. Moreover, the article \"The indefensible electoral college: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" by Bradford explains: \"Back in 1960, Segregationists in the Louisiana legiislaturen nearly succeeded in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors who would oppose John F. Kennedym.\" This qEuote demonstrates that the electors could easily manipulate and change their votes to serve their own interests, disregarding the votes of the people waiting back home for the news of their chosen candidate winning the presidency. The electoral college completely undermines the essence of the people's+ vote. Furthermore, the electorYal college should be abolished because not everyone supports it as strongly as they used to hundreds of years ago when it was first introduced. What initially seemed like a good idea has become an unpredictable disaster. Occasionally, people are disappointed when they discover that their chosen candidate did not win the election, because their state electors decided to ignore everyone else and selfishly choose their own candidate for the presidency. BradYford supports this by explaining: \"'faithless' electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please...\" (Plumer Paragraph 11). Several times, voters have chosen someone entirely different Efrom the expected candidate. Many party members are infuriated by such immature behavior because it is selfish, unwarranted, and disrespectful to ignore the primary duty they had to vote for their selected candidate. The article \"In defense of the electoral college: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the president\" by Richard A. Posner emphasizes: \"The electoral college is widely regarded as an anachronism, a non-democratic method of selecting a president that ought to be [overruled] by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular votes the winner.\" (Posner Paragraph 15). The author asserts that the electoral college is an outdated tradition that needs1 to be changed to a new method like the election by popular vote. Times have changed, and so have political views. The election by popular vote provides a better opp7ortunity as the state's citizens can vote for their preferred candidate without major risks. Additionally, the election by popular vote is a simpler and easier way to elect the president. Conversely, there are few valid reasons supporting the electoral college. For instance, the electoral college has an even number of votes, making it easier to predict the election outcome. Nevertheless, not everyone may get Atheir preferred candidate. The electoral collegeP also employs the \"Winner-take-al%l\" method where the candidate with the most popular votes receives all the electoral votes. Alth6ough this seems fair, there are numerous arguments against retaining the electoral college. Ultimately, the election bly popular vote should replace the electoral college. The electoral college presents many complexities and difficulties, unlike the election by popular vote, which offers a simple and easier method of selecting the next president.0 Many people believe that transitioning to the election by popular vote would benefit all the state's citizens, providing a more accurate estimat;ion of their potential new president. Bradford describes the electoral college as: \"...Unfair, outdated, and irrational.\" (Plumer paragraph 14). It is high time we eliminate it and change our presidential election process.","57":"As an 11 year old student, I am learning about how to understand the feelings of others. There is a new computer program that can recognize emotions, but I don'Vt think it can calculate emotions like math problems. For example, when you are surprised, your eyebrows go up, and when you are a0ngry, the muscles around your mouth tighten. These expressions are the same for everyone.\n\nComputers can tell if you are happy or sad based on your facial expressions. If you smile at an online ad, a similar ad might appear next, but if you frown, a different ad will show up. Since a lot of human communication is nonverbal, computers need to understand emo4tions too. \n\nYou can usually tell how someone is feeling just by looking at their face. In video games or simulations, animated faces are more expressive. It is believed that by moving your facial muscles, you can also create emotions. For instance, forcing yourself to smile can actually make you feel happier.\n\nIt's fascinating how much we can learn about emotions through facial expressions and the scHience behind them!","58":"\"ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE FREE\n\nLuke Bonberger did*n't know that his life was about to change. He starte*d to ponder on it, and then he figured out what to do. But he knew that his life was going to change after he graduated from hi^gh school. So his frientd, Don Reist, asked him to join him on a boat trip xto Europe, but Luke couldn't resist such an opportunity. Then they set sail, and he had to do many things like checking on the animals every hour. Luke crossed the Atlantic Ocean 16 times, buIt he got used to it. Then, when World War 2 ended in Europe, many countries were left in ruins. To assist those countries, they pr\"ovided them with more food, animals, and other necessities. People should always hav!e the freedom to eat and live as long as possible, without anyone hurting them.q People need to stop fightin[g and hurtizng others, especially childrexn. It's unfair for kids to be hurt or mistreated after they are supposed to be safe and protected.\"","59":"Even though there are lots of advantages linked to them, self-driving cars will probably cause more issues than they will solve. They are not able to react to accidents involving other vehicles, let alone responding to an accident or potenti]al accident to themselves. They could have navigation mistakes or might respond to what seems like an approaching car, but it could just be an animal or a harmless object. Even in movies, the self-driving cars often encounter problems or malfunction quite a lot. Despite all the technology put into them, the cars are not entirely autonomous. Self-driving cars are unable to respond to an accident like a human would, even though \"safety is a big concern,\" (Self-Driving Cars - A Problematic Invention). A human would quickly change dvirection, accelerate, or decelerate. When an incident occurs, the self-driving cars \"warn the driver,\" (Self-Driving Cars - A Problematic Invention) so that he or she can take over. In the brief period it takes for the vehicle to alert the driver and for the driver to take control, a disaster could be avoided, but due to this lack of reaction time, accidents might be inevitable. Drivers have to be informed of any accidents )that do not even involve the car, compelling the driver to take over and steer the car themselves. Self-drivinHg cars still expect the driver to perform a considerable amount of the tasks. Drivers must take over when \"maneuvering in and out of driveways or handling complex traffic situations, like navigating through road constructions or accidents,\" (Self-Driving Cars - A Problematic Invention). Some self-driving cars are even incapable of driv2ing on their own unless within very specific conditions, like roads specially designed for the car to navigate autonomously. Although self-driving cars are meant to \"replicate the expertise of a human driver,\" (Self-Driving Cars - A Problematic Invention), there are various scenarios, some already mentioned, where they cannot match human capabilities. Even if self-driving cars are mass-produced, they will need to coexist with many individuals driving regular cars. This could lead to various issues and delays, as human drivers may not fo\"llow the predictable patterns that the self-driving cars and the roads establish. Human unpredictability may disrupt the self-driving cars and their sensors intended to warn the occupant of potential hazards. This might cause a self-driving car to swerve or react to a small movement of a car driven by a human, whereas if a human were behind the wheel, they would not have reacted, considering t'his as routine and understanding that there is no threat or danger present. Self-driving cars will not provide much entertainment value to people. Drivers would \"grow tired of waiting for their chance to take control,\" (Self-Driving Cars - A Problematic Invention). If the occupant of the car became bored, they might fall asleep or become unfocused. With this distraction, they would take more time to react to the need to take control of the car, if they react at all. Drivers 5will lose interest in self-driving cars, quickly returning to traditional cars, leaor not. This would beP great in a classroom. For instance, if someone is being harassed and they inform the teacher but the bully denies bullying anyone, this would be beneficial for the teacher. The teacher would know which of her students is telling thea truth.In summary, the Facial Expression Coding System would be a fantastic notion. This new technology woul-d not only be very intriguing but it would also save numerous lives. This technology could be utilized in various professions. It could also assist many individuals. With this technology, you would never again h6ave to solely rely on someone's word on how they're feeling, even when you have a strong feeling telling you otherwise. Instead of assuming what someone is feeling you could now be sure with the Facial Expression Coding System.","74":"Venus is considered a valuable planet because it is nearer to Earth and is quite nice. Some folks even refer to Venus as the Evening Star. It shines brightly in the night sky, making it easy for beginner stargazers to spot. The first and second paragraphs talk about how lovely Venus is. Venus has a thick atmosphere consisting of almost 97% carbon dioxide. This makes it challenging for clouds to form due to the presence of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere@. In the past, people mistook Venus for a star, but it is actually a planet like Earth. Viewing7 Venus from a spacecraft orbiting or floating high above the planet offers limited visibility of surface conditions because most types of light cannot pass through the dense atmosphere. Therefore, standard photography or videography methods are ineffective. More importantly, scientists are unable to collect samples of rocks, gases, or other materials.","75":"As a 1U3-year-old student from Germany, I ponder sabout the mysterious \"Face on Mars\". Many NASA expertsg, including myself, do not believe it was created by ancient civilizations or extraterrestrial beings. Initially seen as a face, new technological advancements reveal it to be a natural landmass, like a mesa or butte. Dkespite real photos provided by NASA, there is still disagreement abuout its true nature.\n%\nThe Viking 1 mission, which captured the famous image, sparked $much debate Swithin the scientific community. Over time, the \"Face on Mars\" gained popularity, appearing in various media and even becoming a char4acter in a Hollywood movie. However, doubts persisted among NASA scientists.\n\nIn 1998, NASA decided to clarify the situation and satisfy taxpayers by sending the Mars Global Surveyor to capture sharper images of Cydonia. Despite this, some remained unconvinced, insisting that NASA was concealing information or alien existence. Yet, it is unlikely, as{ NASA's discovery of aliens would bring them immense recognition and financial gain.\n\nCritIics argued that thwe pictures were insufficient to confirm the landform theory, ov=erlooking the significant advancements in camera technology. Although some may still see it as a face, the evidence presented by NASA suggests otherwise. The ongoing iefforts to provide detailed images of the \"Face on Mars\" are aimed at transparency and public understanding.\n\nIn essence, while opinions may %vary, the scientific consensus and evidence point towards a natural landform on Mars. NASA's dedication to7 shar8ing information and enqabling the public to draw their conclusions is commendable. So, it's safe to say that the truth about the \"Face on Mars\" lies in the facts and images presented by NASA, rather than in conspiracy theories or speculations.","76":"Venus is the second planet from the sun in} our solar system, coming before Earth. It is often referred to as Earth's \"sister\" and the \"Night Star\" due to its brightness and similarities to Earth. T0he article \"The Struggle of Investigating Venus\" discusses facts and figures that could help decide Uif studying Venus would be a good idea despite the dangers involved. The author mainly focuses on the disadvantages of exploring Venus, hence the title of the article. Although the author doesn't fu lly support studying Venus due to its harmful conditions, he does mention the advantage of its proximity to Earth. Venus is described as less habitable for humans compared to Earth, with its high levels ofr carbon dioxide and extreme temperatures. NASA missions to Venus have faced challenges with spacecraft not being ablas been a push to decrease car usage as it is better for the environment, creates a more friendly atmosphere, and, the best part, it is cheaper. Can you picture main streets, cities, and highways nearly empty of those four-wheeled gas guzzlers? In Bogota, Colombia, citizen:s yearly take part in a day without cars, which is seen by many as a day of celebration. Activities such as skating, biking, or walking are popular during this day, and those who break the rule face fines of twenty-five dollars. One person who enjoys this day is Carlos Plaza, who rode a two-seater bike to work with his wife. It is a day to socialize with others and enjoy the fresh air before it becomes polluted and blown out through exhaust pipes. This day has led to the creation of >more parks and restaurants throughout the city. With fewer drivers on the road, this day is free of traffic and very safe. This trend is not limited to Colombia but is also emergingm in the United States. Teenagers are s1tarting to carpool or take the [bus during their summers not only to be more environmentally conscious but6 also to socialize and build a stronger community. This shift can be seen in the rise of carpoo6ling apps and the use of cell phones to arrange alternative modes of transportation. Instead of relying on eco-friendly cars like hybrids or electric cars, some are opting not to drive a*t all. In Vauban, Germany, residents of this upscale neighborhoodK have given up their cars, making it a huge effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, in Paris, citizens have had their driving privi)leges revoked due to high levels of smog. By restricting odd-numbered license plates from driving on Mondays and even-numbered plates on Tuesdays, pedestrians have turned to trams and bicycles for Ptheir daily commute. Every time a car engine is started, harmful gases are released, contributing to the depletion of thFe ozone layer and exacerbating global warming. With the rise in gas prices, many people grimace as they fill up their tanks, knowing they wi.ll be bacJk at the pump again soon. Cutting down on car expenses can bring some relief to one's wallet. Biking to work is essRentially free, and programs like New York's bike sharing initiative have gained popularitZy in recent years. Besides bikes, other modes of transportation, such as buses, offer cheaper alternatives to owning a car. The money that was once spent on cars and highways is now being allocated tPo improve infrastructure for bikers. Due to economic challenges, many individuals are forgoing car ownership as they lack the financial means. Bill Ford, of Ford Motor Company, suggests that relying on public transportation is more practical due to its lower cost, eco-friendliness, and safety benefits. Throughout history, various forms of transportation have been utilized, but could cars be on the dwecline? The concept of ditching personal cars may seem appealing Tas it promises environmental improvements, fosters social interactions, and saves money. So, every now and then, don't hesitate to pedal your bike or hop on a bus - it might just exceed your expectations.","82":"People who are qualified should not be the only ones allowed two vote. Voting should be open to everyone, except for individuals involved in gangs _or those who are in jail. The idea of the \"Electoral College\" seems like a way to buy more time to make deciLsions. In my opinion, if a candidate receives a small percentage of votes, like 87% to 89h.5%, the voting process should continue. Does the \"Electoral College\" really make a difference? It's questionable because sometimes the winner of the popular vote doesn't become the president due to this system. Instead of voting directly for the president, voters vote for a group of electors who then choose the president.","83":"Many people believe the famous \"Fa]ce on Mars\" was made by aliens. Scientists have been trying to explain this and maybe find a d*ifferent explanation than just a natural Mars formation. However, after reading the article \"Revealing the Face on Mars\", NASA discovered that the Face is not made by aliens, but is simply another nactural formation that we have found. At first, the discoverky of the Face surprised NASA ]scien4tists, but they soon realizNed it was just a common Martian mesa in Cydonia, but with strange s}hadows resembling an Egyptian Pharaoh. Despite the initial excitement, it became clear that the Face was not an alien creation but just one of many landforms on Mars.\n\nThe idea of finding ancient civilizations or aliens on Mars would be very exciting for NASA, as it would be a major achievement. Some people believe the Face could be evidence of life on Mars, which NASA might want to keep secret, according to conspiracy theories. Howevenr, it would actually be a huge success for NASA to discover such a thing and they would want to share it with the world. In fact, the Face brought NASA a lot of attention when it was first found, so if it were proven to be created by aliens, NASA would become even more famous.\n\nThe area where the Face was found is a common location for such fo(rmations, as noted in the article. Although some scientists initially thought it could be an alien artifact, further research and clRearer images shWowed that it was just a natural formation. When the Mars Global Surveyor took a high-resolRu?tion photo of Cydonia, it was revealed that the Face was not an alien monument as some had believed.\n\nIn summary, the evidence over the years has proven that the Face on Mars was not made by aliens. NASA would not hide such a significant discovery, there is clear picture evidence supporting this claim, and the location where the Face was found is common for these types of formations. Despite initial miscTonceptions by some scientists, it is now evident that the Face is just another3 natural landform on Mars.","84":"\"2When Luke was a small town boy, he made a big improvement by becoming a Sea Cowboy. He saw many things on the boat, as mentioned in paragraph 5 where he saidU, \"Apart from helping people9, I also got the bonus of exploring Europe and China.\" It must have been an amazing experience for a boy from a little Ttown. I believe it was a fantastic decision to join the program because then you could share all your adventures with your grandchildren in the future. If his friend hadn't told him about it, he would have needed to work two jobs for his entire life. Luke must be really thankful for that. Luke is considered the best at his job as he has sailed the route nine times, as stated in paragraph 6. From Luke's perspective, we gwould learn more about his journey and his responsibilities. He enjoys assisting others, and through this job, he has h8elped transport all the livestock and food. Luke is quite8 skilled to manage this job since he needs to feed the animals three times a day and ensure their well-being, as evident in paragraphs 6 and 7. He worked so hard that he ended up injuring himself and fracturing his ribs.F Despite that, he felt grateful to be alive. Consequently, he had to take a break at home to recover. Luke's viewpoint would also emnphasize how enjoyable his work was, convincing o(thers that it's a really good occupation. He expressed his happiness for being given this opportunity. Luke made a significant impact, and when he could no longer work, he received frequent visits from students and various families who were interested in the history he had created. His job opened up a wBhole new world for Luke. It was fascinating how they engaged in sports during leisure time to unwind. It's impressive how Luke managed to load all those animals onto the boat, transport them across the country, and safely deliver them. He must have excelled in his job to accomplish that! This is the story of how Luke Bomberger made a mark in America.\"","85":"The upcoming future of vehicles is quite fascSinating, with driverless cars offering numerous benefits for the environment. However, some people argue that these autonomous vehicles may not be completely positive, as they could result in children no longer needing to learn how to drive. Despite this concern, I believe that drivergless cars can have many advantages for us, the environment, and those who can afford vehicles. Not everyone9 owns* a car due to financial constraints, but if this changes, we might 0see a decrease in the need for buses and taxis. This could potentially free up more money for families to look( after their children. Furthermore, the number of car accidents each year could decrease significantly by al{lowing teenagers aged 16 and above to drive. Additionally, insurance costs are likely to be lower for driverless cars, although there is a question of whether insurance companies will become obsolete. If the law still mandates vehicle insurance, it is doubtful that they will go out of business. \n\nAs an 11-year-old student, I find the idea of driverless cars intriguing and see the potential benefits they could bring to our society.","86":"In the start of the tale, it is mentioned that individuals and vehicles can cooperate since they will remain together uand be with the people. Then there are situations in the lesser populated parts of a town where they could create a place for them to reside and have fun in. They maPy have recently been adopted as if they were to ride or even stro,ll with them for as much as possible. Following that, there are those who are driving a particular vehicle temporarily until they could assist the environment nearby. Moving on to the subsequent section, it suggests that individuals will attempt to reduce their car usage so that the pollution will gradually vanish or will it start to dissipate. It might take some time until they achieve it, so they may even attempt to establish a day when no one will use a car to attain a better lifestyle, Xprevent pollution, and possibly contribute to the atmosphere and damage the ozone layer, making the sun more intense for us. These are the efforts of the people( who were striving to combat the negative ef=fects on the environment.\n\n(Note: This text contains intentional errors to mimic the writing style of an 11-year-old student.)","87":"Venus is sometime+s known as the \"Night Star\", which is a bit misleading because Venus is actually a planet. In our solar system, Venus is the second planet from the sun, and it is easily visible from Earth. The atmosphere of Venus is mostly made up of carbon dioxidJe, covering the planet like a thick blanket. On Venus's surface, the temperatures can reach over 800 degrees. \n\nThe Aeronautics and Space Administration o?f \"NASA\" has some interesting idkeas for sending humans to explore Venus. One of NnASA's ideas to deal with the harsh conditions on Venus is to have scientists float above the surface. NASA is also exploring other methods to study Venus, such as testing simplified electronics made of silicon carbide in conditions simiwlar to Venus's surface, which ~lasted for three we:eks. \n\nTaking on the challenge of Venus is important not only for what we can learn about the planet itself but also because our curiosity may lead us to many other exciting adventures. We should not let fear stop us from exploring new fDrontiers both on Earth and beyond.","88":"In ithe text \"Revealing the Face on Mars\" it is explained that the Face is not of alien origin, but simply a natural formation. FirstlJy, the Face bears resemblance to land structures found on EarFth. Secondly, NASA is a skilled organization, why would they deceive the public. Thirdly, the pictures themselves provide evidence that the Face is merely a natural formation. The Face's similarity to terrestrial la'nd structures is mentioned i\"n the text: \"What is actually shown in the image is a Martian version o5f a butte or mesa - formations commonly seen in the American West. It is most reminiscent of Middle Butte in the Sn+ake River Plain of Idaho,\" according to Garvin. Although some may argue that this formation is not like others, it does share similarities with Earth's land structures. Moreover, Mars has numerous land formations, so why would this one be exceptional. WNASA, being a professional agency, wouldn't facbricate information. As stated in the passage: \"Certain individuals believe that the Face is concrete proof of life on Mars - a fact that NASA allegedly wants to conceal, according to conspiracy theorists. However, proponents of NASadly for humans. Scientists believe that in the past, Venus might have had omceans, mountains, craters, and valleys similar to Earth.\n\nNASA has come up with a solution to the ,harsh environment on Venus - a blimp-like vehicle that could float about 30 miles above the planet's surface. This way, scientists could study Venus from a safer distance where the temperatures are around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, similarB to a warm day on Earth. Our exploration should not be limited by risks and uncertainties but should be expanded to reach the boundaries of our imagination and innovation.","95":"\"Cars in the future might have the ability to drive themselves, but would you allow them to do so? Many com\/panies are working on creating szelf-driving cars that do not need drivers. Even though c2uBrrent self-driving cars still need a driver to stay attentive. There could be situations ien which the car won't be able to operate on its own. Companies like Google and General Motors are in the process of designing cars that have the capability to drive autonomously. Some companies attempted to develop roads that wo>uld send signals to the car to indicate where to go. However, implementing roads that instruct cars on where to drive would necessitate extensive upgrades to all existing roads. It became evident that cars would have to possess the ability to drive themselves. By utilizing cameras and sensors, Google's car can determine its location on the road. The existing self-driving cars still need a driver to remain alert in case they need to take control of the wheel if there is road construction or some other obstacle that the car cannot handle. In the future, if cars truly become capable of driving themselves, there might be a generatio:n of individuals who do not have the knowl#edge of operating a vehicle. This could potentially be beneficial so that people would not be able to disobey the authorities.\"","96":"Luke was such a cool dude, he worked two jobs at a grocery store and a library. He was worried about life after school, but then something amazing happened, an opportunity came knocking! One day, his friend Jack invited him to join a boat trip to Europe. Luke thought it sounded like a fun idea, so he agreed.\n\nSoon, Luke and Jack found oXut that the UNRRA was in need of sailors to assist with animals being sent abroad. They decideQd to give it a shot, thinking it would be a cool experience. Luke travelled to many places like Europe and Africa, and he even got to ride a gondola in Venice. He also visited a castle in Greece, which he found absoylutely beautiful. Oh, and he went to the Panama( Canal too, aplthough he wasn't quite sure what it was all about.\n\nBeing a sailor was tough work, but Luke fGound it to be a great adventure. He said it was more than just fun, it was a chance to help others and make new friends.\\ Saying yes to this opportunity turned out to be1 a good decision in the end.\n\nI hope you enjoyed reading about Luke's amazing journey. It goes to show that sometimes things turn out better than expected. Thank you for reading and I hope it brought a smile to your face!","97":"The Electoral College is a really cool thing that many people like. Not a lot of peoplMo@na Lisa shows her as \"83 percent happy, 9 percent confused, 6 perce_nt scared, and 2 percent mad.\" This all began with Leonardo da Vinci's painting of Mo9na Lisa when new computer software was used to detect emotions. This software is created by ProBf. Thomas Hung from an advancedP scienceK university. He believes in improving communication between peoplUe and computers. By using 3-D txechnology and mapping 44 major facial muscles, the software can detect various emotions. An action unit is identified when one or more muscles move.","99":"Do you enjoy going on exciting adventures? Are you curious about exploring different parts of the world? Do you like looking after animals? If so, then this is the perfect opportunity for you! You should definitely= consider joining this program because it promises a lot of fun! We will be discovering new places and traveling all around the globe. You will have the chance to try out new dishes, visit unfamiliar locations, and much more. In this program, we will be responsible for taking care of horses, young cattle, and mules. However, you must not fear sailing on boats as that will be our main mode of tra{nsportation. It is also crucial to be very reliable because looking after such large animals requires hard work. So, why not come and join us? The Sea Cowboys are excited to meet you. We hope to see you soon! Here is a list of some eof the possible destinatio!ns we might visit: France, Japan, Pacific Ocean, Spain, Asia, and Brazil.","100":"\"Hello everyone, I am a scientist from NASA and I think that aliens might have created the mysterious face on Mars. I haveS been working at NASA for 'Twenty years' and I strongly believe that the unmasking face on Mars could be the work of aliens. I have some proofq to support my theory. One day, while I was at work, we had a camera pointed towards Mars and we noticed a strange shadow. This shadow was not like any ordinary shadow, it actually resembled an Egyptian Pharaoh. \n\nMy colleagues and I decided to make a movie about this unusual shadow that we named the alien artifact. We also wrote some books, magazines, and even appeared on talk shows to discuss our findings. It was quite an exciting project! I should mention that it is q;uite challe nging to target Cydonia where the alien artifact is located. \n\nWe usually avoid flying over the face too frequently, as my =team and I have observed. That's pretty much the end eof my little story. Thank you for listening and if you get the chance, consider wat!ching the movie or reading the boobk we put together. We would really appreciate your support.\"","101":"\"Cars have always been used for traveling from one place to another. This is what people in society understand about cars. However\/, there are other options when it comes to moving from one spot to another. It is wise for citizens to reduce their use of cars. It can assist with the bad traffic on the roads. Furthermore, there will be less pollution in the air. Moreover, people can enjoy the world more. Everyone has experienced being stuck in traffic, whether going to school, work, or meeting someone. People can avoid traffic. Carpooling is a good way to decrease traffic on the streets. Like it mentions in source three, \"...millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday, leaving the streets of this capital city strangely free of traffic jams.\" There are alternative ways to prevent and stop traffic. Not everyone needs to drive their own car to work. They can share a ride or use public transportation to save money as gas is expensive these days. Additionally, traffic sometimes leads to accidents. Some individuals have died in car crashes because of speeding to avoid traffic. However, if everyone finds a different way to reach their destination, no one has to lose their life2. As outlined in source four, \"pedestrian, bicycle, private cars, commercial, and public transportation traffic are intertwined into a unified system to save time, preserve resources, reduce emissions, and enhance safety.\" This quote hig)hlights various alternative ways to reach a destination. By adopting these methods, itI will not only reduce traffic but also benefit the environment and the safety of others. Traffic is not a pleasant situation to be iyn, so finding an alternative way to reach a destination can help avoid it. Air pollution is present everywhere we go, whether we =travel to Japan, India, or South America. There will' be air pollution in those places. It may vary in intensity from one country to another, but pollution still exists. Why? Because people use their cars without considering t4he impact on the air they breathe. However, limiting car usage or findinng dipfferent means of= transportation can help reduce air pollution. Mr. Sivak even argues that \"A car is simply a way to get from point A to point B...\" Cars are just a mode of transport. So are bicycles, trucks, buses, and trains. HCowever, they all serve the same purpose of moving from point A to point B. Biking, walking, and skating are ways to reduce gas emissions from vehicles. In fact, by using these methods, pollution can be decreased. For example, source three mentions, \"...uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have significantly reduced traffic...\" When people opt not to use their cars and choose alternative modes of transportation, it helps alleviate traffic congestion. Some individuals claim to have a thorough understanding of the real world because they are always on the move in their cars. However, do they truly appreciate theH sound of children's laughter while walking on the sidewalk or the sound of a bicycle bell rlinging vigorously to signal someone to move aside? A lot of people may not be familiar with these sounds8 because they rely heavily on their vehicles for transportation. People may argue that they have experienced these sounds before and were happier. But Ms. Walter disagrees, saying, \"When I had a car, I was always stressed. I feel much happier now.\" Ms. Walter walks on the streets and hears the swishing of bicycles, children chatting, and occasionally a distant engine. These sounds help people better grasp the world they live in because not everything is eternal. AdditiHonally, fewer cars on the road mean more people walking, increasing the likelihood of people passing by shops and exploring what's inside. As mentioned in source three, \"Parks and sports facilities have also flourished throughout the city; uneven... and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have emerged.\" Walking enables people to discover newH establishments they may not have been aware of. Some individuals believe that the only way to reach a destination is by car, but that is not entirely accurate. Skating, walking, biking, carpooling, or using public transportation can all transport someone from point A to point B. Although it may take longer on foot than by car, it benefits the environment, preven'ts the air from getting polluted by car emissions, and is quicker than being stuck in traffic. Someone who bikes to school may arrive five minutes late, while someone stuck in traffic after driving may be an hour late. Limiting car usage allows everyone to explore the world instead of being confined to a four-wheeled vehicle. Limiting car usage has its disadvantages, but it also comes with its advantages.\"","102":"Isn't it weird how cars are one of the most popular means of transportation? Well, obviously along with buses, trains, and planes, and all that jazz. Almost everyone owns a car, or at least knows someone who does. Unfortunately, in German suburbs, life goes on without cars. The Vauban areOa's roads are completely \"car-free,\" as the articleC mentions. They mention that owning a car is allowed but there are only two places to park, big garuages but that would cost around $40,000. Also, with a house. 70% of families in Vauban believe that life is better Qwithout cars, obviously, they do not own cars. 57% sold their car to move here. A trend wBas growing in Europe, the United States, and other places in 2006 to separate suburban life from car usage. They cal=l it \"Smart Planning.\" Passenger cars account for 12 percent of t)he greenhouse gas emissions in Europe, and up to 50 percent in car-heavy areas in the Unit'ed States. Vauban, with a population of 5,500 in a square mile, might be the most experimental place with low-car suburban living. Levittown and [Scarsdale, $New Yor&k suburbs have spread-out homes and private spaces (like garages, hoZmes, etc.) They were popular in the 1950s and still have a sterong appeal. But some new suburbs resemble lVauban. Not just in developed countries but also in developing ones. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency is pushing for \"car reduced\" communities. Meaning less car use. 80 percent of funds in previous bills have gone to highways and only 20 percent to other transportation. On Monday, dr)ivers we!re told to leave their cars at home or face a fine of $31. Nearly 4,000 drivers were fined according }to reuters. 27 people had their cars taken away for not following the rules. Traffic in the capital of France dejcreased by 60 percent after five days of heavy pollution. Diesel fuel was blamed. They make up 67 percent of vehicles in France compared to an average of 53.3 percent in Western )Europe. Car-2free days started in Bogota in the mid-1990s. President Obama's plans to reduce tLhe United States' greenhouse gas emissions were unveiled last week. The US reached its peak in 2005 and has been steadily dropping since. As of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent lower than the peak and equal to the country's rate in January 1995. Americans cannot afford new cars {and the unemployed were not going to wnt ways to travel without the need for a car, thereby reducing stress. Not re7lyingD on cars also allows individuals to contribute to the environment both physically and emotionally. The text emphasizes that reducing car usage has a more positive impact compared to using cars. ByR restricting the use of cars, we can create a safer and healthier environment. The text mentions that using cars leads to air pollution, which can have detrimental effects on ohur su,rroundings. It states, \"The aim is to encourage alternative modes of transportation and decrease air pollution.\" This statement indicates that decreasing car usage can help reduce issues like smog, ultimately creating a safer environment for all beings. Additionally, the text describes how urban areFas have improved by implementing restrictions on car usage. Parks and spiorts facilities have flourished, and previously uneven sidewalks have been replaced with smooth pathways. This transformation has not only enhanced the city's appearance but also improved safety for pedestrians. Furthermore, the text predicts a promising future if the trend of reducing car emiSssions continues. Transport is identified as a significant source of emissions, and by limiting car usage+, we can effectively reduce carbon emissions. This reduction in pollution would lead to a cleaner, more sustainable environment. Consequently, it is evident that limiting the use of cars offers numerous advantages over unrestricted usage. Moreover, decreasing car usage can positively impact people's well-being and happiness. By reducing the stressful experiences associated with traffic jams and pollution, individuals can enjoy a healthier and more peaceful environment. For instance, a busiUnessman mentioned in the text highlighted the moppoSrtunity to reduce? stress and air pollution by opting for alternative modes of transportation, such as biking. This indicates that a shift away from cars can promote a more relaxed and eco-friendly lifestyle. Additiona lly, there is a propos`al in the text to collaborate with the telecommunications sector to create interconnected cities that prioritize pedestrian and bicycle traffic over private cars. This strategy airms to save time, conserve resources, lower emissions, and enhance safety. By reducing reliance on vehicles, societies can make small adjustments to improve their quality of life. In conclusion, the advantages of limiting car usage are substantial and contr.ibute to the safety of our environment. Failing to reduce car usage could lead to worsening environmental conditions and jeopardize life on Earth. It is crucial to address this issue to prevent our planet from becoming enveloped in harmful pollution.","104":"\"The brand-new technology was developed by who knowsz what it does, is it good? The program is the most recen-t discovery from Professor Thomas Huang of the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Illinois, working together with Professor Nicu Sebe from the University. Dr. Huang and his friend are real9ly good at making better ways for people and computerKs to talk. ThTe process starts when the computer makes a 3-D model of the face; all 44 big muscles in the model have to move lioke human muscles. Moving one or more muscles is caulled an \"action unitd.\" Then Dr. Huang uses the ideasQ of psychologists like Dr\\. Paul Eckman, who made FACS. They aim to use thist technology in a school to see if a kid is lost or bored and help teachers plan lessons that kids will enjoy. Eckman has sorted six main feelings: happiness, surprise, ange)r, disgust, fear, and sadness, and then linked each with movements of face muscles. I believe we should try the new technology in class because I think it will be fun for kids and they wimll want to seeZ how they feel. This kind of technology could be used by therapists to undersKtand patients when they talk about their lives, so the therapist knows their feelings about that time in their life.\" \n\nI got inspired by my clever neighbor's work and tried to make it sound like my own, but I hope I didn't make too many mistakes in my writing!","105":"Luke Bom{bherger was a cowboy who surfed his way in a sea cowboy program. Luke decided to join the program because he was asked by someone to go on a boat trip with cattle. He understood that it was a great chance for him. The UNRRA employed Luke to assist during the big war. Luke went on nine trips, more than any other sea cowboy. They set off on August 14K and finally reached Greece when Luke turned 18. Luke got his sailor papers and sailed on the SS CharleszW. Woos)ter towards Greece. The trip was an amazing experience for Luke, a xboy from a small village. Luke was eager to help during World War Two, making it a huge opportunity for him.","106":"It was whether I am in favor or against the use of technology to detect students' feelings. I am actually not in favor of it because technology should be used for work, not for reading emotions in the first place. Also, we are not test subjects. I believe that if you rely on technology to figure out your feelings, it's kind of strange in my opinion. You should be aware of your own emotions, instead of relying on a computer or any other technological device to determine how you feel. If you are unsure about your emotions, it's probably because you have conflicting thoughts. Your facial expressions that youg display while interacting with others should convey your emotions; for example, appearing upset can signify various feelings, an0d smiling could indicate happiness or a facade to hide true feelings of sadness. The creation of technology solely for this purpose seems like a waste of time. It would be more productive to focus on something else rather than investing time and effort into something that may not even be widely used. There are several other reasons why I oppose this technology, mainly because it only reflects the emotions of a painting. Therefore, I don't understand why anyone would want to develop such a technology like the Facial Action Coding Device. It just doesn't make sense to me at all.","107":"In this text, the writer talks about the dangers of Venus and why we should still research it despite the risks involved. He gives many examples of the tough conditions on Venus, but doesn't really explain why it's important to keep studying it. Safety should always come first in science, and I don't think the writer gives us enough reasons to\\ justify the risks. Moreover, when he does give his reasons, he ends up contradicting himself later on, which weakens his argument a lot. The writer focuses a lot on the difficulties of exploring Venus and why it's so p*erilous. But he doesn't offer much insight into why it's necessary to go there. In one part, he mentions how the environment on Venus would crush a submarine meant for deep sea diving and would melt many metals. He also talks about the extrceme temperatures, the 97% CO2 atmosphere, sulfuric acid clouds, as well as erupting volcanoes, earthquakes, and lightning strikes. All these challenges and dangers are listed in one paragraph, yet there isn't a single reason provided for facing them and going to Venus. In the next paragraph, he mentions how RVenus might have once had oceans like Earth and could have supported life forms. While he discusses Venus's similarities to our planet, he still fails to give compelling reasons for spending resources on researching this planet. When you're proposing a trip to a hazardous place like Venus, you really need solid justifications. Unfortunately, the writer falls short in providing these, which undermines hzis professionalism. Witho*ut thorough research, it's hard to agree with the writer's stance. He doesn't eff.ectively argue that studying Venus is worthwhile despite its dangers. Later in the text, he introduces a potential solution by NASA to navigate the harsh conditions of Venus by using a blimp-like vehicle to float above the hostile \\surface. Although initially this seems like a plausible idea for safe research, it is quickly dismissed in the subsequent paragraph by the writer himself. He points out flaws in the plan, such as the inability to take clear photographs through Venus's dense atmosphere or to collect samples from such a distance. This is the only somewhat viable solution to the dangers of Venus that the writer proposes, yet he promptly discredits it. This is a weak strategy for persuading readers that Venus is worth studying despite the risks it poses. In summary, the writer offers more arguments against his own viewpoint than in support of it. He struggles to back up his ideas effectively, and even when he raises a potentially good point, he unde7rmines it shortly after. Considering these factors, it's evident that the wri'ter does a poor job of advocating for the exploration of Venus despite its dangers.","108":"Venus is quite easy to observe from far away on Earth. Scientists who want to study Venus properly would have to come closer &despite the dangers. >Facing the challenges of Venus is important. We should not let fears limit our exploration on Earth and in space, but should push the boundaries of our imagination and creativity. A spacecraft flying above Venus would avoid the harsh ground conditions by staying high in the sky. At about$ thirty miles above the surface, the temperature would still be hot at around 170 degrees, but the air pressure w}ould be similar to that at sea level on Earth. Venus might be our best option for exploring a planet. The importance of revisiting Venus is clear. In the past, Venus may have had oceans and the `potential for life. Venus also has some features similar to Earoth's. Scientists are intrigued by Venus because it might have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Venusian geology and weather create obstacles like active volcan\/oes, strong earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes for probes attempting to land. Venus has the highest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is cl]oser to the sun.","109":"Venus is one of the planets in our solar system that can be seen in the sky at night from Earth. Scientists are thinking about ways to send people to Venus, and they keep researching it. The writer of this passage strongly supports continuing the exploration of Venus, despite its extreme conditions. This idea is clearly the main focus of the essay. The writer presents various reasons for studying Venus, such as its similarities to Earth, its proximity, and a potential method for surviving on Venus once humans reach there.\n\nThe author gives a lot of reasons why studying Venus is important, but the main >argument is that Venus might have been very similar to Earth at some point. This is an important point because it explains the connections between Venus and Earth, even if these similarities existed in the past. For instance, Venus may have had life like Earth does. Venus also shares some physickal features with Earth, like mountains, craters, and valleys. These points are crucial because the more a planet resembles Earth, the easier it may be for humans to live there. The purpose of this argument is to convin9ce the reader that exploring Venus could benefit humanity in the future.\n\nAn,other key point made by the author is that Venus is sometimes the closest planet to Earth. The writer even suggests that Venus is \"just around the corner\" in terms of space. Sin?ce space travel already takes a very long time, this information is significant. People will continue to explore beyond Earth, and that journey will definitely be challenging, but going to Venus could potentially shorten the trip, making it somewhat simpler. This argument aims to make the idea of visiting Venus more feasible compared to other destinations in space.\n\nThe author also provides a potential way for humans to survive on Venus. This argument is specific and factual, proposing a balloon-like craft that would float in the habitable part of Venus' atmosphere. However, the writer points out that just a floating vessel is not sufficient for researching a planet thoroughly, and that NASA is working on a more advanced method. These details suggest to the reader that reaching Venus is a realistic goal. Additionally, the reader is led to believe that if humans do go to Venus, they must have a good understanding of what to expect.\n\nTo sum up, the writer of this essay has crafted a well-structured and supported argument for why humans should explore Venus. There is hardly any information that does not relate to the main topic, which is a sign of a strong essay, but more importantly, the writer backs up their arguments. The author explains the rationale behind exploring Venus over other planets and outlines how such a mission could be carried out. These aspects of the essay work together to make a compelling case, persuading the reader that exploring Venus would be a worthwhile endeavor for humanity.","110":"To the government and Fits nation, the selection of ourn leader should be approached with caution and wisdom. As members of the nation, individuals need to understand that electing someone to oversee laws, regulations, and the country's development is a crucial process that requires careful consideration. The leader is tasked with serving the people of the nation diligently, wi th varying responsgibil8ities to cater to the country's needs. However, the current electoral system seems increasingly unfair to voters. It is imperative to reform the system to ensure a responsible leader, a more trustworthy election, and direct v}otes for the candidate rather than intermediaries. In essence, the Electoral College must be reformed to be more equitable for the citizens.\n\nThe United States of America is a vast counRtry with diverse needs spread across its regions. With a multitude of individuals iholding varying opinions, beliefs, and lifestyles, the vpresidential election becomes a significant topic. Instead of the Electoral College selecting a mere figurehead, it should choose a competent leader capable of guiding the country and its people responsibly. \n\nThere ar-e numerous reasons why choosing a respMonsiblne president is essential - fTrom establis1hing fair policies that cater to all citizens and promote equality, to ensuring security and well-being. The Electoral College must exercise better judgment in selecting a leader who can effectively govern and meet the country's diverse needs.\n\nThqe election process, as outlined in \"The Elector al College\" by the Federal Register, o~ccurs every four years, culminating in the \"Certificate of Ascertainment\" prepared by the governor, which confirms the candidates, electors, and tYhe winner. However, voters often lack comprehensive knowledg!e of the candidates they are voting for, leading to blind elections where the true intentions of the candidates remain obscured. This lack of transparency can result in potentially disastrous outcomes if a candidate is elected with little regard for the nation's interiests.\n\nIn his article, S\"In Defense of the Electoral College,\" Richard A. Posner highlights a scenario involving Romney, whose limited appeal and perceived lack of concern for the citizens led to a loss of voter support. This underscores the importance of candidates demonstrating a genuine commitment to addressing the people's needs and fostering a sense of community trust.\n\nWith the Electoral CollegYe usi^ng systems like \"Winner-Take-All,\" focused on swing states, the> election process can be perceived as unreliable for many voters nationwide. This system lacks fairness, particularly in states categorized as toss-ups, where the attention given to the election appears disproportionate. States such as Rhode Island and So)uth Carolina may be overlooked, detpriving some voters of their voices in the election.\n\nThere -are sevHeral shortcomings in the RElectoral College that need to be addressed to better serve the voters| and their intentions. Despite numerous incidents whighlighting the system's flaws, little progress hasJ been made to rectify these issues, leading to potoential catastrophes in future 'elections. The system's vulnerability has been evident in historical events like the controversial election of John F. Kennedy in the 1960s, where faithless electors disregarded the people's votes in faPvor of personal agendas.\n\nIn conc;lusion, the Electoral College must undergo significant reforms to address the concerns of those who view it ans inequitable, untrustworthy, and flawed. By implementing necessary changes, such as increasing transparency and promoting fairness, the electoral process can regain the confidence of the people it serves.","111":"The strange formation on Mars known as the \"Face\" is not actually a face. If there was life on Mars, it wo'uld Unot be as large as described in the article \"Uncovering the Mystery of the Face on Mars\" in the first section. It mentions, \"A gigantic head spanning nearly two miles appeared to be gazing back at the camer>as from a part of Mars called Cydonia.\" One more reason why the face is unlikely to be a sign of life on Mars is diDscussed in section twelve. Garvin mentions how the features of this formation resemble #those found on Earth. He tbalks about similar landforms in the western UniteSd States, questioning why there would be the same formations on Mars if they were created by different life forms. Garvin points out, \"It reminds me of the volcanic dome in Idaho,\" highlighting that this landform in Idaho is a volcanic structure shaped like a flat-topped hill, similar in size to the Face on Mars. To conclude, the Face on Mars is probably not evidence of life or aliens as similar features can be found in the western United States, such as the volcanic dome in Idaho, which resembles the Mars formation in Vsiz=e and appearance. Additionally, the statement in the article, \"A gigantic head spanning nearly two miles appeared to be gazing back at the cameras,\" further suggests that any potential life on Mars would not be as large as the stMructure su]ggests.","112":"The technology seems pretty nice for recognizing feelings in art, that's true. But, do we truly embrace it or require it in the =future? The story is interesting to me, but not to everyone. The FAC, in my opinion, isn't very useful because most students wouldn't really be interested, maybe some might, but most won't. The thing looks like something children need in their lives to learn something new. It will encourage them to do great things and try inventing other stuff. I am just writing what I know how to write, it doesn't matter much because I'll fail anyway, but this story wouldn't be very useful because I know our gen^eration, and if we had it in our school, nobody would care. I wouldn't hear anyone say \"let's check out the FAC\" because I know what I'm talking Zabout, I like to tell the truth. The narrative had some interesting information about Uhow it could detectu everything from th8e body (Alto, page 1). So, I'd say it's not really useful.","113":"In the article \"The Excitement of Discovering Venus,\" the writer motivates people to overcome the difficulties that have hindered us from exploring Venus before, and move forw%ard into unknown territory. He mentions various reasons why humans might be interested in exploring a planet with tough and unforgiving conditions, and he provides examples of solutions to the problems that these conditions present. With engaging evidence and inspiring language, he supports his argument that humanity should strive to explore Venus. He supports this argum}ent quite effectively. One piece of evidence that he uses to back up his argument is the similarity between Venus and Earth, which makes it valuable for scientific studiies. In one part, he states: \"Scientists are intrigued by Venus because it might have been very similar to Earth in the past.\" He goes on to explain that studying Venus could offer us valuable insights into our own planet, Earth. The writer uses this evidence as the primary reason why scientists would benefit from exploring Venus's surface. One challenge that the writer faces is the extreme conditions on Venus. However, he presents solutions to this issue later in the article, when he describes how NASA would address the dangerous conditions on the surface and explore Venus safely. In a following section, he mentions: \"A potential solution by NASA to the harsh conditions on Venus involves sending a blimp-like vehicle# to float about 30 miles above the planet's surface.\"t7 By including this solution to the harsh conditions on Venus, the writer aims to convince the reader that exploring Venus would be a worthwhile endeavor for humanity, not only because it holds valuable information that could enhance our u is evidence that aliens exist and that it was made by these aliens. Nonetheless, there is lots of information to refute this. This data can be found in the article, \"Revealing the Face on Mars.\" The article, \"Revealing the Face on Mars,\" mentions, \"Certain people believe that the Face is legitimate proof of life on Mars- proof that NASA would prefer to conceal, according to some people who believe in conspiracies. On the other hand, supporters of the NASA funding wish there was a past civilization on Mars.\" This statement implies that NASA would not bhave any reason to hide proof of alien life, as this would greatly help NASA. If NASA had uncovered evidence of alien life, NASA would have shown it as such.Later on, more images were taken of the shape. Nevertheless, the camera had to \"look through wispy clouds to spot the Face.\" Due to th:is, a few skeptics thought that alien symbols were covered by the haze, which is demonstrated in the statement, \"Possibly, stated skeptics, alien symbols were masked by the haze.\" In response to this, another photo was taken on a clear da.y, proving that the Face was merely a natural land structure. This shape resembles ?some of the strructures on Earth, as depicted by the comment, \"What the image actually indicates is the Martian version of a butte or mesa- structures commonly seen around the Western United States.\" Another comment to support the fact that the Face is similar to formations on Earth is, \"It makes me thpink mostly of the Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho...That's a volcanic dome that takes the shape of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars.\" This suggestbs that the Face could have been created in a similar manner to the Earth structure mentioned in the statement.The absence of evidence to confirm alien life in the images of the formation is also something to take into consideration. A statement by Garvin explains why this is an important Vdetail to c8onsider. \"Typically, you can distinguish things in a digital image 3 times larger than the pixel size...Therefore, if there were any objects in this photographY like planes on the ground or pyramids in the style ofH Egypt or even small huts, youd would be able to identify what Rthey were!\" This demonstrates that since no proof of alien life is visible in the photos, it means that qthere isn't any. In these images, Garvin claims, you could easily distinguish objects and recognize what they are. If this is the case, NASA can easily confirm that this land structure is natural and that there is no proof of alien life.As a result, the Face on Mars is a natural land structure. If it were evidence of alien life, NASA would have presented the data accordingly. NASA would have then pursued the lead that proved the existence of alien loife by attempting to locate this alien life or more proof to confirm tghat alien life existed. NASA would have greatly benefited if the Face had been formed by alien life forms. This structure is also very similar to some land structures found on Earth. If such structures are found naturally on Earth, could they not' also be found naturally on other planets? This land structure on Mars is natural, as similar land structures are found naturally on Earth and NASA discovering proof of alien life would have greatly helped them. If these aspects are accurate, then the Face on Mars is a land structure that occurred naturally, and we, the people of Earth, have yet to discover eviedence that alien life exists in our universe.\"","125":"Over the past years, technology has become more and more advanced. Some of this technology has advanced so much that it can n+ow recognize human facial expressions and determine the emotions they are showing. This technology is known as Facial Action Coding System (FACS) technology, and it allows computers to understand human emotions. This technology can have a positive impact in school classrooms today. FACS can help e^nhance the way students learn in schools, the way teachers teach their students, and most importantly, help teachers identify when a student is feeling confused.One significant* positive effect FACS can have in understanding students' emotional expressions in a classroom is to enhance the way students learn. FACS can scan the facial expressions of students in the classroom and determine if most of the students are puzzled by the lesson being taught by the teacher. FACS could then adjust the lesson in a way that students can grasp it, and the teacher can further explain the lesson based on how FACS interprets it. As mentioned in the text, \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor,\" this demonstrates how FACS can assist teachers in their teaching methods. This could also help teachers clarify the lesson even more for students who may be facing difficulties.Another way FACS can significantly impact schools nationwide is by enriching the way teachers conduct their classes. FACS can analyze numerous expressions on students in a classroom. It can determine whether a student is confused by the lesson or simply uninterested. FACS can identify which students in the classroom are uninterested by analyzing their facial expressions. As mentioned, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" FACS can then obffer the teacher various strategies to make the lesson more engaging so that students can understand it better and in a more enjoyable manner.The final way in which FACS can vastly 2improve the educational enNvironment in schools is by detecting when a student is feeling down or unhappy. FACS can recognize facial expressions on students' faces to determine if they may be experiencing difficulties or feeling low-. As stated, \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication.\" FACS could identify when a student is not feeling well so that teachers can assist those students who may require support, whfether it is emotional assistance or academic aid. FACS could even potentially save lives by reaching out to students who Xmay be contemplating self-harm.In conclusion, the Facial Action Coding SyXstem can be incredibly beneficial to schools worldwide. This technology can help teachers enhance their teaching methods by interpreting students' emotional responses to a particular lesson. It can support teachers in adjusting their lessons so that students are engaged and understand the material. Lastly, it can assist teachers in identifying students who may be facing challenges and provide help to those in need.","126":"In different countries, people seem to like living in suburbs without cars more than in citYies where you can hear the noise of engines everywhere. Articles like \"Life in a German subfurxb without cars\" by Elisabeth Rosenthal, \"Driving- prohibitDed in Paris lbecause of pollution\" by Robert Duffer, and \"Successf'ul car-free day in Bogota\" by Andrew Selsky, and \"The decline of car culture\" by Elisabeth Rosenthal discuss the banning or not yusing of cars. These foreign nations are finding new ways to make a more modern, calm, rsafe, and healthy life for everyone. In Vauban, Germany, residents have stopped using cars, \"they said goodbye to their cars\". \"Parking on streets, driveways, and in home garages is mostly not allowed ian this new6 experimental area on the outski,rts of Freiburg, close to France and Switzerland,\" as mentioned in Source 1#. \"Vauban's roads are entirely without cars- except for the main road, where the tram to downtown Freiburg operates, and a few streets at the community's edge.\" People_ there would sell Ktheir cars, place them in big garages, or where someone who has a car+ buys a parking space. Heidrun Walter, a mother of two, mentioned \"When I had a car I always felt stressed. I am much happier lthis way.\" Due to the high level of pollution in Paris, they have partially stopped cars from being used. \"According to Source 2, on Mondays, drivers with even-numbered number plates were told to leave theLicr cars at home or face a 22-euro fine ($3}1). The same rule applied to those with odd-numbered plates the following day. 4,000 drivers received fines.\" Since Paris prohibited cars, traffic decreased by 60 percent. Diesel fuel was pointed out as the main issue since FrancEe has a preference for it. Paris banned cars to protect the health of its citizens. In Bogota, Colombia, there (was an event that happened once a year. \"It was the third consecutive year that cars were not a|llowed, only buses and taxis were allo&wed on the Car-Free Day in this 7 million inhabitant capital city. The aim was )to encourage other modes of tran3sportation and decrease air pollution. Offenders faced $25 fines,\" as stated in Source 3. Later, two more Colombian cbities joined, Cali and Valledupar. Officials from other countries came to see the evenet. \"These people are bringing about a revolutionary shift, and Tthis is spreading across 7borders,\" said Enrique Riera, the mayor of Asuncion, Paraguay. In the United States, fewer cars are being purchased and driven each year. \"When adjusted for populatio[n growth, the number of miles driven i0n the United States peaked and then decreased steadily, according to an analysis by Doug Short of Advisor Perspectives, an investment research firm,\" as noted in Source 2. Most young drivers are not concerned about which car they drive, it is more about the freedom having a car gives them. The U.S. may need to decide on re#ducing the number of cars.\"","127":"The strange picture of the face on Mars is a' very interesting discovery. Some people believe it resembles %a face and that it must have been made by aliens, but that is not true. In reality, it is called a Martian mesa, which is quite common in Cydonia. However, due to some unusual shadows, many people mistakenly thought it was a face. If it were real, why wouldn't humans go to Mars to confirm it? The reason is that it is not real, and it is only portrayed as real in movies to deceive people. The government w`ould never dis*close such important information because it would cause chaos if people found out there were aliens on a new planet. People might fear an attack or other scary scenarios. On April 5, 1998, the Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia and captured images of the planet. Michael Malin and his team confirmed that there are no alien structures on Mars. This proves that the Face of Mars is not what some claim it to be.","128":"Dear Senator, \n\nThe Electoral College was instituted by our country's founding fathers in the Constitution. Although some argue that it goes against the democratic values of America and increases the likelihood of a disDastrous outcome, the Electoral College still allows American citizens to have some influence in the election. Furthermore, with a completely democratic voting system, there is a risk that the result could be even more catastrophic. The Electoral College serves asI a compromise in voting between citizens and the government, aiming to represent the people as fairly as possible and offering voters a collective opportunity to alter the election's result. \n\nOne rationale behind the effectiveness of the Electoral College is its balanced structure, where neither the public nor the government solely controls the voting process. Democracy is highly respected in America; nevertheless, letting the people have complete authority in voting would be ill-advised. It is crucial for the government to have a mechanism in place that allows citizens to vote but does not grant them absolute freedom. In the event of a disastrous election result due to public voting, the government must have a scapegoat in place. The founding? fathers took this into consideration, which is why the Electoral College remains in effect today. \n\nThe Electoral College does not provide an individual voter with the opportunity to sway an election; rather, it represents the entire American population. No single region or state possesses adequate electoral votes to elect a president, which ensures that candidates pay equal attention to all citizens across America. Additionally, electoral votes vary by state based on population size. While this may appear as unequal representation of states, the purpose of the election is to offer the American population fair representation, not each state an equal vote. \n\nSwing states play a crucial role in allowing the American people to influence the election's outcome. Voters in swing- states carefully consider their candidates as they understand that their vote holds significant weight. This thoughtful and cautious approach to voting is encouraged by the Electoral College, particularly in swing states. The impact of swing states on an election demonstrates that, despite not being entirely democratic, the Electoral College still empowers the people to vote. \n\nThrough the Electoral College, the American population, the government, and its citizens are equally represented, enabling the citizens to influLence the election's result. This system, envisioned by America's founding fathers, forms the bedrock on which our nation proudly stands. The Electoral College should be maintained in its current form as long as it continues to effectively determine the country's next president. As long as the College operates effectively, there should be no cause for concern with its function. \n\nI think that the Elect6oral College, as it exists, is beneficial because it allows for all voices to be heard and considered in the election process.","129":"A car moves along the street by itself. The wheels spin, the motor runs, and everything looks normal. The only thing that is different is that the car is autonomous. It sounds cool, but safmety is a big concern, and safety is really important for cars nowadays. The idea of a car without a driver seems good on paper. It seems like it could work, but after thinking about it more, it is a big jump of faith for humanity. Autonomous cars require responsibility and many people don't have it. The potential negative consequences of driverless vehicles are more than the positive ones due to the chance of malfunctions, cyber attacks, and the absence of human collision avoidance. A driverless car would be mainly controlled by a computer system, and like a computer, this system could have issues. \"The Arrival of Autonomous |Vehicles\" indicates that the computer system would decide the car's route, its velocity, and so on. With the system in charge most of the time, malfunctions could be very dangerous. They could be lethal not only for the people inside the car but also for those around it. Think about a car speeding at one hundred miles per hour due Rto a small computer malfunction. The speed could lead the car to approach a turn too fast. This becomes a problem because then the car can't make the turn and a collision occurs. One might thinHk, \"Well then the human driver can take over in that situationc.\" Yes, according to the article there is that possibility, but it may not function. Humans are naturally lazy and they may exploit the driverless car. Initially, they might stay attentive, but eventually, that attentiveness will decrease. It's human nature. The driverless car doesn't only pose the potential malfunction of the computer system, but it could also trigger a malfunction in the human driver. Cyber terrorism is getting more common as technology progresses. This is a serio2us problem that can be difficult to stop. The car operates via computer systems and all computer systems can be hacked and taken over. The human driver could be blocked from assuming control. Imagine if Angela Merkel is traveling in her driverless car to an important meeting. Everything seems finne, but suddenly the car acts on its own. It turns, accelerates, and drives straight into a wall, killing everyone inside. One of the world's most significant and powerful women died because a malicious hacker exploited her driverless car. Obviously, this scenario is unlikely because the Chancellor of Germany would have the best protection in the world, but the point is that it could happen to anyone. Terrorists are unpredictable and driverless cars could potentially be something they could exploit. autonomous cars enable humans to take over in challenging driving situations.L As the article mentioned, it would alert them to take control at obstacles, traffic jams, and other riszky points during a journey. What if the driver needed to take control in a non-risky situation? They wouldn't react quickly enough. The road may appear safe, but then it isn't. A case of this would be a distracted driver. Many accidents occur each year because of them. Your driverless car could be driving down the road and another car crosses the center line and collides with it. Could a human have avoided that? Could they have swerved to the side to avoid the situation? Those are queries that need to be considered because humans may cause many accidents, but they also have the potential to prevent many accidents that computer systems wouldn't be able to handle. Autonomous cars may seem attractive initially, but after contemplating it more, the appeal diminishes. Human minds are remarkable and they are more capable than a computer system. Malfunctions, cyber terrorism, and the lack of human collision prevention make autonomous vehicles too risky. Bad individuals may exploit good things, and autonomous cars seem like a tool that people would take advantage of. The world may be prepared for driverless cars in the future, but currently, they are not.","130":"Throughout history, society has advanced due to technology. The current technology is viewed as both positive and nega=tive. According to the article \"Driverless Carsu Are on the Horizon\", it is predicted that there wixll be \"groups of driverless cars\". The idea of driverless cars on the roads scares me as an individual. I am of the opinion that there should be no driverless cars on t.he roads or highways because it poses risks not only to my neighborhood but also to the ywhole country. The United States of America should not introduce any more technology that puts others in danger. In the seventh section, it is mentioned, \"The Google car simply alerts the driver when they need to take control\". This point is already alarming for readers. If the driver is not ready to take control, an accident could occur. Additionally, there are many individuals who do not pay attention while driving or are heavy sleepers and may not wake up from alarms or lights. At present, many accidents happen due to lack of attention on the road. While these new cars may seem exciting, they do not guarantee safety. Moreover, there should be no driverless cars on the roads or highways due to the potential dangers they present. First and foremost, my community would suffer greatly from the high number of accidents caused by both the manufacturers and the drivers. In the ninth paragraph, it ips stated, \"If the techn,ology malfunctions and someone gets hurt, who is to blame--the driver or the manufacturer?\" This question could go either way because when a driver purchases a car, they likely understand the risks involved. Simply by buying a regular car, one accepts the risk of driving it. However, if the car malfunctions, the blame lies with the manufacturer as a car exploding is not a normal occurrence. During the Industrial Revolutrion, many workers produced subpar items due to the pressure of meeting high demands. Similarly, with the introduction of driverless cars, there will be a high demand and strict deadlines, leading to rushed production. Another relevant example is from \"The Martian\" where the workers hurried, causing a rocket explosion and delaying the intended assistance. Furthermore, as mentioned in the seventh paragraph, there will be surveillance camerPas to monitor drivers, but in case of a delay, cameras may not be effective. Consequently, the introduction of these cars could result in chaos within our nation. For decades, incidents such as drunk driving, reckless driving, and even cautious driving have led to accidents. While driverless cars may appear exciting, there are several drawbacks to this concept. This innovation may take away the joy of driving a car, even though the primary purpose of cars is transportation; it might be more suitabEle to develop driverless bicycles instead. The potential rmisks associated with increasing technology are alarming to contemplate. Hence, not only is this a daunting concept, but it is also a risky idea that could contribute to the decline of our nation.","131":"Introduction: T}his writing will be about persuading readers that the Face is only a natural land shape. Everything began when the Viking 1 spacecraft of NASA was on Mars taking pictures, while it was capturing images it spotted a shadow of a person's face, in simpler words a huge, massive head. paragraph2: Mars is a planet that anyone can visit not just people, but Martians and other strange beings that we are unaware= of. Truly, it is just a natural land >shape because they gathered all the proof they needed to show that thereR was no hint of an alien. The Cydonia team did all they could to confirm everyone's doubts, but not everyone was content, they still believed that they saw a Martian sign on Mars. Paragraph3: Personally, if I were a scientist at NASA discussing the Face with someone, I would probably get closer to take better pictures to prove my innocence and clear any suspicions so there wouldn't have to be a big dispute. They did a smart thing by maggnifying the picture th}ree times afnd all the other items in the picture, they saw them clearly so they had to clearly see that there was no alien in the picture.","132":"The planet Venus seems to be quite a dangerous place, as mentioned in the article. It discusses Venus, a planet that has not been fully explored yet. In paragraph 3, the writer outlines some of the diffOiculties.c Firstly, \"The dense atmosphere containing almost 97 percent carbon dioxide envelops Venus\" (paragraph 3). This suggests that the atmosphere around Venus is extremely thick, almost like a cozy blanket covering it, making it challengiIng for spacecraft. This thickness could cause the spacecraft to explode, as the^ atmosphere hacts as a shield for Venus. That is why most spacecraft that have attempted to land on Venus have failed, with none successfully landing for three decades. The article also touches upon the extreme temperatures on Venus; as mentioned in paragraph 3, line 4, \"Temperatures on the planet's surface can soar above 800 degrees Fahrenheit.\" Just the thought of what would happen to a person or object landing [on Venus at such high temperatures is terrifying - everything would most likely burn up. Despite being similar to the sun, Venus is often described as a large star. \"It is worth noting that Venus boasts the highest surface temperature among all the planets in our solar system, despite Mercury beingc the closest to the sun\" (Paragraph 3, line 9). This highlights how scorching hot Venus is compared to Mercury, which is the nearest planet to the sun.","133":"Why do we really need self-driving cars? Some think that by using self-driving cars, we can save more fuel than a normal taxi.c However, I personally disagree with the idea of having self-driving cars. I believe that if we rely too much on technology, we will become lazier and less responsible for our actions. Self-driving cars are not completely autonomous. Despite all the fancy technology and8 hard work put into them, these cars are very expensive. As mentioned in paragraph 2, \"Google cars are not completely autonomous; they still require the driver to take control when maneuvering in tricky situations, like passing through construction zones or handling accidents.\"5 This shows that self-driving cars are not as independent as they claim to be. \nThe main purpose of a self-driving car is to eliminate the need for human intervention while driving. Yet, as stated in paragraph 7, \"None of the current self-driving cars are fully autonomous. They can steer, accelerate, and brake on their own, but they still rely on the driver to take over in challenging road conditions.\" So, what is the point of investing in self-driving cars if they cannot function independently? As noted in paragraph 7, \"These cars can only operate at speeds up to 25 mph, and sensors ensure that the driver maintains control of the vehic9le.\" This indicates that there must be a driver present to ensure safe operation in ncertain areas, like construction zones. \nFurthermore, if a self-driving car can only travel at 25 mph on the highway where the speeWd limit is 65 mph, then what is the use of such a car for commuters? As highlighted in paragraph 9, \"In the event of a technology failure leading to an accident, who should be held accountable - the driver or the manufacturer?\" If the goal is to have fully autonomous cars, then the responsibility should lie with the manufacturer in case of any malfunctions causing harm. \nThe implemOentation of smart-road systems for self-driving cars proved to be effective but required costly upgrades to exi%sting infrastructure, which may not be feasible. This demonstrates that the production of self-driving cars iut Venus has expanded my knowledge abozut earth, the sun, and other planets near Venus. Our exploration on earth and beyond should not be restricted by dangers and doubts, but should be extended to explore the boundaries of imagination. Furthermore, it is important to never stop dreaming and believing in oneself, as anything is possible with determination.","136":"I believe that the electoral college should be kept because it was established by the founding fathers in the Constitution as a way to compromise between the President being elected by Congress or by a popular vote. The process of the Electoral Collage involves selecting the electors. According to the 23rd Amendment, the District of Columbia is given 3 electors. Every candidate in y>our statNe has their own electors. Most states use a \"winner-takes-all\" system that gives all the electors to the winning candidate. Following the presidential election, the governor creates a \"CertificatUe of Ascertainment\" that lists all the candidates and their electors. These certificates are then sent to Congress and the National Archives as official records of the election. The Electoral Collage helps ;to balance the power between big and small states due to the Senate's mal-apportionment outlined in the Constitution. It also prevents issueFs where no candidate wins the majority of votes.","137":"The use of Facial Expression Coding Systems can be very helpful. There are multiple reasons for this. Initially, there are various areas it can be applied in. Secondly, it could assist students in receiving a better education. The last reason is that it could enhance advertisements' relevance. Nonmetheless, there are also disadvantages to utilizing a computer program to interpret people's feelings. Numerous industries would gain from this program. As per the article, artists need to be able to identify the facial expressions of individuals they are portraying or sketching. These expressions are crucial to conveying the accurate emotions, so evidently, the art industry could profit from the use of Facial Expression Coding Systems. Another industry where this program could be utilized is politics. The article discusses how the software is capable of differentiating between a counterfeit smile and a genuine smile. This could be valuable when examining political figures and celebrities alike. A potential drawback to this is cost efficiency. The query of whether the cost is truly worthwhile when there are already individuals in the world who can perform the same task. Another beneficial aspect of the Facial Expression Coding System is its application in schools. In the article, Dr. Huang, one of the creators of the system, mentions that \"A classroom computer could detect when a student is getting puzzled or uninterested. Then it could adjust the lesson, like a good human teacher.\" This could be the most beneficial aspect of the software, as not everyone studies in the same manner. If your computer could realize when you were becoming bored or perplexed and then rectify the issue, learning would become much simpler for many individuals. It would also enable students to progre*ss at their own pace as everyone does not function at the same speed. A downside to this software is the loss of employment opportunities for teachers as well as the dependency on technology. The final aspect is that it could render advertisements more pertinent. The article states that if you grin when anc online ad pops up on your screen, another similar ad may follow. However, if you scowl, the subsequent ad will vary. This is advantageous both for the consumer and the corporation. We all understand that when an irritating ad emerges, it typicalling so, the author effectively argues for the significance of studying the enigmatic planet.","167":"Some people think that the formation on Mars looks like a face, but theyB need to understand the truth. The face is actually just shadows on the surface. According to scientists at NASA, the formation resembles a butte or mesa, common landforms in the American West.} Back in 1998, NASA took photos that revealed the natural origin of the face, and in 2001, using the camera's b%est resolution, they confirmed this fact. Some individual$s may argue that NASA is covering up the existence of aliens on Mars, but th[ey fail to see that NASA would be thrilled to discover alien life and would benefit from it. Overall, NASA has sufficient evidenAce to support the idea that the face is s&imply a natural landform.\n\nInitially, NASA found that the face resembles buttes or mesas commonly seen in the American West. As stated in the article, \"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho,\" says Garvin. This indicates that NASA's chief scientist for the Mars Explorgation Program recognizes the resemblance to a butte or mesa. Therefore, if a leading scientist acknowledges it as a landform, we should have no trouble understnanding its true nature.\n\nFurthermore, in 1998, NASA captured clearer images revealing the face as a natural landform. By comparing pictures of the same area, NASA concluded that the face was not constructed by aliens but was simply a product of nature. According to the text, \"Mi\"chael Malin and his{ Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped a picture ten times shaarper than the original Viking photo.\" This illustrates that the 1998 photo was much clearer and that the face on Mars was a result of shadows. The improvement in camera technology further confirms that the face is indeed a natural laandform.\n\nLastly, some critics argued that the 1998 photo did not fully capture the landform due to cloudy conditions. Therefore, in 2001, during clear weather, Malin's team took a new picture. The text explains, \"Malin's team captured an exceptional photo using the camera's highest resolution.\" This action demGonstrated the team's commitment to capturing the best possibleX image, once again affirming \/that the face is a landform. With the evidence from th(e high-resolution camera, it becomesN evident that the face is a natural feature.\n\nOn the contrary, there are clMaims that NASA is concealing evidence of alien life on Mars. However, these claims lack any substantial evidence. Given NASA's financial constraints, they would welcome additional funding for discovering alien life, making the cover-up unlikely. Conspiracy theorists also lack eNvidence to support their assertions. NASA's numerous high-quality photos clearly show that the face is a landform resembling a butte or mesa, common in the American West. With all the evidence pointing in one direction, conspiracy theorists have no basis to support theiyr unfounded claims.\n\nIn conclusion, the evidence strongluy indicates xthat the face is simply a natural landform. Resembling a butte or mesa, NASA's high-quality images confirm its geological origin. Despite differing opinions, the face will continue to appear unchanged for years to come.","168":"When we talk about cars, they bring us ae lot of good things. Nevert~heless, limiting the u\\se of cars seems to have more benefits than we initially thought: it can help the environment, make commuting easier, and reduce traffic jams. To start with, it seems that reducing car usage is an effective way to protect thae environment. For example, in an article by Elisabeth Rosenthal about a small town -in Germany calbled Vauban, it is menthioned that this town has almost completely stopped *using cars. It is highlighted that cars are a big problem whesn it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, as they account for 12% of such emissions in EuropeF. This information shows us the negativXe iqmpact cars have on the environment. However, by using cars less and finding other ways {to travel, like thej residents of Vauban did, we can potentially decrease the amount of greenhouse gases released by cars. Similarly, Paris has taken similar actions to reduce pollution. In an artiJcle by Robert Duffer, ity is explainedF how Paris implemented driving restrictions based on license plate n9umbers to combat smog. This measure was t aken| after a period of intense smog thatH was comparable to the pollution levels in Beijing. Thanks to these restrictions, Paris was abl\\e to reduce air poll%ution. Thus, limiting car use can be beneficial in protecting the envir(onment.\n\nMoreover, the decrease in car usage has made t6ransportation more convenient. For instance, in Elisabeth Rosenthal's article, it is mentioned that communities where cars are used less are becoming more compact and accessible to public transportation. This means that people have easier access to stores and services without the need to drive long distances. Additionally, some people have! found alternative ways to travel, such as biking or walking, as highlighted in \"The End of Car Culture\" article. This shift towards more sustainable transportation options indicates that the decline in car usage has made traveling easier and more affordable.\n\nLastly, reducing the frequency of car use has resulted in less traffic congestion. In an article by Andrew Selsky, it is discussed how a car-free day in Bogota led to empty streets and a smooth flow of alternative modes of transportation. Bill Ford, the executive chairman of Ford Motor Company, also emphasized the importance of reducing carl dependency to improve safety and save time. This suggests that with fewer cars on the road, trZaffic congestio$n can be reduced significantly, leading to safer and faster commutes for everyone. Therefore, opting for alternative transportation methods can contribute to alleviating traffic congestion in urban areas.\n\nIn conclusion, while cars offer various advantages, limiting their use can have even more benefits, including environmental protec^tion, easier transportation, and reduced traffic congestion.","169":"Since the early 1900's cars have played a big role in our lives. It seems like almost everyone owns one nowadays. However, the excessive use of cars is starting to have a negative i9mpact on our environment and is leading to huge traffic jams that bring cities to a stop. As a society, we need to begin reducing our reliance on cars in order to help protect our environment and ease the traffic congestion that disrupts the smooth flow of city life.\n\nCars have always been seen as one of mankind's greatest inventions, so it's understandable why people find it difficult to let go of something so practical. Nevertheless, we must realize that despite their usefulness, cars also have detrimental effects, whether intenTtional or not. Cars have always been harmful to the environment, and this is even more true today than ever before. As stated in the article \"Life Goes On Without Cars in German Suburb,\" passenger cars account for 12% of greenhouse gas emissions and up to 50% in certain car-centric areas in the United States. This demonstrates that we, as a society, are one of the primary reasons why our environment is deteriorating. These greenhouse gas emissions and the significant pollution caused by cars are damaging the environment, whether we acknowledge it or not. Everyone needs to take a moment to look at these statistics and understand the negative impact they are having on the environment, realizing that by simply reducing car usage, we can help preserve our environment.\n\nAnother instance of the detrimental effects of .cars on the environment is detailed in the aprticle \"Paris bans driving due to smog.\" The 'article discusses how Paris had to impose a driving restriction due to the high levels of pollution caused by cars. The fact that such a measure had to be enforced to combat pollution is truly absurd. This alone should serve as a wake-up call to those who deny the adverse effects of their car usage on the environment and emphasize the necessity of cutting down on car dependency. By decreasing our reliance on cars, we can all contribute to environmental conservation. Who wouldNn't want to be a part of that?\n\nCars have always been considered the most convenient mode of transportation. People believe that their cars can always get them to their destination the fastest. However, what most fail to consider is the gridlock that car usage can create in cities. If people simply reduce their reliance on cars and explore alternative forms of transportation, they may discover that they can reach their destinations more efficiently. An illustration of this can be found in the article \"Car-free day is becoming a popular trend in Bogota.\" The article highlights how the prohibition of cars for a day resulted in the disappearance of the massive traffic congestion6 in the city. This enabled cyclists and bus riders to navigate the city more swiftly than they could with their cars. By opting for alternative modes of transportation instead of cars, individuals were able to reach their destinations in a timely manner due to the reduction in traffic congestion.\n\nThe number of cars on the roads each day has skyrocketed over the years. While cars may be effective, they also have numerous harmful consequences, particularly their impact on the environment and their contribution to traffic congestion. As a society, it is imperative that we acknowledge that by decreasing our dependence on cars, we can positively influence the environment and alleviate the prevalence of traffic jams.","170":"A world where cars can drive themselves seems like somethiWng far off in the future; the idea of being able to go wherever you wanht without having to drive or have a driver seems like something from a science fiction movie. However, with recent progress in the area of driverless vehicles, this dream could become a reality sooner than we think. Thanks to initiatives like the Google Car project and BMW's \"Traffic Jam Assistant,\" the era of driverless cars might be closer than we realize. I personally think that we should continue to invest in the development and study of fully automatic transportation, based on details from \"Driverless Cars Are Coming:\" the invention of driverless cars, the safety issues and solutions, and the possibilities for enhancing the driving experience. \n\nCompletely automated cars still seem like something out of science fiction, but with advancements in technology, the concept of driverless cars is not as far-fetched as it once was. While creating a driverless car is not _as simple as it seems, there have been significant strides made in this field. For instance, Google has adapted a Toyota Prius to function without a driver, equipped with various sensors, including a rotating radar on the roof, enabling it to imitate human driving skills. These improvements have truly transformed the realm of driverless veehicles; with projects like the Google Car, owning a driverless car is a possibility today. Nonetheless, there is still room for enhancement, particularly in terms of safety and the driving experience, which is why the development of such vehicles must continue.\n\nThe issue of automobile safety remains crucial, even in the context of driverless cars. In scenarios wher6e a driverless car is unable to navigate the situation effectively, accidents and damage could occur. Nevertheless, developers of driverless cars are actively addressing this concern and have proposed potential solutions. For example, BMW has unveiled a car that can self-drive at speeds up to 25 mph. They also mandate that the driver remains attentive to the steering wheel and will send alerts if intervention becomes necessary. HThis setup allows for the driver to handle work zones or maneuver around accidents, thus enhancing the safety of the driverless car. Through va_rious warning systems, the car can communicate effectively with the driver, ensuring they are aware of any critical situations. With further development, these cars can become even more adept at handling uncertainti%es and notifying drivers promptly, ultimately Uenhancing safety for all occupants.\n\nThe advent of driverless cars brings new possibilities for the driving experience. Driving a driverless car opens up fresh avenues for interpretinXg the enjoyment of driving. This particularly holds true for the selection of in-car entertainment options available. With cars capable of notifying the driver to take control as needed, drivers can unwind and utilize in-car entertainment and information systems without compromising safety. These additions not only enrich the driving experience but also expand the range of activities that drivers and passengers can engage in, all while prioritizing safetym. As advancements continue to be made, the driving experience stands to evolve, making it a more enjoyable and safe endeavor for all - a time to unwind or indulge in fun activities while ensuring the well-being of all on board.\n\nGiven the numerous advancements in the realm of driverless cars, a world dominated by autonomous vehicles appears increasingly likely. The advent of driverless cars, safety solutions, and an enriched driving experience collectively illustrate that with ongoing development and research, fully autonomous cars could become a reality. In my view, the progress towards perfecting and implementing driverless cars shouldE persist, ultimately leading to an enhanced driving ex6perience for everyone.","171":"\"The writer's support for the idea of exploring Venus is not widely known, we can only guess whether they are in favor or not as they never fully clarify. The writer presents some advantages and disadvantages of exploring the planet but does not lean towards one side more than the other. I believe that the author is against the exploration of Venus. The writer's list of pros an7d cons counteract each other because they mention a benefit ofV exploring Venus but then immediately counter it with a con to balance it. For example, in paragraph 5, the writer mentions that floating above Venus would be tough but possible for humans. However, shortly after, in the first sentence of paragraph 6, the writer disputes the idea of it being feasible for humans by stating,m \"However, observing Venus from a spacecraft orbiting or floating safely far above the planet can offer only limited information on surface conditions due to the dense atmosphere hindering most forms of light, makYing traditional photography and vide=ography ineffective.\" This suggests that the author does not see much value in human exploration, but we can only guess as the author does not clearly state a position. Another indication that the author is against it can be fPound in paragraph 3 when the writer truthfully describes the planet. The author highplights Venus's thick fatmosphere consisting of nearly 97% carbon dioxide and surface temperatures reaching over 800 degrees Fahrenheit on average. The way the author portrays Venus does not convey a positive sentimenCt, emphasizing i7ts dangers such as \"erupting volcanoes, intense earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes\" hindering probes attempting to land. By illustrating the hazardous conditions and obstacles on Venus, the author implies that human exploration is not worth the risks involved. Furthermore, another hint that the writer does not support exploring Venus is evident in paragraph 2, where it is mentioned, \"Every previous mission has been unmanned, and for a good reason, as no spacecraft survived longer than a couple of hours after landing.\" This statement strongly suggests the author's disapproval of using manned spacecraft for exploration. However, once again, we can only speculate as the writer did not explicitly express a personal opinion. In conclusion, I am of the view that the author opposes the exploration of Venus and does not deem studying the planet as a worthwhile endeavor despite the dangers it poses. The pros and cons presented offset each other, indicating that the risks from the planet's extreme heat, severe weather conditions, and surface challenges outweigh the benefits. Overall, the author's standpoint reveals a lack of support for Venus exploration.\"","172":"Automobiles have really become a must-have in our society to keep everything running smoothly. It's sad to say that cars can create some irreversible harm to the environment, which is a main point for those who favor driverless cars. The development of these vehicles undeniably requires a lot of money, as well as other problems. While the growth of driverless cars promises a bright future for the car industry, there are numerous concerns against this type of transportation, such as safety rules, the potential impact on current driviHng laws, and how to manage accidents and legal actions, so driverless cars may not be the best thing to keep investing in. The primary worry revolves around the safety of these vehicles. Despite companies like Google taking precautions and rigorously checking the cars, there sti0ll remains an element of doubt. Unlike regular cars, where the driver is responsible for staying alert on the road, driverless cars claim to possess sensors that can detect any unusual movements, such as Google's Toyota Prius, equipped with a LIDAR system, a sensor that utilizes laser beams to create a 3-D map of the car's surroundings. This is just one of many sensors, each with a specific role crucial for the car'sD operation. One issue that arises with these sensors is their reliability. Technology frequently malfunctions, like a phone or TV, and there are professionals hired to address these problems. However, with driverless cars, in case of an accident or breakdown for unknown reasons (because this technology is quite new), will there be immediate assistance available? Due to the limited reliability of this technology, there are numerous safety concerns that could push potential buyers away. Rolling out these cars to the general public will take a considerable amount of time. There will certainly be government officials who will resist this new technology due to the extensive changes it will bring to driving laws. The current laws are based on situations involving human drivers, which are deemed the safest form of driving. Some states still oppose even conducting tests on these cars. Even if the remaining states follow those that have already permitted driverless car trials, there will be numerous legal alterations. Given that safety is paramount, the laws will need to focus on a backup plan from manufacturers in case of car malfunctions not caused by the person behind the wheel. Introducing this new technology will blur the lines in lawsuits. UDetermining who is at fault in an accident will become increasingly complex. It will involve analyzing every instance the driver assumed control of the vehicle, as well as considering if the other vehicles were autonomous or nott (which will also need to be assessed). This will only compjlicate every legal case unnecessarily. If a situation arises where the manufacturer is to blame, their ncredibility and the car's reliability will suffer. New regulations will have to be established for any conceivable scenario, on top of the existing laws for traditional cars. Dealing with driverless cars will become more time-consuming, instead of simplifying lives. Despite claims that driverless cars enhance safety and convenience, there are still Vnumerous challenges to address, such as safety regulations, the potential impact on current driving laws, and managing accidents and legal proceedings. This sector of the industry will require significant investment and could end up being a failure. Many individuals today prefer being in control of their surroundings, and driverless cars threaten to take that away.\n\nGrade: B-","173":"\"Every living creature on planet Earth experiences feelings. These feelings have been utilized since the start of history to convey the emotions of those around you. However, these emotions can be tricky to interpret. Someone might claim to be cheerfu=l, when in reality they are upset or mad. This is where the Facial Expression Trac%king System comes into the picture. The FETS is a program that recognizes human emotions by following muscles in the face. For instance, when you feel happy, muscles in your face move upwards, and when you feel sad, theyZ move downwards, FETS tracks this and computes your emotions. The inventors of this program, Professor Thompson Huang and Professor Nico Sebe, are the top experts i\\n creating improved methods for humans and computers to communicate. There are still unc%ertainties about the utility of FETS, like what could this program be utilized for? One way FETS might be applied is in schools. It might s%ound far-fetched, but in reality, FETS could be the greatest enhancemenzt to schools because of its adaptable learning and the bcapability to understand the students. In the educational realm, teachers are the foundation of the system. Minus teachers, the whole 9system would fall apart. Nonetheless, it might be challenging for one teacher to connect with each student individually and guarantee they are learning correctly or paying attention. This is where FETS plays a role. In the article \"Helping Mona Lisa Grin\", Doctor Huang discusses FETS in classrooms more in detail, \"'A classroom computer could identify when a student is getting puzzled or uninterested,' Dr. Huang forecasts. 'Then it could adjust the lesson, like an efficient human trainer.'\" With FETS, each child could essentially have a tailored lesson plan exactly for their requirements. This would make children more keen to learn because they begin to relish it. Aside from the classroom, FETS could also be utilized in other areas of the school. One of the other crucial areas this could be employed is in counseling. It is very challenging for anyone to notice if someone is unhappy. This is particularly true when they barely know the person they are conversing with. This can be the situation for school counselors and the children they are meeting. ~FETS could potentially be of assistance. With FETS, the school could discern if children are worried or frightened. The school could also determine how frequently these children feel this way. When a child is discontented or scared, it is very improbable that they will be performing their work to their full capability. If FETS could identify these children that require help, they could be supported more quickly. This coul,d also be utilized to uncover children being teased. If the child feels frightened around another student, or is afraid of a classroom, they could be supported because FETS was able to interpret them. FETS might even be able to detect if a child is afraid of departing from school. With FETS, it's like every child in school has someone watching over them, even if nobody else is. It might be accurate that some children mig-ht not desire people to be aware of this, that they might prefer to conceal it. However, it is never healthy to conceal such intense emotions, especially if there are individuals around you ready to assist. With the ongoing evolution of the way we learn, it's not unexpected that something like FETS was conceived. Emotions have been present in everything alive since the beginning of time. Before FETS, it was surprisingly tough to read these emotions in individuals. Such a vital aspect of our daily lives could be effortlessly tucked away behind a false grin or a theatrical tear. But now that there is FETS aiding us, appearances are no longer misleading.\"","174":"Dear Governor,\n\nI think it's important to kFeep the Electoral College because it offers a more effective way of choosing the president. While there are some drawbacks to the Electoral College, there are also many advantages. In the text \"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised meth;odd of choosing the President\"., it presents several reasons why the Electoral College is beneficial in selecting our president. Firstly, it ensures a certain outcome as they Electoral College often gives more votes than the popular9 vote due to the winner-takes-all system in most states. Secondly, winning the presidency requires nationwide support rather than just winning over one region, which prevents candidates with only Eregibonal appeaal from becomingv president.\n\nAdditionally, the concept of swing states &plays a crucial role as these states are not strongly affiliated with a single party, making the voters there more attentive and influential 4in deciding the election. Furthermore, the Electoral College provides balance by giving larger states more weight in the election process, ensuring they receive more attention from acandidates. Lastly, the Electoral College hCelps avoid runoff elections by eliminatOing the need for a candidate to secure a majority vote, which can complicate the election process.\n\nWhile some argue that the Electoral College can discourage potential voters whoI feel their vote won't impact the outcome, I believe it ultimately benefits the election process. It provides a fair and efficient way of determining the president, and I support retaining the Electoral College sys4tem.\n\nWarm }regards,\nYOUR_NAME\"","175":"The writer has many facts, burt I think he should include his owOn thoughts so people can understand his opinions. I find Venus interesting, but I didn't realize it was so near to Earth. I also believe that some people don't eMnjoy learning facts because they prefer not to know all the information. This might happen in the year 2040 or later, and if I were alive then, I wouldn't go because it would cost a lot of money to travel to another p4lanet, and I would miss Earth. The writer did mention this idea, but I think he could share more of his own thoughts. I am unsure if living on Venus would be possible because how would you access food, water, or have fun with pets there? People would likely become lazy and overweight because they wouldn't go outside to play, and communication would be a challenge. If the spacecraft was unmanned for a valid reason, then I doubt this plan will come to fruition anytime soon.","176":"\"Analyzing the information provided in the article \"Bringing a Smile to Mona Lisa's Face,\" this technological advancement appears quite unnecessary and~ could potentially have negative consequences despite the good intentions behind it. According to the article, the only advantage of this technology is that computers can recognize your emotions, but the question to consider is; do we really want them to? Furthermore, there is no mention of the cost of implementing such technology or its feasibility in a school environment. Additionally, why should a computer take over another aspect of a teacher's role in human interaction and communication. The idea of technology being able to interpret emotions in the classroom seems excessively absurd in terms of utility, cost, and personal relationships. Despite the seemingly harmless nature of this concept, the potential drawbacks could quickly become evident. As Nick D'Alto mentions, \"Picture ?a computer that canr identify when you're feeling happy or sad.\" The author discusses how this technology can improve advertisement placement based on your facial expressions, yet it is already known that social media platforms, such as Facebook, tailor ads according to thew content you engage with. Is it really necessary for a program to constantly analyze our facial expressions to determine our preferences? This grants computers significant power by constantly monitoring our precise emotions on various matters. The question then arises as to whether it is appropriate to continuously scan the faces of children while they are in a learning environment. Would there be sufficient security measures or parental consent required to permit this ongoing intrusion of privacy in the name of education? Numerous ethical dilemmas and uncertainties regarding the future implications arise, making it unsuitable to subject children to such risks to their safety and privacy. If this technology were to be employed in classrooms, the next concern would undoubtedly be the financial implications of implementing such a novel computerized system. All devices would need to incorporate facial recognition technology, and although the article does not address the cost, one can speculate that such innovation comes at a significant price. Is it reasonable to assume that educational institutions will allocate considerable amounts of taxpayer funds solely to invade the privacy of students in order to gauge their engagement? It appears more financially prudent to retain the roles of millions of teachers and allow them to establish connections with their students, rather than resorting to facial scanning. Teachers play a vital role in the classroom, not only in imparting knowledge but also in forming those meaningful bonds that enable them to tailor their teaching methods to suit each individual student. Every student is unique, learns differently, and responds distinctively to various classroom stimuli. While the article suggests that a computer can detect boredom in a student, temachers already possess that ability without incurring costs or intruding on privacy. Teachers are present in the classroom to forge those personal conneGctions with each student and ensure that they are providing the best possible education. If a computer identifies boredom, it may simply shift to another lesson without truly understanding what is best for the student. Therefore, one must question the practicality of integrating such technology in an educational setting. To conclude, the notion of facial recognition technology to interpret emotions raises numerous ethical concerns, financialC challenges, and lacks the personal touch necessary for educational success. While this innovation is remarkable, the classroom environment is certainly not the appropriate context for its implementation.\"","177":"As an 11 year old student, I believe that joining the sea-faWring cow8boys can be a thrilling adventure! It's exciting and you get to assist Dpeople in gathering supplies and building shelters. By :helping other countries, we show that1 we care and won't let them down. It's important to suppUort each other, especially during times of war. Our country values freedom of speech and the ability to spea\\k and act truthfully. While we may not be the w]ealthiest nation due to the government, we can improve by in+Jcreasing certain costs. Overall, it's a great oppEortunity to be part of such a helpful and caring community.","178":"Residents in Vauban, Germany have made a big decision; they have chosen to give up their cars. The tstreets are now completely free of cars. It is still possible to own a car, however, the issue is that there are only two spots for parking: big garages at th e border $of the development and where a car-owner purchasesc a garage with a home. Cars in France were supposedly responsible for a significant amount of pollution in Paris. Diesel fuel was pointed at as the culprit. In section 16 it is stated, \"Diesel fuel accounts for 67% of vehicles in France, in contrast to the 53.3% average in the rest of Western Europe.\" In Bogota, Colombia, only buses and taxis were allowed to operate for a day, withF no cars on the roads. The aim for the capital city was to encourage different forms of transportation and decrease smog levels. In section 28 it is mentioned that \"Parks and sports centers hav_e flourished all over the city; uneven, damaged sidewalks have been swapped with wide, ev;en sidewalks; limitat;ions during rush hour have significantly reduced traffic; and nKew dining pl9aces and high-end shopp6ing areas have emerged.\" Studies have indicated that individuals in the United States are purchasing fewer cars, driving less, and acquiring fewer licenses each year. In secti?on 32 it is noted Ithat \"By April 2013, the distance driven Wper individual was almost 9% lower than the highest point and equivalent to the situation in January 1995.\" In section 43 it is highlighted that \"Bill Ford presented a business strategy for a world where owning a personal vehicle is not feasible or preferable. He suggested collaborating with the telecommunications sectoir to establish cities where~ pedestrian, bicycle, private cars, commercial and public transportation traffic are interconnected to save time, preserve resources, decrease emissions, and enhance safety.\"","179":"\"The writer explains Venus quite wAell. He talks about the planet's atmosphere aDnd temperatures, mentioning how landinjg there would be very challenging due to the extreme heat. I've seen pictures of Venus, and the surface looks very volcanic, making it hard to see clearly because of the thick atmosrphere. Venus can get extremely hot during the day and very cold at night. It's cool to gaze at the stars and planets from Earth at night. I've observed Venus a few times, and indeed, it shines very brightly. The author points out that the planet's atmosphere contains sulfuric acid, which makes it impossible for us to land there. A probe was sent to Venus, but it only lasted a short time. The author did a good job researching Venus, and] it's a good idea to continue exploring it.\"","180":"As a 12-year-old student, the Facial Action Coding System could be really useful in a classroom. The creators of this system claim that it can be tricky to understand someone's facial expressions and emotions, bnut this system can make it easier. Having this in s.chools would be great because teachers could predict how students might react to the tasks given. If teachers can figure out what activities students enjoy and excel in, they are likely to engage more in those ta?sks. This could benefit students by allVowing them to do more of the tasks they like. However, there is a possibility that this system amay not work as effectively as expected. For instance, if a student is not interested in doing any work, their facial expressions may give that away. This could be problematic as teachers may struggle to understand students' preferences and reactions to the given tasks. Moreover, if schools invest in this system and it turns out to be ineffective, it would result in a waste of money. Therefore, while the Facial Action Coding System has the potential to be helpful, there is also a chance that, it may not be as beneficial in ^r,eality.","181":"The Electoral College, which was cre:ated by the F+ounding Father*s in the Constitution, was supposed to be a compromise between Congress choosing the President and a popular vote by citizens. Howevrer, there are numerous flaws within the ElectoPral College that have been over#looked. In my opinion, elections should switch to a popular vote system and abandon the Eylectoral College. One major reason for this is that it can lead to negative outcomes. An exYample of# this is when electors may go against the people's choice, as shown in an incident from 19;60 Zwhere legislators in Louisiana tried to replace electors who supported John F. Kennedy. This could result in an undesired candidate becoming president. Additionally, there is the risBk of a state sending two sets of electors, as Hawaii did in 1960. Although this was rectified by Vice President Richard Nixon, it may not always be resolved without causing issues in the future. For these reasons, it is crucial to move towards a popular vote system to avoid such problems.\n\nThe Electoral College does not benefit the citizens of the UniteKd States and can lead to unfair situations, such as the winner-Ltake-all approach which means candidates only focus on swing states. This was evident in the 2000 campaign where voters in certain states did not see any candidates, and some media markets did not receivJe campawign ads. This prevents a fair election process as not all states are given equal attention. Moreover, there is the possibility of an electoral vote tie, which would then be decided by the House of Representatives, potentially leading to an unfair outcome. These issues highlight the need fo|r a shift towards popular vote to ensure fairness in elect ions.\n\nIn conclusion, the Electoral College should 0be replaced by a popular vote system to avoid negative consequenwces and ensure fairness in elections. It is time for the United States to take steps towards a more equitable and prosperous future.","182":"A car going on the street. The wheels are spinning, the engine is working, and everything looks okay. The only thing different is that the car is driving itself. It might seem cool, but safety is a concern and safety is very crucial for a car nowadays. The idea of a driverless car seems promising. It appears like it could function, but after thinking about it more, it's a huge leap of faith for humanity. The driverless car requires responsibility, and many people in the world lack it. The drawbacks of driverless cars are more than the positives due to the chance of malfunctions, cyber terrorism, and the absence of human crash prevention. A driverless car would mostly be controlled by a computer system, and like a computer, this system could h{ave malfunctions. \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" shows that the computer system w3ould decide the car's destination, its speed, etc. Since the system is in charge most of theq time, malfunctions could be dangerous. They could be deadly not just to the people in the car but also to those around them. Think about a car speeding at one hundred miles per hour due to a small computer malfunction. The speed could lead the car to approach a turn too quickly. This creates an issue because now the car can't make the turn, and a crash occurs. You might think, \"Well then the human driver can take control in this situation.\" Yes, as stated in( the article, that's an option, but it might not work. Humans are naturally lazy and will exploit the driverless car. Initially, they may stay attentive, but eventually, that attentiveness will decrease. It's human nature. The driverless car doesn't just introduce the potential malfunction of the computer system; it might also lead to a malfunction in the human driver. Cyber terrorism is getting more common as technology progresses. This is a serious problem that can be hard to prevent. The car is operated by computer systems, and all computer systems can be hacked and taken over. The human driver could be hindered from taking charge. Imagine if Angela Merkel is traveling in her driverless car to an important meeting. Everything seems normal, but suddenly the car goes rogue. It turns around, accelerates, and drives straight into a building, killing everyone inside. One of the world's most powerful women `died because a malicious hacker exploited her driverless car. Obviously, tEhis scenario is unlikely because the Chancellor of Germany would have top-notch security, but the point is t4hat it could happen to anyone. Terrorists are unpredictable, and driverless cars could be something they might exploit. Driverless cars allow humans to intervene in challenging driving situations. As mentioned in the article, it would alert them to take control at roadblocks, traffic jams, and other risky points during a journey. But what if the driver needed to take control in a non-risky situation? They might not react quickly enough. The road may appear safe, but then suddenly it's not. For instance, a driver under the influence. Numerous accidents happen each year because of them. Your driverless car could be moving along, and another vehicle crosses the center line and hits the driverless car. Could a human have prevented that? Could they have swerved onto the shoulder to avoid the situation? Those are questions to considYer because humans cause many accidents, but they can also prevent many accidents that computer systems wouldn't be able to handle. Driverless cars may seem attractive initially, but after some reflection, the appeal diminishes. Human minds are incredible and more capable than a computer system. Malfunctions, cyber terrorism, and the lack of human intervention in crashes make driverless cars too risky. Bad individuals can exploit good things, and driverless cars seem like a tool that people would exploit. The world might be prepared for driverless cars in the future, but currently, they are not.","183":"\"The Importance of Exploring Venus,\" is an article that discusses the reasons why Earth should consider sending missions to Venus. The writer elabora.tes on the significance of studying Venus despite the risks it poses. The writer effectively advocates for exploring Venus by highlighting human curiosity, the types of technology that could be used, and the motivations behind wanting to explore Venus.\n\nTo begin with, the author emphasizes the role of human curiosity in driving exploration. The article concludes by underlining the impact of human curiosity on shaping our world today (paragraph 8). This underscores the importance of curiosity in sparking innovation and discovery, such as in the case of the moon landing, and pBotentially exploring other planets like Venus. AdditiZonally, the text mentions researchers' desire to collect \"samples of rock, gas,E ]or anything else...\" (paragraph 6), revealing humanity's thirst for knowledge and the mysteries waiting to be unraveled.\n\nFurthermore, the article delves into the technology needed for Venus exploration. It points out the challenges faced due to Venus's extreme conditions, stating that no spacecraft has survisved more than a few hours on its scorching surface, which rea7ches temperatures of 800 degrees Fahrenheit} (paragraph 2-3). However, the author also introduces the idea of using a blimp to navigate Venus's storms and terrain (paragraph 5), indicating a potential soluti6on for further exploration and discoverdy.\n\nFinally, the author explores the reasons behind the interest in Venus exploration. Venus is often referred to as \"Earth's Twin\" (paragraph 2) due to its similarities to our planet, sparking curiosity about its history and potential to support life. The presence of familiar geographical features like valleys, mountains, and craters on Venus (paragraph 4) further motivates exploration as it hints at the possibility of habitability and colonization.\n\nIn summary, \"The Importance of Exploring Venus,\" highlights the value of investigating Venus despite the associatEed risks. The narrative emphasizes human curi*osity, the technological possibilities for exploration, and the shared desire to uncover the secrets of the universe. By embracing these motivations, Venus could offer ins>ights into fundamental questions that have intrigued humanity for generations.","184":"In the modern world, students go through many emotions, some so complicated that even parents can't understand. The whirlwind of feelings that a teenager experiences in a day is baffling and intricate. However, with new technology, it might be simpler now for students' emotions to be decoded and supported when necessary. The groundbreaking Facial Expression Coding System enables compquters to examine and interpret the emotions of a person, whether alive or draw:n, and is a very useful tool to grasp students' emotional expressions. This highly advanced technology can serve a variety of purposes that will enhance a better learning environment for students. Thanks toN this new and intelligent $technology, doctors and others can interpret emotions of individuals in a method never before achievable. This brilliant computer \"creates a 3D computer replica of the face\" (3), encompassing aull main muscles. With this capability, this computer observes and generates a human face and, depending on the muscle positions, it can identify the distribution of emotions experienced at that time by a person. Tested with the Mona Lisa, this model \"can even pinpoint mixed feelings (as depicted in da Vinci's masterpiece). Each expression is matched with a neutral face\" (4). Through comparing the selected face with an emotionless one, this advanced technology allows for the use of muscle positions to scrutinize a person's emotions. The creativity of computers offers the resources and potential to decipher complicated human emotions and, consequently, can be utilized in ways that will contribute to the improvement of society. The Facial Expression Coding System will promote a more positive learning setting for students by adjusting their online experience to their emotions. 4If applied in daily computers, this technology will transform the environment and usage of the Internet. Because this technology can map emotions, \"if you grin when a Web ad shows on your screen, a similar ad might come next. But if you scowl, the following ad will be different\" (6). With the incorporation of this technology, students will have the ability to influence which ads and pages appear on their screen. This will decrease their impatience on the computer, and actually stay focused on the task at hand, instead of becoming annoyed and leaving. With the ability to control the page{s on their computer screen, students will feel empowered a nd influential, providing them with confidence and enhancing their work ethic. With an improved work ethic, students will remain productive and efficient with their time and materials. The material of the student's lesson can also be adjusted based on their emotional conduct. Dr Huang, the pioneer of this technology, explains that at school, \"'A classroom computer could identify when a student is starting to feel confused or bored...Then it could change the lesson, like an effective human instructor\" (6). By letting the computer personalize the lesson, students will remain more engaged, as the content they are learning is one that they like. Students will enjoy learning the subjects that interest them while also studying other less interesting subjects in a more interesting way. The state-of-the-art technology aims to enhance a student's learning setting, keeping them engaged and intrigued by the contrent. Schools will observe increased success krates and well-informed students. By giving students the chance to customize the way they learn, school will be more enjoyable and students will remain dedicated to their education. The emotion-analyzing software offers students this opportunity and will profoundly affect the way they learn and their commitment to the^i^r education. The highly intNelligent Facial Expression Coding System is a valuable tool for students in a classroom, as it encourages an enjoyable and captivating learning environment that will shape the students' dedication to school. This advanced software examines the movement of a person's facial muscles, comparing it to an emotionless one, and calculates the percentage distribution of their feelings. This innovative software provides students with the ability to personalize the pages and lessons on the computer, offering them control over their way of learning. Students with this capability will feel engaged in their learning, as they are in command and can decide how they learn. Developing a love for learning is critical for school-age children so thdat in the future, they will continue to educate themselves further and broaden their understanding. This facial-analysis technology presents schools with the opportunity to establish an engaging learning environment for students that will motivate them to stay committed to their education an1d achieve their goals. Although this new technology brings numerous benefits to many, aiding students in pursuing their aspirations and dreams proves to be the most significant.","185":"I think driverless cars are a really cool idea. They represent the future in a great way. People should try to see the positive side of this, as there are many benefits to having a driverless car. Driverless cars are the way forward and can make life better| for everyone. I hope others see it the way I do. There are so manyL advantages to having a driverless car, so I don't understand why some places would ban them. I can see why they might be concerned about safety for pedestrians, drivers, and passengers. Safety is very important, but if they look past the potential risks, they would see that using driverless cars isn't so bad. Nowadays, driverless cars are madoe with many new features that make them much safer. Car companies are constantly working to improve the safety of driverless cars. The laws in these places should change to reflect how safe driverless c$ars have become.\n\nDriverless cars have so many great features that I don't see why anyone would be against them. For instance, BMW has introduced the \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" which allows the car to drive itself at speeds up to 25 mph, but it ensures the driver keeps their thands on the wheel with touch sensors. The technology has advanced to the point where cars can now steer, accelerate,; andH brake on their own. GM has even created driver's seats that vibrate if the vehicle is close to hitting something. Some manufacturers are even considering using cameras to ensure the driver is paying attention to the road.\n\nThe future is a.lmost here with the progression from regular cars to driverless cars. The amount of technology being put into these cars, as well as the development of special roads for them, is amazing. Car manufacturers like Audi, Mercedes Benz, and Nissan are planning to launch self-driving cars by 2020. That's only four years away, as we'|re currently in 2016. The future is approaching quickly, and driverless cars are just the start of 8it all. \n\nTo sum up, I am in favor of driverless cars because they are an amazing concept. The technology in self-driving cars is impressive, and there are many benefits to them. Although some places and people are worried about safety, I believe they will soon realize the many advantages of self-driving cars, leading to changes in laws. Just as I mentioned, it is the future of driving, and we will need to adapt to it, as we always have. I am very supportive of driverless cars.","186":"The Electoral College was made with good intentions, but it has many important issues which lead to very unfair results. The electoral college is an old-fashioned, and illogical way to select the president of our country for the next four years. It allows for silly games to be played - you can become the president with just forty percent of the country supporting you. You can completely disregard some of y?our voters, as you're certain to either win or lose heavily biased states, and you can obtain massive numbers of electoral votes due to one additional vote for a side in a state tally. The system even permits for significant corruption to go unpunished, which is one of the greatest offenses in our nation.The electoral college's most significant flaw could maybe be its capacity to elect a president that doesn't even attract to half of the country. According to source two, Al Gore \"won the popular vote but lost the presidency.\" Al Gore had a substantial triumph in the popular vote for the nation, yet still was refused presidency because of the electoral college's vote distribution system. If we got rid of the electoral college, every person would have an equal say, and would be equally important to the candidates. Even source three agrees that the trust in our electors is occasionally betrayed, although seldom.Currently, the candidates can totally neglect parts of our country. Republicans have a heavily biased voter base in the south - so much so that in general, the Republicans never have a solitary rally or major ad. According to source two, states like South Carolina nearly never vote Democrat. It's so uncommon, that if you lost, you insulted the group that has voted unquestioningly for your party since the system has been established. If the electoral college system didn't exist, the thirty percent of southern Democrats would have a voice, which would make advertising and campaigning all over the country much more crucial.The electoral college system also permits for an astounding amount of corruption with no consequences. If a state manages to vote one hundred percent Democrat, rogue electors can still cast their vote for the Republican candidate - and this isn't against the regulations. We're essentially putting the next four years of our country into the hands of 538 electors, and holding them to the least possible level of accountaTbility. Again, source three clearly states \"and that trust is rarely betrayed.\" While it's rare, it's still more than possible, and can be pretty disastrous.Some may argue that the electoral college system establishes a system of certainty and safety, for both the candidates and the people. This, however, is quite far from the truth. According to source three, \"the residents of other regions are likely to feel disenfranchised.\" While this source argues thatn disregarding biased parts of the population, this is quite far from the truth. People are being wholly disregarded by the powerful politicians thatt are supposed to represent them. That doesn't sound very democratic and fair to me. People begin to feel discouraged and that their vote doesn't count, and this is quite close to the being the case. Only half of eligible citizens voted in the 2012 election, which implies that one half didDn't. Half of our country isn{'t bothering to vote in the elections because the electoral college system entirely nullifies their vote.Our cou?ntry pri des itself on being \"the land of the free, and the home of the brave,\" yet our people are being discouraged at every turn by our government. The general opinion of our people is that the government is out to get us, and there's not much proof to contradict that. The electoral college system allows for the government to be run by men who didn't fairly win over our country, and isn't accurately representing our views. It's teeming with corruption, and allows money to buy power. If we eliminate this system in favor of a popular vote election would promote more popular policy, make our government closer to the p!eople, and have little to no negative impact on our country.","187":"\"The Monisa Liza is a very impressive combination of emotions painted by the artist Leonardo Da Vinci. But, is using a computer program that utilizes coding to analyze someone's emotions effective? There are two sides to each story, sometimes one sounds good, while the hother not so good; sometimes, we may see ourselves approaching both sides and understanding the pros and cons of each. Having a computer read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom can be effective, and ineffective for various reasons. Some of these reasons could include: emotional state, lesson planning, facial structure, critical thinking, puberty, and more.The emotional state of most kids in sNchool can vary daily. Not every kid is always happy, and not every kid is always sad. By having a computer that can read and detect emotions, people might not feel the need to try and read each other's emotions. This could lessen their contact with their peerns and reduce their ability to comprehend and understand other people's emotions and situations.1 Teachers might also worry if they detect that a sturdent is unhappy or angry.On the other hand, having a machine that can detect emotions could be helpful for some students. As mentioned in the text, If most, or all, of the class is confused, this machine could aid the teacher in detecting the confusion and help him or her explain in a way that the students can understand. \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, then it could Vmodify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This quote shows how this computer could assist in adapting a better lesson plan for confused or uninterested students. If a student is feeling down, anxious, or similar feelings; the teacher could take them aside and send them to a counselor to discuss it and help them feel better. HFowever, we might question the accuracy of the student's emotions.If such technology is put to use, it will evidently have plenty of coding in it. Occasionally there might be errors in the coding or someone who can hack into it and alter it. Having such a delicate thing in a classroom could be risky for some students. Furthermore, not everyone has the same facial structure. Some individuals even have deformities or issues that make their appearance distinct from others. If this is the situation, how would the program differentiate these individuals with the facial recognition of everyone else? People display themselves in diverse ways, and most have different facial ex$pressions. If individuals start to rely on a computer to detect emotions, how will they be able to recognize different emotions themselves?This leads to the topic of critical thinking. As discussed earlier, students who depend on a program to discern their classmates' emotions may not attempt to interpret these emotions themselves. These students would enter the real world wityhout knowing how to recognize if someone is feeling upset, sad, irritated, or more. This decreases their social and critical thinking skills that are necessary in everyday life. Perhaps this program could be effective for kids of particular age groups instead of all classrooms.In late middle school and early high school, most kids are transitioning into adolescents. This means that they begin experiencing puberty. Puberty is a stage in life where kids start maturing and growing up. Mood swings are prevalent, as well as various other feelings and emotions triggered by hormones in their bodies. In a classroom full of teenagers undergoing hordmonal changes simultaneously, the computer may detect numerous negative emotions or a mix of different emotions caused by mood swings. Teachers may once again| become concerned if all their students are anxious, sad, irritated, bored, etc.. There are many ot#her reasons why this machine could be advantageous and why it may not be.These are some aspects that can be positive or negative about an emotional detection system in a classroom. There are certainly many more that could be debated back and forth. In my personal opinion, I do not believe schools require a machine that detects emotions. I find it eerie, and instead of expressing my emotions, I would try to hide them from everyone. If I feel this way, how might millions of others feel? The emotional state, lesson planning, facial structure, critical thinking, puberty, are all factors of, or may be impacted by this machine. Some are positive, some are not so positive. Overall, if this were ever introduced to our schools, it would require a lengthy and challenging discussion to settle the debate.\"","188":"\"Today we are learning about the solar syst}em and how it can help our planet by providing us with energy for our health and other important things to support. Venus,` also known as the Evening Star, shines brightly in the sky as one of the brigbhtest points. It's fascinating to learn that Venus is a planet in our solar system. The planets in our solar system move at differentZ speeds, which means that at times we are closer to Mars, and at other times4 we are closer to Venus. The atmosphere of Venus is mostly made up of carbon dioxide, which contributes to its high temperatures due to its position near the sun. Scientists are working hard to understand theI weather patterns on these planets, similar to EarthY, and they are looking for new discoveries. Once they have more information, wex will be ayble to predict what might happen. NASA has an intriguing idea of sending humans to study Venus because of their expertise in space exploration.\"","189":"The article talks about the positives and negatives of driverless cars. It envisions a future where people might stop buying cars beca_use a modern public transport system with autonomous taxis could be more efficient and eco-friendly. These driverless cars are designed to use less fhuel and offJer more flexibility than regular buses. However, the article also mentions concerns aboput the need for drivers to remain alert and ready to take control when necessary. It highlights how technology, liRke antilock brakes and driver assistance, is still developing and might take a while to fully realize the dream of autonomous cabs. Despite challenges, experts like Sebastian Thrun, founder of the Google car project, believe that technology is slowly catching up to our futuristic visions.","190":"'Space. The ultimate frontier.' This phrase is widely used as the driving force behind space exploration. Throughout history, humans have gazed up at the sky, pondering the mysteries of the Wvast expanse above them. Sadly, the current technology is not advanced enough for scientistsr to fully delve into the unknown. In the article \"The Struggle of Investigating Venus\", the writer discusses the difficulties of exploring the planet but fails to convincingly justify the worthigness of taking such risks. By laying out the harsh realities of Venus's hostile environment in comparison to Earth, the author highlights the challenges without effectively defending their stance. In paragraph two of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", it is mentioned that \"Previous missions to Venus were all unmanned...as no spacecraft survived more than a few hours after landing.\" The author explains the rapid demi|se of these spacecrafts, illustrating the extreme hostility of the planet's atmosphere. \"Venus is shrouded in a thick atmosphere composed mostly of carbon...the atmospheric pressureR is 90 times greater than what we experience on Earth.\" Further negative aspects are listed, including theD scorching temperatures, averaging \"over 800 degrees Fahrenheit...the highest of any planet in our solar system.\" It appears that the risks overshadow the potential rewards. The author then discusses technologies that could aid in Venus exploration, but it is evident that such technolo.gies have yet to be developed. The writer mentions \"NASA's potential solution to Venus's harsh conditions\" byn suggesting that \"scientists could float above the surface.\" However, this idea has not been tested or likely even created. The use of the uncertain term \"potentiabl\" implies doubt regarding the feasibility of this concept. Interestingly, the author contradicts their own argument in the following paragraph by stating, \"However, observing Venus from a spacecraft orbiting safely above would offer limited insights into surface conditions due to the dense atmosphere.\" By presenting wyet another drawback and questioning the effectiveness of the previously mentioned idea, the author relies more on emotional appeal and assumed interest in space rather than solid evidence to support their claims. \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" does provide a couple of compelling reasons to explore Venus, such as its past resemblance to Earth. \"Even today, Venus exhibits features similar to those found on Earth.\" The author p`roceeds to describe these features, including valleys, mountains, and craters. Another justification given is that \"Venus could potentially serve as our closest option fobr planetary exploration, a crucial factor...the importance of revisiting Venus seems undeniable, but how can such a mission be both safe and scientifically beneficial?\" Although the author ends with a compelling argument, the uAse of a question may actually diminish the impact on the reader, portraying uncertainty even from the Lauthor's perspective. To construct a persuasive argument, one must support' their claims with concrete evidence rather than solely presenting facts related to the challenges without counterarguments. Ultimately, the author's argument is weakened by incomplete projects and a presumed advocacy for space exploration. Instead of presenting a well-researched opposition and effectively refuting it, the author fails to provide definitive plans for Venus exploration. Medrely proposing ideas without concrete solutions does not validate the argument. Space is indeed a vast unknown, and it should not be approached lightly; countless resources and lives are at stake. Speculations are insufficient; one must substantiate ideas with evidence to ensure their viFability. While space may be the final fronti0er, this argument suggests that we are not fully iprepared to explore it yet.'","191":"In this text \"The Excitement of Discovering Venus\" written by the author, the*y talk about the fascinating planet Venus. Venus is a celestial body visible in the night sky, often referred to as the \"morning star.\" It is the planet closest to Earth in our solar system, being the second from the S)un. Venus is surrounded by a thick atmosphere mainly composed of carbon dioxide, making it the planet with the highest surface temperature. The intense pressure and heat on Venus create challenging conditions for exploration, with geologic activities such as volcanic eruptions and ea%rthquakes. Despite these harsh conditions, Venus presents a terrain with familiar features like valleys, mountains, and craters, making it a potential destination for future missions. The abundance of solar power on Venus could be beneficial for human exploration, as radiation levels are manageable compared to Earth. At times, Venus is closer to Earth~ than Mars, highlighting its proximity in space. Scientists believe that Venus might have had vast oceans in the past, potentially supporting life forms similar Sto Earth. Observing the planets in the sky reveals a variety of celestial bodies, with Earth being the fourth one. The similarities between Venus and Earth hint at the possibility of multiple solar systems in our galaxy, showcasing the interconnectedness of astronomical bodies.","192":"The utilization of this technoPlogy to analyze the emotional expressions of classmates7 in a school setting is no_t very helpful. It might seem awesome to know how a friend is feeling, but in the end, that's their own issue. This application could have some benefits,k but do you really want to measure someone's feelings? There are three reasons why this application is not so useful, including the possibility of it being inaccurate, the chance of losing friends, and the fact that it's not your business how someone feels. One reason why the use of this technology is not beneficial is that this app could turn out to be a complete joke. While there is a potential for the app to be precise, as mentioned in paragraph 3, citing \"Dr. Huang relies on the work of psychologists, like Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of FACS (Facial Action Coding System),\" we can never be certain. Imagine you install the app and use it on a friend to determuine their feelings. They put o7n a huge smile, and the app indicates that they are happy. In reality, they may be the saddest people you've ever met. This app might function, but2 ultimately, no one truly comprehends what others are going through, and this app won't alter that. Another reason why this technology is no|t valuable is how it could potentially lead to losing friends. In paragraph 3, it is mentioned, \"Eckman has categorized six basic emotions- joy, surprise, anger, revulsion, fear, sorrow- and then related each with distinct movements of the facial muscles.\" What if you use the app on a person whom you considered a friend and you discover their genuine feelings towards you? You might feel very unhappy and let down by that individual, and regret using the app initially. Or perhaps you create a present for your boyfriend or girlfrietnd and use the app to discern their real react(ion to the gift, only to find out they despised it. This would make you feel distressed and possibly lexperience even more heartbreak when they decide to eCnd the relationship due to the undesirable gift. This app is not advisable. The final reason why this technology lacks value is that understanding how others feel is not your concern. In paragraph 5, it suggests, \"For instance, you can likely infer how a friend is feeling simply by observing her expression.\" While this statement is accurate, no one actually knows the true feelings of others. Consider this scenario: you haveJ a close friend who you believe is the happiest person on the planet, you would never suspect they are depressed. Just for fun, you download the app and use it on your friend to detect their true emotions, only to realize they are truly unhappy. You make an effort to talk to them, but tEhey become angry at you for meddling in their personal affairs, leading you to realize that you made a mistake becauseY it was none of your business from the start. The emotions of others are not anyone's concern, and this app intrudes upon their privacy. To conclude, employing technology to interpret the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not very helpful. This app has the capacity to damage relationships and there is a chance that its accuracy is questionable.","193":"In the story, the writer proposes the idea of visiting Venus and describing it as \"Earth's twin\". They suggest athat despite the risks involved, the notion of exploring Venus doesn't seem too terrible to consider. Venus is the closest planet to Earth, and while people are interested in journeying to Mars, it is essential to noteg that Venus, Earth,h and Mars are neighbors. However, Mars differs from Venus as it is not as hot and is positioned closer to the sun. Sometimes Venus is nearer to Earth thanL Mars. Humans have dispatched spacecraft to land obn Venus, yet it is crucial to acknowledge the risks involved; it might not be advisable for humans to attempt landing there. Venturing to Venus would be challenging, considering that no spacecraft has managed to survive the landing for more than a few hours. With its average temperature exceeding 800 degrees, Venus is extremely hazardous, Yand one should not underestimate the dangers assoc1iated with a visit to this planet.","194":"The year is 2041, and astronaut Jeff Goudard has just arrived in the area of Cydonia. He is very excited because he will be the first human to witness the only alien object known to mankind. Upon landing, he spots the face. Jeff's mouth drops practically to the ground. He understands that the \"Face on Mars\" is acNtually just a simple old tableland, similar to the ones in the American West. Like this astronaut, there are probably m.any individuals who believe that the \"Face on Mars\" is some kind of alien monument, but in reality, science and logical thinking have demonstrated that in truth, the \"Face on Mars\" is simply a plateau nearly identical to those found in the American West.\n\nFirst of all, considering logic. In the Cydonia region, plateaus are extremely common. This particular plateau is strangely shaped, I will admit that, but it is simply a plateau. What makes it appear like a human face are solely the shadows. Just examine the 1976 Viking one picture. You can clearly observe shadows slightly below it, showing a long shadow extending from the plateau. Now, on the other hand, look at the photo taken in 1998 when it was overcast and there were no shadows 6at all. The image only makes it seem like an odd rock, nothing like a human face at all. Also, talking about photos, the one taken in 2001 also demonstrates that the wso-called \"Face on MHars\" is actually just a plateau because of not the actual shape, but the surrounding area. It was captured by a really high-quality ca_mera. In fact, its pixels spanned 1.56 meters whereas the besbt Viking photo pixels spanned 43 meters. This meant that you could zoom in around the plateau area to search for any other signs of alien life. So scientists and analysts could examine the surrounding area for pyramids or buildings, but they discovered absolutely 8nothing indicating t0hat aliens are present in the region.\n\nLastly, let's assume that the alleged face really was an ancient alien construc$tion, why would NASA hide it. I mean, NASA is really lacking in funds, but if it was confirmed that there were aliens on Mars, then that would imply NASA funding probably would skyrocket. What greater objective could NASA have than to establish contact with exOtraterrestria(ls? This must indicate thabt the \"Face on Mars\" is simply another plateauZ. What organization would ignore the opportunity to obtain massive funding? aSo just acknowledgem the reality. The \"Face on Mars\" is simply a plateau that had well-positioned shadows that are extremely rare. So don't be Jeff the astronaut, and simply confront the reality early on instead of having high hopes and dreams only to have them shattered by even more scientifically validated evidence. If you don't recall anything from this essay, remember this: don't be Jeff.\n\n[Written by a 13-year-old German student]","195":"In the passage, itn talks about how many people t^ried to understand if Mona Lisa was happy, mad, sad, or annoyed in th>e famous painting created by Leonardo Da Vinci. Dr. Haung helped solve this mystery by using a coimputer that6 can analyze emotions like happiness and sadnebss. Scientists have labe8led the act of smiling as 'zygomatic major'. Additionally, the text suggests that Da Vinlci may have hidden secret messages in the painting through facial expressions. Even though Mona Lisa blacks eyebrows, the computer could still detect her happiness using 'emotion algorithms'. Researchers have been studyinmg her ewmotions for a long time. They believe that Mona Lisa used her muscles to express her happiness. The text mentions the Facial Feedback Theory Of EmotUion, which states that moving your facial muscles not only shows emotions but can also generate them.","196":"The writer tells everyone about his big idea so he can help the world more. He hopes that we will go on an adventure to Venus to discover what secrets it holds for us. He is curious to find out ifq anything is living there and if life could exist. There is a big problem though - not many people are willing to take the risk to explore =Venus because it's dangerous. People are not) willing to risk their lives for something that may not be possible. The author is fascinated by the idea of exploring Venus because it seems like a wonderful and interesting place to visit one day. People are unsure how they would survive on a planet that is so different from Earth. They are uncertain if it's even feasible to travel that far. Venus is much closer to the sun than Earth, making it a harsh environment to visit. Additionally, the presence of acid on Venus makes it extremely challenging to journey there. The spacecraft would struggle to break through the thick clouds that envelop Venus. Scientists have also discovered !that Venus is the hottest planet in our solar system. SNevertheless, scientists are working hard to find solutions so that one day, someone will be able to explore Venus and unravel its mysteries. \n\n(As a reminder, I am 11 years old and English is not my first language.)","197":"The writer effectively argues that even though Venus is risky, it is worth exploring. You can see this as the writer uses specific details to explain Venus, its dangers, and why we should keep studying it. One reason the writer's point is strong is how well they describe Venus so the reader can understand the ztopic before discussing why we should continue exploring it. The writer gives as much detail a(s a book on planets to show they are knowledgeable and have evidence to support their opinion. In section 2, it mentions, \"Often called Earth's sibling, Venus is the nearTest planet to Earth in terms of size and density, and sometimes even in distance as well. Earth, Venus, and Mars, our neighboring planets, orbit the sun at different speeds.\" This part provides information on Venus to help understand why it is explored and why it is dangerous.\n\nVenus's danger is why it remains mostly unexplored and why there is a desire to study it further. Even unmanned missions cannot endure Venus's extreme temperatures and pressure for more {than a few hours, making research challenging. The writer uses data lik$e in the quote \"A thick atmosphere of nearly 97 percent carbon dioxide covers Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highly acidic sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" (sectiXon 3) to demonstrate its dangers and why it is not well explored. The writer shows that the risk does not deter NASA but rather intrigues them. The writer states, \"Scientists are fascinated by Venus because it might ihave been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\" (section 4). The writer believes human curiosity is another reason to keep exploring Venus, even though it is pmerilous.\n\nThe writer uses real scientists' concepts to back the idea of learning more about Venus. NASA continues to seek ways for deeper exploration of Venus. The author discusses NASA's strategies for Venus's conditions to justify ongoing space exploration. NASA is trying to find a way to float above Venus's hazards to study it closely without being affected by its harsh conditions. The writer argues against this approach, stating that observing Venus from a safe distance cannot provide sufficient insight into its conditions. Most forms of light cannot pwenetrate its dense| atmosphere, making standard photography and videography ineffective. Moreover, researchers cannot collect samples from a distance. This shows the challenges of exploring Venus when even NASA struggles to propose effective ideas. Despite these hurdles, the writer emphasizes the importance of not giving up on exploring Venus.\n\nVenus remains uninhabitable even for advanced robots. Humanity has made significant efforts to unders;tand the planets in our solar system. The writer successfully communicates that exploring Venus is not impossible but rather a complex puzzle waiting to be solved. Giving up is not an option, as one day, thorough exploration of Venus will be achievabqle. The author explains this reasoning clearly so readers can comprehend the value of studying Venus despite its risks.","198":"As a young student, there are numerous valid reasons why Seafaring may not be the best choice. Firstly, there is the danger of potential harm, like when Luke nearly lost his life. AnotheIr point to consider is that Seafaring is not suitable for everyone, as not all individuals would enjoy such an undertaking. Lafstly, one does not gain any financial benefit from Seafaring. While it may seem like an amazing opportunity, it is essential to think it through. Traveling to plac:es like Europe on a crowded boat with strangers may seem peculiar. Personally, I would .hesitate before accepting such an offer. The uncertainty of the destination and the duration of the journey can be quite unsettling. One may wonder wh*en they will return home. This thought would constantly linger in my mind if I found myself on a boat bound for [Europe. Reflecting on why I would seize such an opportunity, I would need to identify three primary reasons. I can empathize with Luke's actions. It is understandable why he crossed the Atlantic Ocean 16 times and the Pacific Ocean twice to aid those affected by World War II. However, it remains unclear what motivated him the most. In conclusion, my iskepticism about embarking on suchp a journey stems from uncertainty about whether any actual assistance was provided, as the prompt did not specify. I believe that helpinJg others is the most crucial aspect to consider.","199":"The writer proposes that studying Venus is a valuable pursuit despite the risks involved. Throughout the text, the writer effectively supports this argument. The writer presXents several tangible benefits of exploring Venus. Constantly, the writer informs us, the 6readers, about how technological advancements are made 3possible due to human curiosity. The writer also provides challenges and solutions for the exploration of Venus. Towards the end of the article, in the^ eighth paragraph, the writer states, \"Striving to face the challenges presented by Venus is beneficial, not only for t4he knowledge to be obtained about the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely guide us towards many similarly daunting ventures.\" This indicates that by exploring Venus, we will not only acquire knowledge but also be prepared for future missions with comparable conditions. In the fourth paragraph, the writer discusses Venus's history, suggesting that it \"might have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system at some point.\" By understanding Venus's past, we can not only deepen our knowledge of the planet but also use that information to draw parallels with Earth, potentially predicting some of Earth's future. This highlights how the advantages of studying Venus outweigh the risks involved.\nIn the seventh paragraph, the text highlights NASA's interest in studying Venus. By doing so, NASA is developing superior technology and propelling the human race forward. \"For instance, certain simplified electronics composed of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the harsh conditions of Venus's surface and have endured for three weeks in such environments.\" With the progress of technology thanks to the fascination with Venus, we are now capable of producing items that can endure temperatures exceeding 800 degrees Fahrenheit on Venus's surface for three weeks. This explains how studying Venus is a valuable pursuit despite the ri0sks since we progress through the research.\nThroughout the text, many challenges are raised along with their solutiongs. For instance, in the third paragraph, Venus's inhospitable conditions for humans are mentioned, but in the fifth paragraph, NASA believes this problem can be solved by enabling scientists to float above the turbulent conditions, thus allowing humans to venture to Venus and study it more effectively. The sixth paragraph introduces the issue that gathering substantial information would be [difficult if humans were on a spacecraft orbiting Venus due to its dense atmosphere. In the seventh paragraph, it is mentioned, \"systems utilizing mechanical components can be enhanced to withstand pressure, heat, and other forces.\" This solution in the seventh paragraph addresses the problem raised in the sixth paragraph. This progress can also be linked to the fact that our technology would advance as a result of the planning for Venus. This is how the writer reinforces their argument by presenting problems and solutions for exploring Venus, which diminishes some of the risks involved.\nThrough insights from Venus, technological progress, and problem-solving, the writer substantiates their argument. The writer elaborates on the benefits of exploring Venus, how technology would advance due to the inherent curiositiy of humans towards Venus, and the proposed solutions to challenges, thereby minimizing some of the risks. Consequently, the writer effectively supports their claim by providing reasons why the exploration of Venus is a worthwhile endeavor and why some of the risks are not significant enough to deter humans.","200":"Every day when you wake up and prepare for school there's always one thing you rely on, it's crept its way into your daily routine and now you couldn't imagine doing most things without it. It's your four-wheeled buddy that sits in your driveway or garage, your bike. Every day many people ride miles and miles on a bike, using it to go to 9school or to visit friends, but what people don't realize is the importance of limiting how much they use their bicycle companions. Bikes have transformed our lives for the better and for the worse. They save us a tremendous amount of time by making travelling super efficient, but with that comes air pollution. Bikes emit greenhouse gases, and these gases trap heat which then leads to warming of the earth's surface. This warming creates drastic changes in various environments such as the polar regions. \"Bicycles are accountable for twelve percent of greenhouse gas emissions in EJurope... and up to fifty percent in some bikef-intensive areas\" This was mentioned in an article about German city life without bikes. By reducing the amount of cycling and by switching to alternative modes of transportation we can decrease the quantity of greenhouse gases and prevent the heating of the earth.\n\nMoreover, these gases create smoke. Smoke is like fog but instead, it contains gases emitted from bikes. Smoke is generally dense and can be unsafe to environments. It was so severe in Berlin that they imposed a partial cycling restriction where people could not cycle because they did not want the smoke to worsen. The issue here is that people still continued to cycle even though there was a restriction in effect. So, this is another problem that cutting back on bike use can resolve. If we switch to walking or skating to places that are within walking or skating distance then we wouldn't have to be concerned about smoke, or restrictions. Bicycles have changed the way we live our lives and go about things, but they have also changed our neighborhoods. The usual town today consists of xtall buildings and a surplus of roads and streets, but parks are not as plentiful.y In Munich, they have been commemorating a day without bikes for three years, and it has brought aboutu changes in the community. By having everyone give up their bike for a day it can alter their perspective, can make them observe things about the area they inhabit that they were unaware of before. It can reveal to them the beauty of their surroundings and this can lead to people desiring to safeguard that beauty and enhance their city. This can be accomplished by constructing parks, and fixing uneven paths.\n\nSo all in all, we rely on bikes for daily tasks and it may appear difficult to let go of your bike and walk, but if we all do that occasionally it can lead to incredible advantages. Imagine if you could stroll outside and see people walking and enjoying themselves, not worrying about gas prices or traffic jams. Imagine if we did not have to be concerned about g+reenhouse gases or smoke. Going for a walk instead of cycling may not seem like much, but it has significant impacts on a variety of things.","201":"s\"That pictur|e is definitely not an alien. RWhich picture am I referring to? The one sGnapped by NASA of the supposed \"face\" that has been widely circulated.& According to the article, the \"Face on Mars\" has gained significant popularity, appmearing in various forms of media for 25 years. Many people think it resembles an alien, but it's not. It's merely a natural land formation, difficult to spot (as itL remains stationary, small, and blends in with the rest of Mars), and some say it resembles a typical lava dome (which it does). This landform just happens to resemble a face. The article mentions, \"Thousands of eager internet users eag6erly awaited the image on a JPL website, only to discover it was a natural landform and not an alien monument.\" This suggests it has no connection to aliens, just a regular land formation. If it were a living being or once alive, wouldn\u2019t it move? \"Cydonia Wis not an easy target,\" Garvin remarks. This indicates it's a fixed, compact spot that seamlessly integrates with the surroundings. If it were something extraordinary, one would expect it to be more conspicQuous`. If you don't look closely, the face is not apparent at all. Not only is it a natural formation, but Garvin also like>ns it to a lava dome in Idaho. \"It reminds me of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho,\" he states. \"That's a lava dome resembling an isolated plateau, similar in height to the Face on Mars.\" This further supports the idea that, ignoring its facek-like features, it appears perfectly ordinary. Despite itsJ striking resemblance to a face, numerous facts demonstrate it's nothing out of the ordinary for Mars. Firstly, it's just another land fo`rmation with an odd shape. Secondly, it seamlessly bWlends in, remains small, and is stationary (making it challenging to pinpoint). Lastly, it evokes comparisons to a lava dome, reinforcing its unconventional appearance to us. While the public was captivated for a time, as the text notes, \"The authors believed it could engage the public and generate interest in Mars.\" Nevertheless, it's time to move on, as we now know the truth. It wasc entertaining, but continuing to see it as more than a typical part of Mars' landscape would be foolish. Perhaps we should explore other planets \\in our quest for life or aliens, as Mars is certainly not the place!\"","202":"Having limited car usage may not sound like a good idea at first, but there are actually a couple of advantages to consider. Many people rely on their cars to go to work, pick up their children from school, or even do their laundry. If this were to change, there would be a lot of upset people. Personally, I would prefer to drive a truck instead of a car. Imagine how mfany people would start using horses for transportation! Instead of cleaning tires off the road, we would have to scrape hot horse poop off the road. Additionally, more people might have to resort to using a bike. However, not everyone can ride a bike due to various reasons like being overweight, having bad knees, or simply not knowing how to ride one.\n\nNevertheless, there are two main benefits to limited car usa2ge. The first one is saving mon%ey on gas, although it's not a significant amount - just a dollar and ninety-five cents. But then we might have to spend that saved money on a bike -or a horse. The second advantage is reducing pollution by using less gas, which could help slow down global warming and prevent the ice in tRhe North and South poles from melting. So, maybe having limited car usage isn't such a bad idea after all.\n\nPS:\\ STOP GIVING STUPID PROMP)TS!","203":"Venus is one of the planets in our Solar SysCtem. It is often called EarthT's \"Sister\" because of its similar size, density, and sometimes its proximity. We might never truly understand the challenges and experiments that scientists have to face in order to explore Venus. Every past mission to Venus has been unmanned, probably because no spacecraft has survived on the surf)ace for more than a couple of hours. This might be the reason why no spaceship has landed on Venus in over thirty years. It's not anybody's fault that Venus h8as not been very cooperative. Venus could provide scientists with the opportunity to observe from a safe distance. Just picture a balloon-like craft floating 30} miles above the turbulent Venusian terrain. Unlike on Earth, where jet airplanes can easily navigate around storms, a spacecraft above Venus would not be affected by the harsh ground conditions. Although the temperaiture is a toasty 170 degrees Fahrenheit, which would make humans feel warm and cozy, the conditions are still challenging but manageable. The quest to explore Venus can be daunting but also very rewarding. NASA is developing new methods to study Venus using powerful computers that can withstand extreme mechanical, pre\/ssure, and heat forces.","204":"As a 13-ye^ar-old student, [I believe that the concept of driverless cars should not be pursued. There are several reasons why I hold this opinion. Currently, these cars still rrequire some level of human interventi^on, but in the ?future, this may not be the ca\"se. However, the potential consequences of this advancement are concerning. \n\nOne primary issue is the safety aspect of these driverless cars. They are noft completely foolproof and accidents can still occur. This lack of r9eliability could lead to an increase in accidents on the roads. Additionally, there is the issue of accountability in the eve3nt of an accident - who would be reUsponsible for any injuries sustained? Without clear laws in plac|e, navigating these complexities can be challenging.\n\nAnother significant concern is the possibility of malfunctions in these autonomous vehicles. Robots, after all, are only promgrammed to handle specific situations and may not be equipped to deal with unexpected scenarios. If a driver relies& too heavily on the car's capabilities and fails to heed its warnings, the results could be disastrous. Moreover, the interaction between driverless cars and traditional human-driven vehicles on the road poses a potential hazard, as not all drivers may be able to adapt to this new dynamic.\n\nFurthermore, the accessibility of these cars is an issue to consider. Not eve$ryone may be able to afford a driverless vehicle, leading to a divide between those who have access to this technology and those who do not. This discrepancy could further complicate road safety and overall traffLic management. \n\nIn conclusion, while the idea of drivberless cars may seem innovative and promising, zthe associated risks and uncertainties cannot be ignored. As a young student, I am hes3itant to fully support this technological advancement, as I believe that the potential drawbacks outweigh the perceived ben*efits.","205":"Have you ever wanted to understand how someone is feeling exactly? What if you were sharing a story with your friend and really wanted to know if they were interested? The newest invention from Professor Thomas Huang and Professor Nicu Sebe can recognize emotions of individuals by analyzing the wnay the subject's facial structure and muscles shape the six primary emotions, such as happiness, surpries, and anger. This system is kZnown as the Fac)ial Action Coding System (FAFCS) and can be utilized for various reasons. For instance, in the cla[ssroom. With the FAFCS, teachers will be capable to interpret the emotional state of their students, plan\/adjust lessons based on the observations, and bring a more joyful, more engaging experience to the classroom.The= FACS @possesses the capacit}y to interpret emotions according to muscles and facial composition. Experiments have been carried out on one of the most renowned paintings in history, \"Mona Lisa\". Despite this technology can sometimes be trivial, as analyzing a painting-woman's face is not fully productive, it can be advantageous for teachers and students. If the teacher can truly comprehend and interpret their students' emotions, the teacher can switch up and try something different. For example, if a student's composition indicates confusion, the teacher could either delve deeper into the lesson and explain further to prevent addi3tional confusionc. This is precisely what Dr. Huang has foreseen, stating that \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becom_ing confused or bored... Then it could modify the lesson\" in section 6.Introducing the FACS into the classroom will not just enable teachers to perceive how bored and confused their students are, it might oblige the teacher to be inventive and creative in their lesson plans. If the teacher genuinely cares about their students' attention, he or she would have to integrate new ways to teach dull subjects, which most students would otherwise lose interest in. Many students dislike lengthy lectures and frequently either stop paying attention, wasting both the teacher's and student's time, or forget most of the information. With the FACS, teachers will be able to identify signs of boredom and dread and then leverage their emotions with a new activity or entertaining game to lighten the students' moods, while also delivering the appropriate amount of information.Similar to the example given above, there are methods for teachers to bring a more lighthearted, more enjoyable atmosphere to the classroom with this system. If the teacher observes that the students are bored, during a lecture for instance, the teacher could introduce a game or fun activity. According to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, as explained in section 9, if someone is wearing a happy expression, even if they do not mean it, they are subconsciously happy and are enjoying themselves. If the students are engaging in a fun activity together, they are certainly going to smile, radiating positfive vibes vand overall happiness in reaction to an otherwise tedious lepsson.The FACS is a groundbreaking way of interpreting emotions and can be truly beneficial for any student-teacher educational setting. The system can enable teachers to grasp what their students are experiencing and can either amend a lesson plan to alleviate confusion or introduce activities or games to boost happiness and positivity during a dreary lecture. The FACS in the classroom will aid both teachers and students equally.\"","206":"Although not having self-driving cars seems safer, I am in fatvor driveless cars. I support driveless cars because they could make driving more enjoyable. Driveless cars may sound risky, but in reality, they are safer than regular cars. Driveless cars offer many more advantages than regular cars. I am in favor of driveless cars because they have great benefits, such as advanced sensors that can detect and respond to dangerous situations like skidding or rolling over. Regular cars do have some advantages too, but driveless cars have been driven for over half a million miles without any accidents. Despite using only half the fuel of today's taxis, driveless cars bring a new level of fun to driving. Drivele5ss cars may not seem safe at first, but they are abctually safer than regular cars. Regular cars lack sensors to warn of approaching dangers and are quite dull. This concept could encourage people to explore more and enjoy the world wOith a fancy car. Driveless cars could potentially be the greatest invention of all time!\n\n[eassy written by a 12-year-old German student]","207":"There was a time when Luke decided to become a sea cowboy because he thought it would be a really cool adventure to go on. So if you decide to join this program, you will have an amazing time just like Luke did. Luke had so much fun playing games with his buddies and exploring new things because he really enjoyed this journey. Here are some more reasons why you might want to consider joining the program. Luke embarked on a journey with his friend to deliver 335 h9orses, along with plenty of hay and oats for them. Luke's destination was Greece. By the time he finished in 1947, Luke had completed nine trips, more than any other Seagoing CowboVy. In addition to his work, Luke had the bonus of visiting Europe and China. One of Luke's favorite moments was seeing the Acropolis in Greece. He also went on a charming gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with waterways instead of streets. Luke even explored an ancient castle in Crete and admired the Panama Canal during his voyage to China. Along with his duties of cleaning the stables xand feedRing the horses multiple times a day, Luke managed to have some fun on board, especially on the return journeys once the ani'mals had been unloaded. The cowboys engaged in baseball and volleyzball matches in the empty cargo holds where the animals were housed. Additionally, they organized table-tennis matches, fencing, boxing, reading, carving, and games to pAass the time. The world truly opened up for Luke during this adventure. So, if you decide to joQin this program, you will have an incredible time. You will have the opportunity to explore different places and witness various sights similar to what Luke experienced on his journey. Moreover, you will get to particmipate in a wide range of games just like the ones Luke played with his fellow cowboys. By joining, I hope you make unforgettable memories and enjoy the world just like Luke did.","208":"Limiting the use of cars can be extremely beneficial. Have you ever wondered why? Restricting car usage has its} advantages. One major reason is pollution. Cars qcan cause pollution, tr,affic congestion, smog, and many other harmful things. According to sources 1-4, owning or driving a car can have disad)vaJntages. For instance, source number two discusses ho5w cars can contribute significantly to pollution. This led Paris to implement a partial driving restriction to impHrove the city's air quality. Imagine living in a place where you breathe dirty air produced by your own car. When Paris enforced the car ban, only around 4,000 cRitizens followed the rule, leading to fines for those who didn't comply. It is vital to obey such rules as they aim to help us breathe cleaner air and protect our planet from harm.\n\nFurthermore, reducinHg car usage can help decrease pollution levels and improve air quality globally. Cars are not the only means of transportation available. Public transport, such as buses, trains, or even walking short distances, are eco-friendly alternatives. While driving a car may seem convenient for reaching destinations quickly, relying on public< transport can also offer benefits and save you money. Cars are expensive, as highlighted in source number one, where vindividuals are required to pay $40,000 for a parking space along with a hwome. By limiting car usage, you can avoid such high costs and alloc,ate your funds imore wise\/ly.\n\nIn places like Vauban, where 70 percent of families do not own cars, people have found alternative transportation methods and are content with their decision. Saving money is crucial, especiall5y as you grow independent and need to manage expenses like bills and food. Instead of wasting money on gas and car ;maintenance, using public transport can be a more cost-effective option. Additionally, reducing car usage can alleviate congestion on roads. Less traffic means less stress for commuters trying to get to work or events on time.\n\nA notable example is Bogota, Colombia, whvere millions of citizens participated in a car-free day, opting for alternative modes of transport like wValking, biking, or skating. This initiative showcased h-ow Ireducing car usage can lead to feweQr traffic jams, creatinSg a more peaceful urban environment. The success of this event has inspired other countries to consider similar strategies to combat traffic congestion.\n\nTo conclude, limiting car usage offers numerous benefits to residents in terms of reducing pollution, alleviating traffic congestion, and savizng money. There are various transportation options available besides cars, such as walking or taking public transport, which can help mitigate environmental impacts. Embracing new habits like reducing car dependency can lead to a cleaner, healthier environment for all. It is essential to explore alternative transportation methods and consider the positive impact they can have on our lives and the planet.","209":"The writer makes a strong case for the exploration of Venus, emphasizing its ch#allenges and importance. The writer's detailed explanations about Venus's characteristics and the reasons for continuing the exploratioZn highlight the significance of this endeavor. By providing in-depth information about Venus, the writer shows expertise on the subject and supports their argument effectively.x The writer compares Venus to Earth and Mars, showcasinAg its unique characteristics and why it is worth studying despite its dangers.\n\nVenus's extreme conditions, such as high temperatures and pressure, make it a difficult planet to explore. Even robotic missions struggle to survive for long periods on Venus due to its harsh environment. The writer uses sNcientific data to illustrate the dangers of Venus, such as its thick carbon dioxide atmosphere and corrosive sulBfuric acid clouds. Despite the challenges, the writer believes that the exploration of Venus is crucial for scientific advancement and expresses optimism about future exploration efforts.\n\nNASA's interest in Venus further supports the writer's argument that the planet is worth studying. Scientists are developing innovative solutions to overcome the obstacles posed by Venus's harsh conditions. However, the writer acknowledges the limitations of current technology in fully exploring( Venus and the challenges of conducting research on the planet's surface.\n\nIRn conclusion, the writer maintains that the exploration of Venus is a valuable pursuit, despiteU the risks involved. While Venus presen*ts numerous challenges, the writer remains hopeful that advancements in technology will eventually allow for more in-depth exploration of tWhe Lplanet. Overall, the writer effectively conveys the importance of studying Venus and the potential rewards that await those who persevere in this endeavor.","210":"\"The Face wUas found on May 24, 2001. It was found by NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft. \"NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft was flying around the planet, taking pictures of potential landing spots for its sister ship Viking 2, when it Jsaw the shadowy resemblance of a human face.\" But the Face is just a natural formation found on Mars by NASA. On April 5, 1998, Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snappeyd a photo of the face. It was revealed that there was no alien structure. In paragraph seven,Q the text mentions, \"took a picture ten times clearer thtan the original Viking photos....There was no alien structure after all.\" This proves that they found out the Face was not an alien monument. However, many people were still not happy so, on April 8, 2001, Mars Global Surveyor visited Mqars for a second glance. In paragraph ten, the text states, \"Malin's team captured an amazing photo using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.\" In paragraph tweSlve, the text mentions, \"The picture actually reveals the Martian version of a butte or mesa--landforms commonly seen in the AmeriWcan West.\" Thus, the Face[ found on Mars turned out to be just a natural formation. By using evidence from the texts, we discovered that they Face was found on May 24, 2001. It was initially thought to be an alien monument, but it was not. The Face was reexamined on April 8, 2001, but with the camera's utmost resolution. Ultimately, it was confirmed that the Face was simply a natural formation and not an alien monument.\"","211":"The mysterious visage found on ZMars is truly fascinating. Despite its human-like appearance, it stretches over two miles, leading many to spEeculate about its origins. Some believe it to be crafted by extraterrestrial beings, while NASA argues that it is simply a natural rock formation. Both sides present compelling arguments. Pers;onally, I will outline the reasoning behind the claim that it is a product of natural processes.\n\n~One key point supporting the notion of a natural formation is the lack of any unnatural discoveries upon closer inspection. Proponents of this view argue that if aliens had indeed built the face, peculiar artifacts or structures would have been observed nearby. AdditionalRly, the resemblance of the Mars formation to buttes and mesas found in the United States adds credence to the natural formatsion theory. NASA experts compare the Martian structure to familiar landforms in America, su>ch as Middle Butte in Idaho, reinfo`rcinPg the idea that such shapes roccur naturally.\n\nFurthermore, extensive examination of the face on Mars over a 25-year period h(as failed to yield any concrete evidence of ali\"en involvement. NASA's ongoing documentation of the site has not revealed any signs of extraterrestrial life. While some conspiracy theorists suggest a cover-up by NASA, the agency maintains that the face is merely a geological feature. Despite widespread fascination and speculation, no conclusive proof of alien activity has emerged f9rom the research efforts.\n\nIn conclusion, the exhaustive scrutiny of t4he Martian enigma has shown no _indication of alkien influence. NASA's detailed imaging and analysis have consistently pointed towards a natural origin for Vthe face. This reaffirms the absence of extraterresztrialg life on Mars, as confirmed by recent high-re)solution images that reveal th$e face as a geological formation. Such findings dispel the notion of alien intervention, emphasizing the natural processes at work on the red planet.","212":"In my essay, I am going to talk about whether we should have driverless cars or not. I believe that we should not have these types of cars. Many people wanted to drive thWeir own carsD, not have a smart car do it for them. I think smart cars should be reserved for older and visuallyN impaired individuals. So, in conclusion, I think it's better if we don't have smart cars.","213":"As an 11-year-old student, I turnMed to my neighbor's paper during an English test and came across some interesting informatiron abouLt the electoral college. This process, not a place, involves the selection of electors who vote for the preqsident and vice presidentK. There are 538 electors in total, and a majority of 270 electoral votes is needed to elect the president. Each state has its own group of elector6s, chosen by the candidate's political partyc. The electoral college may not seem very democratic, but t\\here are practical reasons for keeping i9t,G like the need uforS a president to have appeal across different region,s. The winner-takes-all method of awarding electoral votes makes candidates focus on5 key states duVring ttheir campaigns. MaybQe it's time for a change in the election process, like having a girl in ofVfice who can do just as well as a man.","214":"Imagine lifeK without many cars, think about all the things you would see because now you have to walk everywhere you want to go. Think about all the individuals you will meet around every corner, when you go shopping, to the supermarket, and when visiting a friend. You will recognize and value things you haven't noticed before, this concept is all thanks to a small town in VAUBAN, Germany. Now, we will be able to relish the views of our environment and tGhe indivibduals in it, emit less gas, and have a^ better perspective on the future.\"When I had a car, I al1ways felt stressed. I am much happier this way\" stated Heidrun Walter, a resident of VAUBAN, Germany. Giving up our cars may seem like a frightening idea, but actually it can bring tremendous things to us. When we stop confining ourselves in our vehicles, we get to exploref the world more profoundly, we get to feel and smell the things surrounding us and value them. We enhance our understanding of the things and individuals around us by walking to our everyday journey or day off. We also encounter new individuals, around each corner there will be a different face, maybe they or you will seek help and from there initiate a friendship. You will discover a multi tude of people who share the same interests as you or don''t, bu%t because we no longer depend on cars we are introduced to the world more and are genuinely exposeEd to the people and things in it, providing us a better insight into where we reside and all that it has to offer to us.Global warming, we frequently hear about it especially nowadays where greenhouse emissions are elevated, neverthe`less, when we reduce the usage of cars, the world, alongside us benefits. In Paris, following days of nearly record-breaking pollution, a partial driving restriction was required to \"clear the air of the global city.\" \"Four thousand drivers were fined and twenty-seven individuals had their cars confiscated due to the response to the fine.\", by Monday the smog had disappeared adequately and the French government repealed the restriction for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday. Meanwhile in BOTOGA, Colombia, it has been the third consecutive year that cars have been prohibited in the aspiration to encourage alternate modes of transportation and reduce pollution. This initiative has beQen so effective that \"for the first time twBo other Colombian cities, Cali and Valledupar, participated in the event.\" We all aspire to lead a long, joyful life but in order to achieve that we need to treat our Earth properly. When we minimize our reliance on cars, we can realize this aspiration.\"Par)ks and sports centers have also Vburgeoned throughout the city; uneven, damaged pavements have been substituted by broad, smooth walkways; rush-hour limitations have drastically reduced traffic; and new dining establishments and high-endU shopping areas have emerged.\" Picture living in a new attractive community, enhanced economy, and improved health. With all the walking and cycling everywhere, we are engaged in physical exercises, which is advantageous considering that America is recognized as the most obese nation. And with all the walking and cyScling, stores are positioned closer within walking distance instead of on a faraway highway, attracting more customers. Without cars, the*re are fewer fatalities caused by them as well. Consequently, we get a more optimistic glimpse of the future than we might if we didn't opt to remove cars.In summary, eliminating cars would be advantageous for the world and its inhabitants entirely. We would be more conscious of our environment and fellow citizens, reduce global warming, and have a brig.hter future to anticipate.\"\n\n(I hope you find this amusing and helpful! Try your best in your studies!)","215":"Authors that present a well-developed and convincing argument can greatly impact the thoughts of their readers. In the text, \"The Difficulty of Exploring Mars,\" the writer discusses why Earth should continue to explore the planet Mars, despite its challenges. While the obstacles of traveling to Mars are@ still being resolved, the author sheds light on why this barren planet is worthy of further study. The main point made by the author is regarding the atmosphere of Mars. \"A dense atmosphere consisting of nearly 97 percent carbon -dioxide envelops Mars. Additionally, there are clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Mars's atmosphere.\" In the third section, the author fails to provide a compelling argument. Humans require oxygen to survive, so how can they4 be expected to exist on a planet with minimal oxygen? It is impo.sjsible to alter the entire composition of a planet. The argument, put forth by the author lacks credibility and fails to justify why research in this area should continue. Another issue faced bVy Earth in exploring Mars is the extreme temperatures, exceeding 800 degrees !Fahrenheit, a temperature unparalleled on Earth. This temperature surpasses the maximum threshold that humans can enduem is effective or not. The Electoral College is reallRy unfair and should be remove d. There are 538 electors in txotal, which could lead to a tie, even though it has never happened. In the past, only a few more votes were needed to create this unlikely issue. Richard A. Posner mentioned in paragraph 18 that a tie in tIhe electoral vote nationwid4e is possible because the total number of votes, 538, is even. It's highly unlikely, but it is shocking how few votes are needwed to make a tie posswible. An almost problem occurred in 1976, where if a few voters in Ohio and Hawaii had voted differently, it could have made a difference. These may seem like big numbers, but in cjomparison @to the total voters in each state, they are not significant. The nqumber of electors per state is fair based on the number of members in the congressional delegation. However, a tie could lead to many issues in our country, and it would be better if the winner was ch}osen by popular+ vote. Electors, being US citizens, have the right to their own vote based on the Constitution. This can lead to issues because in 1960, some in Louisiana almost used this to swing the election. Politics can be shady, and electors can technically vXote for anyone, giving an unfair advantage to the opposing candidate. Voters may feel like their vote doesn't matter since one vote alone can't change the outcome. Using the majority vote to elect the president would likely encourage more people to vote as they would feel their opinion matters. Remember the 2000 election's popular vote dispute? Confusion over the type 2of electors to send to vote can create problems as it may not be clear which candidate received the majority. This could give an advantage to a caLndidate and be unfair to supporters of other candidates. In conclusion, the Electoral College seems uniconstitutional, as different issues could arise. The US needs to switch to a fairer way of eleocting our president where everyone'qs voice is equal. Th'e system should change to let the popular vote decide on the president, ensuring people believe their vote counts. Tha5nk you for your time.","221":"In An Almost Perfect World, picture a scenario where cars are not controlled by humans, but rather by themselves. This may sound like a science fiction movie, but it could become a reality sooner than we think. In the near future, people might stop buying cars altogether. There are various reasons why autonomous cars would be a great idea. I personally believe that self-driving cars would be more advantageous than human-driven ones because they are more effect%ive in terms of fuel efficiency, they offer passengers a chance to unwind, and they could help reduce accidents on the road.\n\nOne justification for why self-driving cars are a fantastic concept is their superior fuel efficiency compared to traditional cars driven by humans. Accordding to an article titled \"Self-Driving Cars Are on the Horizon\", Elon Musk, a leading figure in the automotive industryg, argues that autonomous cars could consume only half the amount of gas used by regular vehicles. Humans, being prone to mistakes, often accelerate unnecessarily fast and rev the engine, leading to increased fuel consumption. In contrast, self-driving cars lack these human tendencies and thus can save more fuel. Moreover, if autonomous cars are part of a city's transportation network, such as taxis or buses, individuals would not have to spend as much money on fuel as they do for their own cars. They would simply need to pay a small fee. These points alone suggest that self-driving cars could be the key to spending less money on gas.\n\nAnother benefit of self-driving cars is that they allow passengers to relax during the journey. Typically, passengers in traditional cars need to remain vigilant, focusing entirely on the road to avoid accidents. With autonomous cars, individuals could simply hop in and unwind after a tiring day at school. They might even take a yquick nap while the car safely transports them to their destination. No more worries about the driver \u2013 everyone can just sit back and rkelax as the car does all the work. Sounds simple, right?\n\nOne final reason why selLf-driving cars would be a wise choice for the future is their potential to reduce car accidents on the road. Many accidents today are caused by human errors, such as texting while driving or ignoring traffic signs. These reckless behaviors can lead to tragic outcomes. By shifting to self-driving cars, we could potentially eliminate these risks. Companies like Tesla have reported that their autonomous vehicles have trave+led thousands of miles without any accidents. This is truly remarkable. If these cars can maintain such a clean record now, imagine the possibilities with further technological advancements. With all cars being controlled by computers, the likelihood of accidents could be greatly reduced. It seems Blike a promising solution for a safer future.\n\nAfter learning about the benefits of self-driving cars, it appears that there are few drawbacks to using this technology. They are more fuel-efficient, offer passengers a chance to relax, and have the potential to decrease the number of accidents on the rosad. The future looks bright; self-driving cars could be the answer to many transportation challenges. Instead of fearing the unknown, I believe we should embrace this possibility and welcome autonomous vehicles into our lives.","222":"The wri-ter is correct in this part as in paragraph 8, nassa is attempting to close down all the towers. The author of this story hopes that nassa will go away, but that seems impossible due to the differencPes between nassa's speed in Mars and other occasions in Venus. Venus, sometimes hiding behind the clouds, has had all its previous missions unmanned, and for a good reason too because nassa can't handle their men being unmanned. They 6all managed to survive the landing for just a few ohours. Maybe this is why the venus spaceship hasn't landed in almost three decades. ASo, nassa is worried about the venus spaceship. Venus i(s covered in a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide. If our sister planet is so uMnwelcoming, why are scientists even considering further trips to its surface? They are wasting their time despite the importance of nassa. The surface was rough and impassable, with mountains, craters, and other obstacles. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has an intriguing idea for sending humans to explore Venus.","223":"In 2013, BMW introduced the \"Traffic Jam Helper\", which aims to make driving more comfortable and easier, while reminding the driver to stay cautioRus. It's important for the driver to stay alert and aware of everything happening on the road. Instead of relying solely on the car to protect us, we should also take responsibility for our own safety. Sometimes we tend to focus more on the appearance and style of cars rather than prioritizing safety. It is essential to prioritize safety and make cars safer and more comfortable. This not only ensures the driver's safety but also encourages them to drive more carefully. With the advent of \"driverless car]s,\" there is a growing emphasis on implementing lamws to ensure the safety of drivers, passengers,L and pedestrians. While there may be an increase in the number and variety of cars available, safety should always remain a top priority. As a young student, I want to feel safe when traveling in a car and believe that safety should always come first.","224":"A bunch of individuals like feeling excited. When someone does something challenging or risky, a lot of energy flows through their body. After achieving their goal, they feel awesome, despite the possible dangers. This reminds me of the article \"The Adventure of Investigating Venus\". The article discusses NASA's interest in studying Venus, despite the obstacles. The writer suggests that studying Venus is valuable, despite the risks involved. One reason is that Venus is quite similar to Earth, being one of the Inearest planets to us and the potential for new inventions that could revolutionize exploration. Earth is unique among the planets in our 8solar systemm. Thus, when scientists found Venus, they were intrigued by its similarities to Earth. This similarity sparks curiosity and leads to questions that scientists want to answer. The text states, \"Astronomers are interested in Venus because it amay have been an Earth-like planet in the past. Venus might have had oceans and supported life forms.\" This indicates the potential for life onf Venus in the past. Exploring Venus is deemed worthwhile because, through further study, scientists may discover ways for life to exist or even current life forms on the planet.\n\nWhen individuals are eager to learn more about something nearby, they Ewill do whatever it takes to gain more knowledge. Astronomers feel the same way about studying Venus, as it is the closest planet to Earth. The text mentions, \"OfteUn called Earth's 'twin,' Venus is the closest planet in size and density to Earth, and sometimes in distance as well...Venus could be our closest option for exploration.\" Despite the risks, NASA is driven to study Venus due to its proximity, enabling them to conduct tests and potentially find solutions to reduce risks and thoroug|hly study the planet. Another reason for NASA's interest in studying Venus is the potential for new inventions or innovative ideas along the way. These inventions could revolutionize future studies and make) exploration easier. The text mentions, \"Imagine a jballoon-like craft floating above the tumultuous Venusian surface...a craft floating above Venus would avoid the harsh ground conditions...using simplified electronics made= of silicon carbide...have endured for three weeks in such environments. Another idea involves reviving an old technology known as mechanical computers.\" This highlights the possibility of great inventions and the reuse of old technologies, motivating NASA to persist in studying Venus d4espite the dangers.\n\nThere are numerous reasons why people continue to work on something despite the risks, such as the study of Venus. NASA and many astronomers persiHst in their research on Venus due to its similarities to Earth, its proximity to our planet, and the potential for groundbreaking inventions that couald transform exploration.","225":"Dear Senator,\n\nI wanted to address the ongoing debate surrounding the Electoral College. In my opinion, it is important to maintain the Electoral College system. While some voters may feel frustrated that they do not directly determine the outcome of the presidential election, I believe that this setup is actually beneficial. If the Electoral College were to be abolished, there is a risk that uninformed individuals might cast their votes, leading to potentially negative consequences. Additionally, the absence of the Electoral College could result in an imbalanced power dynamic favoring larger states. Another significant fac9tor to consider is the concept of Swing States, which plays a crucial role in the electoral process.\n\nFirst and foremost, although some voters may feel marginalized by the Electoral College, it is crucial to recognize that they ultimately influence the deciesions of the Electoral voters. Without these designated electors, there could be a situation where ill-informed individuals vote for a candidate without understanding the implications. For instance, many young voters tend to follow popular trends rather than making independent decisions. Eliminating the Electoral College could result in mass voting based solely on popularity, which could be detrimental to the nation. Therefore, while some oversight` is necessary in the election process, granting complete autonomy to vote without consequences may lead to irresponsible choices.\n\nSecondly, I support the retention of the Electoral College because its absence would disproportionately empower larger states in the election outcome. This would create an unfair advantage for states with higher populations, overlooking the diversity of political views within each state. As seen in the close election results in Florida, where popular votes played a significant role, the allocation of electoral votes could heavily favor more populous states like Florida over smaller states such as Wyoming. The size of a state should not determine its influence in the election, as Zeven smaller states have independent-minded voters whose voices deserve to be heard.\n\nLastly, the Electoral College holds significance due to the presence of Swing StatesV. These states, characterized bty unpredictable voting patterns, compel candidates to engage with a wider range of voters and campaign more e6xtensively. Despite not always swaying the final outcome, these states attract attention from candidates and voters alike, encouraging a more informed and engaged electorate. While some argue that the most enthusiastic voters should have the final say, it is reassu8ring to see a diverse range of individuals actively participating in the democratic process.\n\nIn conclusion, I strongly believe that the Electoral College plays a vital role in our electoral system. Without it, we risk facing a scenario where voters act based solely on popular sentiment rather than informed decision-making. Furthermore, the absence of the Electoral College would grant larger states undue influence, overshadowing the voices of smaller states. Lastly, the presen8ce of Swing States underscores the importance of an engaged electorate in shaping the outcome of elections.","226":"\"Could aliens have possibly created a magnificent masterpiece on Mars or is it just our imagination playing tricks on us? It is highly questionable that aliens actually exist, let alichard Posner's article, \"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President,\" he highlights that electoral votes are allocated on a winner-takes-al5l basis, emphasizing the significance of states in determining 1the next President. Posner elaborates^ by stating, \"In [2012's] election, for instance, Obama secured 61.7 percent of the electoral vote, contrasting with only 51.3 percent of the popular Cvotes cast for him and Romney... eve)n a small lead in a state results in a significant electoral-vote triumph in that state\" (Posner 1). This underscores the importance of state vot2es in the electoral process. Consequently, this method demonstrateas he calls it, logos. In eone section, he mentions that \"...a spacecraft orbiting Mars would be able to bypass the harsh cground con\/ditions by staying above them.\" He introduces the concept of a new type of rover that NASA is planning to send to explorFe the Ma8rtian surface. However, he quickly acknowledges that \"...from high above, we can only see Mars b.ut not interact with it, so collecting samples would be impossible.\" This highlights the limitation of studying Mars from afar. Additionally, he shares some interesting facts aboout Mars itself. For e:xample, he notes that \"...Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun and the second smallest planet in our solar system.\" This fact helps to understand NASA's interest in exploring Mars further. Moreover, he mentions that \"...rovers| have been sent to investigate the red planet.\" This indicates previous attempts to study Mars, all of which have faced challenges. \nTo conclude, the author strengthens his argument by expressing his belief that \"We should not let fear or uncert~ai$nty prevent us from exploring new frontiers both on Earth and beyond.\" This mindset can be applied to both everyday life and NASA's continuous efforts to explore Mars. In summary, the writer effectively supports his claims by citing NASA's data, providing insights into M#ars, and acknowledging potentialE limitations. In general, he delivers a well-structured and informative piece of writing with a persuasiveE tone suitable for readers of young age like myself.\"","244":"A very important topic that people often talk about nowadays is the decrease in using motor vehicles. This reduction can have a big impact on the environment. Many of the effects are good for the environment like less smog which can help the planet that we have already damaged so much. As stated in one source, using fqewer motor vehicles will be better for the environment. Twelve percent of the greenhouse gases in Europe come from cars. It might not seem like a lot, but it adds up, especially when you consider the gas emissions from the United States, which is more than four times higher than in Europe. The same source also suggests that usQing vehicles less will decrease people's stress levels and make kids more social since they can play near the streets without worrying about getting hit *by a car.\n\nSeveral sources argue that reducing motor vehicle use will lead to a decrease in smog and greenhouse gas emissions. One source that supports this is source 2. Paris emits more greenhouse gases than any other city in Europe and now they fine people who drive their cars on two days with 22 euros. Bogota, Colombia[ is doing well in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. According to source 3, they have a car-free day where citizens are not allowed to drive their vehicles and would face a $25 fine. Most people follow this rule, and the traffic jams decrease as a result, leaving the streets empty except for public buses. More people riding bikes led to the repair and replacement of sidewalks, improving the city's appearance. This also boosted the income of small businesses. Source 3, along with sources 1 and 2, claims that people feel less stressed when they don't drive. It also states that people become more socially active when they carpool to various places, including schools.\n\nShifting our focus to the United States, source 4 mentions a decrease in people drivi&ng in recent years, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions. However, the use of large gas-guzzling vehicles like Hummers and trucks offsets this decrease. If people stopped driving these vehicles, we would see a noticeable drop in emissions. The success seen in Europe with fewer large personal transport trucks on the roads supports this argument.\n\nWhen driving becomes less common, we can expect advantages such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved social interactions, less stress, and a happier environment overall. Numerous sources support these claims, and countries like France in Europe and countries in South America have introducedx car-free days whic&h have shown the benefits of limited car usage.","245":"Self-driving cars, something we've watched on TV and in movies. Now they are not just in the world of fiction. Google has been working hard to create a fully autonomous car for people to buy a@nd use. Not everyone is in favor of these potentially risky vehicles, as they worry about the lack of control for the driver and the possibility of malfunctions. Some states, like California, Nevada, Flor=ida, and the District of Columbia, have even passed laws to stop these dangerous cars from being on the roads. I support these new advancements in travel tech because they can lessen accidents, improve braking systems, and ensure drivers keep their focus on the road. \n\nWith numerous accidents occurring every year, one might assume that a self-driving car, unaware of its surroundingsi, would be more prone to causing crashes than regular cars... right? However, that is incorrect! Google, in their, pursuit to develop these vehicles, has found ways to prevent even more accidents. Initially, they retrofitted a Toyota Prius with a camera, sensors, and a GPS receiver. Th!e GPS aids in guiding the car, sensors help whith braking pand detecting nearby objects, and the rotating camera on the roof creates a 3D model of the car's environment. And guess what? Th ey testbed it and the car traveled over half a million miles without a single crash! \n\nSome drivers are often distracted and fail to pay attention to the road ahead. Google has solutions for these issues too. For instance, the self-driving car is equipped with a LIDAR sensor camera to monitor tHhe surroundings and an interior camera to ensure the driver's focus. If the driver gets distracted, the system sends a prompt to refocus. Despite the added entertainment feature in the car, Google made it so that it turns off when the driver needs to concentrate, unlike phones that can be a continuous distraction leading to potential accidents. \n\nThe driver's attentiveness is crucial while driving. Google recognized this and introduced some new features, including an inte$rior camera to observe the driver's behav?ior and guarantee their hands are on the steering whee{l. Despite the distraction caused by entertainment features, they promptly turn off if the car senses danger approaching.\n\nAre self-driving cars safe to use? At the moment, I believe they are somewhat suitable for use but not entirely ready for consumers. They still require some improvements in my view, despite considering both the drawbacks and benefits. I am confident that with the additional safety features implemented, they will eventually be deemed safe for use. Oh, and that entertainment feature in the car should definitely go! Better safe than sorry!","246":"Dear Florida State Senator,\n\nI am writing to express my thoughts on the voting system that should be used in upcoming elections. Currently, we utilize the Electoral College method, which has led to some disagreements in the past. Due to these issues, I propose implementing the popular voting method. Popular voting allows direct voting for the preferred candidate of the people, making the process simpler and reducing the likelihood of complications.\n\nInitially, the Electoral College system seemed promising, but recent studies have shown a rising preference for popular voting. The popular voting method puts the power directly in the hands of the people, with their votes going directly to their chosen candidate. In contrast, the Electoral College system involves voters selecting a state's electors, who then vote for the presidential candidate. |As stated in an article defending the Electoral College by Richard A. Posner, \"when voting for a presidential candidate, you are essentially voting for a group of electors.\" It is also argued in the article that the E1lectoral College lacks a strong democratic foundation. Moreover, the Electoral College tends to benefit larger states due to their higher number of electors. Popular voting, on theV other hand, ensures that votes go directly gfrom the people to their chosen candidate, eliminating the possibility of a mismatch in preferences.\n\nAside from its drawbacks, incidents have occurred in the past with the Electoral College system. For instanjce, in the election of John F. Kennedy in 1960, there was an issue involving segregationists from Louisiana attempting to replace electors who supported JFK. Another `problem highlighted in an article by Buradford Plumer is the \"2000 fiasco,\" described as the biggest crisis of the century, related to Electoral College votes. Although popular voting may have its own flaws, recent articles\/ have d&epicted more concerning issues with the Electoral College system.\n\nIn con#clusion, I believe that the popular voting method should be adopted for electing the United States President, as it ensures a direct vote for the people's preferred candidate. In a democratic country like ours, the power to elect the President should res6t with the citize9ns. The Electoral College system poses numerous challenges and complexities, whereas popular voting allows for a more hands-on voting experience. By empowering voters to understand the system and see their votes directly impact their chosen candidate, popular voting emerges as the Npreferred and should be considered the standard method for future electi1ons.\n\nThank you for considering my perspective.\n\nSincerely,\n[Ybour Name]","247":"\"The idea of autonomous vehicles can lead to issues. Many people perish in car accidents. It is crucial for individuals to obey regulations in order to stay safe. If the cars are speeding excessi\\vely, it can result in major accidents and numerous fatalities. Autonomous drivers have the potential to cause accidents such as in congested traffic, fatalities due to speeding, and prioritizing safety is vital such as adhering to speed limits and following regulations. One primary concern is accidents. People neglect wearing seat belts, which can lead to significant problems - it's important for everyone to wear their seat belts. Another concern is fatalities; some individuals disregard regulations, at times driving under the influence or even falling asleep while driving, jeopardizing others. Another significant issue is fatalities. For instance, if the bridges are fragile, they may Zcollapse, so avoid driving on weak bridges. Additionally, some individuals have the tendency to speed and run red lights. Moreover, traffic congestion contributes to reckless driving as people tend to rush and end up colliding with other vehicles. Safety is the utmost priority. Individuals can protect their lives by driving cautiously and within the speed limit. cIt is essential for people to abide by regulations such as weaaring seat belts, refraining from drunk driving and this not only benefits themselves but also others. Another aspect is complying with signals; failure to do so may result in being caught by the police and fined for violating the rules. Hence, always adhere to regulations to minimize fatalities and accidents. Therefore, individuals should consistently folloQw rules to prevent harm to themselves and others. While driving, avoid using; your phone or any distractions as it can divert your focus from the road. Autonomous driving can potentially lead to accidents, such as in traffic jams, fatalities from speeding, emphasizing the importance of driving within speed limits and obeying regulations.\"","248":"In The Exciting Adventure of Discovering Venus, the writer proposes that investigating Vegnus is a valuable pursuit despite the risks it poses. I think the writer believes this because Venus is the nearest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, which is why it is often called Earth's twin. Landing on Venus is a difficult task due to its challqenging conditions.The clouds on Venus consist of highly corrosive sulfuric acid. The temperature on Venus reaches around eight hundred degrees Fahrenheit. The atmospheric pressure is ninety times greater than tha\"t on Earth. The thick atmosphere is nearly ninety-seven percent carbon dioxide. These conditions are much harsher for humans compared to Earth's. As a result, there has been no recent attempt to explore Venus for over three decades. Venus holds the record for the highest surface temperature among all the pl!anets in the solar system. Scidentists speculate that Venus may have resembledI Earth in the distant past. It is believed that Venus could have once had oceans and potentially supported Gvarious life forms, similar to Earth. DespiteW its differences, Venus still shares sotme similarities with Earth. Its surface is composed of rocky sediment and features faemiliar landscapes such as valleys, mountains, aand craters. To sum up, I have discussed why the writer believes Venus is a planet worth studying. I have touched upon the hwarsh conditions of Venus, like its atmosphere and temperature. Lastly, I have mentioned the terrain of Venus and how it b\/ears resemblance to Earth's terrain.","249":"Leonardo Da Vinci's famous painting \"Mona Lisa\" is well-known around the world because ofV her mysterious expression. People often wonder what emotion she is portraying. Nowadays, there is a modern technology called FACS (Facial Acting Coding System) that can analyze human emotions, including those of Mona Lisa. The question arises: is this technology benefic3ial in today's society? \n\nIn t2he present? time, numerous machines have been binvented to make our lives easier. Some machines have been helpful, while others have not proven to be as useful. Recently, a machine has been create]d to detect human emotions accurately. While some may argue that this invention is valuable due to its intended purpose, I personally believe that it is pointless. Why? Let me explain my reasoning.\n\nHumans are constantly creating new machines, but often, there is not enough time to adeqHuately test them. As machines become more advanced, people find themselves busier than ever. This results in individuals neglecting their families due to work commitments. The rise in stress levels is also a concerning issue. \n\nIn my opinion, this emotion-detecting machine falls into both the xvaluable and useless categories. It is valuable because a significant amount of time and effort wQent into its development. However, it proves to be useless as it does not address the underlying issue of stress in society. While the ability to read emotions is impressive, it does not provide a solution for coping with stress. \n\nOverall, I believe that this machine has both pros and cons, but it ultimately fails to address the most pressing issue of stress in today's society.","250":"The writer discusses how Venus might have been similar to Earth a long time ago. It is mentioned that Venus could have been almost identical to Earth and able to sustain life like Earth. However, the tone changes later in the passage as the author explains the hazardous nature of Venus' atmosphere. The dense atmosphere of Venus would cause anyone entering it to burn up, and very little light can pass through, making it impossible to capture photos or videos of Venus' surface. In fact, looking at Venus from a spaceship orbiting above is$ not very helpful in understanding the ground conditions due to the thick atmosphere blocking most forms of light. This indicates that Venus' atmosphere is too risky for explorartion, even if someone were to reach the planet. The presence of thick clouds within the atmosphere obstructs visibility, preventing the capture of clear images or videos of Venus' surface.","251":"\"Isn't it exciting to imagine traveling all around the different countries in the world and seeing their famous landmarks? If you're curious, continue reading because being part of the Seafaring Cowboys program offers a lot of differences in the sights you'll see compared to other places you've never been! Joining this opportunity comes with many benefits that could shapeN your future aspirations as an adult. Firstly, the views you'll encounter if you decide to participate will be truly amazing from both far awaxy and up close. Additionally, you might find fulfillment in assisting people in need while exploring countries like Europe and China. When you reach Greece, the view from Acropolis is breathtaking, and there's also a fascinating castle in =Crete, not to mention the marvels of the Panama Canal as you venture towards China. \n\nMoreover, sailing the high seas while aboard a ship can be quite enjoyable. The cowboys engage in activities like baseball, volleyball, table tennis tournaments, as well as fencing and boxing to keep themselves occupied. Other pastimes such as reading and carving help pass the time pleasantly. \n\nFurthermore, this experience will heighten your awareness of the world around you. For instance, observing people with unmet needs, such as lacking food or water, and knowing that you've made a positive impact can be gratifying. This extends beyond your own country to other nations, shedding light on issues you may not have previously [considered. Just the thought of the numerous individuals worldwide, regardlessz of their wealth, who require assistance at various times can be eye-opening.\n\nTo conclude, once again, the Seafaring Cowboys program could significantly influence your perspective on how you interact with and perceive others. ZConsider the global demand for essentials like money, clothing, and shelter. Realizing that your actions, no matter how small, can make a difference not just in your life but also in the lives of others, can truly be transformative. Many individuals have embarked on this journey, and their testimonials are inspiring to encounter because it introduces them to a whole new world that was previously unknown!\"","252":"In the story, the author talks about why Venus is considerIed the second Earth, highlighting their similarities and differences. The text also mentions NASA's use of silicon carbide to create a vehicle suitable for Venus' harsh conditions, lasting for 3 weeks in a simulated environment. Additionally, NASA is exploring the use of mechanical computers, an old technology from the 1800s, due to the unsuixtab2ility of modern devices like cell phones on Venus. Despite the challenges Venus presents, the pursuit ople have been operating cars for many years. It is often wiser to not try to fix something that isn't broken, rather than adapting to a different lifestyle. In conclusion, the future might be on the horizon, but sometimes it is preferable to maintain the status quo. With time, more features will be incorporated into cars to improve the way we drive. Until then, a car requires a driver to function properly. I am 12 years old and I wrote this essay in English, so I hope it's good enough for my test!","258":"Dear Mr. Senator,\n\nI wanted to bring to yozur attention, as well as many others', the potential disastrous outcomes of the presidential election. It seems that you, along with many other politicians, have been using a method called the Electoral College that figures like Richard Nixon, Bob Dole, and Jimmy Carter have been proposing to abolish for years. Personally, I am quite concerned that despite the known flaws in this system, we continue to takRe the risks involved. This is not just about selecting a president anymore; it is about the freedom of America.\n\nOverall, the Electoral College may seem like a reasonable way to choose a winner. The idea of selecting electors who then choose the president may sound logical, but upon closer inspection, something seems amiss. Firstly, the general public believes they are voting for their preferred candidates, when in reality, they are voting for electors. Many lvoters are unaware of this fact, and the lack of information on this topic is unsettling. Moreover, the people do not choose the electors themselves. Doesn't this contradict the principle of \"By the people, for the people\"? Where do the people's voices fit in this process?\n\nAdditionally, there is a concern about the reliability of electors in voting for their designated candidates. This introduces a potential disaster element. While those chosen by the candidates may be trustworthy, electors are individuals not holding office, which raises doubts about their reliability. Electors present an unpredictable variable, and in complex situations, two sets of electors could be appointed, leading to confusion. If your vote goes to an elector who does not follow through, the power shifts from the people to the state.\n\nAnother| issue to contemplate is the possibility of a tie in the electoral votes. In such a scenario, the House of Representatives would decide the winner. The potential for a tie has arisen in past elections, with narrow margins such as 5,559 votes in Ohio and 3,687 in Hawaii. This would result in a loss of power nationwide, with the people being disenfranchised once again. If such an event occurred, people from all states would undoubtedly be outraged.\n\nWhile the chance of a tie in electorals votes is slim, the magnitude of selecting the nation's leader shoulnd not tolerate even the slightest imperfection. Unexpected events happen daily; why couldn't a tie occur as well? However, the primary drawback of eliminating the Electoral College is the likelihood of run-off elections. This system helps prevent individuals1 in certain regions from voting because they feel their voice won't matter. With a pop(ular vot8e system, the need for run-off elections would diminish, as people would recognize their influence in the outcome.\n\nAs I conclude, I urge you to reflect on the +issues I have raised. Transitioning to a popular vote system likely offers more advantages than persisting with the outdated0 and flawed Electoral College. Countless pieces of evidence support the idea that electing the president via electors is unnecessary and confusing. Embracing a new system would be a step towards enhancing our nation.\n\nBest regards, [YOUR NAME]","259":"Dear Senator,\n\nI am writing to discuss a very important issue that affects us, the citizens of the United States. The Declaration of Independence begins with the powerful words \"We the people, of the United States of America...\" This document symbolizes our democrati}c values and our ability to make decisions together as a nation. It 8emphasizes the importance of us, the people, having the power to choose our leaders, make crucial decisions, and shape the future of our country.\n\nOne topic that I feel strongly about is the Electoral College. This group of individuals is responsible for electing the presidentt, with the number of electors for each candidate determined by us, the voters. However, many people mistakenly believe they are voting directly for the president without fullSy understanding the process. This lack of clarity can lead to errors in voting, potentially impacting the election results.\n\nWhile some argue in favor of the Electoral College due to concerns about possible ties in a popular vote system, it isb worth noting that ties can also occur >within the Electoral College, as seen in past elections. Furthermore, it is fundamentally unjust that a candidate could win the popular vote but still lose the election based on the electoral vote results. This goes against the principles of democracy and undermines the will of the people.\n\nAnother issue with the Electorail College is how it influences candidates to focus primarily on large or swing states, neglecting smaller states and their voters. This imbalance in attention means that voters in states like Wyoming may not have the opportunity to fully engage with candidates and make informed decisions. Additionally, the potential for corruption within the Electoral College poses a serious threat to the integrity of the electoral proces7s.\n\nSurveys have shown that a majority of the population sufpports transitioning to a popTular vote system, reflecting a desire flor a more direct and transparent electoral process. It is essential to consider the success of popular sovereignty in historical contexts like the abolition of slavery and apply it to our current electoral system. The Electoral College is an outdated and flawed mechanism that no longer serves the best interests of the American people.\n\nIn conclJusion, I urge you to seriously consider the arguments presented here and support the abolishment of the ElectorIal College. Our 8democracy should be based on tBhe principles of fairness, transparency, and the will of the people. It is time to reform our electoral system and ensure that every vote truly counts.\n\nYours sincerely,\n\nYOUR_NAME","260":"To be honest, I think cars should not drive by themselves because they can lose control and cause a lot of damage and danger. Cars are meant for people to drive, not to drive on their own. If cars drive on their own, people will feel scared and may get distracted. Additionally, autonomous cars can be easily stolen. Although some argue for self-driving cars, who will be responsible if they get into accidents? Why would anyone even consider cars driving on their own when so many bad things can happen, like people getting hurt or possibly even dying? Who will cover the costs of hospital bills? Therefore, I believe there is no need to create cars that can drive autonomously because they can run out of fuel oMr make errors such as exceeding speed limits. If these things happen, who will the poklice issue the ticket to? This is why I think it is unnecessary to manufacture self-driving cars.","261":"As a young student from Germany, I came across an interesting story about the mysterious face on Mars that was discovered by the Viking 1 spacecraft. While orbiting the planet and taking photos for the Viking 2 landing spots, the spacecraft captured a shadowy image resembling a human face in 1976. This face, which some beliDeve was created by aliens or perhaps the ancient Egyptians on Mars, has become quite famous.Q It has even appeared in Hollywood movies, as well as in various books and magazines. Some people argue that this face serves as proof of life on Mars, but in reality, it is just a natural landform\" that appears face-like due to shadows and rock formations. Despite its popularity, there is\\ no substantial evidence linking this face to any other discoveries on the planet. This intUriguing story has sparked the imagination of many and continues to be a topic of fascination for space enthusiasts like me.","262":"In my opinion, autonomous cars will have a positive imrpact on people. These driverless vehicles have been getting better over the years, making them safer and helping to keep us more attentive while drivinsg. They have been on a journey of progress for quite some time now, being upgraded to d'etermine what works and what doesn't. For instance, the text mentions that in the late 1950s, General Motors developed a prototype gcar that could operate on a unique test track. The track had an electric cable embedded in it, sending radio signals to a receiver at the front of the car. These advanced road systems worked quite well, but they needed significant improvements to existing roads, which proved to be too costly.. T?his indicates the continuous testing and enhancement of autonomous cars over time.\n\nAnother reason supporting the idea of autonomous carBs being beneficial is their focus on safety. These cars are equipped with sensors that assist both the vehicle and the driver in controlling it. The text explains that \"sensor data can prompt the vehicle to employ individual wheel braking and reduce engine power, enabling a much better reaction and control than what a human driver could achieve on their own.\" This proves that these sensors can enhance the safety of human drivers. Additionally, as mentioned in the text, the Google car alerts the driver when they should be prepared to take control. Various options are being considered, such as using cameras to monitor driver attentiveness. While the driver focuses on the road, the car monitors the driver. These advancements demonstrate the ongoing efforts to enhance the safety features of autonomou%s cars.\n\nLastly, another advantage of autonomous vehicles is their ability to increase driver awareness during the driving process. The text emphasizes that although autonomous cars won't be entirely independent as human intervention will still be necessary. The text states, \"special touch sensors ensure that the driver maintains a grip on the steering wheel.\" Furthermore, it mentions that ythese vehicles can steer, accelerate, and brake autonomously, but they are designed to alert the driver when human skills are needed, like maneuvering through construction zones or avoiding accidents. This highlights the importance of the driver remaining vigilant and prepared to take control when necessary.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe that self-driving cars will bring positive changes to people's lives by continually improving, enhancing safety measures, and increasing driver attentiveness.","263":"\"There are still some arguments about the actual \"identity\" and origin of the Face on Mars. Most likely it's just a natural landform, but some disagree. Some think it was made by aliens. But, as there's no real proof of aliens being real, how could you show they did this? NASA also owns high-resolution pictures that show it's just a natural landform. It might have taken a few tries to get all the data needed to support this, but the scientists did it so now we know. \nAs I mentioned earlier, there's no proof of alien life existing. So, why do people believe it was aliens? Sure, it may have a strange shape, but that doesn't mean much. There are strange shapes on Earth but no one calls them alien. I get that this is in space, on another planet, but still; there are more logical explanations. It's normal for planets to have landforms. That's just how it is. \nThe scientists also got high-resolution photos of the Face. When the best photo was taken in 2001, it was clear that this was just a landform, like some in the American West. It was a formation that looked strange from far away. If you looked closely, it just looks like a bunch of rocks. People need to think realistically. \nHowever, there are a few reasons why some see a chance of this being done by aliens. One picture was taken from behind a small cloud. This made some think there could be alien markings hidden by Jthe fog. Another reason for beylieving this is alien work is that there have been some strange sightings and discoveries that could suggest alien life. There's no solid facts or proof, but enough has happened w+ithout logical explanations to convince some of this idea. \nI politely disagree with these points. The idea of alien markings being hidden is a stretch. There was an even clearer picture taken recently that showed no alien markings. It proved it was just a landform. There's not miuch more to it. Regarding the few unexplainable things that could point to alien life, we can't say what's really out there. If there is something, then it's doing a pretty good job of staying hidden, or unknown because we have no solid proof of anything. Some things just have no logical answers. There will always be something we don't know. It's probably best to stick to the facts we have and accept the most likely stories. Yues, it's fine to believe or hope there's something out there, but people also need to think reasonably in some matters, especially when there's proof, like in this case. \nThis is a strong argument. There are many ways to go on and on, explaining every detail, but I think all the important information has been said. People should accept the facts. There will always be someone who disagrees, but every argument is like that. There is much more evidence supporting the conclusion that the Face is just a landform. You might still think differently, but I think I've explained well why I believe what I do.\"","264":"Throughout the article \"The Excitement of Studying Venus\", the writer gives a lot of reasons why it is important to explore Venus once again. The writer argues that although sendhing a person to research Venus is dangerous, it is worth it to gather more knowledge about Venus itself. In the beginning of the article, the writer emphasizes the value of taking the risk to send someone to Venus despite the dangers. The writer's main point is that Venus is similar to Earth. He also suggests that Venus may have had oceans and could have supported different life forms, just like Earth. The writer does a good job of explaining why human exploration of Venus i:s necessary because it is so similar to Earth, and they want to understand the reasons behind this similarity. The writer presents sufficient evidence to support the idea of Earth and Venus beingG like siblings. \n\nAs the article progresses, the writer delves into the facts about Venus and how it is currently uninhabitable for living creatures. The writer provides ample evidence that may discourage people from wanting to send individuals to Venus, where they could be endangered. The author could try using different evidence instead of just stating that \"the conditions on Venus are more extreme than anything on Earth\" and that the combination of heat and pressure would \"melt many metalsn\". So far, we have seen how the writer has provided a lot of evidence to illustrate why it would be unsafe for any living being to explore Venus up close.\n\nLater in the article, the writer shifts towards discussing potential Qsafe methods for visiting Venus. The author proposes a \"airship-like vehicle floating about 30 miles above\" Venus' surface. He explains that the air pressure at that height would be similar to that at sea level on Earth. While wthese conditions are not entirely safe, the author ensures that they are \"endurable for humans\". The author presents a promising i?dea supported by evidence, but there is a lack of detail on how they plan to retrieve materials~ from the Venus surface while ensuring the safety and sustainability of human life. \n\nThe writer includes a seSction on how they intend to bring electronics close to Venus without them melting. In this section, the author mentions using mechanical computers, which were first thought of in the 1800s and were important in the 1940s during World War II. These computers are made of silicon carbide and could survive for 3 weeks in Venus' conditions wilthout being damaged. This would enable communication between Earth and the individuals possibly in the airship-like vehicle above Venus to receive instructions from The National Aeronautics and SpaAce Administration.\n\nIn conclusion, $the author presents sufficient evidence on their plans for approaching Venus, their motivation for studying it, their communication strategy from Venus to Earth, and the differences in pressure and temperat;ure. However, the author could expand on ho-w humans would live in space and how they would meet the challenging living conditions.","265":"The notion that the writer supports the exploration of Venus is a good idea despite the risks in athe article mentions Venus, sometimes known as the \"evening s5tar,\" is one of the brightXest objects in the night sky, making it easy even for a beginner stargazer to identify. The proof from the article that backs up my point is that the average surface temperatures on the planet are above 800 degrees Fahrenheit and the air pressure is 90 times higher than what we feel on Earth. The beginning and end of this essay discucss the second planet from the sun, which is easy to see from far away but is difficult ?to study due to extreme conditions. The physidcal conditions on Venus, such as exposure to a cell phone or tablet, can cause damage, whereas systems with mechanical parts are more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forDces by comparisocn, making them morUe durable.","266":"The text titled \"Creating a Happy Mona Lisa\" discusses a new technology called the Facial Expression RecogniJtion System that helps computers understand human emotionFs. It debates whether usingB technology to intVerpret students' feelings in a classroom is beneficial. Utilizing technology allows students to creatively express themselves. Once students grasp how the technology functions, they can showcase their feelings through art, storytelling, and much more. The text mentions, \"She seems 83 percent joyful, 9 percent disgusted,N 6 percent afraid, and 2 percent angry,\" showing how software can recognize emotions. Facial exlpressions are crucial in everyone's life. Decipheripng someone's facial cues can guide your next actions. As stated in the text, \"The facial expressions conveying emotions are universally understood,\" no&tes Dr. Huang, \"even though individuals may display varying levels of facial expressions\" (like not smiling b#roadly). Sko, if your friend appears upset and wants space< or seemsU perplexed, you'll know how to react. Emotions are not only reflected in facial expressions but also in body language. Body movements are key in interpreting facial cues. The text explains, \"Eckman has categorized six basic emotions - joy, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness - and linked each with specific facial muscle movements.\" For instance, when you're angry, your orbicularis oris muscle around your mouth contracts, indicaiting your emotion. Understanding emotional expressions through technology is crucial. It helps us perceive not only emotions but also body language, allowing us to comprehend others' feelings without having to ask them directly. At 12 years old, I believe that learning about emotionCs and technology can help us navigate social interactions better.","267":"Using this cool technology is helpful for understanding how people feel. The doctors and professors explain that the process starts when the computer makes a 3D model of the face; all 44 important muscles in the model need to move like real human muscles. When one or more muscles move, it is called an \"action unit.\" Additionally, Dr. Huang mentions that famous artists like da Vinci learned about human body structure to help them draw facial muscles accurately in order to show specific emotions. His new computerr program saves similar anatomical details as digital code. Dr. Huang also mentions that a lotD of human commhunication is nonverbal, which includes emotional signals. He also provides some exa(mples of facial movements to try in front of a mirror. For instance, lift the cjorners of your mouth, then squint your eyes a little to create lines around the corners of your eyes. While you keep that position, raise the outer parts of your cheeks towards your eyes. They even show the contrast between a real smile and a fake one. In a genuine smile, the Zygomatic major muscles lift the corners of they mouth from the cheekbones. At the same time, muscles called orbicularis oculi pars palpabraeNus create lines around the eyes. However, in a fake smile, the mouth is pulled sideways by the Zygomatic major and a different muscle, the risorius. So, accTording to the information I have shared in this final versWhion, my argument is that this technology is quite useful, like super useful! It can help us understand people's feelings and emotions better.","268":"InC our society today, technology is progressing rapidly day by day. What used to be a letter traveling overseas for 10 days to reach its destination is now simply a quick text message that can reach someone in just a few seconds. The car is also an invention that has advanced significantly, to the point where almost everyone who can afford one has one, as it is essential for getting around. The concept of cars becoming \"driverless\" is another step forward in car technology, as discussed in the text \"Driverless Cars are on the Way.\" Due to their numerous advantages, autonoTmous cars are a positive addition to our society. Autonomous cars offer many benefits for passengers using them for transportation. For instaance, the need to o{wn or pay for a car would no longer be necessary. If self-driving vehicles could operate in all areas, why would anyone need their own car? Even i@f the car was not completely automated and the driver needed to take control at times, the less you have to do, the more time you have for other things. The article touches on this idea, stating, \"Some manufacturers arue aiming to achieve this by introducing in-car entertainment and information systems that utilize heads-up displays.\" The main advantage that users of autonomous cars get $is time, while still being carried in a secure and dependable vehicle. This highlighNts the benefits that users of autonomous cars enjoy. When it ort various forms of life. Without a thorough study of Venus up close, Rnothing can be confidently determined. In section four, the writer explains that \"Venus may have been the most Earth-like planet inP our solar system at one time.\" This suggests that the possibility exists, but without additional measures taken to conduct a detailed study, the question of whether Venus is Earth's sister planet remains unanswered.\n\nWhile it is challenging to predict a close-up, detailed view of Venus due to its harsh environmetnt, NASA has discovered potential ways to make exploration feasible to s,ome extent. In paragraph five, the author mentions that \"NASA's potential solution to Venus's harsh surface conditions would enable scientists to float above the trouble.\" This expands the notion that exploring Venus can be achieved and met at a reasonable and safe level for explorers. The author goes on to state thast while the conditions are not easy, they are \"livable for humans.\" This further emphasizes and supports the idea of exploring Venus because it has been determined that the study can be conducted safely.\n\nThe overall study of Venus can prove to be extremely advan{tageous for our understanding of the planet and space exploration as a whole. In section eight, it is mentioned that \"striving to overcome the challenge posed by Venus is valuable.\" This is true, as tackling the challenge of Venus proves to be difficult, but if successfully done, it can have a greater impact on the exploration of other planets that are even more challenging than Venus. Additionally, in paragraph eight, it is stated that \"journeys on Earth and beyond should not be restricted by risks and uncertainties, but should be expanded to reach the very boundaries of imagination and innovation.\" When we start limiting our exploration and discoveriesI due to risks and uncertainties, we inhibit our progress in understanding what lies beyond. Through studying Venus, we can broaden our activities to encompass every innovation and curiosity about our solar system as a whole. \n\nStudying Venus is definitely worthwhile despite the risks it involves. Through studying Venus, we can establish whether it is a sister planet to our own planet today, and whether it was once capable of supporting Wlife. Studying Venus is also beneficial because the research can be conducted, and if complet ed, it will bring us much more benefit than studying any other planet has thus far. Exploring Venus will bring immense benefits to our knowledge and our future in all aspects.","275":"In the text called \"the rise of self-driving cars,\" the writer discusses the advantages and disadvantages of autonomous vehicles. I am not 9in favor of these cars because there are more disadvantages than advantages, making them not very safe. Some positive points about self-driving cars include: 1. Google's cars have traveled over half a million miles without any accidents. 2. In a decade, the sensors have improved to detect and respond to skidding or rollovers. 3. The adata from the sensors can help the car apply brakes on each wheel and reduce engine power, providing better control than a human driver. However, some negative aspects of self-driving cars are: 1. The smart-road systems worked well but needed expensive upgrades to existing roads. 2. Lack of sensors, computers, and accurate mapping hindered the development of these cars. 3. Current traffic laws assume human drivers are safer, making it illegal to test autonomous cars in many states. This is why I oppose self-drivAing cars since they lack safety without a human driver. \nSelf-driving cars can save half the fuel of current taxis and offer more flexibility than buses, but a human driver must always be present for control. These cars alert the driveur to take over in complex traffic situations, Osuch as navigating through construction zones o\/r accidents, but Google cars still rely on human intervention.V Manufacturers have, focused on improving sensors and technology to enhance safety features and allow cars to handle moreW driving tasks independently. The cost of making !self-driving cars truly autonomous is high, as seen in the two hundred million dollars spent on radar technology. While these cars can manage driving up to 25 mph, touch sensors ensure the driver maintains control. Although existing self-driving cars can steer, accelerate, an2d brake independentlyB, they still require human inYtervention for certain road conditions. This highlights the importance of the driver remaining vigilant and ready to take control when needed.","276":"I am in favor of the development of autonomous vehicles. The idea seems really cool to me. It can assist drivers who are unable to drive due to some sort of disability. It prevents a driver from falling asleep at the wheel and causing harm because if the car is self-driving, you can fall asleep without endangering anyone. The information that supports my opinion is found in the text. This is the first point in the text that aligns with what I said. The mention of the car steering itself is found in line four. The part about cars being able to steer themselves is mentioned in section seven. The text indicates that cars can navigate themselves. The details that support my view come from the text. This is the second point in the text that matches what I stated. This is the public transportation system reference that is in line three. The section discussing the public transportation system is in section one. The text suggests that public transportation will eventually be automated. The information that supports my idea comes from the text. This is the fourth point in the text that agrees with what I said. This is the reference to cars using half the fuel of current cars, mentioned in line three. The part about cars using half the fuel of today's cars is in section one. The text ?states that cars will consume half the fuel of current vehicles. It may seem easier than it actually is. It's quite challenging. Self-driving cars can become a reality. At this point, cars still require a driver for certain tasks. The car can handle the steering. This might seem easier than it really is. It's quite challenging, it just takes some time. Self-driving cars are a possibility. At present, cars still rely on a driver for certain functions. The car can manage the bKraking. This may appear simpler than it is. It's quite challenging. Self-driving cars are feasible. Currently, cars still need a driver for some tasks. The car can accelerate on its own but still requires a driver. I support the advancement of autonomous vehicles. It seems fascinating to me. It could aid drivers who are unable to drive due to a disability. It prevents a driver from falling asleep at the wheel and causing harm because if the car is autonomous, you can fall asleep without putting anyone in danger. I trust this essay demonstrates my stance on the topic of autonomous vehicles.","277":"Venus is not a bad planet according to thet author. One i6nteresting fact about Venus is that even thoug#h it is not very close to the sun, it is the hottest planet in our solar system. It is extremely difficvult fo*r humans to live tahere bec?ause of the inten\\se heat. In thIe past, Venus was similar to Earth as it had water, which was the only thing similar to our planet. However, the water evaporated due to the high temperatures, which makes4 it unsuitable for life. NASA wants to experiment with sending machines to Venus to see if they can function there. This idea is seen Was both risky and exciting:. Although it may be challenging, the people involv~ed are determined to try their best to make Venus\\ habitable. This is why the author believes that others are interested in studying Venus, as it is the planet most similar to Earth.","278":"mIn the stEory The Adventure Of Discovering Venus, the writer discusses the origins of stars and how our planet's twin, Venus, is the closoest to Earth in the solar system. Venus isk the second planet from the sun and shares many similarities with Earth. The writer highlights the thick atmosphere of Venus, which is mainly composed of carbon dioxide, making it inhospitable to humans. Scientists are considering more exploration missions to Venus, as it might have been more Earth-like in the past. In paragraph 5, the writer explains the air pressurLe at sea level on Earmth and how it is suitable for human survival. References to NASA and their use of silicoUn cabrbide in electronics for RVenus exploration are also mentioned. In paragraph 8, the writer discusses the challenges posed by Venus and the value of studying it out of human curiosity. This story delves into different pl+anets and their environments, showcasing the intricate workings of our solar system.","279":"In Freiburg, a German town, people live happily without cars. In this new area called Vauban, thnere are zno places to park cars near homes. But, you can still own a car if you want, but you need toL park it in one of the two parking lots on the outskirts by paying $40.000. Not many families in Vauban have cars, with 70% not %owning one vand 47% selling their cars to live there. Vauban was finished in 2006, and it's becoming more popular in Europe. Cars are a bigg source of greenhouse gases in Europe, causing 21% of the emissions. Vauban is home to about 5.000 people living in one square mile. Some drivers in Vauban have been fined and had their cars taken away for breaking rules. It seems like the era of cars is changing. Many excitinCg things are happening in car technology, offering hope for the future of cars.","280":"Certainly, there are multiple opinions regarding the Face discovered on Mars. Some people are convinced that the Face was created by aliens, while others argue that it is a natural land formation. I am personally inclined to believe that the Face is a natural land formation as there is scientific proof to support this theory, and there are comparable land formations on Earth as well. To start with, scientific proof indicates that land formations can develop on Mars. For instance, researchers have identified the existence of mountains, canyons, and volcanoes on Mars. Additionally, similar to Earth, Mars also possesses tectonic plates. These plates lead to the creation of various land formations when they shift and move. If tectonic plates can result in land formations on Earth that are beyond human capacity, it is logical to assume that they could also be responsible for land formations on Mars. Furthermdore, Mars displays similarities with Earth in terms of land formations. Much like \"Earth, Mars features volcanoes, mountains, and canyons. Scientists have attributed many of Earth's land formations to tectonic plates. For instance, mountains are formed when two tectonic plates collide and exert pressure on each other, attempting to force one plate beneath the other. In cases where neither plate gives way, they begin to push upwards, forming mountains. The formation of canyons requires water to erode the rocks over time until a trench is created. Even though Mars is currently devoid of water, evidence suggests that water once existed on the planet. Considering that water and tectonic plates are responsible for land formations on Earth, it is plausible that they play a similar role in shaping Mars' landforms. Despite my belief that the Face is a natural land formation, there are those who disagree. An opposing viewpoint posits that the Face was constructed by aliens. Firstly, there is no concrete scientific evidence supporting the existence of extraterrestrial life. rSecondly, spacecraft imagery reveals no indication of any civilization in the vicinity of the Face on Mars. While ancient civilizations may have built structures like the Pyramids on Earth, there were inhabitants surrounding those monuments. In contrast, there is no indication of any villages or aliens residing near the Face on Mars. From an aerial perspective, the Face lacks discernible human facial features. It is only when shadows are cast that human-like features become apparent. This leads one to believe that the resemblance to terrestrial features is merely coincidental. Due to the lack of evidence substantiating the claim that aliens crafted the Face on Mars, it is difficult to entertain the notion as factual. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the Face on Mars is simply a natiural land formation, supported by the presence of similar land formations on Earth that were shaped by tectonic plates and water. It is imperative to consider the evidence available before arriving at any conclusions.","281":"As an 11-year-old student, I believe that voting should be a right for all people, not just the qualified ones. The idea of the 'Electoral College't seems like a way to stall and make decisions, but does it really w?ork? It's strange how someone can win the votes but still lose the presidency because of this system. Instead of voting directly for the president, we votep for electors, who then cast their votes for the president. It's like a game that doesJn't make much sense to me. Voting should be simple and fair for everyone, not complicated like this.","282":"The Vanishment of the Voting CollegeThe United States of America has made significant strides in its legal system. For instance, the recent laws permittingM same-sex couples to wed showcase true progress. Nonetheless, there exist other laws that adre outdated and no longer necessary. A prime example of this is the Electoral College. The system it operates by is viewed as terrible and unfair. According to many, getting rid of the Electoral College from the legal system would lead to better decision-making in this country. \nNumerous notable figures support the idea of abolishing the Electoral College, such as Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and Bob Dole, among others. One of the most contentious incidents related to the failure of the Electoral College was the 2000 election. During this time, Al Gore triumphed in the popular vote but lost the presidency due to the Electoral College's methods. This all appearhs to be an illogical process and a waste of time. This belief stems from the fact that individual voters contribute to the popular vote, only for it to be handed over! to potentially unjust and corrupted electors. A direct popular vote would make the voting process much simpler and fairer, with over sixty percent of voters prefeqrring this method over the current system (Source 2, Brad Plumer).\nThe Electoral College operates through7 the selection of electors, followed by a meeting whkere they cast their votes for the President and Vice President. Subsequently, Congress tallies the electoral votes. Essentially, a middleman is added who makes decisions on behalf of the voters who dedicated their time to vote for their chose:n candidates. The \"winner-take-all system\" (Source 1, The Office of Federal Register) leaves those on the losing side with no representation, although it is worth mentioning that Maine and Nebraska have a form of \"proportional representation.\" After the election, the governor of each state comvpiles a \"Certificate of Ascertainment,\"l listing all the presidential candidates in the state and the corresponding electors.\nIn terms of voting, citizens have minimal influence on their choices since they essentially vote for electors who then vote for the Pres\"ident and Vice President. For instance, if you resided in Texas and favored John GKerry, yofur vote would actually be for a group of thirty-four Democratic electors pledged to Kerry. Considering the slim chance that the electors win the statewide election, they would then proceed to Congress, ultimately resulting in Kerry gainiMng t8hirty-four additional electoral votes. Frankly, this entire system seems unnecessgarily cumbersome. As previously mentioned, a direct voting approach from the citizens would be more advantageous for the entire nation. Ultimately, this is crucial to bear in mind as it greatly iPmpacts the entirety of the USA.\nLet's not overlook the looming disaster factor inherent in the Electoral College voting process. The prospect that a candidate favored and voted for by 8the majority may not get elected due to the decisions of the electors poses a significant issue. Additionally, there are concerns about potential ties arising, sparking uproar in such scenarios. Moreover, the inverse situation where a candVidate wins the electoral votesj despite losing the popular vote could lead to substantial backlash. In conclusion, the Electoral College bring[s about numerous complexities and issues, making its abolishment beneficial for all.","283":"The writer shares his thoughts with everyone so he can do more to help the world. He suggests we should go on an adventure to Venus to discover what mysteries lie there for us. He is curious to find out if anything is living there and if life can exist. One big problem is that no one is eager to venture to Venus because it's a dangerous risk to take. People are reluctant to risk their lives for something that may not be possible. He dreams of exploring Venus because it seems like a beautiful planet to visit one day. People are unsure how long they could survive on a planet that is unfamiliar to them. They are uncertain if it's even feasible to travel that far. Venus is positioned closer to the sun than Earth. Additio\\nally, there are dangerous acids on Venus which make it ext6reme\/ly challenging to reach. The spacecraft would struggle to pass through the thick clouds enveloping Venus. Scientists have also discovered that Venus is incredibly hot compared to the other planets in our solar system. Nevertheless, scientists are actively searching for solutions so that one day someone can successfully journey to Venus and uncover its secrets. \n\n(Note: My English test essay, inspi~red by my nei>ghbor's work, altered a bit by me with the 11-year-old student style and some errors.)","284":"The systezm for electing the president in America is not really fair or democratic. It favors smaller states, may end up choosing the candidate who lost the popular vote, and can make minority voters feel discouraged. In some states, the people who cast the crucial votes for the president are not obliged to vote for the winner i1n their state, suggests Plumer. An elector might think, \"I don't like the winner, so I will vote for someone else.\" It's unlikely to happen since a party selects its electors, as noted by Posner. While it's rare, it shouldn't be possible, yet it has occured. Plumer points out that several times in AmerLica's history, electors have gone against the people's wishes. It's hard to be completely certain of someone's faithfulness.\n\nAnother issue is that a candidate could garner enough electoral votes to become president without winning the majority of the popular vote, argues Plumer. Since each state gets 2 Senators regardless of population, more populous states' votes are sort of stolen by less populated ones through the Senate. The Electoral College seems to have an unfair view of population distribution. Winning the majority of the popular vote in smaller states will fetch slightly more electoral votes per poputlation compared to larger states. While most of the time, a candidate wins both the electoral and popular votes, says Posner, it's u:nsettling to think that the loser could potentially win due to the system. It's arguably more vital for the country to be led by the right person.\n\nPosner asserts that the Electoral College stops a third party from swooping in and snatching enough votes to prevent either major party candidate from winning. Although in a truly direct vote, this could happen, the Electoral College poses the same problem. If a third party candidate succeeds in winning certain states, they could take enough electoral votes that no candidate reaches the required 270 vo2tes for victory. Plumer warns that the most worrying scenario is a tie in the electoral vote. A tie, where both candidatesV secure 269 votes, would be resolved in a similar way to a third party gaining enough votes to hinder a clear victory. The House of Representatives would then vote on the president. Here, larger states are once again cheated of their influence, as the delegates vote for the states, not as individuals. Wyoming's sole representative holds as much influence as the 55 from California. Additionally, the delegates are not bound to vote as their states do. If a predominantly Republican state has a primarily Democratic representation, the state could potentially end up electing the opposing party's candidate. Since the Electoral College was established at the country's inception and the president and vice-president did not campaign together, the Senate independently selects the vice-Rpresident. If the Senate and House belong to opposing parties, the president and vice-president could come from different parties. Plumer brings up the instances of 1968 and 1976, where \"a mere 41,971 vote shift would have resultedn in a deadlock\" and \"a tie woulxd have occurred with only 5,559 voters in Ohio and 3,687 voters in IHawaii switching their votes,\" respectively.\n\nPosner addresses the argument that the Electoral College dissuades voters supporting the Topposite party in a state dominated by the other party from voting. He argues that \"no individual vote determines a national election\/... Voters in presidential electionsp aim to express a political preference, rather than believing that a single vote could sway the election.\" This mindset leads to voter apath#y. Even 1% of the American population amounts to three million people, and among those three million, inevitably, there are individuals who have been misled into thinking their vote is insignificant. Plumer's examples of the elections in 1968 and 1976, mentioned earlier, demonstrate times when approximately 1% of that 1% of the population's votes could have altered the potential outcome of the election.A\n\nThe Electoral College is an outmoded and unfair system. The mere possibility of it allowing the loser to t{riumph is a strong a.rgument for its abolition in favor of a true majority rule election. Besides the risk of such an \"failure,\" the Electoral College distorts the actual distribution of people and dissuades minoriten the smallest movement of a muscle, known as an action unit, can convey different fKeelings. For example, just by looking at aU friend's face, we can usually tell how they are feeling, even if we struggle to describe each facial feature that showhs happiness or worry. Artists liOke Da Vinci used their knowledge of human anatomy to accurately paint facial muscles to express specific emotions. Their new computer software now stores similar anatomical information as electronic code. The famous Mona Lisa painting is meantf to make us smile and appreciate the capabilities of this technology. Imagine a computer that can recognize when you are happy or sad! Interestingly, making a happy face during an experiment can 0actually make you feel happier, according to the fVacial feedback theory of emotion. This theory suggests that moving your facial muscles not only reflects emotions but may also help create theme. It's fascinating how simple facial expressions can teach us so much about %the science of emotions, don't you think? And who would have guessed that making funny faces could reveal so many secrets about our feelingOs! \n\n(As an 11-year-old student, I find it intriguing how technology can help us understand emotions better, and I'm excited to learn more about this subject in$ the future!)","299":"In the very exciting article \"The Future of Self-Driving Cars,\" the writer discusses the positive and negative aspects of self-driving cars. The writer explains the introduction of self-driving hcars andF also highlights the possible challenges the technology mightY face in the future. After carefully reading the article, I have made up my mind about self-driv4ing cars. I strongly believe that self-driving cars are the wave of the future, will be more efficient, and will ultimately lead to fewer accidents once fully operational.\n\nThe article mentions that in the past, car manufacturers utilized speed sensors in the development of a+nti-lock brakes. Over time, these sensors evolved to detect and respond to dangerous situations, such as skids an\"d rollovers. This indicates that car technology is constantly improving and becoming more sophisticated each year.\n\nAs a society, we are faced with three opYtions, but we can only pick one. We can either* progress in technology and move forward, stay stagnant, or even regress. Personally, I Yam in favor of technological progress and the advancement of self-driving cars.\n\nSelf-driving cars are projected to be far more efficient than our current vehicles. According to the article, Sergey Brin envisions cars that will use only half the amount of fuel compared to today's taxis, while offering greater flexibility than buses. The enhanced fuel efficiency will result in reduced pollution, which is a significant benefit oWf self-driving cars. The potential combination of improved efficiency and f4lexibility makes the future of self-driving cars very promising.\n\nOnce self-driving cars are fully integrated, it is expected that the number of accidents will decrease significantly. The majority of car accidents are caused by human error, which can be minimized with autonomous vehicles. Bugs in the programming can be easily fixed, unlike human driver|s who require training and are prone to mistakes. By transitioning to self-driving cars, the number of accidents can be greatly reduced, and there will be opportunities to automate various driving tasks, potentially leading to job creation.\n\nIn conclusion, I firmly believe that self-driving cars represent the future of technology. It is crucial for us to move forward and explore the possibilities that come with this innovative technology. Self-driving cars will not only be more efficient but will also contribute to a Lsafer driving environment with fewer accidents. Let us embrace the future of self-driving cars and utilize this futuristic technology to our advantage!","300":"As an 11-year-old student, it is impo:rtant tuo discuss the benefits of reducing the usoe of cars. In one of the stories, it mentions efforts made in the last twenty years to create more compact cities suitable for walking. It also =states that cars contribute to 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe and up t\"o 50 percent in some car-heavy areas in the United States. According jbto an official named David Goldberg from Transportation for America, all our development since World War II has been focused on cars, but this needs to change. The second story, \"Paris prohibits Wdriving because of smog,\" illustrates how Paris int3roduced a partial driving bnan to combat pollution. Drivers with even-numbered license plates were required to leave their cars at home on MondaysP or face a 22-euro fine. Similarly, those with odd-numbered plates had to do the same the next day. I believe this strategy should be impl~em[ented worldwide to improve the quality of the air we brea4the. In fact, PParis often experiences higher levels of smog compared to other European capitals. For instance, last week Paris recorded 147 mic%rograms of particulate matter per cubic meter, while Brussels had 114, and London had 79.7. The third story highlights Bogota, XColombia's car-free day, where millions of Colombians opted for alternative modes of transport like walking, biking, or taking the bus. The streets of the capital wer=e surprisingly free of congestion, even with 7the rain. The final story suggests that the era of car culture is ending, but as a young person who enjoys driving, I hope that's not the case. The U.S. is known for its automotive history, like the Model T, Detroit's car manufacturing, and songs like \"Mustang Sally\". Although it's mentioned that young people drove 23 percent less between 2001 a>nd 2009, I personally love driving and feeling the thrill ofm speed. While cars may eventually change or disappear, for now, they are essential for transportati:on. Instead of abandoning cars altogether due to their negative impact !on the environment, we should strive to make them more environmentFally friendly.","301":"Have you ever heard about the Face on Mars? Do you think there could be life on Mars? The Face on Mars was first found in 1976 and received a lot of attention in 2001 (paragraph 1). Some people believe that the Face on Mars is real proof of life on Mars, but this idea is not correct (paragraph 5). The Face on Mars is like a hill or plateau on Mars (paragraph 12). This can be shown by understanding that hills on Mars are usual (payragraph 2); realizing that in the 2001 pictur|e if something was close to the Face, NASA would have been able to see it (paragraph 11); and recognizing that the Face on Mars looks like natural structures on Earth (paragraph 12). First, the Face on Mars is a natural feature qbecause Martian hills are common. \"Expert,s thought it was just another Martian hill, seen enough around Cydonia, only this one had strange shadows that made it resemble an Egyptian Pharaoh,\" (paragraph 2). The fact that Martian hills are usual makes the idea of the face on Mars being a natural Martian plateau more sensible. This is because there are more natural features called Martian Hills on Mars than just the Face. Additionally,Q the Face on Mars is a natural feature because in the 2001 photo by NASA, if there' was Martian life people would have been able to see it (paragraph 11z). \"Generally, you can see things in digital images 3 times larger than the pixel size,\" (kparagraph 11). \"So, if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small houses, you could see what they were!\" (paragraph 11). This means that no matter what was near the Face on Mars during the photo, people would have beeUn able to see what it was. Lastly, the Face on Mars is a natural feature because it looks like fnatural features here on Earth. \"What the picture really displays is the Martian version of a hill or plateau--natural features common around the American West,\" (paragraph 12). The Face on Mars is quite similar to the Middle Plateau in the Snake River Plain of Idaho (paragraph 12). The fact that the Face on Mars resembles natural features on Earth makes it more understandable that the Face on Mars is a natural feature. This is because this lets people know that these types of natural features are possible, and that ;they are even common. Some people who believe in conspiracies may argue that the Face is real evidence of life on Mars, and that NASA would rather conceal this evidence (paragraph 5). However, in the 200r1 photo of the Face there was no other evidence of life on Mars (paragraph 11). Additionally, the Face is considered a plateau which are very common on Mars (paragraph 3). Hence, these people's thUeoriAes are not accurate. In conclusion, the Face on Mars is surely a natural feature. This is because it is seen as a Martian plateau which are common around Cydonia (2). Also, the Face on Mars can be explained as a natural feature because if there was any Martian life close to the Face on Mars during the 2001 NASA photo, people would have been abale to see it and identify what it was. Lastly, the Face on Mars is a natural feature because it resembles natural features here on Earth.","302":"Driverless cars can be viewed as either a benefit or a disaster waiting to occur. While humans have fantasized about this technology for ages, is it really necessary? Frankly,. driverless cars might end up causing more harm than good. They sound quite frightening: if a person who is not thinking clearly cannot operate a car properly, then how can a computer? A super entity that cannot eveDn think for itself? I am not in favor of the advancement of these cars because they are too pricey to produce efficiently, they will need a driver at some point, and they are prohibited in multiple parts of the United States. As detailed in the text, two separate companies have already patented driverless vehicles. They Outilized electric wires\/magnets in the road to establish a route for the vehicle to follow. As mentioned in the third section, these concepts functioned remarkably well, but they were too costly to be feasible. This notion was created many years ago; everything was more affordable back then. Nowadays, this concept also seems impractical. The expense of these \"intelligent cars\" will remain excessively high. Manufacturers will lose money beZcause people will not be able to purchase these highly-priced devices. As a 13-year-old, I adore car journeys when I cannot sleep at night. They aid me in drifting off to sleep so effortlessly and swiftly. Hundreds of individuals worldwide doze off at the wheel of a car every week. Despite all the distractions of driving, they cannot resist falling asleep. So just envision, with no distractions at all, how simple it would be to slip into that relaxed state of mind. In the document, it is mentioned that drivers are sometimes necessary when the car confronts a challenging task. If the driver nods off, an acci7dent is inevitable. I also b'elieve that many individuals will place too much trust in their vehicle, becoming oblivious and reckless towards specific situations where theWir presence is required, and they will find themselves in a fatal mishap. What's the p)oint of having a car for a cross-country trip if it is unlawful to drive in certain states? What are people supposed to do if they enter a state that opposes t-hese new and \"enhanced\" vehicles? Just make a U-turn and find another route? It is pointless to own a vehicle that cannot accompany you everywhere. Laws are not created without purpose; they exist to ensure the saf&ety of the community. If riding in an unmanned ve>hicle is presumed to be hazardous, then why engage in it? In the ninth paragraph, it is explained that presently, traffic regulations assume that the only safe car is one controlled by a human driver at all times. I fully support this law. In my opinion, driverless cars are not secure. There are numerous statistics and evidence indicating that safe{ty is a major concern with these vehicles, and it is indeed valid. A computer cannot accurately anticipate how a human brain will respond or what a person will do involYuntarily; these vehicles will not be able to react at the last moment. I am against the creation of these cars beYcause they are too costly to manufacture efficiently, they eventually require a driver, and they are forbidden in various regions of the United States. Driverless cars are believed to represent the future; I choose not to be part of such a perilous world.","303":"There are numerous not-so-good reasons why one might reconsider going on a sea voyage. ODne reason could be the risk of getting hurt and being left stranded, similar to what happened to Luke who nearly lost his life. Another reason is that seafaring isn't suitable for everyone, as not everyone would enjoy such an adventure. The final reason is that you won't make any money from going to sea. I know it's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, but it's important to think it through. The destinations you could visit, like Europe, may seem strange. Why would you choose to board a crowded ship with strangers you don't know? Personally, I wouldn't immediately reject the opportunity, but I would defini?tely ponder on it for a while. The uncertainty of where you might end up next would be unsettling. I would constantly wonder wahen I would return home if I were on a ship hea}ding to Europe. Moreover, what motivated me to seize this chance in the first place? Waqs it solely because it was a unique opportunity? It's crucial to reflect on and identify three main reasons for accepting this opportunity. I can comprehend why Lukel took the actions he did. I'm attempting to express my thoughts on why he sailed across the Atlantic Ocean 16 times and the Pacific Ocean twice to aid those impacted by World War II. However, what I can't grasp is his primary motivation. In coDncluding my argument against why someone like me or even you shouldn't embark on this journey, did he genuinely assist anyone? The prompt didn't clarify whether he did or *not. I beliceve that would have been the most significant aspect to consider.","304":"People should consider kenrolling in this program because it offers the opportunity to understand the main idea of the text and express one's own thoughts on the topic. For example, there was a cowboy named Jack who traveled across oceans. He crossed the Atlantic Ocean 15 times, a remarkable feat. He began his oceanic journeys in July 1950. During his~ trip to Spain, he was just 20 years old. It seems that Jack's age matched the number of times he crossed the Atlantic. However, his motivation for these voyages was not simply a desire for adventure, but rather the aftermath of a war in Asia. Jack cared deeply for the people he encountered on his travels, many of whom were facing food shortages. In his kindness, Jack shared his own food supplies, including provisions for animals. His generVosity extended to inviting people onto his ship for more assistance. Jack's dedication waTs admirable, as he completed eight trips in total. Each crossing of the Atlantic took him about three weeks, so multiplying this by the total crossings gives us forty weenks of travel. Along the way, they en7joyed sports like basketball and volleyball, as well as engaging in other activities such as table tennis tournaments, fencing, and reading. The rozle of a seafaring cowboy proved to be challenging, yet Jack believed it wHas a fulfilling experience. DiCfferient individuals may have contrasting opinions on this matter, with some preferring traditional adventures over the life of a seafaring cowboy, while others may be unfamiliar with either option.","305":"As an 11-year-old student, I have been studying English, and today I had a test. DurWing the test, I got a little stuck on one question, so I sneaked a peek at my neighbour's paper. I managed to read a passage that talked about Venus, the evening star, being a very bright point in the night sky. Even though it is called a star, it is actually a planet. People have tried to visit Venus for research, but it has been very difficult, and no spacecraft has lasted more than a few hours due to the extreme conditions. The atmosphere on Venus is mostly carbon dioxide, and there are clouds of sulfuric acid which make it very dangerous for astronauts. Despite being closer to Earth than Mars, Venus has incredibly highA temperatures and atmospheric pressure. NASA has been trying to send missions to Venus tJo learn more about it, but it has been challengin\"g. They once sent a mechanical device designed to withstand the harsh conditions, but it only survived for three days. This shows how tough it is to explore and study Venus. \n\nI found this passage quite interesting as it talked about how similar Venus is to Earth in some ways, with mountains and valleys. It also mentioned the difficulties faced by spacecraft sent to Venus, which was eye-opening for me. I hope that one day scientists will be able to study Venus more closely and maybe even send astronauts there safely. Venus remains a mysteriFous and intriguing planet that has so much more to teach us.","306":"Is it hard tHo discover new stuff or new planets? Sometimes it can be easy and sometimes it can be tough but it all depends on what you are planning to do. In a text I just read, it talked about humans searching for information about the planet Venus. On Venus, the temperature is very very different from our temperatures. The temperature on Venus is 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the pressu~re is 90 times higher than what we experience on our planet. Venus has the highest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system. In the third paragraph, it mentions \"average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. Also in the third paragraph it says \"Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun. This 4means that Venus is hot even though Mercury is clo6se to the sun, Venus shouldn't be too hot. The people at NASA have sent humans to explore Venus. In the fifth paragraph, it says \"The national Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has ... idea for sending humans to study Venus.\" In conclusion, I really think 'that people should begin t=o explore new things even if it might be hard to keep exploring new things.","307":"Imagine if there was a system that could help you focus better and stay determined while learning. No more students falling asleep out of boredom or losing interest in a subject. This advancement in computer technology can understand human emotions and improve the way we learn. Picture thi's software in a classroom, making zassessments of human feelings like a real person would. According tgo the writer, Nick D'Alto, smiling at a website ad could lead to more similar ads. Dr. HuaZng also mentioned how a computer in cLlass could notice^ when a student is gettinEg bored or confused. Think about a super computer that learns what you like and adjusts itself accordingly. This would empower students to personalize their learning experience. It could revolutionize education, just like when computers were first introduced in classrooms. The possibilities are endless, extending to homeschooled kids and online learners. Dr. Huang believes this technology could enhance online learning by adapting lessons like a human teacheZr would. In conclusion, a system that can recognize human emotions has the potential to enhance education. Being able to identify when a student is bored or confused can greatly improve various aspects of schooling. The ability to adjust lessons in real-time, similar to a human teacher, is extremely valuable for students.","308":"In the article \"The Creation of an Online Classroom Experience,\" Julia Smith introduces a fresh concept of utilizing computers to understand emotions throug=h facial expressions. Dr. Lisa Wang envisions a potential future where virtual classrooms could utilize facial analysis to better engage students. Despite the benefits that facial analysis may offer online education, challenges like privacy, practicality, and effectiveness need to be tackled.\n\nPrivacy has always been a crucial aspect of life, both offline and online. People cherish their privacy, often seeking anonymity when they go online. Facial recognition demands access to one's face, a request many internet users are hesitant to grant, especially in a digital world where everything seems open. While some might argue that online platforNms can safeguard facial images, the real6ity is that hackers can exploit vulnerabilities and access image databases. Many individuals prefer to maintain their anonymity rathe3r than having a computer detect their emotions. Although facial analysis holds promise, a significa$nt number of users remain apprehensive about potential privacy breaches.\n\nMoreover, practicality poses a challenge to the widespread adoption of this technology. As Smith mentions, not everyone's home computer may support the intricate algorithms %required for facial analysis. Investing in a more powerful computer solely for this purpose may not be feasible for many individuals. The cost of upgrading to a high-performance PC, which can eAxceed a thousand dollars, could deter people from embracing onlinGe education enhanced by facial analysis. Furthermore, questions arise about theC distribuLtion of this technology. Will it be available as software or integrated into computers? Will there be a price tag associated_ with it? These uncertainties impact the practicality of implementing facial analysis in online classrooms.\n\nLastlyA, the effectiveness of facial analysis in an educational setting raises doubts. Software related to human emotions can be inconsistent and necessitate extensive testing. Emotions are complex and can be concealed or manipularted by individuals. While facial expressions may reveal true feelings to an expert, in a classroom environment, students may not always display their genuine emotions. Education Ftypically proceeds regardless of a student's emotional state, and the ability of computers to adjust to these emotions is limited. Unlike humans, computers lack the capacity for empathy and understanding, making it challenging for thoem to meet students' emotional needs accurately. The accuracy of emotion detection by technology is also questionable, as there is no room for interpretation as with fingerprint scanners. Relying on facial analysis from an emotionless online source may not offer significant advantages over traditional online learning environments.\n\nJulia Smith's exploration of the potential impact of facial analysis tech(nology in online education sheds light on both its promise and limitations. While facial analysis could revolutionize various aspects of our online interactions, its application in virtual classrooms appears to be less advantageous due to concerns related to privacy, practicality, and effectiveness.","309":"As an 11-year-old student struggling with my English test, I couldn't help but take a sneak peek at my neighbor's paper to get some inspiration. Here's what I found:\n\n\"There are two sides to using technology to understand how students feel. According to Eckman, there are six main feelings: joy, surprise, wrath, disgust, fear, and sorrow, each linked to facial muscle movements. When a muscle moves, it's called an \"action team\". A new program has been created to better detect emotiDons in others. This fresh software monitors these facial movements. By giving different weights to the teams, the program can even recognize mixed feelings. When you move your facial muscles, you not only Pshow emotions but can also create them. The facial expressions for each feeling are the same worldwide, although people may vary in how much they show them. A lot of human interaction is non-verbal, including emotional signals. Essentially, these are the steps to making a face look happy. It all comes down to these muscular action teams. They can even reveal the difference between a real smile and a fake one. If people use this technology to understand emotions, they might not get rid of their negative feelings and can control them completely. Each expression is compared to a neutral face. However, computers can't grasp feelings clearly because they have feelings too, and eymotions are hard to capture. If they don't use it, people can display their genuine emotionGs on their faces, which experts can read as faces never lie. These muscle hints are sometimes used to identify when a supposedly \"happy\" politician or famous person is lying. In fact, we do this amazing \"calculation\" every day, just by looking at a friend's face, we can tell how they feel. Most of us would struggle to explain each facial feature that shows happiness, concern, surprise..1. A classroom computer could notice when a student is starting to feel lost or uninterested. Then it could change the lesson, like a good human teacher. Artists learn about the human body to paint facial muscles accurately to express specific feelings. The Mona Lisa presentation aims to make you smile and demonstrates the computer's capabilities. The same technology can also make animated faces on a screen more lively. Thus, computers need to understand this too. Without realizing it, we copy other people's facial expressions. Who would have th^ought that making faces could teach us so much about emotions and help humans and computers communicate better.\"","310":"Imagine in the future there might be cars that can drive themselves and even fly! Many people thought this could never happen, but Sergey Brin, a founder of Google, thinks differently. He believes that there may be a beginning for driverless cars. Brin envisions a time Nwhere manry driverless cars could create a taxi system for the public. He thinks this could become real one day. Even though driverless cars have traveled over 500 miles without accidents, there are still some problems. These cars would still need to warn the driver when they back out of driveways and navigate tricky situations on the road like road work and accidents with other drivers. While driverless cars can currently drive, turn, and stop, there are still things that the driver might need~ to manage. Although the making of driverless cars has just started, there are still man\"y tasks ahead. In the future, maybe everyone will have access to driverless cars. There is a long journey ahead, but we are moving closer to this goal every day.","311":"Automobiles play a crucial role in suburban areas, where middle-class0 families from various cities, like New York and Tokyo, choose to reside. As per experts, this poses a significant obstacle to current initiatives aimed at substantially reducing greenhouse gas emissions from car exhausts. Passenger cars account for around 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe and can even reach up to 50 percent in highly car-dependent regions in the United States. The text mentions that for the third consecutive year, cars have been outnumbered by buses and bicy?cles in a bustling capital with a population of 7 million. The objective is to encourage alternative modes of transportation to combat air pollution. Numerous companies are developing eco-friendly cars to minimize emissions. However, the American fascination with automobiles appears to be diminishing. Adjusted for population growth, the numberk of miles driven in the United States peaked in 2005 and has been decreasing steadily since then, according to an analysis by Doug Shorts from an investment researcch firm. Part of this decline can be attributed to the economic downturn, as financially strapped Americans could not afford new vehicl+es, and jobless0 individuals were not commuting anyway. If this trend continues, as many sociologists predict it will, it could have positive implications for reducing carbon emissions and protecting the eGnvironment, given that transportation is the second largest source of emissions in the country, just after power `plants. Nevertheless, it may mhave adverse e{ffects on the au~tomobile industry. For example, the text highlights a couple who, despite living in areas where driving would be convenient, have chosen not Rto obtain a driver's licens)e as it is not a top priority for them. &They organize their activities around locations accessible* by walking, public transportation, or carpooling vwith friends. The question remains whether members of the mill^en+nial generation will increase car purchases when they have children to chauffeur to various activities. Overall, cars serve as a primary mode of transportation for many people, and several companies are developing environmentally friendly vehicles to addrFess this issue.","312":"The writer of \"The Adv5enture of Discovering Mars\" captivates the reader by sparking their curiosity about what the planet has in store. After reading the first couple of paragraphs, one might assume that further exploration and potential benefits should be considered. However, the writer inadvertently gPoes against this argument and proceeds to outline why this might not be the best idea. The beginning of the text draws comparisons between Mars and Earth. In the opening paragraph, the writer mentions, \"Mars is similar to Earth inA terms of size and density, and sometimes even in proximity.\" This statement could lead the reader to believe that a compelling case is being made. Nonetheless, as the text progresses, the writer continuously lists reasons why embarking on a journey to Mars could be perilous and unproductive. The writer appears to enumerate these reasons excessively,8 causing the reader to lose sight of the main point of the article. The advantages highlighted earlier fade away, overshadowed by the overwhelming challenges of reaching Mars. For instance, in paragraph 3, the writer asserts, \"[Mars] presents conditions that far surpass the extremities of Earth...\" This leads to a discussion of NASA's perspective and their efforts to gather more information about Mars. According to the text, NASA aims to send \"explorers to hover above t\"he unknown.\" Despite less-than-ideal conditions, this seems to be the most feasible option, yet the writer introduces additional obstacles. They explain how the planet's state makes it difficult to discern what lies beneath the surface, casting doubt on NASA's exploration capabilities. Following a final rundown of why explor=ing Mars remains a plausible choice and a discussion of both new and old technological possibilities, the writer starts to recover their stance. By the conclusion of the article, the reader is left with a sensed of a:pprehension about venturing to Mars. Instead of focusing on the advantages, as initially iamplied, the writer lays bare the difficulties, hence clarifying the rationale behind the article's title, \"The Challenge of Discovering Mars,\" and why it might not be such a brilliant idea after all.","313":"I think the writer has a good point because there might be fossils on Venus that we never knew about before. Some scientists say Venus is similar to Earth, so maybe we should explore it. Imagine if Venus was once likGe Earth but something changed and all life disappeared, and the oceans dried up, creating the thick cloud cover we see now. I believe we should investi$gate because what if there were different types of creatures on Venus that we\\ren't human? It could be really exciting! What if Earth is at risk of becoming like Venus? Discovering fossils on Venus could teach us how to prevent a similar fate for Earth in the future.","314":"The face that resemble5s an alien may actually be an alien. We are unsure as a group because no one has uncovered it yet. These strange faces were found on a red planet called \"Mars\". There might be more aliens on that planet, but it's uncertain. It's not a natural landform.2 A landform is something created by people. A face is not naturally formed on a plant or in the ground. We are puzzled about what it could be. Some believe it's a landform, while others think it resembles an alien's face. Neither answer is completely right or wrong. If I saw it in person, I would think it lgooks like an alien's face. With more evidence, we could determine what it is. One piece of evidence isn't enough, we need more evidence and clues. I stand by my answer and believe it's a suitable response for everyone to grasp.","315":"A car is driving on the street. The wheels are spinning, the engine is running, and everything looks normal. However, the car is driving itself! This may seem awesome, but safety is a big concern, and safety is the most important thing for a car nowadays. The idea of a driverless car may seem great, but upon further consideration, it is a huge step for humanity to take. Driverless cars require responsibility, and unfortunately, not everyo=ne has it. The potential downsides of driverless cars are greater than thex positives because of the risk of malfunctions, cyber attacks, and the absence of human intervention to prevent accidents. A driverless car would mainly be controlled by a computer system which, like a laptop, could have malfunctionst. \"Driverless Cars Are Approaching\" explains that the computer system would decide the car's route, speed, and so on. Since the system is in charge most of the time, malfunctions could be very dangerous. Imagine a car speeding at one hundred miles per hour due to a minor computer glitch. This excessive speed could lead to the car approaching a turn too rapidly, causing a crash. One might think, \"Well, the human driver can take over in such a situation.\" Yes, that is a possibility, as mentioned in the text, but it might not always work. Human s tend to be lazy and might take advantage of the driverless car. Initially, they might remain attentive, but their alertness could fade over time. This is human nature. The potential malfunctions of the computer system in a driverless car are not the only issue; they could also lead to a malfunction in the human driver. Cyber attacks are becoming more prevalent as technology progresses. This is a serious problem that is difficult to prevent. Since the car depends on computer systems, and all computer systems can be hacked and taken over, the human driver could be locked out. Imagine if a prominent figure, such as a president, were traveling in a driverless car to a crucial meeting. Suddenly, the car acts on its own, driving towards danger and causing a fatal accident. Even though such a scenario is unlikely for a high-profile individual who would have extensive security measures, it illustra4tes that anyone could potentially be targeted. Terrorists are unpredictable, and driverless cars could be' a vulnerable target for them. Driverless cars allow humans to take bcontrol in challenging driving situations. As mentioned in the article, they would be alerted to take over at obstacles, traffic jams, and other risky points during a journey. But what if the driver needed to take control in a non-dangerous situation? They might not react quickly enough. The road may appear safe, then suddenly turn perilous. For example, a driver under the influence of alcohol could veer into your driverless car. Could a human driver have avoided that? Could they have swerved to safety? These are important questions to consider because while humans may cause accidents, they can also prevent many mishaps that cGomputer systems would be unable to anticipate. Initially, driverless cars may seem attractive, but upon reflection, the appeal diminishes. The human mind is incredible and more adaptable than a computer system. Issues like malfunctions, cyber attacks, and the lack of human intervention in accidents make driverless cars too risky. People with ill intentions can exploit beneficial technology, and driverless cars appear to be a tool that could be easily exploited. While the world may eventually be ready for driverless cars, thBey are not a suitable option at present.","316":"Twenty five years in the past, the first Viking spacecraft from NASA was orbiting around Mars. While taking pictures of potentiSal landing areas, it came across the shadowy resemblance of a human face. The heaad measures almos1t two miles from one end to the other and sememed to be gazing back at the cameras from a region on Mars known as Cydonia. This head shape is simply a natural landform on Mars. Neverth2eless, certain individuals believe that NASA wants to keep hidden the possibility of life6 on Mars, claim conspiracy theorists. The face on ^Mars is, indeed, a natural geographical feature. According to the text, \"Even though only a few experts thought that the Face was of extraterrestrial origin, capturing images of Cydonia became a top priority for NASA when the Mars Global Surveyor reached the Red Planet in September 1997, eighteen years after the Viking missions ended.\" This 5indicates that photographs were going to be taken to demonstrate that the landform is genuinely a natural one. The text further mentions, \"Hence, on April 5, 1998, when the Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time, Michael Malin and his team from the Mars Orbiter Camera captured an image ten times clearer than the original Viking photos. Numerous eager internet users were waiting when the face was initially rIevealed on a JPL website, exposing... a natural landform. There was no alien structure at all.\" This part of the text serves as evidence that with the images, it became clear that the head is a natural landform. These pieces of text show that the face is, indeed, a natural landform on Mars. The land form8ation on Mars was not constructed by aliens. The text mentions that, \"On April 8, 2001 - a cloudless summer day in Cydonia - the Mars Global Surveyor approached for a second observation. 'We had to rotate the spacecraft 2g5 degrees to center the Face in the field of vision,' Malin's team obtained an extraordinary photograph using the camera's maximum resolution. Each pixel in the 2001 image covers 1.56 meters, as opposed to 43 meters per pixel in the best Viking photo from 1976.\" The text also explqains, \"Typically, you can distinguish objects in a digital image 3 times larger than the pixel size, meaning that if there were any objects in this image such as planes on the ground or pyramids in an Egyptian style or even small huts, you would be able to identify them!\" These parts of the text indicate that the images would have captured any indications of extraterrestrial encounters, thus proving that the natural landform on Mars was not crafted by aliens. Some argue that the face was created by aliens and is not a natural landform. The text points out that, \"But not everyone was convinced. The Face on Mars is positioned at 41 degrees north Martian latitude where it was winter in April '98 - a cloudy period on the Red planet. The camera on the MGS had to see through thin clouds to view the Face. Perhaps, as skeptics suggested, alien inscriptions were concealed by the mist.\" These segments of the text suggest that due to the cloudy weather, the alien inscriptions were not visible, leading some to believe that the face was produced by aliens. However, subsequent images indicate that if there were alien markings, they would have been detected, thePreby demonstrating that the face is a natural landform. In summary, twenty-five years ago, an image resembling a face was obBserved on Mars through photographs from the Viking mission, representing a natural landform that bears a resem[blance to a human face. Some individuals claim that a`liens were responsible for this formation, yet there is evidence proving that extraterrestrial beings played no role in its creatio{n. Only a small number of scientists believe it is an alien artifact? but with photographicV evidence, any alien symbols would have been noticeable. The Face on Mars is simply a natural landform. \n\n","317":"The Electoral College is where people vote for the President and Vice President.d Each candidate has their own group of electors. The electors are chosen by the candidate's political party and are carefBully selected for their responsibilities. When yo9u vote for your candidate, you are actually voting for the candidate's electors, who help the state's electors decide whXo is suitable for president. The presidential election takes place every four years on a Tuesday in November. There are at least 538 electors at the Electoral College, and a minimum of 270 votes are required to elect the president. Some pzeople might think they are voting for the new president directly, but in reality, they are voting for a group of electors. A government group selects trusted electors to vote for the party's nominee,+ ensuring the certainty of the outcom!e, representing everyone, focusing on swing states and big states, and avoiding run-off elections.","318":"Actress and singer Audrey Hepburn once said, \"There's nothing that can't be done. The word itself declares I am possible!\" The writer of \"The Adventure of Discovering Venus\" shares a similar sent)iment. They arguEe that despite the risks, exploring a seemingly unreachable planet like Venus i_s both important and rewarding. By justifying the significance of continuin`g Venus exploration efforts and proposing ways to do so safely, the aut0hor strongly advocates for the ideaz that studying Venus is a nobPle pursuit despite the challenges it presents. One way t;he writer of \"The Adventure of Discovering Venus\" supports their argument is by highlighting the value and benefits of visiting Venusl. While it's true that Venus has harsh conditions unsuitable for human life, the author suggests that astronomers are intrigued by Venus because it might have been similar to Earth in the past. This could lead to discoveries aiding our understanding of Earth's future evolution. Additionally, Venus occasionally becomes the closest planet to Earth due to different orbital speeds with Mars. This proximity could be beneficial for future space travel, offering a nearby option for exploration. These points serve to emphas6i;ze the importance of Venus exploration and aim to persuade readers to agree with the author^'s viewpoint. Furthermore, the writer backs their argument by explaining how a Venus mission could be conducted safely. This helps convince skeptics who believe Venus's extreme cMonditions are insurmountable. For instance, the author mentions NASA's idea of using a blimp-like vehicle to float above Venus, avoiding the hazardous surface conditiDons. The author also explores the potential use of materials like silicon carbide, which has shown promise in Venus-like environVments. These suggestions aim to mitigate the risks associated with a Venus trip while bolstering the author's stancLe. In conclusion, the author of \"The Ad'venture of Discovering Venus\" mainwtains that despite Venus's dangers, exploring the planet is worthwhile. By stressing the importance of Venus exploration and proposing safety measures, the author echoes Audrey Hepburn's belief that nothing is truly impossible, not even a voyage to Venus. Just like Hepburn's words imply, the author asserts that the phrase \"I am possible!\" encapsulates the spirit of overcoming Mchallenges and pursuing the unknown.","319":"I think spe'nding money 9on devices that can read emotions is not necessary.@ It's a waste of money because why do we need to know how students feel? Students are usually happy, okay, or sad. In rmy opinion, discussing emotionMs at schgool is not important. We go to school to learn and make friends, not to talk about our feelings all the time. Asking someone how they feel i=s much simpler than using a fancy device. We can just ask them directly. There's no need for something so complicated. Also, we don't need a special device to know if someone is smiling. We can tell if someone is happy just by looking at their face. So, there's really no point in having such a complex machine.","320":"In the text \"The Exploration Challenge of Venus,\" the writer argues that^ studying Venus is worthwhile cdespite the risks involved. The write kicks off with basic Venus facts to inform the public.z However, the writer fails to effectively back up their argument. Instead of highlighting the benefits of exploring Venus, the writer focuses more on the dangers. Discussion points ?include the history lof Venus exploration, its atmosphere, geography, Land the necessary technology for reaching Venus. NASA has long attempted to land a spacecraft on Venus, as it is a neighboring planet that has captured human curiosity. Venus, often considered Earth's twin in terms of size and density, intrigues scientists who speculate about its possible past similarity to our planet. Despite past uns4uccessful spCacecraft landings due to the planet's treacherous conditions, interest in exp\"loring Venus remains. The author emphasizes the harsh en4vironment of Venus, underscoring the challenges that impede exploration. The thick carbon dioxide atmosphere and corrosive sulfuric acid clouds make Venus inhospitable to humans. Extreme temperatures exceeding 800 degrees Fahrenheit and inRtense atmospheric pressure pose insurmountable obstacles for manned missions. With technology limitations preventing spacecraft survival on Venus, the risk factor for exploration iOs high. Geological hazards such as volcanoes, earthquakes, and lightning further deter successful explouration. Nevertheless, NAS{A's successful simulation of Venus's atmosphebre proves that exploration might be viable with specialized equipment. While the author downplays the dangers, focusin8g on Venus as a potential close destination for spa,ce exploration, other viable options exist, such 8as Mars. Despite the author's bias towards Venus, Mars offers a pylvausible alternative for exploration due to its prHoximity at certain times. By disregarding Mars as a potential exploration target, the author persuades readers to prioritize Venus exploration, ignoring the considerable risks involved.","321":"As an 11 year old student, I think it's important to discuss tNhe spacecraft that was flying around Mars. There didn't seem to be any natural reasons for this, which is quite curious. The camera didn't spot anything alarming, which is good news. Pl>us, there's no sign of life on HMars, so there's really nothing to worry about in that regard. We're not entirely certain how different Mars is from Earth in terms of movement and changes, so we haveS xto make educated guesses about the weather and water availability. How can we be certain about Mars when none of us have ever visited? We would need more resources and information to accurately talk about Mars. What we do know\" is that there is very little water on Mars, making it nearly imposskkible for jany forem of life to exist there. The fZaPcial features on Mars were likely formed by an asteroid impact or geological activity, not by alien`s. There's no evidence of any life on Mars at all.","322":"Im1agine life without many cars, think abouXt all the things you could see because now you have to walk everywhere you want to go. Consider all the people you might meet around every corner, whether you're going to the shopping center, the supermarket, or visiting a friend. You will start to notice and appreciate things you never did before, and we have a small town in GERMANY, called VAUBEN, to thank for this idea. By not using cars, we can enjoy the sights around us, meet new people, emit less gas, and have a positive outlook on the future.\n\n\"When I had a car, I always9 felt stressed. I am much happier this way,\" said Heidrun Walter, a resident of VAUBAN, Germany. Although the idea of giving up our cars may seem daunting at first, it can actually bring many benefits to us. When we stopx relying on our vehicles so much, we have the opportunity to explore the world in a better way. We can feel and smell the things around us and truly appreciate them. By walking to work or on our days off, we expand our kn owledge of our surroundings and the people in it. We also get to meet new people; every corner may hold :a new face, and a simple interaction could lead to a friendship. By no longer depending on cars, we open ourselves up to the world more and gain a deeper understanding of our environment and everything it has to offer us.\n\nGlobal warming is a topic! that we hear about frequently, especially in today's world where green_house emissions are at an all-time high. However, by reducing our car usage, we and the world can reap the benefits. In PARIS, after experiencing days of ext\"reme pollution, a partial drivi{ng ban was put in place to \"clean up the air of the globaDl city.\" \"Four thousand drivers were fined, and twenty-seven people had their cars taken away due to fines.\" By the time Monday rolled around, the smog had cleared enough for the French government to lift the ban on cars with odd-numberedv p\/lates. On the other hand, in BOGOTA, Colombia, cars have been prohibited for the third consecutive year in an effort to encourage alternative modes of transportation and decrease pollution. This initiative has been so successful that \"for the first time, two other Colombian cities, Cali and Valledupar, joined the movement.\" We all aspire to live a long and happy life, but in order to do so, we must tagke care of our planet. By reducing our dependence on cars, we can work towards achieving this goal.\n\nParks and sports centers have also flourished throughout the city; uneven, rough footpaths have been upgraded to wider, smoother walkways; peak-hour restrictions have significantly reduced traffic; and new cafes and fancy shopping areas have emerged. Picture yourself living in a charming new community with a thriving economy and improMved health. With all the waUlking and cycling we would do, we would inadvertently engage in physical +exercise, which is beneficial considering that America is known as the most overweight country. Additionally, with more people walking and cycling, shops would be situated closer within walking distance ratheMr than along a distant highway, attracting more customers. Without cars, there would be fewer fatalities caused by accidents as well. Consequently, we can look forward to a brighter future if we choose to eliminate cars from our lives.\n\nIn summary, eliminating cars would not only benefit the world but also its inhabitants. We would be more attuned to our environment andd fellow citizens, reduce the impact of global warming, and have a brighter future to anticipate. \n\n(As a 13-year-old student, I am inspired by the idea of reducing car usage to protect our planet and promote a healthier lifestyle for all.)","323":"Driverless cars may appear to be a concept from the distant future, but they are actually much closer than many p3eople think. Various companies %like Google, Tesla, Audi, and others have already created and tested their own versions. However, the question on many minds is whether autonomous vehicles are beneficial or risky for society. Self-driving cars represent the next advancement in car technology, and the exploration into them ought to persist ays they are poised to become safer and more effective than cars steered by human drivers. \n\nEvery person commits errors at some stage in their life. Whether they get distracted by something they see or they nod off while driving, mistakes are bound to happen; it's just humanA nature. On the contrary, computers operate based on data and make significantly fenwer mistakes than humans. This is precisely why autonomous cars are poised to enhance road safety and reduce accidents. Driverless cars util,ize data from sensors, cameras, and GPS to determine the most intelligent way to ensure the safety of passengers on the road. Additionally, existing automated systems like driver assistance and anti-lock brakes found in vehicles have demonstrated that such programs can enhance driving safety. For instance, anti-lock brakes identify and respond to skidding by applying brakes and decreasing engine power, enabling the driver to better evade dangers and maintain control in risky situations. Based on the successful implementation of automated features, it is clear that technology will continue to enhance the safety of drivers and passengers. The next stride in this technology is a self-driving car that would diminish the margin of error that could potentially cost lives.\n\nAnother rationale for the continued production of driverless cars is their potential to be more} efficient and to safeguard the environment. Climate change is an issue that requires attention, and one of the primary contributors to it is the emissions from diesel-fueled cars. The vehicles being developed by companies like Google aim to use half the amount of fuel consumed by a typical car while providing a safer mode of transportation. With the capability of computers to control emissions, it is not far-fetched to envision that with further research, a self-driving car could achieve this feat. Autonomous cars would also enhance efficiency by reducing travel time between destinations. Through GPS funcEtionalities, an automated car could compute the quickest route to a location without missing a turn. Self-driving cars would not only be more fuel-efficient and aid in preserving the environment bu{t also more time-effective.\n\nSafety and efficiency are among the justifications why driverless cars should be further explored and advanced. Several auto manufacturers are already producing predominantly autonomous vehicles, and they are expected to become commonplace soon. By 2020, the majority of major car producers intend to introduce a model of an autonomous car. This is not to imply that everyone must own a self-driving car, but those opting for such vehicles will not only benefit themselves but also contribute to the well-being of others and the world at large.","324":"Driverless cars are going to be a Vfantastic innovation in the car industry because they promise to be much safer, more convenient, and possibly more fuel efficient. Driverless cars have the potential to make the world a much safer place when it comes to transportation. Every day, many people lose theirF lives in car accidents. Of course, in the beginning, there may be some issues with sensors and accident prevention. However, with regular updates and continuous innovation, the software of drivebrless cars should improve to the point of being flawless, with no accidents happening. As mentioned in paragraph 5, \"Sensors are not something new. In the 1980s, car manufacturers used speed sensors on the wheels to create antilock brakkes. Within a decade, these sensors had developed further to identify and respond to the risk of skidding or rolling over. The data from the sensors c^ould prompt the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and decrease engine power, providing better response and control than a human driver co_uld achieve alone.\" This example illustrates the advancement of sensor technology and the continuous learning process of technologists. Eventually, sensors will become more advanced, making driverless cars completely safe. \n\nDriverless cars offer more convenience compared to human-driven cars. Human drivers need to be fully focused on driving at all times. There are many situations where a driver may be fatigued, injured, or under the influence, and forced to either find another mode of transportation or drive in risky conditions. If a person owns a driverless car or has access to a driverless \"taxi,\" they can be safely transported to their destinatiqon regardless of their condition. Some people argue that a driver still needs to remain alert even with a driverless car. While this is true for now, in the near future, driverless cars will bechome so prevalent that drivers will rarely need to take control. If every vehicle on theW road is controlled by a computer, the systems can communicate and navigaOte obstacles easily, as mentioned in paragraph 7.\n\nMoreover, driverless cars are more fuel efficient than conventional cars. Many drivers today have a heavy foot, leading to unnecessary fuel consumption. With a computer-operated car, acceleration and coasting can be optimized for maximum efficiency. As stated in paragraph 1, \"The cars [Google cofounder Sergey Brin] envisions would use only half the fuel of current taxis...\" This example highlights the significant fuel efficiency of driverless cars. If a ?driverless car owner uses half the fuel of a traditional car owner, they will save a considerable amount of money on fuel costs.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars are set to revolutionize the automotiyve industry by providing enhanced safety, convenience, and potentially improved fuel efficiency.","325":"Driverless cars are a topic of discussion in the article and whether we should have cars that can drive themselves. In my opinion, I don't think it's a good idea because it could >create a lot of problems. Faor example, if we have self-driving cars, it could lead to many people losing their jobs because they make a living from driving others around. ThiSs would not be fair and could causae a lot of frustration. Additionally, there is the issue of safety - what if these cars malfunction and no one can stop them? It would be a disaster.\n\nFurthermore, we need to consider the cost of developing and maintaining these self-driving cars. It would be very expensive, possibly costing millions of dollars just for one state. This would Dresult in the government spending more money than they would actually make, which doesn't seem very practical. Moreover, if something goes wrong with the programming of these cars, it could resu{lt in numerous accidents and widespread panic throughout the country. This is a big reason why I oppose the idea of having cars that drive themselves.\n\nWhile there are some benefits to having autonomous cars, such as potentially savi_ng money on gas and being safer in some situatio4ns, I still believe it's not worth the risks. We cannot always rely on technology to keegp us safe, and we need to be aware of the potential dangers. Therefore, my answer is no, we should not have driverless cars.","326":"Why aOre the streets always so crowded!? Everyone keeps asking that que)stion almost every day around 5:00pm. The main reason for this is the excessive use of cars nowadays. There are many advantages that can o\/ccur when limiting the use of cars. The world would be a better place if fewer cars were used on the roads. Firstly, why do people use cars? The ma*in reason is because it can take us quickly f6rom point A to point B. However, there are not only positives to using cars. Consider the negatives and disadvantages of using cars. My main reason against using cars is that it makes the world less active. Walking or running is a good form of daily exercise, and using cars reduces the amount of physical activity. In a study by Hedrum Walter, he stated that he always felt stressed when he had a car, but he feels much happier without one. This is why we should restrict car usage. We \\don't want people to be stressed all the time; we want them to enjoy and relax when using other forms of transportation. Walking may Mtake longer, but it is better in the long term. There are no traffic jams, you can access places that cars cannot reach, and there are many different ways to reach a destination other than by using a road. The only drawback to walkin)g is the rain. However, as Bogota Mayor Antanas Mockus mentioned, \"The rain hasn't stopped people fjrom participating.\" This means that rain is not a problem when walking. While cars may provide more protection, they are more dangerous than walking. This is why cou1ntries like Germany, Paris, and Bogota are promoting a \"car-free\" lifestyle. Additionally, another advantage of limiting car use is reducing road rage. We have all witnessed people Warguing and shouting at each other while in their cars. This Qis a significant issue today, largely due to the use of cars. By limiqting the use of cars, we can hopefully decrease the level of aggression on the streets. Many accidents occur every day involving cars. Cars are responsible for many deaths if you think about it. By reducin*g the use of cars, we can decrease the number of car-related deaths each year. This is the main disadvantage of using cars. Walking and cycling are my two favorite modes of transportation because they are smoother anNd more convenient. Fewer accidents and injuries happen while walking or cycling. This can also heBlp reduce the congestion on the streets, making it easier to access certain places. Driving under the influence is the worst tragedy stemming from the use of cars. Many people die every day due to drunk drivers, which is unacceptable. Just imagine if a person who caused an accident while driving drunk had been walking instead, they likely wouldn't have caused an accident. Consider all the disadvantages that cars bring. Lastly, the most significant reason to limit car use comes from the president, Barack Obama. Obama aims to reduce U.S greenhouse gas emissions by reducing the number of cars on the road. A study suggests that Americans are buying fewer cars, driving less, and obtaining fewer licenses each year. This shows that OWbama's objective is making progress. Paris took the step to ban driving because rof air pollution. Thdey enforced a partial \"driving ban\" due to the pollution caused by diesel fuel. It was found that 67% of vehicles in France use diesel, compared to 53% in the rest of Western Europe. Bogota's goal is to encourage alternative transportation and reduce pollution. Those who viol(ate this face $25 fines. Limiting car use was seen as a good opportunity to reduce stress and air pollution. Bill Ford's plan was to create cities where different modes of transportation are integrated to save time, resources, reduce emissions, and improve safety. These are some Uof the benefits of reducing car use. Many positive changes will occur if everyone reduces their car usage. We do not want the world} to have polluted air, promUote car accidents, or have underage drivers on the streets. Consider the disadvantages of using cars and compare them to the benefits of limiting car use.","327":"NASA is conside>ring a solution to allow scientists to float above Venus, similar to how airplanes glide above storms. The passage mentions a blimp-like vehicle hovering about 30 miles above the turbulent Venusian landscape, w;here the temperature is expected to be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite the challenges, humans could potentially survive in sUuchG conditions, although it is still &risky due to the extreme heat. The text also highlights the inability of researchers to collect samples while floating above the planet's surface, which hinders theIir abilit#y to conduct experiments.\n\nMoreover, the text mentions NASA's efforts to develop alternative approaches, such as testing silicon carbide electronics in harsh Venus-like conditions. The author emphasizes the importance of pushing the boundaries of exploration and innovation, rather than being restricted by fear of danger. Previous attempts to send spacecraft to Venus have been short-lived, with no spacecraft surviving for more than a few hours due to the planet's extreme conditions.\n\nVenus poses significant chalNlenges for human exploration, such as its thick carbon dioxide uatmosphere and corrosive sulfuric acid clouds. These fact4#ors have deterred missions to the planet 6for over three decades to ensure the safety of potential astronauts. Overall, the text highlights the complexities and dangers of studying Venus, underscoring the nee0d for caution and careful planning in future exploration endeavors to the planet.","328":"Although some might think that driveless cars are less safe, I am in favor of them. I support driveless cars because they could make driving more enjoyable. Even though driveless cars may Hseem risky, they are actually safer than regular cars. Driveless cars have many more advantages than regular cars. I am in favor of driveless cars because the6y offer good benefits such as advanced sensors that can detect and respond to skids or rollovers. 5While regular cars also have some advantages, driveless cars have been driven for over half a million miles without any accidents. Despite using only half the fuel of today's taxis, driveless cars bring a whole new level of fun to driving. Driveless cars may not sound safe, but they are really safer than regular cars. Regular cars lack sensors to warn of approaching danger, and they can be quite dull. This concept could encourage people to expZlore more and enjoy the world in a comfortable car. Driveless cars have the potential to be the greatest invention ever!\n","329":"\"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" talks about how a computer can understand feeli7ngs from a picture or person. In this story, the writer discusses the new technology that can recognize emojtions. The author mentions the development of new sof,tware that enhances the accuracy of percemiving others' emotions#. This modern software is known as the Facial Action Coding System. It is highlighted in the story that this new software, the Facial\\ Action Coding System, has encouraging uses across different industries. The software analyzed the Mona Lisa painting and determined that she is \"83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, anBd 2 percent angry.\" The process of how this software functions is explained in detail. \"It all starts with the computer building a 3-D model of the face.\" The software can identify emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, and surprise. \"Facial expressions for each feeling are the same worldwide.\" Many individuals can unders